New York Times calls Massachusetts for Harris with 0% of votes counted

Don’t need Nostradamus in this situation, apparently. With 0% of votes in, the New York Times has called Massachusetts for the Candidate of Virtue:

They similarly called VT, CT, and MD with 0% of votes counted. RI was more efficient, apparently, because fully 1% of votes were tallied at 8:19 pm when I checked and the NYT had called the state for Kamala:

(Florida at the same time had 90% of votes counted.)

Looks like Republicans have taken over nearly all of the U.S. Senate, at least measured by floor space, with just one victory:

Could the person who calls himself “Jim Justice” be Jabba the Hutt’s cousin in disguise?

According to official media reports, Tim Walz was the most able of all American governors, yet at 9:47 pm central, nearly two hours after polls closed, his/her/zir/their state had counted just 5 percent of its ballots. Neighboring Iowa’s polls also closed at 8 pm and, despite malgoverance by Republican Kim Reynolds, was able to count 62 percent of the votes.

If Democrats are better at governing than Republicans, why aren’t Democrat-run states able to run elections as efficiently?

2 thoughts on “New York Times calls Massachusetts for Harris with 0% of votes counted

  1. Concord NH went from 7500 vote margin for Bide to 3700 for Kamal. 15% collapse
    Hope.you are ready for Orange Fuhrer!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *