Surfacing a submarine at the North Pole

One of my favorite parts of Sea Power: The History and Geopolitics of the World’s Oceans:

Any U.S. Navy sailor who has gone above the Arctic Circle is awarded a certificate as a Blue Nose sailor. But very few even of the limited number of Blue Nose sailors have done the most challenging maneuver of all: breaking through the icepack itself in a submarine and bursting to the surface at the North Pole.

Each U.S. Navy submarine that has performed this feat recognizes the significant danger imposed on the boat by the dangling ice keels, large tongues of ice hanging down from the ice pack itself. Avoiding these is crucial, as is understanding the precise thickness of the ice pack at the proposed point of surfacing.

The entire maneuver is controlled carefully by the submarine’s captain himself and uses a detailed checklist with two-man control over each step of the standard operating procedure or SOP. Sonar— a pinging of sound through the water that measures distance by listening to the reverberation back— is used to find a flat spot, and the delicate controls of the submarine are used to maneuver the boat just below the surface of the ice. Throughout most of the cold war, most of our boats had hardened sails (the towerlike structure on the top of the boat) for this operation, but even given the hardening, it remains imperative to lower all masts and antennae while situating the boat below just the right patch of “clean” and hopefully thin ice. To make a cheap pun, finding the thin ice feels like “walking on thin ice” above— you know that a wrong step could be disastrous.

Once the thinnest ice patch is located and the ship is positioned beneath it, air is then blown into the ballast tanks, creating the reserve buoyancy and the essential upward thrusting energy needed to break through the ice. Like most submerged operations, this one is quiet and nearly silent throughout most of the boat. But in the conning space— the underwater part of the submarine where all maneuvering is conducted while the boat is submerged— and of course in sonar control, the crunching sound of the ice on the hull is discernible— a low, grinding, pulsing sound until the final breaking of the ice layer.

Once the boat has broken through, the crew can ascend the tower and carefully open the clamshells on the sail of the submarine and check the full status of the hull of the boat as it hangs just through the ice on the surface. Sailors wearing special cold weather exposure suits are initially tethered to the boat as the hull above the ice is checked for damage. Eventually, the goal is to get every one of the hundred or so sailors over the side to walk on the ice, snap pictures, and safely avoid polar bears— which amble right up to the hull. There are many places in the

Separately, it seems that not everyone got the global warming memo. The author says that we need to build a lot more icebreakers (the Russians and Chinese are building them!) and we can do this for only $1 billion per ship. At the same time he says that “By 2040 there will be an open passage for essentially twelve months of the year, and another decade later there will no longer be ice over the North Pole.” Given that it takes the U.S. military 10 or 15 years to get a new ship designed and ready, won’t these icebreakers be mothballed just a few years after completion? Until the icebreakers are built, the retired admiral suggests that we cooperate with the Russians… (he didn’t get the memo from Hillary about what a bad idea this is?)

It is worth noting in this regard how fundamental the Arctic is to Russia. Fully 20 percent of Russia’s population lives within the Arctic Circle, as opposed to essentially zero Americans and really only a handful of Canadians. The Russians, by the way, fully self-identify as an Arctic nation in ways that certainly transcend the feelings of any other sovereign state with the possible exception of Canada. They have just launched the largest and most powerful nuclear icebreaker in the world, the Arktika— 567 feet long, 33,000 tons, 80,000 shaft horse power, and capable of breaking through up to ten feet of ice. Strangely, for a region that is essentially devoid of human settlement, the Arctic is today the fastest-growing region in the world— each of the Arctic nations is actively pushing for the opening of settlements, increasing military activity, expanding resource exploitations, and generally staking claims with humans in the High North.

More: read Sea Power: The History and Geopolitics of the World’s Oceans.

10 thoughts on “Surfacing a submarine at the North Pole

  1. “Fully 20 percent of Russia’s population lives within the Arctic Circle”

    Fact check on aisle four! This is laughable. The population of Russia is around 145 million, 20% would be about 30 million. According to http://arctic.ru/population/, “the three most numerous population centers above the Arctic Circle lie in Russia: Murmansk (population around 300,000), Norilsk (over 170,000), and Vorkuta (around 60,000).”

    I went to the Arctic Circle in Russia in 1994, on an assignment to photograph a huge oil spill just outside of Usinsk in the Komi Republic, about 1000 miles NE of Moscow. To say it is sparsely populated barely describes the region.

    During Soviet times, many towns and cities were built above the arctic circle, to support oil, mining and logging operations (plus some military), people were given financial incentives to live there and provided with special travel to warm spots in the winter. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, many of these settlements collapsed, though it is possible that some are doing better now.

  2. The author was our top admiral, more or less, and the book was edited by Penguin. So the factual error is a good window into how well the best-educated Americans are able to think about Russia.

  3. He may have meant, “from 60 degrees N latitude” instead of the Arctic Circle which is farther north. That would easily fit the 20% number, as Saint Petersburg, Novosibirsk (4th largest city), and Ekaterinburg (3rd largest city) are inside that.

  4. Usually “Within the Arctic Circle” means “within the Arctic Circle.”

    Perhaps he meant “2%,” which would be about 3 million, and a zero was accidentally added. That’s closer to the total number of people of all nations who permanently reside above the Arctic Circle. Dunno. Either ways it’s a pretty egregious error.

    By the way, I forgot to mention that the highlight of my trip to the Russian North was peeing over the actual arctic circle demarcation. 🙂

  5. You know whats cooler than surfacing a sub at the North pole? Driving a truck to the North pole (well maybe not, but its close). “Top Gear Polar Special” (youtube/amazon) is a truck vs dog-sled race to the North pole by 3 middle age out-of-shape Brits. Its quite fun watching them try not to die.

  6. I don’t think this is Russia, or Penguin House, specific, but I do think this was covered many years ago:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Innumeracy_(book)

    However, his aim probably wasn’t to be factually correct, but to make sure those ice breakers were built! So I contradict myself, it wasn’t innumeracy it was:

    Serving on boards of ice-breaker-making companies >> cost of factual errors in book.

    Note: I didn’t fact check this. Well, I sort of did. Innumeracy is a real book.

  7. It’s always cool to see a sub break through the ice.

    Didn’t that movie Babylon AD (Vin Diesel movie) have a scene of a submarine breaking through the ice? I’ve never watched the Fast and The Furious movies but there was also a clip of a race with the submarine breaking through the ice as well during some race. Now I know why I don’t watch the Fast and the Furious.

    Any other movies that feature such scenes? I had thought the Hunt for Red October would have it, but I haven’t found a clip of it…

    The Russians already staked their claim on the Arctic by saying it is part of their continental shelf. Canada, Norway and Denmark have also filed claims and are increasing their military presence. At least these countries are in the vicinity of the Arctic. What I don’t really understand are the claims made in the Antarctic from countries nowhere near the Antarctic.

Comments are closed.