… but not desperate enough to spend time with someone who doesn’t share her love for Kacklin’ Kamala.
What do we see at marrylisa.com?
- 41 years old (also, “Wants marriage and kids within the next 2-3 years with the right man”?)
- Loves cats!
Her “non-negotiable items” include the following:
- Must be Democratic or liberal or left leaning politically.
Preferences for a mate:
- 35-45. Flexible within a year or two at most.
One open question is why she insists on a single gender ID (“a man”). She’s a self-described Bay Area liberal. Why the heteronormativity? Second question: How is she going to produce “kids” (plural) starting at age 44?
In the background:
- Lisa didn’t focus on dating in her 20’s and early 30’s – she prioritized finishing college, starting a career, learning new skills and working on personal development.
Let’s ignore the improper punctuation (should be “20s and early 30s”) and ask whether her life plan made sense. The New York Post article says that Lisa Catalano is “a vintage clothes retailer”. In other words, she could have the job that she has without ever having finished high school, much less having earned a college degree. So she spent the years in which she was most attractive as a mate, plus tons of tuition money and foregone income, to earn a degree that has no value to her at the moment. The result of this plan is that she’s out on Tinder at the age of a normal human grandmother.
Loosely related, “‘Men seem to make life for women worse’: single US women share the woes of dating in 2025” (Guardian):
By 2030, 45% of prime working age women in the US, defined as women aged between 25 and 44, will be single according to Census Bureau historical data and Morgan Stanley forecasts – the largest share in history.
Kellie, 43 [i.e., grandmother age], from Georgia, joined the substantial number of respondents who felt that social media narratives had made dating toxic and pitted men against women.
“I wish I could have met my person before the stupid gender wars, social media and red pill rhetoric that has ruined people’s view of dating and marriage,” she said.
Danielle, 29, a public relations professional from Tennessee, said her future partner would need to be “kind, thoughtful, emotionally available, considerate, reliable, and responsible”, but also “college educated”.
“I’m very disheartened by the shortage of quality men,” she added. “Men my age are less educated, their social skills are abysmal, and now they’re running into the arms of Trump and ‘incel’ forums.”
She doesn’t have a height requirement…so she still might “choo, choo, choose me”? I’m follicle challenged, so probably not. Our neighbor is about 24, and she seems desperate. She kept waving to me until I took my boonie hat off. Then the next time she saw me she screamed, “You are bald…aaaaahhh!” Could be the weed.
Of course, your readers are urgently awaiting an update on Mohammed on Muzz:
https://muzz.com/us/en/blog/muzz/did-mohamed-ever-find-a-wife/
Just registered marrypoorshortbaldking.com — wish me luck.
From the Guardian article.
“Many of the responses were surprisingly similar. The most frequently listed qualities women said they were looking for in a partner were kindness and emotional intelligence, mental and physical health, shared values [i.e., liberalism], ambition and being “hardworking”, financial stability, masculinity and maturity, and a willingness to commit to an equal, monogamous relationship as well as, in many cases, having a family.”
A simple checklist of a mere eleven items, even if they are broadly defined. And what does the woman bring to the table?
[Sarah, 43] “I miss having someone to cook for, to share things with. But now, my motto is: ‘My alone feels so good, I’ll only have you if your presence is sweeter than my solitude.’”
There you have it. If worst comes to worst, Phil can direct you to a certain website to ponder.
Monogamy? No Drugs? No older men? It’s clear she’s in Burning Man country
For a reality check Mona Lisa might to go onto Reddit r/rateme. Post a few pictures, then her exhaustive list of “non-negotiables” versus her own assets. My prediction is that she’s going to get a “4-5” (kinda cute but not beautiful, “looks like you grind your teeth”, “don’t do anything to that big beautiful schnozz”), then have to negotiate heavily after reading “The Art of the Deal”. And maybe delete her Reddit post, so her children made with 45+ year old eggs don’t bullied on the short bus.
And that’s a good question, in a time of “Love is Love” why is a Liberal not keeping GLBT (not sure if there is a more modern term) in mind?
As for incels running into the arms of Trump, let’s just say “I’m not that lonely, yet.” Plus, I’m married to a 5’9″ goddess who knows her way around the kitchen, so this is all rhetorical. (I’m looking for a new place to live, and I’m distracted today with reports of terrible crime everywhere in the U.S.)
“terrible crime everywhere in the U.S.”? If we had crime in elite neighborhoods the elites would do something about it! Ergo, almost by definition there is hardly any crime in elite neighborhoods (also no low-skill migrants, which is why an open border is acceptable from an elite point of view).
If we ask ChatGPT “How much does the violent crime rate vary between the safest neighborhoods in Memphis and the most dangerous?” the answer is 117:1.
@phil
Memphis? I saw the biggest rat I there had ever encountered, including my years in NYC, during a Porsche Club meetup. Scarier than all the human low-lifes loitering along the river.
If I was going to live in TN, it would be in temporarily in Nashville. Get an apartment, score a hot, drunk bachelorette, get her AA, then diction lessons for that horrid Southern accent. Wisk her away to an elite neighborhood. Train her to lie and say, “I’m from Greenwich, CT.”
You are, of course, right. It is either live next to a filthy, hypocritical elite and not be able to afford foie gras or live next to a toothless meth-head and sup on squab. I once lived in a 1%-er neighborhood, and the oriental guy next door kept going psychotic and calling the cops on everyone.
I really want to be super-elite and move somewhere like this:
https://www.wyomingnews.com/news/local_news/gov-matt-mead-to-retire-in-albany-county/article_eb7d723e-7770-11e8-b9d4-773e94a057b0.html
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
P.S.
I might be developing a crush on Lisa, so thanks. Her video on dating called for the man to pay, and she only needs occasional really expensive dates. She also craves “intimacy” daily–but that’s what they all say before marriage.
Short King: I didn’t watch Lisa’s video(s)! Now I will have to. Even with “daily intimacy” I have a tough time understanding how a 45-year-old produces multiple children.
Phil, you noted that ChatGPT says the delta in the violent crime rate between “the safest” and “most violent” neighborhoods in Memphis is 117:1. It appears you may have reversed the ratio? I just checked with ChatGPT and it says 1:117 (safest:most violent). Also, it says the “most violent” neighborhoods there are comprised of almost entirely Noble Blacks (>90%) and the “safest” are comprised of almost entirely whites Supremacists (>90%). I know many of these AI models are developed by white Supremacists, so are likely very biased, hence I also checked with Grok to see if it was also Racist. Shockingly, it agreed with GhatGPT! What do you make of these Racist AI models?
BMR: Is it wrong to say that there is a 117:1 variation when it is clear that the rate is lower in the safer neighborhoods? ChatGPT actually said “the more dangerous area would have 117 times higher violent crime rate”.
Adjusting for racial demographics is (a) virtuous when the New York Times does it, and (b) racist when a Republican does it!