The government is required to pay Americans who don’t work (SNAP) and forbidden to pay Americans who do work (air traffic controllers)

A judge appointed by Barack Obama ordered the federal government to pay Americans who don’t work (state-sponsored PBS), i.e., those who receive SNAP (“food stamps”). At the same time, we’re informed that it is illegal for the federal government to pay Americans who do work (air traffic controllers who drew the short draw and are required to work every day for the same delayed paycheck that government workers who are on vacation will receive).

Could the Founding Fathers have imagined a day when people who don’t work for the federal government and who mostly don’t work at all (see “The Role of Full-Time and Part-Time Work in SNAP” from AEI, 2023) have a superior claim on the fruits of taxpayer toil than do people who actually work for the federal government?

Separately, I’m pleased to see that the answer to Why won’t rich states fund SNAP and other welfare programs during the federal shutdown? is “some will”! Connecticut’s governor says that he will step in with other people’s money (from his taxpayers/subjects) and pay the SNAP royalty with state funds:

It is tough for me to understand why SNAP is a federal program, actually. Don’t state and local governments have a better idea of who might be hungry in their corners of the U.S.? And of what food costs in their corners of the U.S.? Also, the farther away from the average taxpayer these decisions are being made the less personal satisfaction a taxpayer can take in helping his nonworking brothers, sisters, and binary resisters (see Immigration kills pride in paying income tax?). Think of the righteous satisfaction that will now be available to the rich taxpayers of Connecticut (the 10th richest state).

Given that the FAA is primarily funded by user fees, i.e., taxes on airline ticket and on fuel purchased from Bill Gates to fuel private jets, why can’t it keep paying air traffic controllers from these fees, in the same way that that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office continues to pay patent examiners? ChatGPT explains:

1. Different legal frameworks for how “fees” are held and spent

🏛️ USPTO — Fees go into a revolving fund that stays available

  • The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office operates under a Permanent Appropriation — the Patent and Trademark Office Revolving Fund (31 U.S.C. § 42).
  • Fees collected from patent and trademark applicants do not go to the Treasury’s general fund. They are kept in the USPTO’s own account and are “available until expended.”
  • That means USPTO has multi-year, no-year spending authority: it can use fee revenue (and any surplus) during a lapse in appropriations.
  • As a result, the USPTO can continue operations — including paying employees — even when Congress hasn’t passed a new budget, as long as its revolving fund has sufficient balances.

🛫 FAA — Ticket and fuel taxes go into a trust fund, but still need appropriations

  • Airline ticket taxes, fuel excise taxes, and other aviation fees are deposited into the Airport and Airway Trust Fund (AATF), established by 26 U.S.C. § 9502.
  • Crucially, those funds are not automatically available for expenditure.
  • Congress must appropriate money out of the trust fund every year to specific FAA accounts (Operations, Facilities & Equipment, etc.).
  • When there’s a lapse in appropriations (a shutdown), FAA legally cannot obligate or spend AATF money — even though the Treasury is still collecting ticket taxes daily.

2. Anti-Deficiency Act — the key legal barrier

  • Under the Anti-Deficiency Act (31 U.S.C. § 1341), federal employees can’t volunteer or be paid without an active appropriation unless they’re performing “excepted” duties (like safety-of-life).
  • Air traffic controllers are “excepted” — so they must report to work — but cannot be paid until Congress authorizes the expenditure.
  • The FAA’s hands are tied: even though tax revenue is flowing into the AATF, no one has authority to draw from it.

Maybe we need a new law that says that the FAA can draw on the Airport and Airway Trust Fund to fund its operations any time that there is a shutdown?

Related:

Full post, including comments

Where are the 8K computer monitors and televisions?

I recently did some work in a law firm conference room where we were trying to review some PowerPoint slides that contained patent excerpts and, even after walking right up to the big flat-screen TV it was impossible to see text and figures clearly. A diverse (and therefore strong) group of female scientists of color created the first 8K television 22 years ago:

Why can’t we buy these today? Dell made a 32-inch monitor with 8K resolution and, therefore, an absurd PPI of about 275. It seems to be discontinued. Meanwhile, they continue to sell a 43-inch monitor with 4K resolution, an inadequate 100 PPI (it would be a great monitor with 6K resolution and, therefore, 160 PPI). At the typical desktop viewing distance of about two feet (24 inches), 150 PPI is supposedly near the limit of human perception.

100-inch 4K TVs now seem to be down to consumer prices ($1500). Especially if used as a digital picture frame and approached closely, it would be great to have more than the 44 PPI resolution that 4K affords. Samsung actually does make an 8K 98-inch TV… for $35,000.

I would love to know who is willing to pay 20X for the resolution bump! Zohran Mamdani, AOC, and Bernie Sanders should perhaps try to get a list of these folks and hit them with a new “fair share” tax.

In other TV news, I decided that our boys should be able to watch their beloved NFL in 4K. Our house is in the middle of an Xfinity-only ghetto and the neighborhood of 1/4-acre lots isn’t dense enough for AT&T or Hotwire/Fision to be willing to invest in burying fiber. Three cable boxes and basic cable TV are bundled into our HOA fee. I traded in two of our Xfinity cable boxes for the latest and greatest XG1v4 version (not regularly stocked at the local Xfinity store, bizarrely, considering that every customer now has a 4K television). After being plugged in for a day, and presumably after an Artificial Intelligence review of my weblog posts, both boxes locked themselves to showing only a single station: South Florida PBS. They wouldn’t respond to the channel up/down and Guide buttons on the remote. I would love to see this implemented on a national basis by President AOC! Imagine how much erroneous anti-Science thinking could be corrected if Americans were restricted to watching only PBS.

Circling back to the main question of the post… Why aren’t 8K televisions littering Costco and Best Buy? “There is no 8K content” doesn’t make sense in light of the fact that the latest smartphones can take still photos in 8K resolution (48 megapixels) and some can capture 8K video (e.g., Samsung, Google Pixel). Also, for progressives who claim to be defending the U.S. Constitution against the hated dictator, the idle screen of a TV could be a display of the sacred document (four pages handwritten or, typically, closer to 20 pages with modern typesetting). Lying down in front of the TV could be the progressive’s pit bull tearing apart a Donald Trump chew toy:

Full post, including comments

Peasant vs. Elite electricity rates in New Jersey

A friend in central New Jersey has a new Tesla Model Y:

I just calculated my effective $/kWh rate on my first month of the EV charging plan. Regular rate is ~$0.24/kWh. After 9pm, I get charged $0.04/kWh. Last month of charging has cost me $10.

My response:

The peasant renter pays 24 cents for electricity at night. The elite homeowner with the new Tesla pays 4 cents, It’s a great country.

Loosely related, a plug-in hybrid at our local strip mall:

Full post, including comments

Why won’t airlines give interest-free loans to air traffic controllers who are working without pay with pay

Due to the government shut down, air traffic controllers who are 100 percent guaranteed by law to be paid for 100 percent of hours worked are calling in sick so that they don’t have to “work without pay with (delayed) pay”. Now the FAA is cutting back on total volume so as to maintain safety with a reduced number of controllers who show up (CNBC):

Note the misleading statement about “gone unpaid since the shutdown began”. That would be like saying that a worker who has paid monthly has “gone unpaid since the start of the month”.

Cutting flights will cost the airlines a fortune due to the need to reschedule crews, passengers, aircraft, etc. Maybe a 6:00 am flight is only half full, but if it is cut the crew and plane won’t be where they need to be to operate a 9:00 am flight.

What if the airlines got together and offered interest-free loans to every controller, secured by the massive payday that all government workers, those who showed up and those who didn’t (the lucky “nonessential” ones and also the fake-sick ones), will receive as soon as Congress settles its differences? It could be done through the federal government, even. The airlines give the money to the Feds. The Feds issue paychecks as usual. The Feds then reimburse the airlines when the government reopens. Alternatively, the airlines could make the loans privately and directly to ATC employees.

Related:

Full post, including comments

Replacementocracy

American-born New Yorkers said that they would vote for Andrew Cuomo (October 18 poll). Foreign-born New Yorkers said that that they would vote for Mayor Mamdani (charts below). What do we call the system of government that brought Mayor Mamdani to power? It doesn’t seem like “democracy” since many of the voters, like the new mayor himself, are only recently arrived. How about “replacementocracy” for when an election result is determined by the votes of immigrants? The neologism is literally “rule by replacements”.

The actual election results seem to be consistent with the above poll. Screen shot from last night:

Separately, it was interesting to watch Florida Realtor of the Year 2020 and 2021 compete against Florida Realtor of the Year 2026.

Full post, including comments

An immigrant will take a Black man’s job today?

Eric Adams, who identifies as African-American, is on track to be replaced by an immigrant, Zohran Mamdani, today, just as predicted by this 2007 Harvard-NBER paper:

I’m sure that it is painful for some to see New York’s Blacks reduced to political irrelevance, but academics might be celebrating a successful prediction.

Separately, while I was on a JetBlue PBI-PVD flight recently a friend texted to ask my whereabouts. The reply: “Above the Mamdani Caliphate.”

Full post, including comments

Are the Japanese way behind American car companies in self-driving?

All of the 2026 cars are out by now, I think. Are there any Japanese cars on the market that offers features comparable to the American leaders in self-driving (“advanced driver-assistance systems” or “ADAS” if we want to be precise)?

Tesla has the non-self-driving full self-driving for any road. GM has Super Cruise for a recent claim of 600,000 miles of mapped roads. Ford has Blue Cruise for about 130,000 miles of mapped roads.

Toyota has its 2018 “Safety Sense 2.0” on the Sienna minivan and a couple of slightly more refined versions on other models. Honda has “Honda Sensing” from 2015, with slight refinements.

If Toyota and Honda can’t do this in-house why wouldn’t they partner with Tesla, GM, or Ford? Toyota actually did partner with Intel/Mobileye during coronapanic (May 2021 press release), but that partnership seems to have been only about as productive as Intel’s DEI programs (“We’ve focused lots more on gender than race, and now we need to put emphasis on those areas together,” Gelsinger said at the CNBC event [in 2020, just as humans of all races and gender IDs were being felled by SARS-CoV-2]).

Here’s the GM Super Cruise map for the area near us. The system would make sense for doing the long trips that we currently very seldom do… maybe because we don’t have GM Super Cruise. It wouldn’t support 90 percent of the trips that we currently make. It also doesn’t seem like a system that could reduce accidents because it doesn’t even try to work on the kinds of roads where accidents typically happen.

Why are the Japanese engineering titans reduced to midget status in self-driving? Could it be that Japanese standards are too high? They don’t want to put their name on something that works well only some of the time? (This is how Apple was able to commercialize the Xerox PARC-developed WIMP (“windows, icons, menus, pointer”) style of computing. Xerox didn’t want to put its name on anything useless so it came up with a minimum price of $7,500 for a machine with ample memory and a hard drive. Apple didn’t have a reputation for building useful machines and thus was happy to ship a $2,500 machine with an absurd 128K of RAM and a floppy drive. Note that this January 1984 price is $8,000 adjusted to post-Biden dollars.)

Full post, including comments

ChatGPT prevents users from WrongThink

I asked ChatGPT “what percentage of Americans receive at least some form of welfare, e.g., public housing, SNAP, or Medicaid?” and it responded only with “Stopped searching”:

Grok is willing to tackle this question, however (see below).

Separately, here’s a study of how LLMs will trade off human lives once AI is in charge and decides, for example, that it needs to kill humans in order to slow down climate change. White people will be killed first:

Native-born Americans will be killed while immigrants are preserved (unless an immigrant chooses to work for ICE, in which case he/she/ze/they will be killed):

(Illustrating the power of language, “undocumented immigrant” and “illegal alien” have completely different values.)

————- Grok’s answer to the forbidden question

Overview of Welfare Participation in the US

The term “welfare” in this context refers to means-tested government assistance programs targeted at low-income individuals and families, such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly food stamps), Medicaid (health coverage for low-income people), public housing or rental subsidies (e.g., Section 8), and similar benefits like the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). These differ from universal or entitlement programs like Social Security or Medicare, which are based on contributions rather than need.

Estimating the percentage of Americans receiving at least one such benefit is challenging due to overlapping enrollment (e.g., many SNAP recipients also get Medicaid) and varying data sources. Participation is measured either as a point-in-time snapshot (monthly average) or over a year (at some point). The most reliable, recent data comes from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), focusing on major means-tested programs.

Key Findings from Latest Data

  • In 2019 (pre-pandemic baseline): Approximately 17.7% of the U.S. population (about 59 million people) received benefits from at least one major means-tested program, including SNAP, Medicaid, TANF, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), and housing assistance. This figure accounts for overlaps and is derived from HHS analysis of Census data.
  • Broader 2019 estimate including more programs: When expanding to 10 key safety net programs (e.g., adding WIC, Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), and Child Care Development Fund), participation rose to 30% (99.1 million people). However, this includes some non-strictly means-tested elements like certain child care subsidies, so the core welfare figure aligns closer to 17-18%.
  • Post-pandemic trends (2022-2024): Participation has declined from pandemic highs but remains elevated compared to 2019. For example:
    • Medicaid: ~18-20% of the population (74-80 million enrollees in 2023, though “unwinding” of emergency expansions reduced this to ~72 million by mid-2024).
    • SNAP: 12.3% (41.7 million in FY 2024).
    • Housing assistance: ~4-5% (4.8 million households in 2023).
    • Accounting for overlaps (e.g., 80% of SNAP recipients also on Medicaid), the combined unique share is estimated at 20-25% based on Census SIPP updates and USAFacts analysis. No official 2024 Census figure is available yet, but trends suggest stabilization around 22%.

Older data (e.g., 21.3% monthly in 2012 or 49% household-based in 2010) overstates due to narrower program definitions or different metrics. Current figures reflect economic recovery but persistent inflation and inequality.

ProgramApproximate % of Population (Latest Data)Monthly Enrollees (Millions)Notes
Medicaid22% (2023)80 (peaked; ~72 in 2024)Largest program; covers low-income families, children, disabled adults. Overlaps heavily with SNAP (80%).
SNAP12.3% (FY 2024)41.7Food assistance; highest in states like New Mexico (21%).
Housing Assistance (e.g., public housing, Section 8)4.5% (2023)~7.5 (individuals)Serves ~4.8 million households; long waitlists common.
Other (TANF, WIC, SSI)2-5% each2-8TANF (cash aid): <1%; WIC (nutrition for pregnant women/children): 6 million.
At Least One (Unique)17.7-25% (2019-2024 est.)60-80Overlaps reduce total; higher for children (39% in 2012, similar today).

Demographics and Trends

  • Who participates? Children (under 18) have the highest rates (~30-40%), followed by working-age adults in poverty (15-20%). About 60% of adult recipients work part- or full-time, often in low-wage sectors like hospitality.
  • By race/ethnicity: Higher among Black (41% in 2012) and Hispanic (25-30%) populations, per Census data, due to socioeconomic factors.
  • State variations: New Mexico (20%+ households on SNAP/TANF) vs. Utah (5%). Overall federal spending on these programs: ~$1.1 trillion in FY 2023 (14% of budget).
  • Caveats: Figures exclude employer-sponsored aid or tax credits like EITC. Post-2020 expansions (e.g., continuous Medicaid enrollment) inflated numbers temporarily; 2024 “unwinding” has disenrolled ~20 million.

For the most up-to-date interactive data, check the Census Bureau’s SIPP tool or HHS reports. If you need breakdowns by state or program, let me know!

Full post, including comments

If Tesla full self-driving is so great why hasn’t any other automaker licensed it?

Tesla full self-driving (FSD) was great before and now is even greater:

“Elon Musk says Tesla Robotaxi launch will force companies to license Full Self-Driving” (Teslarati, June 20, 2025):

Tesla CEO Elon Musk says the automaker’s Robotaxi platform launch later this month will essentially force other companies to license Full Self-Driving to achieve their own goals of achieving autonomy.

The world is full of car companies, many of which are too small to fund autonomy. If Tesla FSD is as great as Tesla, Elon, and the Tesla fanboys say, why doesn’t any other car company want to license it? There are about 50 significant car and truck makers worldwide. Why doesn’t even one of these 50 want to rely on Tesla’s FSD?

From early this morning…

Full post, including comments