Does Saifullah Khan go back to Yale now?

“Yale Student Found Not Guilty in Rape Trial” (nytimes) is about a 25-year-old defendant who was found “not guilty” by a jury (but the journalists and editors refer to his unnamed accuser as “the victim” in the last paragraph; what was the unnamed person a victim of, if no crime was committed?). Saifullah Khan was, according to the article, suspended from Yale. Does the school now take him back so that he can finish the degree toward which, presumably, hundreds of thousands of dollars have already been paid? Or do they pocket the money and say “You don’t meet our standards for enrollment”?

What has this guy been doing for 2.5 years? Has he been a full-time defendant or did someone want to hire him to pump septic tanks or do HVAC system maintenance? Did he go back to his native Afghanistan and Skype with his legal defense team as needed? If he does graduate from Yale, who will hire him after doing any kind of Google search? Can he do a legal name change to “Billy Bob Cone” and thus thwart employers or graduate schools that might be interested in this background?

“A New Survey Finds 81 Percent Of Women Have Experienced Sexual Harassment” (PBS) suggests that a significant number of Americans might be cast out of society by the time all of these complaints have been adjudicated. Can those accused and subsequently acquitted worm their way back in? What are the aggregate economic effects?

[Update: Looks like the NYT has edited the article. It now says “Maura Crossin, executive director of the Victim Rights Center of Connecticut, which, along with the state’s attorney’s office, represented the complainant, declined to comment.” So they’ve replaced the word victim with complainant. Also they’ve added the fact that, after a two-week trial, the jury deliberated for three hours, comparable to the 2.5 hours that the jury took to acquit the defendant in the trail chronicle in the Missoula book (see below)..]

Related:

Full post, including comments

Why doesn’t everyone with unmetered electricity mine Bitcoin?

A lot of folks are in situations where they either don’t pay for electricity or pay a flat rate. Why aren’t they all mining Bitcoin? How about office workers? Nobody complains if they plug in a space heater, a Lava lamp, an aquarium, or a personal phone charger. Maybe the landlord is paying the electric bill in any case. Why wouldn’t there be a Bitcoin miner that “flies under the radar” by consuming less than 500 watts? Supposedly it takes about 13,000 kW/h to mine one coin (source), so that’s about three years at 500 watts per hour. Three years is a long time to wait (we could get lucky and earn a Bitcoin after 1 day, right?), but on the other hand a $10,000 bonus once every three years would be welcome!

How about folks who live in apartment buildings where the landlord hasn’t installed individual electric meters? If there are indeed any of these buildings left, why don’t the tenants replace all of the bulbs with LEDs, refrain from using the electric stove, and then run two 1500-watt Bitcoin miners 24/7?

Here’s a miner designed for home use: the AntMinerR4. It consumes 845 watts of power and generates “52 dB” of noise (actually 52 dBA?).

Related:

Full post, including comments

Medical School 2020, Year 2, Week 15

From our anonymous insider…

Those of us who passed the last block’s exams on our first try are back from a week of vacation. Wildflower Willow, a free-spirited outdoors enthusiast from Oregon and founder of our school’s wilderness club, went on a three-night solo backpacking trip. Pinterest Penelope spent the week in Banff with her family. Gigolo Giorgio crashed his parents’ trip to Europe. “I was planning to go home, but my father had a last-minute business trip to London and Brussels. He called me up to cancel my trip. I asked if I could come along for the ride. He reluctantly agreed. I think he had been excited to spend quality time with my mother.”

Jane and I skipped the Monday morning lecture, so our GI pathology week begins with a new 8-person “small group.” “You look too happy to be medical students” remarked a gentleman in a wheelchair as Jane and I take the elevator to the third floor. The 57-year-old retired orthopedist is our facilitator. Five years ago he had a bike accident that left him paralyzed from the waist down. “I expect a comprehensive differential. Don’t just blurt out syndromes. Tell me why you are thinking that. Do not expect to be leaving early with me.” Geezer George, a 32-year-old Boston native who is our oldest classmate, commented “It is refreshing to have someone hold us to high standards. Most of the facilitators have been more casual.”

Our group discussed celiac disease and common GI pathogens. Celiac disease, an autoimmune disease due to hypersensitivity reaction against gliadin (component of gluten), is most associated with Northern European ancestry. Type-A Anita: “White people have to pay somehow.” The immune reaction produces IgA that frequently cross-reacts with proteins in the dermal papillae (junction of dermis and epidermis) creating the characteristic dermatitis herpetiformis (grouped fluid-filled sacs, named after the similar appearance to a herpes outbreak). The IgA antibodies do not lead to GI pathology, but serve as a useful biomarker for diagnosis.

Geezer George brought up a norovirus outbreak while discussing common GI pathogens: “I was at ground zero in Boston. I lived across the street from the Chipotle where half our school got lunch.” (the illness was traced to a sick employee and it was unrelated to an earlier E. coli outbreak at Chipotle) A student replied, “Chipotle gets a bad wrap… no pun intended. You do not have an increased risk of getting a GI bug at Chipotle compared to any other restaurant, just so many people get meals there. It’s like the Toyota brake scandal.” A student described getting a Staphylococcus aureus enteritis characterized by profuse vomiting and diarrhea: “It’s like you don’t know whether to sit on the toilet or to stand next to it.”

A 45-year-old gastroenterologist specializing in hepatology (liver) gave Tuesday’s lecture on GI pathology: gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), peptic ulcer disease, Boerhaave syndrome, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

She explained that “36 – 77 percent of Americans experience GERD throughout their life. The severity of the symptoms do not correlate with the severity of GERD. Patients are not faking the pain. Some just have more sensitive mucosa than others. Avoid caffeine, smoking and late night meals.” She detailed how the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI), such as Prilosec (omeprazole) has gone through cycles. “Patients and providers have become skeptical about the use of PPI. The problem is that we overprescribed them for some time and they started to be linked to everything without evidence. I had a patient post-MI [heart attack] with a peptic ulcer. The CCU staff took him off the PPI out of fear of reinfarction. [Once off the PPI] The ulcer bled so much he required transfusion. The link has been proven false.”

Peptic ulcer disease, ulcers that form in the stomach and duodenum (proximal small intestine), is associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID; aspirin and ibuprofen are examples) use and chronic Helicobacter pylori infection. “20 million people take NSAIDs daily including 70 percent of people over 65. As long as people use NSAIDs, I have a job.” Why do doctors ask if the abdominal pain gets better or worse after eating? “Gastric ulcers worsen after eating. Eating stimulates acid production in the stomach. Duodenal ulcers become better after eating. Eating causes release of bicarbonate in the duodenum that neutralizes irritants.”

Boerhaave syndrome, a condition where intense vomiting leads to esophageal rupture, is caused by binge drinking. “Chronic vomiting such as in alcoholics and bulimics typically does not rupture through the esophagus,” she explained. Boerhaave syndrome is associated with a 35 percent mortality, “the most of any GI perforation.” Gigolo Giorgio: “I’m surprised that none of my college friends got Boerhaave syndrome.”

“Do not get IBD [inflammatory bowel disease] confused with IBS [irritable bowel syndrome]. Much different. IBS comes and goes and is not as severe as IBD,” she explained. The two most common IBD conditions are Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis (UC).

Nervous Nancy has Crohn disease. “My doctor is convinced I am Jewish. I keep telling him I am not. Infliximab [tnf-alpha inhibitor] has been a Godsend. I usually let my roommate inject it into me every three weeks. It’s like ripping a band-aid – easier if someone else does it quickly. He was trying to impress his new female friend by winding up before stabbing me. He ejected prematurely, wasting half the dose. I am freaking out. That’s like $4,000. My insurance won’t give me another prescription so I am going to try to make the next few doses last longer. I can already feel my hands and legs swelling and getting hot.”

Crohn disease, a transmural (entire thickness of gut tube) granulomatous inflammation of the GI system, usually occurs in the ileum [terminal small intestine]. Because Crohn Disease is transmural inflammation it can lead to performation and fistualization (connection between two tubes). If the colon ruptures it can create a connection to the bladder, called a colovesical fistula. Gigolo Giorgio: “Could you imagine peeing feces?”

Our patient case is Rebecca, a high-school swimmer who began seeing our gastroenterologist/hepatologist lecturer when she was 15. Rebecca presented for bloody diarrhea with mucous, fatigue, and a seven-month history of crampy abdominal pain. Over the preceding week she has experienced sharp right-upper quadrant (RUQ) pain. On physical exam, Rebecca appears pale with an enlarged liver palpable six centimeters below the costal margin and a palpable spleen. No scleral icterus (yellowing of the sclera) is noted. CBC shows pancytopenia (low red and white blood cell count) with a normocytic anemia (normal red blood cells, but not enough of them) and high reticulocyte count. Stool sample tests positive for white blood cells, red blood cells, but negative for pathogens. After a colonoscopy, Rebecca is diagnosed with ulcerative colitis.

What is causing her enlarged liver and spleen? Ten percent of patients with UC develop primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). PSC is an inflammatory reaction that causes fibrosis of the biliary tree connecting the liver to the duodenum. Over time this causes incurable cirrhosis (hardening of the liver), which clogs portal circulation of blood returning to the liver.

“The treatment of PSC is liver transplantation. That is how serious a disease it is. Liver transplant is not even a cure,” explains her doctor (our lecturer). Rebecca is placed on the liver transplant list.

Patients on the liver transplant list are ranked according to the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, which predicts three-month mortality among liver failure patients based on three lab values: creatinine (kidney function), bilirubin (liver’s ability to breakdown and excrete heme), and the international normalized ratio (liver’s ability to synthesize clotting factors). Rebecca was at 12 out of 40. “PSC patients are screwed over by the MELD score,” explained our hepatologist. “Their lab values do not reflect their deterioration. I told Rebecca’s family that she would not make it to the expected donation time.” Her family and doctor petitioned the UNOS (United Network for Organ Sharing) to no avail. Pinterest Penelope whispered, “This story reminds me of Denny from Grey’s Anatomy losing the heart transplant by 17 seconds.”

Her mother described searching for a living donor. Live donor liver transplant (LDLT) is a procedure where a liver section from a living donor is removed for transplantation. The liver is able to regrow to normal function over time. LVLT has several ethical dilemmas. Who gives consent for a pediatric donor? A cousin or uncle who matches may experience immense family pressure to donate, compounded by the fact that many liver transplants require immediate decisions. Pinterest Penelope whispered again, “This is just like Grey’s Anatomy! Remember that episode where the son of an abusive father has to decide to give him part of his liver?” Rebecca’s real-life situation was more serious, but less dramatic. There was no abusive father and nobody in her immediate family was a match.

Rebecca waited three years for a liver while enduring serious complications such as hyperammonemia (high serum ammonia causing mental status changes). One evening she presented to the ED for severe hematemesis (vomiting blood). The dilated veins in her esophagus ruptured. (Esophageal hemorrhage is the most frequent cause of death in liver cirrhosis patients.) Rebecca underwent banding endoscopy (put rubber bands around the veins) to stop the bleeding. After these episodes, the family and doctor petitioned UNOS, who increased her MELD score.

Rebecca underwent a domino liver transplant the summer before her freshman year of college . The first domino was a cadaver (dead person) whose liver is transplanted into a patient with a genetic disease such as familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP) or Maple Syrup Urine Disease (MSUD). The second domino is the liver removed from that patient, which can be installed in Rebecca’s body and then function normally. We saw a picture of the domino family smiling next to each other: the widowed wife of the cadaveric donor, the mother holding an 8-year-old daughter with MSUD, and Rebecca.

Rebecca’s PSC returned three years later. Her mother said, “We knew the system better the second time around. We listed at a transplant center that did not have a national reputation and in a state with high donation rates.” Rebecca showed us her scars. The scar from the first transplant was roughly 4 inches long on her right side. The scar from the second liver transplant went across her entire abdomen. Her transplanted liver had enlarged to cover her spleen. The extensive fibrosis also adhered parts of her liver to the diaphragm making it difficult to remove. As a result, she experienced pain for several months requiring high dose IV opioid painkillers and neurontin. Two years out she is dealing with opioid tolerance and withdrawal symptoms as she tapers off. Rebecca, now a rising senior at college studying chemistry, plans to return to school after a semester break. “I hope to get back in the water next month. It symbolizes, sort of, returning to normalcy.”

After Rebecca and her mother left, a student asked the hepatologist, “Given that there is such a long waiting list for transplants, what are your thoughts on a single patient receiving two livers?” She passionately responded: “Rebecca deserved this liver. I just came back from the AASLD [American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases] conference. UNOS just approved liver transplants for alcoholics who are three months sober [Hepatitis C from IV drug use is another common reason for requiring a transplant]. I have never met someone who is more motivated and wants to be a productive member of society. Throughout her first transplant recovery she kept going to college. Can you imagine the drive that requires? A lot of potential liver transplant patients just sit at home on disability. What do they do after the transplant. They continue to sit at home on disability. No, she deserved this second liver.”

For each of the next six weeks we will write a two-page single-spaced ethics essay. “I am really excited about doing this ethics course with you,” explained our

Full post, including comments

Harvard can get rid of an old guy with tenure

“Married prominent Harvard professor with tenure is placed on administrative leave following 18 accusations of sexual harassment spanning decades” (Daily Mail) concerns a guy to whom Harvard was obligated to keep sending paychecks until his death. Considering all of the virtuous Silicon Valley guys (example: Sundar Pichai) who start their pronouncements with “Because I have daughters…”, this part of the article is disturbing: “The 72-year-old is married and has two daughters.”

The tenure system was established at a time when it was legal and conventional to have a mandatory retirement age. So it was a job guarantee from age 35-65, not from 35-90. Will the #MeToo movement be the catalyst for meaningful access to university jobs for young people?

[Update: They didn’t even have to fire the guy… “Harvard Professor Resigns Amid Allegations of Sexual Harassment” (nytimes).]

Related:

Full post, including comments

PLATO and early computer games

The Friendly Orange Glow: The Untold Story of the PLATO System and the Dawn of Cyberculture (Brian Dear 2017; Pantheon) exhaustively chronicles the first popular multiplayer computer games.

From a software engineering point of view, the PLATO shared mainframe wasn’t that different from Amazon’s game servers today. The client (terminal)had a lot less capability than today’s PC or Web browser, but the basic idea of a central shared memory holding the state of the game hasn’t changed.

PLATO was the first system that gathered up a lot of simultaneous users on terminals with reasonable graphics capability (512×512 resolution in the early 1970s!) and allowed them to burn up precious computer time. The PLATO terminals also had a touch screen with 16×16 resolution.

John Daleske wrote a hugely popular game inspired by Star Trek:

The first version of Empire was primitive: one screen containing one “universe” consisting of eight planets. It only supported eight people at a time, but that was six more than any other game of the era. (Indeed, this first version of Empire may be the first graphical, interactive multiplayer computer game anywhere that supported more than two players simultaneously.) If you weren’t one of the lucky eight players, you had to settle for “lurking,” standing in line, watching the game from the outside.

“In the first version of Empire,” Warner says, “eight players could play against each other. They were not allied in any way.” No Klingons, Feds, Romulans, or Orions— all that would come later. “Just players, one to a planet. They were in fact controllers of each planet.” Like later versions of Empire, the first version of the game had little icons representing the spaceships. But instead of piloting the spaceships, players would simply direct the spaceship to go from one planet to another, and when a ship arrived at another planet, a player could trade with that planet, or fight with that planet, or drop bombs, and so forth. Spaceship combat was automatic: if two spaceships got within a certain distance you would either have the choice of passing or fighting. If they fought, the battle was automatic. “That version of Empire was actually continued after the second version, under the name Conquest,” Silas recalls. His version evolved to support six universes, each a sort of separate level of the game, where you could jump from one to the other. “Usually, universe 1 was always full,” Warner recalls. “Universe 2 was sort of halfway there, and there might be a pickup, an arranged game, in universe 4.”

It didn’t work out too well when an actual Star Trek hero arrived on the scene:

Spock without his Vulcan ears. A few days’ start on a beard. Smelling like booze.

It was Tuesday, May 7, 1974. Actor Leonard Nimoy was in town, on a press junket, meeting with reporters, grabbing a bite in the back room of a local restaurant (where Nimoy, more interested in talking about his serious acting, grew aloof at reporters’ incessant Star Trek questions— didn’t they realize the Trek series had ended five years earlier?), …

(when it was PLATO demo time) to the shock and dismay of the gathered onlookers, the ultra-logical Spock in real life knew nothing about chess. “I didn’t expect Nimoy to actually compete with the computer,” says Frankel, “but I figured he’d move a few pawns around and be amused that the computer could interpret his actions and respond. Plus our graphics were pretty sweet— most chess programs at the time were purely alphanumeric.” Nimoy’s Vulcan counterpart was celebrated as not only an expert at playing chess, but an expert at 3D chess. To discover that in real life the actor didn’t know chess at all was devastating to the gathered Trek fans.

PLATO offered the first mass-market flight simulation game:

Brand Fortner, located right at CERL, had already written Airfight, which seemed destined from the very start to be an insanely popular game. There had been nothing like it before. It was another PLATO first, in the long, long line of PLATO firsts: a first-person-perspective, multiplayer, shoot-’ em-right-out-of-the-sky flight simulator. And until Empire came along, it had ruled the PLATO gaming world. Fortner had stumbled upon a simple PLATO game called Air Ace, where you could type in some parameters, press NEXT, and “about ten seconds later,” says Fortner, “it would redraw line graphics of the cockpit and you would see outside of the plane. And I thought, Well, that is an interesting idea, but gee, wouldn’t it be nice if you could fly a lot faster and shoot down other people?” By today’s standards, Airfight’s graphics and realism, like every other PLATO game, are hopelessly primitive. But in the 1970s Airfight was simply unbelievable. These rooms full of PLATO terminals weren’t “PLATO classrooms,” they were PLATO arcades, and they were free.

You’d hit “9” to set the throttle at maximum, “a” for afterburners, “w” a few times to pull the stick back (using those PLATO arrow keys again), and then NEXT NEXT NEXT NEXT NEXT NEXT NEXT to update the screen as you rolled down the runway, lifted off, and shot up into the sky to join the fight. It might be seconds or minutes, depending on how far away the enemy airplanes were, before you saw dots in the sky, dots that as you flew closer and closer turned into little circles and triangles.

Bruce Artwick, another University of Illinois graduate student, used PLATO terminal parts to make a more realistic flight simulator in the mid-1970s. He stuck with this area and eventually licensed his work to become Microsoft Flight Simulator.

Everything bad that people say today about computer games and computer games they said in the 1970s about PLATO games and PLATO gamers. Addicts stayed up all night to play games, got bad grades, dropped out of school, withdrew from face-to-face socializing.

There was another unexpected outcome. At some point, a point that varied depending on the person, PLATO became more than a novelty in the lives of its more obsessed users. These users would cross an invisible line beyond which being on PLATO became one’s life. There were countless examples of this. One was Mark Eastom, says Bruce Maggs, one of the authors of Avatar. Maggs roomed with Eastom during one of his undergraduate years, and Eastom became one of Avatar’s operators, contributing by managing the monster data. “He was a real character,” says Maggs. “PLATO was his life, he was one of these guys for whom this was it. This was all they had in their lives: their PLATO programming and PLATO game playing and PLATO friendships. There were a lot of people like that.” Living the PLATO life could turn into an addiction, a dangerous path to take. A PLATO-addicted college student risked grades suffering, possibly delaying graduation, or, worse, expulsion or dropping out. All of these outcomes were, sadly, commonplace.

Many UI students from the 1970s and 1980s would in time confess to the havoc PLATO wreaked on their college careers. Michael Schwager was one. “I first saw Plato in 1977,” he says. “I got accepted to the U of I in 1978 and became addicted to it, playing Empire till 6 a.m. In 1979 I flunked out of school, but I got good at PLATO.” David Sides, one of the coauthors of Avatar, stared into the abyss, grade-wise, a few times thanks to overdoing it on PLATO. “I know I got into a lot of trouble sophomore year, because I was ending up too long at the computer lab, I was there until three or four in the morning, and I had real grade problems that first semester of my sophomore year because of it. I didn’t flunk out of anything, but I got a D in a midterm in chemistry, and that made a real major impression on me, and it was a real problem.”

There was, for instance, a notesfile called = addict =, dedicated to PLATO addiction. In it, users could offer true confessions of their predicament: how PLATO felt to them, how being away from PLATO felt, and how getting back online felt. One user in 1981 described his PLATO experience this way: “When I do get on… blooie…. End of sanity. End to sense of proportion. End to perspective on what is important in life. When I first got on in 1975, I used to lay awake at night thinking, ‘Gee, I can’t wait until I get on tomorrow,’ and getting an author signon was the greatest ambition I had.” Another user expressed his PLATO predicament this way: “The orange dots are more personal to me than face-to-face encounters with people I don’t know. This may be because when you leave a note with your signon attached, it is there for a long time, much longer than a spoken word is around, and therefore tends to be more thought out. Those who say computers are impersonal have never used a computer. They are far more personal than most people. P.S. Computer games are better than sex.”

Like most other users of mainframes, PLATO programmers generally failed to see the appeal of microcomputers. What is interesting about a machine with limited CPU and memory and no communications capability? Nonetheless, a few PLATO alumni become the authors of popular PC games. Silas Warner developed Castle Wolfenstein, for example. Brodie Lockard, paralyzed after a gymnastics accident at Stanford, used a mouth stick to program Shanghai.

This part of the book is interesting because we think that we are living in a new age, and maybe we are if we look at the number of people who spend a lot of their time gaming, but in reality it seems that there isn’t much new except lower prices and better graphics.

More: Read The Friendly Orange Glow: The Untold Story of the PLATO System and the Dawn of Cyberculture

Related:

Full post, including comments

The joys of living in Massachusetts

Massachusetts is one of the most lucrative states in which to profit from having been married or having had a child (see our family law). The profitability of marriage per se, however, was scaled back in 2012 due to an “alimony reform” that limited the period under which a plaintiff could profit from alimony based on (a) the number of years of the pre-lawsuit marriage, and (b) whether the person profiting from alimony was living in a “marriage-type” relationship. (Because alimony profits are terminated when a profiteer remarries, it has become conventional in Massachusetts to simply live together with a new sex partner while continuing to bank funds from the former sex partner.)

Following the new law there ensued dozens of lawsuits over whether the changed rules impaired alimony profits secured prior to the cut-off date. Apparently the law was ambiguous. A recent attempt to clarify the situation was killed by Will Brownsberger (lawyer) and his committee, which includes Cynthia Creem, a practicing divorce litigator who earns more than $500/hour arguing these ambiguities.

The comments on the legislator’s page “Retroactive application of new alimony rules” shed light on the experience of being a Massachusetts resident.

From the sole female commenter who seems also to be an alimony payor:

My ex is hiding behind a BiPolar disability and also collecting SSDI [genius!]. He is physically and mentally able to support himself yet I am forced to pay my abuser $550 every WEEK! Why? Because iofbantiquated laws? Because no one had the courage to do the right thing? Is there no relief for me? My children are in their mid 30’s. I shouldn’t have to support this person who is playing every angle of every system so that he can to be a freeloader. … No one is entitled to a lifetime of free support and no one should be fired into involuntary slavery… my marriage license didn’t come with directions. If I signed a contract, I wasn’t given the terms of the contract that contained a lifetime slavery clause. Isn’t that fraud? Even a pack of cigarettes come with warnings. Shouldn’t marriage licenses?? [Her “No one is entitled to a lifetime of free support” statement would be true in Texas or Germany!]

From the new female partners of the divorce lawsuit losers:

It was very clear during the ARA process in 2011 that the intention was for the changes to apply to already-settled divorces. As to the argument that payees would have negotiated differently if they had known that the terms could be changed: Trust that my husband would have negotiated differently during his divorce from his ex-wife if he had had all the facts, as well. If he had known she had been siphoning money from his paychecks during their entire marriage and had secret accounts; if he had known she had been cheating on him with women since their engagement; if he had known that she would be cohabitating for the next fifteen years …

My partner was married for just under 20 years and has been divorced for over 20 years. He has paid child support and college tuition and over $400K in alimony so far. His divorce judgment was completely unfair, as his ex-wife was perfectly capable of working and could have made a very comfortable living without all his additional money.
As we both look toward retirement, the yearly alimony cost continues to hang over our head. Why should we have to work longer to give someone else our hard-earned money. That makes no sense.
I, too, was divorced, but I am an independent, employed, self supporting parent who wouldn’t want to be dependent on anyone to support me for the rest of my life. It sets back women’s rights back a hundred years. [she needs to review the updated definition of feminism!]

I was widowed at 36 left with three young children to raise on my own. In time I remarried, never realizing that the corrupt State of MA would actually use me and my tragic situation to subsidize my husband’s adulterous ex wife who was co-habitating with her still married boyfriend. Her wicked lawyer tried to bring me into the case, trying to gain access to my deceased husband’s estate and my Fatherless children’s bank accounts. They did all this so that they could prove my husband had enough money with me contributing so he could pay her more. He gave his ex 3/4 of his money and I was left to support the household on my own. Even after we had another child together they left me without any help. I could write a book on all the injustices that the state put me and my young children through. Alimony and child support are a joke. Women use the money for fancy houses, new cars, and luxury vacations. There is something seriously flawed with a system that leaves 99 percent of women rich and the men destitute. Women are then able to go to their second marriages with 3 incomes and men who even try to get remarried can’t even contribute to their households. if they have children with their second wife, these kids are not allowed the same standard of living because they are second class citizens.

My husband is 67 years old and has no hope of retirement if his alimony burden of $400 a week, plus 25% of his yearly bonus (for a total of $25,000 a year) isn’t eliminated or at the very least reduced. His ex-wife collects disability and most likely nets more income each week than he does! His 401K was split 50/50 in the divorce. Why should he continue to pay her out of his retirement income too?

Why is it fair or correct that a person receiving alimony should live in a marriage type relationship and still collect alimony? This is not 1974 where cohabitation was considered improper.

My husband was divorced two months too early and now has a lifetime of alimony to a woman who has chosen to work part time. The 20 hours a week she works as a child-care worker is equal to the hours I spend commuting to my job at the federal courthouse in Boston, and then I work a 50-hour week. She lives in a brand-new townhome and we are residing in an attic of an 1800’s home (three-story walkup).

From the men:

my ex is now very well financially secure. She has a wonderful job, making a six figure salary, all three children are independent (ages 25-31), her home is fully paid off, no debt, a new car every few years, wonderful vacations multiple times per year, etc. She has a boyfriend of over 6 years that she refuses to marry so that she doesn’t lose the alimony payment. My divorce was finalized over 15 years ago. I had no issue with paying the alimony during the period of transition and I went above and beyond the divorce agreement by paying well over 90% of the three children’s private (2) and public college tuition costs, when my obligation was 50%. My ex is financially stable and I find it totally unfair to have to pay alimony for the rest of my life.

My ex-wife has a four year college degree, she is very healthy and chooses to work 4 hours a day, and only during the school year, as I struggle to make end meet. She has no interest in becoming self sufficient, she has me supporting her for the rest of my life. She has enjoyed vacations out of the country and several cruises to the Caribbean, I work, period. I will never be able to retire, and as I am now 60 years old, having worked since the age of 14, the thought of working until I die, or my health fails dramatically is nothing I look forward to. I was under the mistaken impression the Alimony Reform Act would allow me to retire, or at least be able to work beyond retirement, and put a way money to retire, as currently my retirement money has and continues to go towards alimony.

Sorry folks but repeal of lifetime alimony must have been a devastating blow to the divorce industry, if given a choice between waiting out a perhaps unjust 10 year sentence or throwing away tens of thousands of dollars or more seeking justice in a kangaroo court, most rational people probably do the math and choose the former. More than just doing the math, a tenner in Gulag parlance is an injustice that the spirit can survive. The lifetime sentence is something that the spirit can’t survive, like a chain that bites deeper into the skin as time goes on. On the business end a slave for life is much easier to defraud than someone doing a tenner, the false hope the divorce industry sells can’t get a very good price when the victim knows he or she will walk away a free person at some point.

I wonder how you’d enjoy your ex-spouse (in my case, ex-wife) enjoying the life or Riley with her live-in boyfriend of five years, another for six years prior, while I send along her weekly checks to support her drinking habits! I am left to support one in college and saddled with all of the $80,000 tuition of the other. She doesn’t make any payments on either. She works for cash so as not to jeopardize her eligibility for alimony. You have no idea how hard this is to watch her enjoy her financial freedom, out in the bars every night with her co-habitant boyfriend!

I was a young man when I got divorced at the age of 27 years old. For over the next 30 years I was paying alimony to a spouse who was working and cohabitating all those years. … I am an old man now and am still working. I live a simple lifestyle compared to former spouse and boyfriend who have had it all.

My alimony was based on my working salary of over 100k per annum. When I retired in 2003 after 37 years of government service, my salary dropped to 65k. I have had to go through all of my 401k to support this alimony, to the point where I may have to file for bankruptcy. At 72 years of age this is grossly unfair to have to pay my ex spouse $560 per month, especially considering that she now receives a trust fund from her deceased boy friend.

I will never understand why it is that I need to continue alimony to my ex-wife through retirement when she already received 1/2 my pension and 1/2 my 401k.

I think it would be interesting to interview people preparing to get married and then live in Massachusetts and see if reading the above comments affected their enthusiasm either regarding (a) entering into a civil marriage, or (b) continuing to reside in Massachusetts and running the risk of ending up like of the commenters. [Option (c), entering into a prenuptial agreement that controls alimony, is not possible to do with any certainty in MA; see Massachusetts Prenuptial Agreements.] Is love so powerful that it can sweep away all caution? Or is it simply that most people are’t familiar with these outcomes, reasonably predictable in the event that the lower-income partner files a divorce lawsuit? (we did a quick survey in Harvard Square and found that college-educated adult residents knew virtually nothing about Massachusetts family law)

Related:

Full post, including comments

People who hate inequality want poor Americans to pay for a $30 billion Wall Streeter tunnel

A Facebook friend posted “Words fail me … #Trumpanitcs” on top of “Trump Pushes Republicans in Congress to Oppose Funding Hudson Rail Tunnel” (nytimes):

President Trump is pressing congressional Republicans to oppose funding for a new rail tunnel between New York and New Jersey, using the power of his office to block a key priority for the region and his Democratic rivals, according to several people with knowledge of his actions.

Mr. Trump urged Speaker Paul D. Ryan this week not to support funding for the $30 billion project, two people familiar with the conversation said.

$30 billion for a short tunnel? The world’s longest and deepest tunnel, opened in 2016, cost roughly $10 billion (Wikipedia). I accepted the assumption that the president of a country that is $21 trillion in debt wouldn’t oppose this purely on the grounds of efficiency and a theory that, if $30 billion must be borrowed, it could be better spent elsewhere. The same friend, when professing his love for Hillary Clinton and/or hatred for Donald Trump, tirelessly beats the inequality drum. So I asked

If you’re concerned about inequality, why would you want the Federal government to subsidize this $30 billion project anyway? Wouldn’t it make inequality in the U.S. more extreme if low- and middle-income taxpayers in the Midwest or South have to pay for a train tunnel to be used by high-income residents of the NY/NJ region? If it actually does make sense to spend $30 billion, why not have NY/NJ fund this themselves?

The consensus response among the virtuous Trump-haters on the thread:

The mid-west has not pulled its own weight in federal taxes in 40 years

Pull their weight means those states get more in Federal funding than they pay

ÇA subsidizes about 5-7 of those states if you count the state budgets as well, and more like 10 if you only count federal tax xfer

In fact if these states were to pay back the coastal Blue states over the next 30 years and balance their own budgets, they would have to triple their state taxes on average

if “we are concerned about inequality,” should’t we be asking states that aren’t solvent and can’t afford the price of admission to politely exit through the rear door?

These folks don’t have any problem with individual Americans being on welfare for decades and, in fact, consistently vote to expand government handouts (free housing, free healthcare, free food, free smartphones, etc.) to individuals. But they don’t like Americans collected into a state not “pulling their weight”? [Note that the assumption that a river of cash is flowing from correct-thinkers to Deplorables may be incorrect: “Against a national average of $1,935 in intergovernmental spending per American, red states receive just $1,879. Blue states get considerably more, at $2,124 per resident.”]

Taxpayers in KY and AL don’t even fully fund the projects they receive. They fund NOTHING out of state

we give them HUGE subsidies, and yet they believe they get none.

if they are going to vote to cut the benefits they receive, let’s accommodate them

I asked why it mattered what “they” believed (assuming any of these virtuous coastal dwellers actually have personal contact with Deplorables in the Midwestern and Southern states). Would it make sense to deny state assistance to people who don’t believe the same things as the elites? Someone living in means-tested public housing has to leave and pay market rents because he or she has incorrect beliefs? They want to reduce inequality, but only among those who believe the same things that they believe?

On the subjecting of voting, I pointed out that fully one third of folks in West Virginia virtuously voted for Hillary Clinton. Why punish them because of the incorrect political beliefs of their neighbors? Aren’t they already suffering sufficiently in having to live near Trump supporters?

Maybe some of those low income states need to be depopulated?

It’s painful, but if a state’s economy for example grew around coal and coal is no longer in demand (or auto manufacturing, steel production, etc) how can one possibly fix that other than by the most artificial means?

I responded by pointing out that schoolteachers in West Virginia are on strike right now and say that they get paid less than teachers in other states. Why not give them the $30 billion so that this inequality is rectified? None of the inequality-obsessed coastal dwellers wanted to do that.

Why is it obviously fair, though, for someone in Kentucky to pay for a tunnel for use by the Wall Street folks who trashed the economy in 2008? Suppose that it were true that Kentucky has been collecting federal welfare for decades. If there is still inequality, with people in Kentucky being less wealthy than people in New Jersey and New York, wouldn’t it make sense to increase the federal welfare flow to Kentucky rather than trying to pull the money in reverse for this new tunnel?

In short, if the answer for a low-income individual is “more welfare” (not to be confused with “more cowbell”) why is the answer for a low-income state “less welfare”?

[We can’t say that the U.S. has historically run this way, can we? During the Great Depression, for example, the Tennessee Valley Authority was created to build infrastructure in a comparatively poor region of the U.S. They didn’t have a “let’s make the rich states even richer” spending plan back then, did they?]

Related:

  • “The Most Expensive Mile of Subway Track on Earth” (nytimes) on how New Yorkers will pay themselves $400/hour when they do get hold of tax dollars harvested in Alabama and Kentucky
  • Oresund Bridge (5-mile suspension bridge and 2.5-mile tunnel connecting Sweden and Denmark, built essentially without taxpayer funds for roughly 1/10th the cost of this proposed NJ/NY link (a 2.5-mile tunnel))
Full post, including comments

Are the same FBI agents who investigated the Tsarnaev brothers investigating Russia and the 2016 election?

Hasn’t it been more than a year since America’s best investigators sunk their teeth into the meaty subject of Russian interference with the 2016 Presidential election? What are their results?

I keep seeing “Russia bad” in the headlines, but can’t figure out what has been determined, other than some Russians have accounts on Facebook and/or run ads on Facebook (but can they possibly be more contemptuous of folks who disagree with them than my actual Facebook friends?)

The Empire State Building was completed in 13 months. In our digital age when the malefactors have purportedly done everything digitally (i.e., at the speed of light), why hasn’t this investigation been wrapped up after 13(?) months?

Full post, including comments

Who watched the Oscars?

Who watched the Oscars? My friend’s 11-year-old daughter made him watch it and then mocked what she felt to be the crude promotion of women as a class (she doesn’t see her own female gender ID as a handicap, a failure of our local school system?).

If these folks are serious about shielding Americans from the products of white males, why not shift from U.S. production to importing movies from China and India? Both countries have comprehensive film industries that are generally free of white male influence (Iran also makes some great movies, but maybe some directors there would be considered too white?). Profitability could be increased because production costs are lower in China and India? The U.S. industry can still make some movies, but have them all directed by Harvey Weinstein’s former shower buddies?

Readers: If you watched the Oscars, what did you take away from the show? Did the movies that won deserve to win?

Related:

Full post, including comments

PLATO and the glorious hopes that our cybernetic betters would teach us

The Friendly Orange Glow: The Untold Story of the PLATO System and the Dawn of Cyberculture (Brian Dear 2017; Pantheon) is about a mainframe-based computer system that died before most of today’s young coder heroes were born.

The book is kind of interesting, nonetheless, for what it reveals about human hopes that machines will take over our most onerous chores. We have a vacuum cleaner and a dishwasher, so why not a robot teacher for the youngsters that the government paid us to create?

Harvard professor B.F. Skinner arguably kicked off the idea of teaching by machine circa 1954:

Skinner’s machine is a plywood box some fifteen inches high, wide, and deep. The hinged top opens so that a scroll of pleated paper tape can be loaded inside. Typewritten onto the paper are arithmetic problems to be solved by the student; the answers to each problem are encoded as small holes, like in a player piano, punched in very specific places to denote a corresponding value. When the box top is shut, you can read the math problems, one at a time, through a small opening in the top of the box, showing a small, exposed area of the paper. You might see a math problem, such as “3 + 2,” through the viewing window on the top side of the box. To answer the problem, you manipulate a series of what Skinner called “sliders” that can be moved up or down through slits in the wood, serving as number scales. This particular math problem is looking for a one-digit answer, so only one slider need be moved into place. The correct slider to move is the one that causes numbers to appear in the hole under the “3 + 2.” Pull the slider toward yourself and the number increases up to 9. Push it away and it drops to zero. Once you’ve formed your answer you can attempt to turn a big black knob on the front side of the box. If the answer is correct, the knob turns freely and the scroll advances to the next problem. This is how you know your answer is correct. If the knob is locked and the scroll won’t advance, you know you’re wrong.

Down the river at MIT, Skinner’s ideas were not popular:

Instead of a machine teaching a student, Papert was in favor of children teaching machines, and in so doing, learning about mathematical concepts, not to mention gaining skills in computer programming. “I find Skinner somewhat of a contradiction,” Papert once confessed to this author, “because as a person he’s intellectually very rich and multi-sided and very literate and likes poetry and I think is a great person. When he thinks about children and education, there’s a lot of richness. The form in which it takes when it gets out into the world is extremely,” he said, pausing for a moment as if to choose the next word carefully, “pernicious. He has a very pernicious doctrine. The pernicious doctrine being that you can break up knowledge into fragments and guide children toward acquiring the knowledge like you might involve the behavior of a rat or a pigeon. I find that a contradiction. I find when you think of Skinner as a whole person, he’s so far away from this kind of thinking and practice of education, well, I’m full of wonderment that he isn’t the main critic of the way that his ideas are being used in the world.”

The idea of computerizing teaching was written about as early as 1958 in a paper by three IBM employees: Gustave Rath, Nancy S. Anderson, and R. C. Brainerd. They’d written a system for students on an IBM 650, but noted that it really needed to be time-shared for efficiency (bizarrely, after citing these IBMers for proposing time-sharing, the author of this book has fallen so deeply in love with his University of Illinois PLATO subjects that he attributes the invention of time-sharing to them, circa 1960 (Wikipedia says that the idea goes back to 1954 and John Backus, who was developing Fortran at the time for IBM. and that the first practical implementation was by John McCarthy, the inventor of Lisp (God’s own programming language), at MIT in 1959)).

The original PLATO system (“Programmed Logic for Automatic Teaching Operations”) ran on the tube-based ILLIAC I mainframe, with its roughly 5,000 bytes of RAM (compare to 4 GB on the latest smartphones, so that’s roughly 1 million times more memory!). Thus the very first implementation relied substantially on a computer-controlled slide projector within the “terminal”.

People forget just how capable early computer nerds were. The University of Illinois team behind PLATO was in theory mostly about delivering an educational experience, but they were not shy about building hardware, including plasma displays, or systems software, such as their own time-sharing operating system and their own computer language: TUTOR.

They also experimented with adding custom hardware for teaching:

“Alphabat,” designed to help young children learn the letters of the alphabet, was a new lesson authored by Amy Alpert (daughter of Dan Alpert), one of the high school kids who like Mike Walker worked on PLATO-related projects with Bitzer as mentor. “Kids who identified the correct letter on the screen were given an M& M,” says Mike Walker, “which was ejected by a contraption powered by a washing machine relay…. It was a bit too powerful and occasionally obliterated the piece of candy.”

National Science Foundation was funding a handful of competitors for computer-based training:

Whereas PLATO was open, flexible, and devoid of any particular instructional theory limiting lesson authors to developing lessons that followed a particular design, TICCIT would reflect a single instructional theory burned not only into the software, but into the hardware as well, right in the keyboard with its special keys for RULE, EXAMPLE, PRACTICE. The culture of the TICCIT lab at BYU could not have been more different than CERL. For one thing, staff meetings were far more formal affairs, always starting with a prayer. Meticulous minutes were kept, typed up in memos, and filed away.

The fact that the projects were so radically different appealed to NSF. They already loved PLATO and had been familiar with Bitzer and Alpert for years. They recognized that TICCIT represented a wholly different approach, both at the scale (supporting a maximum of 128 color TV terminals running on a minicomputer, versus PLATO IV’s much heralded 4,096 terminals running on a supercomputer) and in terms of its instructional design model. “TICCIT was prepared,” says Arthur Melmed, “to demonstrate a certain kind of interaction in a relatively efficient way, and I thought that deserved a crack.” In 1972 both systems received roughly $ 5 million each from Congress. The race was on.

The idea of gamified learning was moderately successful on PLATO back in the 1970s:

Torpedo, another lesson focused on similar fractions problems, presented a situation where a student could play against other students or play against PLATO. The player operated a submarine deep in the ocean, above which swam occasional fish, octopi, and other creatures, and at the surface was a ship. The ocean surface served as the number line, this time horizontal, and the player needed to move their sub backward (by entering the desired negative amount, be it an integer or a fraction) or forward, and then the sub would fire a torpedo upward in an effort to hit the enemy ship. If some creature were in-between, it might get hit by the torpedo instead. The game resembled the popular video arcade game Space Invaders that would come out years later, although with Space Invaders there was no need to know anything about fractions; players simply moved a joystick left or right and fired away.

But it didn’t work in general:

December 1975 was the end of the first semester of the “demonstration year” for NSF and the Educational Testing Service (ETS). Testing revealed that the kids utilizing the elementary reading PLATO lessons were reading at a far lower level than the kids who were in the control classes. “The PLATO lessons were actually having a negative impact upon the kids,” says Yeager.

On the third hand, prisoners liked it:

The PCP project revealed interesting insights into the use of PLATO by its user population. “You couldn’t find,” says Siegel, “a more disadvantaged, disenfranchised, turned-off, uneducated group of people than the kind of people you found in prisons. And as you can imagine, survival in a prison means maintaining a kind of tough-guy image. If you are thought of as weak, bad things are likely to happen to you…. And so typically what happens is, a lot of people will not even opt for educational classes because that’s seen as weak. Or if you’re sort of required to sit in an educational class in a prison, you’re likely to try to misbehave or be the class clown, or act in some way that shows your disinterest. Not because you really are, but because you can’t afford to be wrong in front of your peers. So when the teacher says, ‘Where does the comma go in this sentence?’ and you don’t know the answer to that, you say something that indicates you don’t need to— that that’s irrelevant, or those aren’t the words that someone would say, but it would be the equivalent of that sort of blowing it off. You would blow off the task in front of your fellow classmates. That’s the sort of environment that we were stepping into.”

The inmates discovered not only the advantages of Self-Pacing and Immediate Feedback, but the fact that they were free— in the middle of a prison where there is no freedom or privacy to speak of— to learn, privately, at their own pace, and without fear of ridicule or threats of bodily harm or worse. The computer provided a way to learn that they were not used to. No tough-guy act was required, nor would PLATO have even known how tough a guy you were. You could answer a question and be told you were wrong and why you were wrong, and it was okay. You could answer a question and be told you were right, and that was okay too. PLATO provided a safe space for learning.

The original idea of PCP was to develop some courseware for inmates and then deploy it at a handful of Illinois prisons. The Department of Justice funding was expected to last only a few years. It had originally come from the administrations of Nixon and Gerald Ford. When Jimmy Carter was elected, the Democrats looked around for funding to cut, and the PCP project was put on the chopping block. “They saw these kinds of projects as pet projects of the Republican administration,” says Siegel, “and so there was a freeze on all of these projects. An indiscriminate freeze, I mean they didn’t look at ‘Is this a good project or a bad project’— it was a Republican project: bad idea. And we were shut down.”

Was all lost when the Great Father in Washington diverted the river of cash? No, the state of Illinois liked the system well enough to support it with state tax dollars for another 10+ years. (On the third hand, maybe this, plus pensions, contributed to Illinois being out of cash now!)

Control Data Corporation, the vendor of the mainframe on which PLATO had been running, took over the project and began to commercialize everything. The director of the lab at University of Illinois struck a deal with CDC where they would pay big royalties on the hardware and systems software where he had been a co-inventor, but small royalties for courseware that other folks had written. The course authors were enraged, but began fighting over the scraps nonetheless.

The effect the CDC-Illinois deal had on CERL was significant. “It became like independent little companies inside the laboratory,” recalls former

Full post, including comments