|
16.687: Private Pilot Ground School
Next class: January 7-9, 2025 (Room 56-114)
|
Site Home : Teaching : One Course
Lectures recorded in 2019 are available from YouTube (links below) or
at MIT
OpenCourseWare. See below for organized links to the 2019
lectures. See also slides from the January 2024 class.
Credit for registered MIT students: 3 units, pass/drop/fail (the class is free and open to non-MIT students)
Apply: sign-up form
Read in advance:
Please do read all of the above chapters in the evenings leading up to
the class. Write down your questions. Skip or skim anything that is
confusing because we are going to cover most of this material during
the class as well.
Official Blurb
Would you like to fly a plane, helicopter, or commercial drone? Or
understand the engineering behind today's human-occupied aircraft and
air traffic control system? Come spend 3 days with us and learn
everything that an FAA-certificated Private pilot or Remote Pilot
needs to know for the official knowledge test.
The course includes qualitative aerodynamics, airplane and helicopter
systems, practical meteorology, navigation and cross-country flight
planning, and human factors. We present the FAA-required theory, pose
some thought-experiments, and offer practical advice based on
instructors' real-world experience.
Course staff: Tina Prabha Srivastava, pilot and MIT alum
(Course 16 S.B.; System Design and Management S.M.; Engineering
Systems Design Ph.D, supervised in Course 16, ESD, Sloan); Philip Greenspun, an FAA Airline Transport Pilot and
Flight Instructor for both airplanes and helicopters, MIT alum (Course
18 S.B.; Course 6 Ph.D)
Prerequisites: A few evenings of reading (see above). Optional:
Install Garmin Pilot (Android or iOS; need to create a Garmin account
for weight and balance to function) or ForeFlight (iOS only) and set
yourself up with a 30-day free trial. Bring a device to class, if
convenient.
Materials
Video Lectures from 2019
- Introduction
(slides)
- Aerodynamics
(slides)
- Learning to Fly
(slides)
- Systems
(slides)
- Charts and Airspace
(slides)
- Flight Environment
(slides)
- Navigation
(slides)
- Helicopters
(slides)
- Meteorology
(slides
- Communication and Flight Information
(slides); first portion on why flaps and icing conditions are a bad combination
- Aircraft Ownership and Maintenance
(slides)
- Performance
(slides)
- Interpreting Weather Data
(slides)
- Human Factors
(slides)
- Flight Planning
(slides)
- Seaplanes
(slides)
- Drones a.k.a. sUAS
(slides)
- Weight and Balance
(slides)
- Multiengine and Jets
(slides)
- Night
(slides)
- Weather Minimums and Final Tips
(slides)
Also available as a single YouTube playlist.
Special Lectures
After the Course
Take the FAA knowledge test at a local flight school. Join the MIT
Flying Club. Start flying at one of our local airports. Hanscom Field
in Bedford, Massachusetts (KBED) is the closest. Beverly (KBVY) and
Lawrence (KLWM) are also popular with MIT students. Norwood (KOWD) is
yet an additional alternative. All of these airports have flight
schools, with Bedford being the most popular. You'll learn the basics
of flying after about 10 hours and can earn a pilot certificate after
about 50 hours in an airplane or helicopter. Whichever path you
choose, you should be able to finish during the summer.
Our Philosophy (debrief following the 2018 class)
The world is rich in online teaching materials, starting with the FAA
books in PDF format. People can read faster than they can listen. Why,
then, does it make sense to have an in-person ground school?
Apparently it made sense to the 65 people who showed up all day every
day for three days! It seems that people find it easier to stay
motivated when surrounded by like-minded peers.
That said, given the technical sophistication of our audience and the
fact that they are capable of reading, we tried to have them do some
reading in advance and also didn't try to teach into every corner of
the FAA material. The students who wanted to go on and earn a 98 or
100 score on the FAA knowledge test could hit the books after our
lectures.
The FAA materials are designed to be comprehensible to a motivated
17-year-old. Given our audience we decided to teach some of the Why?
and How? as well as the What?.
One critical departure from the standard approach was made in light of
sociology research that the iPhone generation ("iGen") is more
risk-averse than previous generations of Americans. Any slide that
said "You will crash and die if you do X" was rewritten to say "You
will stay safe if you do not-X." More substantively, we use the class
an an opportunity to introduce the crew concept in flying. The FAA
materials stress single-pilot operations, which is odd considering
that (a) a two-pilot crew running checklists is the cornerstone of
commercial aviation safety, and (b) most of the FAA is devoted to
preventing single-pilot operations (e.g., by airlines).
Our goal was to show students that they could learn something
challenging, develop a skill that they could be proud of, and do some
fun trips, all while staying closer to airline levels of risk than
single-pilot-in-little-plane levels of risk. We took every opportunity
to tell them that here is the kind of flying where it can be helpful
to bring along another pilot and/or instructor.
Finally, we stressed that they didn't have to earn an FAA Private
certificate in order to say that they had achieved the ancient dream
of controlled human flight. The FAA certificate was about being a safe
single-pilot operator, something that passengers don't even
want. Learning to fly per se, we explained, is more like a
10-hour process and therefore much more affordable.
Additional Teachers in 2020
- Eric Zipkin, founder and CEO
of Tradewind, a Pilatus
PC-12 operator, talked about flying the DC-3 to Europe and back
Teachers in 2019
- Lt. Col Diogo Castilho, Brazilian AF
- Lt. Col Randy "Laz" Gordon, USAF
- Philip Greenspun, PhD, ATP, CFII
- Michael Holzwarth, Hollywood drone pilot
- Marc Nathanson, USAF F-4 pilot veteran, FAA Designated Examiner, Aerobatics Instructor at East Coast Aero Club
- Tina Prabha Srivastava, PhD, Private Pilot
Teachers in 2018 (first year for this version)
- Fred Barber, MIT SB EECS '73, Director of Certification, Avidyne, Private Pilot
- David Buser, CFII
- Diogo Castilho, Brazilian AF
- Lt. Col Randy "Laz" Gordon, USAF
- Philip Greenspun, PhD, ATP, CFII
- Matt Guthmiller, Commercial Pilot (youngest round-the-world pilot in 2014 following freshman year at MIT)
- Oxana Poburinnaya, aerobatic competition pilot
- Tina Prabha Srivastava, PhD, Private Pilot
Expanding to a full-semester course
Some other universities have been working on adapting this intensive
course into a full-semester engineering class that meets traditional
academic standards regarding homework, mid-term exams, etc. We're
delighted, of course, if people use our videos and slide decks to
cover the basics. After the students have watched those and
participated in some Q&A sessions regarding the material, here are
some ideas for expansion...
Meteorology. A lot of problems in general aviation start with
the weather. Meteorology is a standard academic topic. Why not cover
it from an aviation angle, with the same kinds of homework that a
meteorology student would do?
Aircraft Certification. FAR 23, 25, 27, and 29 constitute a
rich area for engineers to look at. Homework: "Here is a system. How
do you make it comply with FAR 23? What else would you have to do to
make it comply with FAR 25?"
Software Engineering to FAA Certification
Standards. Panel-mount avionics software is extremely reliable
compared to what is on a desktop computer or a phone, but it is also
extremely slow to evolve. Look at this alternative approach to
software engineering and the pluses (the Garmin GPS will never crash)
and minuses (the Garmin GPS will catch up to ForeFlight's 2020
features in 2050?).
Airport Design. Much of the safety of air transportation is
actually due to forgiving airport design. Why are the K-prefixed airports that
meet ICAO standards safer than the little strips that don't? (KBED v. 6B6) Problem
set: here's an airport layout with some nearby obstacles with heights,
what would you have to change to make it meet ICAO airport
certification standards?
If we could start over...
We inherited these slide decks and they were already packed with great
material organized topic-by-topic. Now that we've thought about it,
though, maybe it would be better to teach in a more project-oriented
manner. Especially in a full-semester course, why can't each class
meeting be organized around a simulated flight? Aerodynamics gets
taught in the context of a trip around the pattern. Charts and
airspace get taught in the context of a trip from Bedford to
Teterboro. The VOR gets taught in the context of a flight where the
pilot gets lost. Nearly all of the same slides can be used, but
reshuffled so that they are presented when the content is needed to
complete a simulated flight.
Gratitude Journal
This 30-year-old class leans heavily on work put in by at least the following:
- T. Wilson Professor in Aeronautics R. John Hansman
- Luke Jensen, Ph.D., Aurora Flight Sciences Corporation
- Brandon Abel, Ph.D., Director of Operations at USAF Test Pilot School, Edwards, California
Thanks also to MIT Video Productions for camping out with us for three
days in 2019, to MIT AV for keeping us mostly glitch-free, to MIT
OpenCourseWare for their support in getting the class online, and to
Marie Stuppard, Course 16 Academic Program Administrator.
philg@mit.edu