Month: April 2018

Several of my remaining Facebook friends have announced plans to leave the platform. They say that they are gradually deleting all of their old posts and that they can be reached via email(!).

For those who wish to preserve some of their best Facebook content in PDF form, Postclipper.com is a free service that allows users to select favorite Facebook postings into one or more books and, for each book, export a PDF version. (I was one of the authors of this software/service, along with Avni Khatri and John Morgan.)

We designed the software/service for people who were going to stay on Facebook, but wanted to segregate out content related to one child or one vacation. It turns out, however, that Postclipper is useful for people who are leaving Facebook.

Separately, can anyone tell me what Mark Zuckerberg said yesterday at the Senate? I didn’t tune in myself because it strikes me that the most serious problems with Facebook are right out in the open, e.g., that it turns people into junkies for news and political information that has no effect on their lives, or that it turns formerly fairly nice people into 24/7 hate/outrage-spewers. (ARPAnet and USENET discussion forums could degrade into flame wars, but the percentage of content that was devoted to hatred regarding abstract political phenomena was much smaller. So this is not a problem inherent to Internet.)

Finally, is there any reason for the average American to need news, other than the weather forecast, more than once per week? Or political information more than once every calendar quarter? Let me scan today’s nytimes.com:

• FBI wants to find out which women were paid to have sex with Donald Trump 10+ years ago and keep quiet about it
• Nigerian schoolgirls previously abducted by an Islamic group are now at a university
• The Law is Coming, Mr. Trump (editorial hatred from the nytimes)
• Paul Ryan is retiring (so people in his district will have to vote for someone else this fall)
• Walter Mondale says that we are ignoring the Fair Housing Act of 1968 (if we have been ignoring it for 50 years, why can’t we ignore it for up to one additional week?)
• The FBI is attacking Trump through the lawyer that paid off Stormy Daniels
• Trump is allegedly taking the bait on Syria (the government supposedly used chemical weapons there, which doesn’t make any obvious military sense (since the government has bombs, artillery, etc.), but it provides a perfect pretext for a U.S. invasion or similar)
• “Pro Cheerleaders Say Groping and Sexual Harassment Are Part of the Job” (photos suggest substantial age and gender discrimination by employers, but the nytimes is not upset by this; see also Family Law Issues for NFL Players, Child Support, Paternity & Prenups by Randall Kessler for a guide to the profitability of getting close to a football player)
• Ilyushin Il-76 plane crashes in Algeria

How would any of the readers have been worse off waiting until Sunday morning to learn about this? It is unfortunate that people died in the plane crash, but is any reader today going to hop on a plane to Algeria and try to help out?

How about the news that I got on Facebook today, highlighted by friends…

• a purported white supremacist died in his home bomb lab in Wisconsin
• “Zuckerberg made it clear he doesn’t care about users.” (over an article about Zuckerberg’s testimony)
• an article on how to tell if one’s information was shared with Cambridge Analytica (how would I behave differently if it had or had not?)
• Arizona cuts off college tuition subsidies for non-citizens (DREAMers can still go to college, but they have to pay the same tuition as, e.g., a citizen-resident of California)
• BP said that an oil spill off the coast of Australia would boost the local economy (probably true if we use the GDP measure; another good reason to get rid of GDP, which also goes up when citizens’ lives are degraded by population growth)
• “Elon Musk to the Young and Ambitious: Skills Matter More Than Degrees” (Inc.); see also Tesla’s recent recruiting effort at Harvard University
• a bunch of articles related to young American women who purported had sex with an old rich guy and/or the ensuing cash flow

I could have waited until Sunday for this stuff too.

Maybe Americans who want to be productive and happy need a firewall programmed so that social networking and news sites are available only on Sunday mornings?

Related:

• “Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook hearing was an utter sham” (by Zephyr Teachout)
• Why Facebook is so addictive: the Like button
• Facebook is bad for us (says the sociologist)

Full post, including comments

Here’s a sign from the Boston Public Garden:

City officials say that giving birds free food and shelter within the City of Boston will lead to overpopulation and environmental damage. Furthermore, they’ll be reluctant to migrate away.

I wonder if these folks ever walk over to the government offices that run the SNAP (food stamps; free food for humans) and public housing (free housing for humans, including Barack Obama’s ordered-by-a-judge-to-migrate Aunt Zeituni (she apparently preferred NOT to migrate, despite the deportation order)) programs and, if so, how the conversations go…

[The Boston Housing Authority says it “processes over 10,000 new applications every year. There are thousands of more applicants than there are available housing units – so the selected waiting lists can be very long.” In other words, there is already “overpopulation” if you consider the mismatch between the supply of housing and the demand from humans.]

Full post, including comments

Available now, the Stormy Daniels action figure:

(spotted at Harrison’s Comics at the Woburn Mall, walking off a dim sum meal at New China Pearl)

Full post, including comments

Friends send their smart kids to the Buckingham Browne and Nichols private school in Cambridge. They texted me from Disney World in mid-March. Public schools in Massachusetts have one-week breaks in February and April. It is tough to go anywhere warm during these breaks due to airline tickets and hotel rooms being scarce and expensive. It seems that BB&N does a two-week break in March. Kids can travel to Asia and have enough time to de-jetlag. Families can take a one-week or 10-day trip without having to pay $1,200 per airline ticket.

If it works for the BB&N families, why can’t a public school system do it too?

I talked to our town’s superintendent. She said that there is no law requiring a mass exodus in Mass (so to speak), but that talk of a change gets shut down due to (1) trying to keep athletic team schedules in sync and, more importantly, (2) keeping school employees who have children in nearby local school systems in vacation sync with their kids.

But maybe it would make sense if the whole state moved to a two-week block? Then there wouldn’t be a mad rush for Logan Airport on a Friday afternoon. People would naturally end up with slightly staggered travel schedules because not too many families would go away for the entire two weeks.

Full post, including comments

A productivity-oriented friend said that she mostly sees news about the Russia investigation when she’s at work. “It makes me feel better and reminds me not to complain about the people at [BigCo] who do nothing.”

Related:

• Are the same FBI agents who investigated the Tsarnaev brothers investigating Russia and the 2016 election?

Full post, including comments

“At $75,560, housing a prisoner in California now costs more than a year at Harvard” (LA Times) is a great companion to the classic “California Prison Academy: Better Than a Harvard Degree” (WSJ), which notes that it is tougher to get into the California Prison Academy than into Harvard and that graduates, on average, earn more than Harvard grads.

Full post, including comments

In How much would an immigrant have to earn to defray the cost of added infrastructure? I wondered if we could afford to have immigrants living in America.

Looking at the materials that we got in advance of a recent “town meeting” (non-anonymous mob democracy, New England-style), I’m wondering if Americans can afford to live in America.

Town elites want to spend $100 million on a new school (see Why wouldn’t a Massachusetts town set up a school for gifted and talented students? for the numbers; on a per-student basis, it is more than the endowment for most of America’s better colleges and universities). To show us that everyone else is doing it too, we are shown a $65 million elementary school in Lexington, Massachusetts for 423 students ($153,664 per student; $593 per square foot; the Hastings School).

What else are we supposed to approve? We need a new fire engine… $600,000. Our library needs a replacement air conditioner… for $305,000. How big is this library? About the size of two serious McMansions: 18,600 square feet. How can it possibly cost $305,000 if they don’t have to run any new ducts or power lines? Asking this question at the meeting would be about as socially acceptable as putting a TRUMP sign on one’s lawn or painting an 8′-wide Confederate flag on the street side of one’s house.

The town will spend $16,000 on an Internet firewall and $26,000 on “email migration to cloud”.

Thanks to the Millionaires for Obama preventing the placement of any cell towers in our bucolic hamlet, our heroic first responders cannot communicate via mobile telephone. They need five new portable radios for $13,785. What kind of radios should they buy? A “Radio Communications Consultant Public Safety” will help them shop… for $14,000 additional.

Circling back to the main topic… given that our buildings and other infrastructure don’t last forever, how can Americans afford to live in America? Consider a family that moves to Lexington and has three children. The town will eventually have to build or rebuild elementary, middle, and high school capacity for those three children. That will cost roughly 3 times $153,664 or roughly $460,992, well above the median price of a house in the U.S. (about $350,000). No doubt some other towns can build cheaper than Lexington can, but the trend is for higher cost everywhere.

 

Full post, including comments

Beloved readers: I’m headed down to Philadelphia on Sunday. I’m hoping to visit the Barnes Foundation on Sunday afternoon in case anyone would like to meet there. I might be available for an after-dinner drink at the Sonesta hotel downtown, perhaps around 9 pm Sunday evening. Alternatively, coffee on Monday morning at 8. Please email philg@mit.edu to let me know if you’d like to get together!

Full post, including comments

“Family’s Fatal Plunge Off Cliff May Have Been Intentional, Authorities Say” (nytimes):

The vehicle, carrying Jennifer and Sarah Hart and at least three of their six adopted children, had stopped on a dirt pullout off Highway 1 on March 26 before accelerating about 70 feet to the edge of the cliff, the California Highway Patrol said, citing an analysis of the vehicle’s onboard computer. Investigators also did not find skid marks at the scene that might have indicated a collision.

Given that plenty of American couples have been driven insane by just one or two kids in the house, why were two people able to adopt six children? The argument was that, because neither mom worked, they had plenty of time and energy to care for children? (In this article with 5 facts about the two adoptive moms there is no suggestion that either Mrs. Hart had a job.) So the standard was more like what you’d have in a daycare center in which there has to be one worker for every 8 children?

Maryland tries to limit adoptions to 6 children per household (source). Angelina Jolie collected 4 children via adoption before she had her own two kids (and then tried to collect $1.2 million per-year tax-free on the 6 kids total). Generally it seems that states may have limits on the number of foster children one may take in, but there are no statutory limits on adoption. It will be up to a social worker or non-profit agency employee in practice and those people get paid for every adoption so they have a financial incentive to approve extra children in a household?

“Cash Incentives for Adoptions Seen as Risk to Some Children” (nytimes, 2003):

In December 1995, Raymond and Vanessa Jackson, who had already adopted a young girl, formally adopted another child — Bruce, a foster child then age 11. Over the next 12 months, the parents adopted two more boys from the state, and in 1997 they scooped up a fourth. Yet another girl was made legally theirs in 2000.

And then, even as prosecutors say the four adopted boys in the family’s New Jersey home were being starved on a diet of peanut butter and plaster wallboard, the Jacksons were being evaluated by state officials for the adoption of a seventh child, a 10-year-old girl.

The Jacksons, with six adopted children and one foster child, received more than $30,000 in government payments last year.

[Compare to child support: Jessica Kosow, a plaintiff described in our chapter on Massachusetts family law, asked for $235,080 per year and received $93,808 per year (plus a free house; at least $3 million total through the child’s 23rd birthday) to care for a single healthy child on a half-time basis.]

Readers: Given that decisions on adoption are currently left up to people who profit from approval, does there need to be a hard and fast rule limiting the number of kids that one or two adults can “scoop up” (as the Times put it)?

Related:

• The happiest children in Spain live with two daddies (a survey found that the least happy children live with two moms)
• Table of cash payments available to foster parents, by state

Full post, including comments

I wonder how much of this is because a lot of people who were high earners before going to business school are also high earners upon graduation, but it is tough to argue with $286,000 per year as a median first-year-out-of-MBA-school income (for MIT Sloan graduates). See Bloomberg for some more numbers.

[See Real World Divorce, though, for how an American resident or visitor doesn’t need to go to business school, or to work at all, to have this kind of after-tax spending power. The Massachusetts chapter has at least one concrete example.]

Readers: Is this rational behavior for employers? Why not hire smart folks fresh out of college for $100,000 per year, have a night school at the company where they go through the MBA textbooks and watch some YouTube videos, and promote the best of this group? Or back it up to high school graduates! Hire them for $50,000 per year, supervise their online bachelor’s degree in the evenings at the company’s office, and promote from that pool? Why let MIT and Harvard college huge $$ to do the filtering? You can argue that you’re investing money in training people who will quit, but most of the investment is a conference room that wouldn’t be used at night anyway. Also, if you hire an MBA at $286,000 per year and he or she gets some experience at your firm there is always a risk that the MBA will quit for a yet higher salary elsewhere (these are not teachers, certainly, who will just keep working despite being underpaid).

Full post, including comments