Taxpayers must fund, but cannot enjoy, the Blue Angels

Today was when hundreds of thousands of taxpayers had expected to enjoy an air show.

“NAS Pensacola cancels annual Blue Angels air show because of government funding uncertainty” (Stars and Stripes):

Naval Air Station Pensacola canceled this year’s Blue Angels Homecoming Air Show due to uncertainty regarding government funding. Officials said the ongoing government shutdown, limited funding and the time needed to arrange for performers and necessary support contracts are key reasons for canceling the annual two-day event, according to a Facebook post by NAS Pensacola. The show was originally set for Nov. 14- 15 in Pensacola, Fla., and expected to draw hundreds of thousands of visitors.

Pensacola might be the best place to learn about the relationship between peasants and rulers in the U.S. See Two-year anniversary of National Naval Aviation Museum’s temporary coronapanic closure (2022) and “US government shutdown closes NAS Pensacola to the public, including aviation museum” (October 1, 2025) and “National Naval Aviation Museum to reopen to public” (AOPA, May 4, 2023):

Access to Naval Air Station Pensacola, home of the museum as well as the Pensacola Lighthouse and Maritime Museum, and Fort Barrancas, had been restricted to Department of Defense cardholders since December 6, 2019, when a terrorist opened fire at the military base, killing three and wounding eight.

Wokipedia:

On the morning of December 6, 2019, a terrorist attack occurred at Naval Air Station Pensacola in Pensacola, Florida. The assailant killed three men and injured eight others. The shooter was killed by Escambia County sheriff deputies after they arrived at the scene. He was identified as Mohammed Saeed Alshamrani, an Air Force aviation student from Saudi Arabia. … On January 13, 2020, the Department of Justice said they had officially classified the incident as an act of terrorism, motivated by “jihadist ideology.”

On February 2, 2020, al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula claimed responsibility for the shooting. In an audio recording, emir of the Yemen-based group Qasim al-Raymi said they directed Alshamrani to carry out the attack. On May 18, 2020, the FBI corroborated the claims.

In response to the domestic jihad, the government excluded taxpayers from the museum for about 3.5 years and then opened the border for any other jihadi who might want to settle permanently in the U.S., e.g., “Nasir Ahmad Tawhedi, an Afghan national who entered the US on September 9, 2021, via humanitarian parole (later applying for a Special Immigrant Visa). In October 2024, he was arrested in Oklahoma City for plotting an ISIS-inspired Election Day mass shooting attack targeting large gatherings. Tawhedi purchased AK-47 rifles and ammunition from undercover FBI agents, communicated with an ISIS facilitator, and planned to die as a martyr. He pleaded guilty in June 2025 to conspiring to provide material support to ISIS and attempting to acquire firearms for a terrorism offense” (Grok).

One of my photos of the Blue Angels from the Reno Air Races 2016 (the races themselves were shut down by “the Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority citing regional growth and safety concerns” (source)):

4 thoughts on “Taxpayers must fund, but cannot enjoy, the Blue Angels

  1. My 23 y/o nephew (2nd Lt., USMC) arrived for flight training at Pensacola NAS last month. Last week he got his first disappointment when at 6-3, sr. USMC staff advised him that he is too tall for fighter jets.

  2. “Dr” Phil:

    What exactly is “woke” about the Wikipedia article you quote? Or is your mind infused with Elon Musk’s algorithmic viral content? Do any thinking on your own?

    • The simple answer is that all of Wikipedia can fairly be characterized as “Wokipedia”. Perhaps this particular article, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_Air_Station_Pensacola_shooting , is actually neutral?

      I guess this paragraph could be considered propaganda: “Saudi Arabia is one of many countries allied to the United States that send members of their military to the naval station for training. At the time of the shooting, the program hosted 5,180 students from 153 countries, including the perpetrator.” It’s not relevant to the incident per se. It reminds that reader that nearly all foreigners, including those from countries whose official religion is Islam, love Americans and it is only 1 out of more than 5,000 that might consider going on a shooting spree.

      We then have “The FBI agent leading the investigation said that all of the Saudi Arabian students were cooperating with the investigation.” In other words, as a group Saudi Arabians are the best friends the U.S. could ever hope to have. The article ends with “Trump further elaborated that the king had said that the Saudi Arabian people were angered by the attack and that the perpetrator “in no way shape or form represents the feelings of the Saudi people who love the American people.”” Certainly the reader shouldn’t be reminded that 15 of the 19 9/11 jihadists were Saudi Arabians (the remaining four were from United Arab Emirates, Lebanon, and Egypt).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *