“Australian traveller strip-searched, held in US prison and deported over little-known entry requirement” (Guardian):
An Australian traveller was denied entry to the US, cavity searched, sent to prison alongside criminals and subsequently deported 30 hours after arriving, due to a little-known entry requirement for the US.
The Victorian student Jack Dunn applied for a visa waiver for his trip to the US in May and planned to travel on to Mexico. He had been warned about the need to prove his plan to exit the US, but was unaware of the rule that requires those entering on the waiver to have booked either a return flight or onward travel to a country that does not border the US.
After arriving in Honolulu Dunn was refused entry to the US and detained at a federal prison until he could be put on a return flight to Australia.
Dunn, 23, had spent more than half a year saving for his trip, and by May had enough for a three- to four-month adventure. He planned to start in the US to see the NBA playoffs, then spend most of his trip backpacking across Mexico and South America.
After landing at 6am on 5 May, he was interrogated by a US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer, who refused him entry after determining that he had not booked onward travel beyond Mexico.
He was put in an interrogation room with no wifi. Because he did not have a local sim card, had no access to the internet.
At one point, Dunn claims, an airline worker offered him his phone to book a flight from Mexico to a third country.
Dunn tried booking a flight to Panama, but did not have enough money in his debit card account, and as his own phone was not connected to the internet, he could not transfer money from his savings account, which held several thousand dollars. He then tried to book a cheaper flight to Guatemala, but the CBP officer re-entered the room and ordered the airline worker to take the phone back, Dunn claimed.
It’s a sad story because he would have been able to stay if he’d simply said “My parents are beating me up and I request asylum” or “there is a gang in my neighborhood that has targeted me for execution” (see “Biden administration reverses Trump-era asylum policies”: “Attorney General Merrick Garland withdrew key rulings that his predecessor issued in 2018 limiting asylum for victims of domestic violence and gang threats.”).
What were the consequences of this failure to claim asylum?
Dunn said about six hours after landing he was handcuffed and taken to the Federal Detention Center in Honolulu, where he was told to strip naked and was twice searched under his scrotum and anus for contraband before being admitted.
Separately, I’m not sure why we need this rule. Since anyone can stay in the U.S. more or less indefinitely merely by saying “I don’t feel safe at home,” why are Australians whose trip terminates in Mexico or Canada a threat to our society?
Related:
Why are Australians whose trip terminates in Mexico or Canada a threat to our society?
It’s because he is white. Obviously! (I still don’t care about Black Lives Matter)
You glossed over this barbaric detail: “He was put in an interrogation room with no wifi.”
We must amend the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Anon: But if he’d had WiFi he could have cured the defect in his ticket, e.g., by changing to a destination other than Mexico for his outward-bound leg.
The U.S. seems to be terrified of people who travel several months. This is a BBC agitprop piece (white Irishman deported, people of color hit hardest):
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-40332646
CBP seems to target red-haired Australians. In this new case, a young Australian woman was asked whether she had an abortion (!) and was subsequently deported:
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/jul/13/have-you-recently-had-an-abortion-australian-transiting-through-us-questioned-then-deported
This is the sort question that people would have had a duel over in the 19th century. Now we are all treated like cattle.