How does a person become great at doing something difficult? (Brain surgery)

Among many other virtues, Do No Harm: Stories of Life, Death, and Brain Surgery (Marsh), contains some stuff about how a human can be trained to become great at a difficult task.

Henry Marsh describes his youth in a comparatively uncompetitive world:

Until the age of twenty-one I had followed the path that seemed clearly laid out for me by my family and education. It was a time when people from my background could simply assume that a job was waiting for them – the only question was to decide what you wanted to do. I had received a private and privileged English education in a famous school, with many years devoted to Latin and Greek, and then to English and History. I took two years off on leaving school, and after several months editing medieval customs documents in the Public Record Office (a job organized by my father through his many connections), spent a year as a volunteer teaching English literature in a remote corner of West Africa. I then went up to Oxford to read Politics, Philosophy and Economics.

I was destined, I suppose, for an academic or administrative career of some kind. During all these years I had received virtually no scientific education.

I was fortunate that my college at Oxford allowed me to come back after my year away to complete my degree and I was later accepted to study medicine at the only medical school in London which took students without any scientific qualifications. Having been rejected by all the other London Medical Schools since I had neither O-levels nor A-levels in science I had telephoned the Royal Free Medical School. They asked me to come for an interview next day. The interview was with an elderly, pipe-smoking Scot, the Medical School Registrar, in a small and cramped office. He was to retire a few weeks later and perhaps he let me in to the Medical School as a kind of joke, or celebration, or perhaps his mind was elsewhere. He asked me if I enjoyed fly-fishing. I replied that I did not. He said that it was best to see medicine as a form of craft, neither art nor science – an opinion with which I came to agree in later years. The interview took five minutes and he offered me a place in the Medical School starting three weeks later. Selection for medical schools has become a rather more rigorous process since then. I believe the Medical School at the huge London hospital where I now work uses role-playing with actors, along with many other procedures, to select the doctors of the future. The nervous candidates must show their ability to break bad news by telling an actor that their cat has just been run over by a car. Failure to take the scenario seriously, I am told, results in immediate rejection. Whether this is any better than the process I went through remains, I believe, unproven. Apparently the actors help select the successful candidates.

Marsh is a big believer in long hours for novice doctors, but that’s no longer how people are trained:

I wanted to be a surgeon – at least I thought I did – so I managed to get a job on a surgical ‘firm’, as it was called, in my teaching hospital. The firm consisted of a consultant, a senior registrar and a junior registrar and the houseman. I worked ‘1 in 2’, which meant I did a normal working day five days a week, but also was on call every other night and every other weekend, so I was in the hospital for about 120 hours a week.

It was at the time when the government was starting to reduce the long working hours of junior hospital doctors. The doctors were tired and overworked, it was said, and patients’ lives were being put at risk. The junior doctors, however, rather than becoming ever more safe and efficient now that they slept longer at night, had instead become increasingly disgruntled and unreliable. It seemed to me that this had happened because they were now working in shifts and had lost the sense of importance and belonging that came with working the long hours of the past. I hoped that by meeting every morning to discuss the latest admissions, to train the juniors with constant teaching as well as to plan the patients’ treatment, we might manage to recreate some of the lost regimental spirit.

‘If they are to be compliant with the European Working Time Directive your registrars can no longer be resident on-call. The on-call room will be taken away. We have examined their diary cards – they are working far too much at the moment. They must have eight hours sleep every night, six of it guaranteed uninterrupted. This can only be achieved if they work in shifts like the SHOs.’ My colleagues stirred uncomfortably in their seats and grumbled. ‘Shifts have been tried elsewhere and are universally unpopular,’ one of them said. ‘It destroys any continuity of care. The doctors will be changing over two or three times every day. The juniors on at night will rarely know any of the patients, nor will the patients know them. Everybody says it’s dangerous. The shorter hours will also mean that they will have much less clinical experience and that’s dangerous also. Even the President of the Royal College of Surgeons has come out against shifts.

‘We have to comply with the law,’ she said

How good can a person get with this kind of training plus a career’s worth of experience?

Early the next morning I lay in bed thinking about the young woman I had operated on the previous week. She had had a tumour in her spinal cord, between the sixth and seventh cervical vertebrae, and – although I do not know why, since the operation had seemed to proceed uneventfully – she awoke from the operation paralysed down the right side of her body. I had probably tried to take out too much of the tumour.

More: Read Do No Harm: Stories of Life, Death, and Brain Surgery

3 thoughts on “How does a person become great at doing something difficult? (Brain surgery)

  1. I am not sure that your last comment is fair or informative. We have no way to know (without reading the book) whether an aggressive surgery was reasonable or not. The words “I had probably tried to take out too much of the tumour” seem to suggest some of it was already pretty diffused in the spinal cord, and thus the operation might have just been a hail Mary attempt to save a young patient who had little chances in any case. It is also impossible to judge how often Marsh did cause considerable side effects with his surgery to his patients (but, CNS surgery is not something one does as an elective, so the issue might just be ‘are the side effects better than not doing anything?’).

    Also Marsh shows how physicians have no idea of what they talk about most of the time. As I patient I would never willingly accept to be cared for by a trainee, end of discussion. Yes, trainees need to learn their craft, but from a patient standpoint they can damn well learn it when physically supervised by a fully qualified physician who is there and then to double check actions and decisions. Here I am clearly assuming the whole point of medicine is the benefit the patients, not to benefit the physicians. This means that senior physicians would not go home to see their families, ever, but frankly I do not care, it’s not that they have been forced in the profession (all the physicians I know are married to physicians anyway, so they do not have a home/work separation to start with).

    If we ignore the best interest of the patients and we just care about the best way of training physicians, this problem is amenable to empirical testing: whether long hours are better than shifts can be assessed through exams and patient outcomes, it need not be a matter of opinion. Finally, as someone who has been in the British system for years, saying that shifts would harm patients is callous bullshit used to justify an attempt to make trainees work more — the best interest of the patients does not even get into the equation. Please note that Marsh might be right that shifts are bad for patients, but this is purely coincidental, patient welfare is used as a blunt moral superiority weapon to win the argument.

  2. “Also Marsh shows how physicians have no idea of what they talk about most of the time.”

    Frederico – If physicians have no idea about medicine, who does?

    I do agree with your idea of using a controlled study to measure the best training methods. My personal experience has been that shift work is worse for both physician training and patient care. There is something to be said for ‘ownership’ of a patient, i.e. my responsibility and not someone else’s.

  3. Sam, most of the time physicians do not limit themselves to discussing their own subset of medicine.

Comments are closed.