Boston will be like Amsterdam, but without the tall people

“With New Cannabis Cafes, You Can Smoke ‘Em Where You Bought ‘Em” (WBUR) describes our new regulations:

Sometime soon in Massachusetts, you’ll be able to walk into a cafe, ask for a marijuana product, and consume it right there without heading home first.

The state agency responsible for regulating legalized marijuana approved a policy on Monday that will allow for such establishments, so-called “cannabis cafes,” to open — where one can buy a cannabis product and then legally consume it on the premises, just like buying a drink at a bar.

Related:

5 thoughts on “Boston will be like Amsterdam, but without the tall people

  1. Calif* faces a funny problem with this new world: taking down all the no smoking signs that they put up during the war against nicotine.

  2. @lion You’ve got it wrong, California will have to update the signs to say no marijuana they already say “no smoking, no vaping”. The people against public smoking are PURITANS.

  3. @lion, @JW: can confirm. I visited the bay area in April and the people I talked to said that California would definitely be making sure that people knew that smoking weed in public spaces was just as socially unacceptable as smoking tobacco.

    They also said that it had taken California longer to pass a recreational cannabis law than Colorado, Washington and Oregon because pretty much anybody in California who wants to use cannabis can get a medical weed card, zero questions asked.

  4. Blog post idea for Philg. No idea what to make of this myself.

    Alimony Treatment Is Reversed. Under existing law, alimony payments are deductible to the individual paying the alimony (usually higher income), and reported as taxable income to the alimony recipient (usually lower income), unless the divorce decree or separation agreement stipulated otherwise. Under the TCJA legislation, alimony payments would no longer be deductible by payors, nor reportable by recipients, effectively eliminating the tax bracket arbitrage between the two. However, this provision will only apply to divorce agreements after December 31st of 2018 (or for prior agreements that are explicitly modified to adopt this provision in 2019 and beyond).

Comments are closed.