If you were to log in, you'd be able to get more information on your fellow community member.
I don't entirely see why the amusing anecdote about changing icons that are linked to by another site, *is* amusing. (Actually I do, but I'm concerned with the principle.) If someone deep links to an image on your page, don't you owe them as much responsibility as to someone who links to your text? If not, why not? Philip usually favours the idea that people can deep link to text and that readers are entitled not to be "led by the nose" according to the site owner's intention. How come it's different for pictures?