Four years ago I wondered why Democrat billionaires didn’t set up transportation for oppressed Americans: Why can’t Michael Bloomberg run a fleet of abortion buses?
This year we are informed that freedom dies on January 20, 2025 if the Nakba of a Trump victory occurs. Polls show that such a victory is at least possible. Here’s an Obama/Biden appointee and member of the “Harris for President National Finance Committee”:
The “Jewish community” (not to be confused with “Jews”) won’t be safe if Trump is elected (for which Doug Emhoff “slams” Trump; not to be confused with “slaps Trump”). Also remember that Andrew Weinstein’s presence on the Harris for President National Finance Committee disproves the right-wing conspiracy theory that rich Jews control American politics…
Here’s The Jewish Democratic Council of America, reminding us of the “direct threat”:
Abortion care can be obtained merely by hopping on a Bloomberg Bus to a state, such as Maskachusetts, where abortion care for pregnant people is available at all stages of a pregnant person’s pregnancy. But the Trump Death Camps (TM) won’t be escapable via an interstate trip because they will be established on a federal basis.
Are the elites who warn of dire consequences from a second Trump presidency making a contingency plan in case the unthinkable occurs? Shouldn’t they have aircraft charters and visas set up for Americans to escape between November 6 and January 19? Evacuating the millions (or tens of millions?) who are “directly” threatened by Trump might not be doable without some advance planning, particularly because most countries defend their borders and won’t allow the undocumented to merely stroll across. Israel is plainly out as a destination for Jewish Democrats due to the country’s refusal to surrender to the Islamic Resistance Movement (“Hamas”), the Party of Allah (“Hezbollah”), UNRWA, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Finding a country that wants to receive oppressed Americans could be a significant challenge.
I’m really struggling to understand the buzz surrounding abortion topic: a woman’s right to her body, and the right to choose. What about the father’s rights concerning the unborn baby or fetus? Shouldn’t the father have a say in this matter as well?
In divorce cases, the mother is entitled to 50% of the access, and the father must pay alimony. Yet, when it comes to abortion, the father appears to have no say or rights at all. Thus, how can abortion be viewed as solely a woman’s right? Not only that, a woman can easily obtain an abortion pill online and terminate a pregnancy during a weekend getaway without anyone being aware.
When Netanyahu delivered a joint address to Congress, Kamala elected not to attend to visit with a college sorority. When it was clear that selecting Governor Shapiro in Pennsylvania would strongly assist in securing this swing-state, she could not be seen aligning herself in any such manner. To secure votes in Michigan, she met with Dearborn Mayor Abdullah Hammound, who on October 7 tweeted “Israel’s decades of illegal military occupation and imprisonment of Gaza makes peace impossible and tragic violence inevitable.” See: https://x.com/AHammoudMI/status/1710826757803196880?lang=en.
Run that by me again Mr. Emhoff, whose rhetoric makes the Jewish community less safe?
Oh, I get it, happy wife, happy life.