A true artist can sell his crack for $1 million

I hadn’t ever noticed this before, but on a recent visit to the de Young Museum in San Francisco, I noticed that they’d purchased Andy Goldsworthy’s crack for what was, no doubt, a significant sum:

Speaking of the museum, they acknowledge that they’re on someone else’s land:

Native Americans are welcome to return to their land for $20 per person, $30 for parking, and $35 for the special exhibit of 100-year-old work that “challenged gender norms”:

It was great to see the Pavia tapestries again (see Could robots weave better tapestries than humans ever have?), especially with the added bonus of Californians wearing their 3-cent surgical masks against an aerosol virus (one of them with the mask over a beard):

The museum reminds us that it is critical to consider the victimhood category of an artist (“women”, “of color”, and “LGBTQ+” are the choices):

Then they organize an activity centered around a sculpture by Louise Nevelson, who rejected and resisted being categorized as a “woman artist” (“I’m not a feminist. I’m an artist who happens to be a woman.”).

Here’s a work that Stéphane Breitwieser and Anne-Catherine Kleinklaus might have been able to steal and that would look great in any house:

I’ll cover the gift shop book selection in another post….

3 thoughts on “A true artist can sell his crack for $1 million

  1. Surely Greenspun would be happier going whale watching than paying to go to politically correct art museums. The lion kingdom has never been on the open ocean & needs blog posts.

    • lion: It would have indeed been a pleasure to hand over funds to these righteous souls so that they could continue to promote social justice. However, my friend and I got in for $0 because of my membership in Sarasota’s Ringling Museum, which has reciprocity with the de Young.

  2. A true artist is someone who can turn a $0.35 banana into a $6.2 million piece of “art.” [1]

    In a past life, I was an artist. Right out of high school, I received a full four-year scholarship to the School of the Museum of Fine Arts (SMFA) [2] — yes, I was that that good. But by my second year, I realized art isn’t for me. Why? The concepts and crazy ideas the instructors were teaching just didn’t sit with me.

    It’s a shame to see what “art” has evolved into!

    [1] https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy87202v43no
    [2] https://smfa.tufts.edu/

Comments are closed.