According to “Many are wondering what Camille Cosby is thinking” (Boston Globe), today is supposed to be Camille Cosby’s deposition in litigation regarding her husband Bill Cosby’s sexual encounter with a woman in Pennsylvania back in 2004. Is this a demonstration of the general principle that the best (or only?) way to learn more about two people having sex in Pennsylvania is to ask someone who was sitting at home in rural Massachusetts at the time?
Related:
So wait a sec: she had 5 kids with Bill and she could have divorced him with ease but she stuck and is still sticking by him? she is not behaving according to the Greenspan’s dictated Modus Operandi…
Staying with Cosby maximized her pussy profits as long as he was continuing to earn. If she could have found someone richer to marry, divorce would have been a net money-spinner for her. Or if she could have found a rich guy to borrow for the night and was young enough to push a 6th kid out of her vag 9 months later.
http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-2871600028.html : College dropout who bought into a $400 million business partnership by spreading her legs. #VerySmart Liquidate because partner is chasing younger pussy? #WhyBother
Camille Cosby revealed her virulent anti-White racism after expressing her hatred for, and condemning all, White people after her son was murdered by a White Ukrainian immigrant in 1997.
Aren’t nearly all of Bill Cosby’s accusers White females?
Federico: You raise kind of a good point, considering the circumstances. Some of my self-employed married friends here in the Boston area talk about how much better off financially they could be if they were to divorce. The current stay-at-home wife becomes a Welfare mom and is entitled to free housing, free health care, food stamps, etc. No more $30,000/year to the Obamacare web site (“MA Health Connector”), potential for a swank city apartment on the taxpayer’s dime, government-funded debit card for use at Whole Foods, etc.
If Camille and Bill were to get divorced via a joint petition (happens about 17 percent of the time here in Massachusetts; see http://www.realworlddivorce.com/MiddlesexMay2011 (the rest of the time, one spouse sues the other)), they could agree to a property division in which Camille gets 90 percent of the assets while Bill is responsible for paying a lot of alimony. If in a few more years the various women and their respective lawyers who are pursuing Bill are able to get judgments against him for $500 million or whatever, he can declare personal bankruptcy and lose just his remaining assets. Whatever Camille had obtained via the divorce would be protected. It is possible that the courts could unroll all of this and make Camille pay nonetheless but I think there is a reasonable case to be made that a divorce between these two is legitimate.
So if the Cosbys want to protect their assets for the benefit of their children, divorce could be the answer.