DC Museum Report

Wrapping up my stay in Washington, DC, here’s a report on the museums.  The National Gallery has a Dan Flavin show.  Even if you have seen his fluorescent light works in Marfa, Texas or at Dia:Beacon this exhibition is worthwhile.  My favorite piece is “untitled (honor of Harold Joachim) 3”, a corner installation that graces the cover of Dan Flavin: The Complete Lights.  The new National Museum of the American Indian has a temporary show of George Morrison wood collages.  Morrison was a 20th century Chippewa artist.  The cafeteria is fantastic.  The rest of the American Indian museum is worth seeing in the sense that a train wreck is fascinating.  The project cost more than $220 million and is kind of a sick supersized parody of Frank Lloyd Wright’s NY Guggenheim.  There is a huge cylindrical atrium that is basically empty and that barely relates to the exhibits, which are well off to the side in dark claustrophobic galleries.  The artwork and artifacts are dimly lit and crammed into crowded display cases.  Compared to the anthropology museum in Mexico City or the average American Indian museum in Oklahoma or South Dakota this new Smithsonian is a depressing example of the current state of American non-profit organization management.  It reminds one of the disappointing Udvar-Hazy Air and Space annex at Dulles Airport, where nearly $1 billion seems to have been invested in the kind of museum that Polynesian cargo cultists might have built.  I.e., a lot of interesting objects (airplanes) are displayed but the assumption is that they can’t be understood or explained.


[Update:  Ellis Vener just emailed a photo that he snapped of Alex in the back seat.]

2 thoughts on “DC Museum Report

  1. The Getty Museum in Los Angeles is similar. Very nice building and grounds. Very nice collection of art. Very poorly designed lighting – light comes in at just the right angle to reflect off the *surface* of the painting (not the paint). Dim bluish lighting on paintings that clearly were intended to show best in a “warm” (i.e. yellow/reddish) light. Astonishing.

  2. I agree, somewhat, with this perspective. I saw the building as having a vast amount of wasted space. I tried to believe that there is a futuristic element to the design, perhaps bigger and better things are in store…

    I soon realized the archtecture is outlandish and rambles without purpose. (which is typical of and well suited to our government and its representatives)

    The exhibits are dark, small, cave-like displays which emphasize most, the miserly greed and the continued monetary domination of all indigenous peoples.

    It only takes one visit to this museum to feel the spirit of deceit that lingers thoughout corridors which mainly lead toward gift shops with over priced, sterotypical merchandise and vast restrooms, which were, even opening night, in need of repair.

    This endeavor is nothing but another slap in the face from a thinly veiled hollywood hype promotion of… what, our three or four indigenous government representatives?

    Well, bless their little hearts I say.

    I attended the dinner @ 250.00 per person and listened to the presentations of Colin Powell and Senator Ben Nighthorse Campbell. I was not impressed. It is hard for me to believe this museum was not established as a collection plate for casino money and a shopping outlet for Ben Campbell’s jewelry.

    Missing most, from this museum, is the respect for history, for indigenous peoples and the beautiful and renowned work of some of the First Nation’s finest designers, writers, film producers, potters, weavers, jewelers, architects, painters and photographers.

    If they wish to sell true, fine art of the
    indigenous people then these museum “curators, buyers and gift shop directors” should first, go to the people.

    There is one good thing, about the Native American Museum, the restaurant’s coffee is very good. I had several cups. Deborah

Comments are closed.