Our stroll to the first morning of work in San Francisco included the usual sights, e.g., a homeless encampment in the same frame as a self-driving Waymo:
Also, a smashed office building glass door:
It also took us past a Silicon Valley Bank “Experience Center” and the San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank, notable for supervising SVB right until the bank was seized by regulators in March 2023.
According to ChatGPT, nobody at the San Francisco Fed was fired as a result of this spectacular immolation of taxpayer dollars (somewhere between $15 and $25 billion; the government pretends that didn’t do the bailout with peasant dollars because it made other banks pay, but of course the other banks are where peasants keep their money).
NYT, 2018:
[Mary C.] Daly, who is openly gay, will become the third woman among the 12 presidents of the Fed’s regional banks. As a senior executive at the San Francisco Fed, she has been a leading voice for addressing what she has described as a “diversity crisis” in the economics profession and at the Federal Reserve. At the San Francisco Fed, she pushed successfully to balance the hiring of male and female research assistants.
Her online biography was updated June 2024 and makes no mention of her role in the SVB collapse.
Incredibly, the bank still operates as SVB, though it is now a division of a North Carolina-based bank. SVB still has its DEI presentation online, updated a few months before the bank failed.
If not for the regulatory seizure they would have put 100 percent of employees through DEI training by now. The 5 percent quota for Black leaders didn’t go into effect until 2025:
Circling back to the life of an expert witness, here’s the view of the Ferry Building from the conference room where I was imprisoned:
In response to a reader question about whether ChatGPT can be trusted, Perplexity.ai’s answer:
Intriguing how much some industries continue to pay to have face to face meetings, despite all the years of internet upgrades & another remote work craze. It’s probably related to recording devices not being allowed in courts.
“According to ChatGPT…”
Why do you cite as a source something that is known to FREQUENTLY be wrong?
I added Perplexity’s answer to the original post. That’s two artificial intelligences queried!