Does the health care bill that the House passed result in more or less liberty?

The U.S. sometimes brands itself as Land of Liberty (TM). Obamacare cut that way back for individuals and employers, who were now required to purchase products from the insurance industry (and therefore, indirectly, from the U.S. healthcare industry), even if they didn’t want those products. Health insurance companies lost the liberty to deny coverage to those with pre-existing conditions, right? But they retained the liberty to withdraw from the Obamacare exchanges and write coverage only to groups?

What about this latest bill? It seems to restore liberty to individuals and employers, but does it take away liberty from insurers? Are they now required to sell insurance to people who are already ridiculously sick? Or can they withdraw from the individual market, at least, and say “we’re only underwriting groups”?

Neither Obamacare nor the new proposed system gives an American living in State X the liberty to purchase insurance from a company in State Y, correct?

I’ve scanned some news articles and Facebook and nobody seems interested in this perspective. Does that mean it is the wrong perspective? Another thing that seems missing from the articles is the idea that we could spend money on something other than health care. If we spend 17 percent of GDP instead of 20 percent, for example, there are mostly “losers” who don’t get certain health care services. There is no discussion of how Americans might be “winners” because now we have 3 percent of GDP to spend on things that we value more than these additional health care services. Less spending = more losers.

Related:

  • my 2009 health care reform proposal (kind of similar to the UK, except that the government doesn’t run hospitals/HMOs directly; citizens don’t have the liberty to refuse to pay taxes, but they do have the liberty to buy whatever health care services they want if they don’t like what they get as a default from the government)
Full post, including comments

Dumb question: How can a computer manufacturer troubleshoot a laptop if the hard drive is encrypted?

I was unwise enough to purchase a Dell XPS 13 2-in-1 (see previous postings: Dell XPS 13 2-in-1 review (Bluetooth, touchscreen, and WiFi failures) and How can a computer company lose data that it gathered only a minute earlier?). After more than 20 hours of technical support efforts via phone and remote login they came up with the idea of me shipping the $2,400 doorstop back to them. This process is supposed to take 2 business days where they decide whether or not to provide “express” or “standard” service (2+ weeks). So if you call them on a Friday and they decide on express/regular on the following Tuesday, the computer doesn’t leave your house until Wednesday. [In the case of this particular XPS 13, however, I called Dell on a Sunday and they didn’t make up their mind on the express/standard issue until Thursday (and even then they didn’t supply return labels), so a minimum of one week was spent in limbo.]

Let’s suppose that this computer eventually does land on a technician’s desk. Given that the hard drive is encrypted with my Windows password/fingerprint, how can it be debugged? The touchscreen, trackpad, Bluetooth, WiFi, and stuck-in-tablet-mode failures tended to be intermittent and were often fixed (temporarily) by a reboot, suggesting that they were software-/driver-related. What can a technician do without the consumer’s password? Test each component individually and say “no fault found” and box the computer back up? Aren’t they actually in a better position to debug a problem if they can remotely log in and poke around with Windows running?

Full post, including comments

Louis Zamperini on recovering from trauma

Hundreds of thousands of Americans endured experiences during World War II that are unimaginable by our modern standards. Louis Zamperini explains how people thought about recovery at the time. From Devil at My Heels:

TO HELP POWS readjust, the army passed out a small red pamphlet published by the Army Air Forces Headquarters, at the command of General Hap Arnold, for “distribution to AAF returnees.” Titled Coming Home, it had simple graphics and straightforward, friendly language. Here’s how it began:

Good? Bad? Mixed up? Or can’t you tell? That’s O.K., though. It’s exactly the way thousands of men have felt who have come back ahead of you. Some of them wanted to talk it over. But some of them didn’t even want to think about their feelings. If that’s the way you feel right now, it’s perfectly all right; don’t turn another page. We suggest that you stick this away in your flight bag or some other place where you can get at it later. It may come in handy.

The story followed a typical soldier, John Brown, through his home-coming, through the fear, the strange feelings of having changed, of being treated differently, and gave tips on how to go along and get along. The advice pretty much came down to this:

No matter how much help John Brown got, though, in the final analysis it was up to him. The real, permanent solution, he found, lies with the individual man himself. But it sure is a big help to understand what is going on inside and why.

Zamperini doesn’t recovery well at first:

ME? I FOUND my own way of “controlling” the hate that had revealed itself as recurring nightmares about the Bird. I’d had the same angry dreams in prison camp, but there I also had to deal with the horrible reality of his presence, meaning that awake or asleep I couldn’t get away from Watanabe. Even after my release, when I was caught up in the excitement of going home, the dreams didn’t stop. I kept hoping they’d pass, but when they didn’t, my solution was alcohol. I thought if I got drunk enough, I’d sleep like a baby.

To dull the pain and memories, I roamed from bar to bar accepting drinks on the house or from bighearted strangers. I told my stories and wallowed in the term “war hero” until I actually believed it myself.

ON THE SURFACE I looked like I was having the time of my life, but the laughs were more and more a cover-up for the conflicts and tensions I’d brought home from the Pacific. After being confined to a raft, then a makeshift dungeon, and finally a series of prison camps, I was less and less able to sit still or tolerate a quiet moment.

I should have reread my Coming Home pamphlet, which described my symptoms exactly. Memories of war kept running around my head. I couldn’t concentrate. I tossed all night. And yet I had so much nervous energy I couldn’t slow down. The section on fear was especially relevant— in my case fear of what to do with my life, of personal failure, of not being able to run again, of the media sobering up long enough to realize that despite my running trophies, war medals, and headlines, I was just a guy who’d done nothing more heroic than live.

It turned out to be Christianity, as explained by Billy Graham, that enabled Zamperini’s recovery. The forgiveness process was complete within five years following the end of the war and Zamperini returned to Japan to forgive his tormentors and spread the word about Christianity.

[at a prison for war criminals] I gave my usual talk but never with more conviction. When I came to the part about how I’d been treated in Japanese prison camps, I again thought to temper the details and emotions so as not to appear too angry, but I didn’t because otherwise my forgiveness would lack true meaning. Afterward, I invited the men to become Christians and asked for a show of hands. Sixty percent raised them high. “This will in no way shorten your sentence,” I explained. “I am not a part of the army and not part of SAC headquarters. It will not help you that way in the least.” Then I asked for hands again. Some who had been tempted or misunderstood withdrew, but many others in search of a new life persisted. The colonel said, “Those of you who were Louie’s guards and heads of his prison camps, he’d like to speak with you. You may come forward if you wish. Without hesitation they did. The moment had finally arrived. I waited onstage, watching men walk down the aisle and faces emerge from the mists of memory. I recognized each vividly: Sasaki, Admiral Yokura, Conga Joe, Shithead, Weasel, Hata the cook, Kano, and others. But not the Bird. Without even thinking I jumped off the stage, ran to the group, and threw my arm around the first guard. He pulled back at my friendliness; I don’t think he understood my intention. My sign of affection was unfamiliar in Japanese culture. It was probably also the last reaction he expected from me. The colonel ushered us into a small room. There I continued to press the issue of salvation, and a few made a decision for Christ, but others didn’t understand or rejected my invitation, particularly the Quack, the medic from Ofuna who had so badly beaten Bill Harris. He remained a committed Buddhist. During my talk I had praised guards like Kano, who had treated us kindly, like human beings. And yet here he was in the room, a prisoner. I couldn’t understand why. When I asked, he explained that despite letters written by former POWs attesting to his kindness, he had been confused with the sadistic Kono and sentenced to several years. I told him I would try to help.

Admiral Yokura’s file indicated he was a kind, personable guy. I’d met him at Ofuna and again at Omori. When I read the transcripts of his trial, it shocked me. The evidence showed him innocent of every accusation. On the next-to-the-last page it said, “Innocent”— and yet the final page read, “Sentence: 10 years.”

Zamperini on old age:

EVEN THOUGH I no longer ran, I made it my priority to stay in shape. Today [2003, age 86] I’m still in great condition. I fly planes, ski doublediamond runs, trail-bike, and climb, though I gave up skateboarding a few years ago, just to be on the safe side. To this day, people ask me how, after all I’ve been through, I managed to do it. It’s a valid question. I say I eat right and exercise— both are necessary and true— but really, it’s all about attitude. The war, the raft, prison camp, drinking— they took ten years off my life. I simply made up my mind to get those ten years back.

 

What I’ve learned is that the more you help people, the longer you live. The good feelings are a healing process. If you’re madly in love, the same thing happens. I could go into depth about this, but let’s just say that you get flooded with white corpuscles and it boosts your immune system. You’ll even get over a cold more quickly. I haven’t been sick for twenty years. Call my life charmed, and I would agree. At almost ninety-four years old I am an example of the blessings of a beneficial lifestyle that is a combination of exercise, diet, cheerful attitude, and charity.

Today [2011, age 94] I am licensed, accomplished, or an expert in eighty-four fields: Scuba diving and skiing instructor. Lifeguard. Glacier climber, skier. Flier.

Full post, including comments

Know any UK or European light aircraft owners?

Folks:

I’m going to be in London May 15-16 helping with a focus group of people who own or who want to own light aircraft, especially helicopters (e.g., Robinson R44s), but a Cessna 172 owner would be welcome as well. Participants get paid about $300 for their time.

If you can’t make it to London they are also doing some interviews via phone or web survey.

Candidates please email me: philg@mit.edu with a brief description (two or three sentences) of flying and aircraft ownership experience. I will forward to the organizers.

Thanks in advance.

Full post, including comments

Shared Parenting Research conference in Boston May 29-30

I’m going to attend the International Conference on Shared Parenting, May 29-30. It happens to be here in Boston!

Professor Malin Bergstrom will be there. She has comprehensive data on all children in Sweden, which makes her the rock star in my opinion. (See “Children, Mothers, and Fathers” for references to her work.)

Professor Linda Nielsen will be there. We interviewed her for a chapter in Real World Divorce on the subject of “Does it make sense to run a court system to pick a winner parent and, mostly, discard the loser parent?”

Professor William Fabricius will be there. He provided the research input to the Arizona state legislature that led them to adopt 50/50 shared parenting as a default (see our Arizona chapter) and perhaps can take credit for Nevada following Arizona’s lead.

Let me know if you’re going to be in town and we can get together for coffee at the conference!

Full post, including comments

Louis Zamperini re-encounters the U.S. military bureaucracy

Louis Zamperini survived 47 days on a raft and imprisonment by the Japanese. He wasted away to 67 lbs. and was rescued (by the atomic bomb) within weeks of his likely death. Devil at My Heels covers his return to the world of plenty:

I lined up for a breakfast meal ticket at the mess hall, but an orderly, scanning a list of names on a clipboard, turned me away. “Sorry,” she said. “This food is only for prisoners of war.” “But I’m a prisoner.” “You’re not registered as a POW.” I couldn’t believe my ears. That was the first I’d heard of it, officially. “Maybe so, but I’m still a prisoner. I’ve been one for more than two years. Ask anyone.” “Sorry. Your name’s not on the list.” Unbelievable. They thought I was just trying to get a free meal, and the pity was that a good look at me proved that I desperately needed one. It’s like if you don’t have an appointment with a doctor, you say, “But, Doctor, look at me, I’m dying.” “Well, yes, you are. Come on in.” I tried again: “I’m skinny. I’m hungry. I’m a prisoner of war.” She wouldn’t budge. “Sorry. No I.D. You’re not listed.” Rather than argue, I went to the Red Cross tent and put two and two together on the way. At Ofuna, the secret interrogation camp, the Japanese hadn’t registered me as a POW— and apparently had neglected to correct that after transferring me to Omori. Even so, I thought that after my broadcast proved to the army that I was alive— certainly I was well known enough that if anyone with any clout had heard, it would make the news— someone would have added me to the POW list. Obviously not. It was assumed that I was already on it. That brought up another problem: without the proper I.D. I wouldn’t get new clothes either.

Zamperini is nearly killed trying to get home:

I SPENT AS much time as I could on Okinawa but eventually had to continue my journey home. Guam was the next scheduled stop, only I got put on the wrong plane and ended up headed for Manila, capital of the Philippines. At first I didn’t want to fly at all; the plane was a B-24 with a plywood deck and forty former POWs inside. But it was the only way home, so I climbed aboard. Midflight the pilot got a call that Manila was socked in with rain and to land instead on a little fighter strip between two mountains at Laoag, in northern Luzon. We came in from the beach side, taxied up between the peaks, and parked overnight. The next day they turned the plane around and we sped down the runway, heading toward the water. Suddenly, I realized we had a problem. The plane should have been airborne but wasn’t. With the wind against us, the runway was too short for a big craft, so heavily loaded. I rushed to the bomb-bay window and looked out. There was the water, right in front of us, and a mound of dirt; I guess they’d bulldozed sand into a small dike to keep the ocean from flooding the runway. I thought, Oh no, after all I’ve gone through, now I’m dead? Then the B-24 hit that bump at the end of the runway, bounced into the air, and settled down so low that whitecaps came through the ill-fitting bomb-bay doors and soaked us. Fortunately the plane never dipped below that level.

No food without an official POW registration status:

MANILA, UNFORTUNATELY, WAS more of the same situation I’d encountered on Okinawa— and worse. I’d gotten a bottle of rare and valuable whisky as a present on Okinawa, but someone stole it from my tent in Manila, and yet again I couldn’t get food or clothing. So I did what I’d done before: head to the Red Cross tent and tell my story.

He does better with his family:

In the living room, more pictures and flashbulbs and voices. Finally, I broke away and wandered aimlessly through the house and out the back door to the garage. To my surprise, I found my 1939 Plymouth convertible inside. At least my parents hadn’t sold it. As I ran my hand over the smooth wax job and patted the hood, my reserve gave way and the dam burst. I rushed back inside, crying. Soon, everyone was in everyone else’s arms. At dinner I was too nervous to eat everything my mother had prepared, but I devoured the risotto to the last grain. Afterward we had coffee, and I noticed everyone looking at one another with expressions that seemed to ask, “Now?” My mother nodded, and everyone trooped out of the living room and returned moments later with armfuls of brightly wrapped packages. These were presents, tagged CHRISTMAS 1943, CHRISTMAS 1944, JANUARY 26, 1945 (my birthday), and notes that read: “Thinking of you on your birthday, wherever you are,” and the like. Here was the full proof that my family had never given up hope, had never stopped believing I was alive, and it struck deeply, not only reaffirming their love but revealing to me— despite all our previous differences— just where I’d come by the indomitable spirit that had kept me going on the raft and in prison camp. And to think that this was the family I’d often ignored, the mother I’d once, years ago, accused of loving Pete more than me. I was ashamed and overcome. My family and friends didn’t try to get me to talk about POW camp or my war experiences except to say, with obvious satisfaction at the positive outcome, that monthly checks from my life insurance had arrived at the house for almost a year and been deposited in the bank, where they lay untouched— another symbol of their faith in my return.

 

 

Full post, including comments

A damned mob of (code-)scribbling women

Nathaniel Hawthorne, 1855, commenting on the competition among novel authors:

America is now wholly given over to a damned mob of scribbling women, and I should have no chance of success while the public taste is occupied with their trash-and should be ashamed of myself if I did succeed.

The Wall Street Journal updates this story for 2017 with “Facebook’s Female Engineers Claim Gender Bias; Analysis found female engineers received 35% more rejections of their code than men”. (How was anyone able to verify the gender ID of the purportedly “female” and “male” programmers?)

Separately, “Girls Who Code founder to Ivanka Trump: Don’t use my story”, mentions that America may soon be blessed with two additional female programmers:

Ivanka Trump said that she planned to take a coding class this summer with her daughter, Arabella.

[Source: The above two stories appeared right next to each other in my Facebook feed, promoted by different friends.]

Related:

Full post, including comments

Louis Zamperini explains the crash that led to his raft journey and imprisonment

Louis Zamperini survived 47 days on a raft and then imprisonment by the Japanese. He explains the crash that led to this in Devil at My Heels:

WE ARRIVED IN the downed plane’s vicinity [on an unsuccessful search and rescue mission] to find cloud cover at one thousand feet. Phil dipped to eight hundred to get a better look and called me to the cockpit while we circled so I could scan the sea for wreckage or a life raft. Suddenly the RPMs on our number one (left outboard) motor dropped radically. It shook violently, sputtered, and died. Phil called the engineer forward to feather the props. Blades normally face nearly flat to the wind so they can cut into the air and pull the plane forward. However, when a motor stops, those surfaces are like a wall and everything slows. Feathering means to turn the blades edge-on to the wind. Think of it this way: you’re in a car doing seventy miles per hour. Put your hand out the window, palm forward, and the wind will blow it back. Turn the edge of your hand to the wind, and it slices right through. Feathering is possible because we had variable-pitch propellers, allowing a different blade angle for takeoff, cruising, or when the motor stopped. After the Nauru raid a new engineer had joined our crew, a green kid just over from the States. He was so eager to help that he rushed into the cockpit and feathered the left inboard (or number-two) motor by mistake— and it died. That old musher could barely fly with four motors and no bombs; suddenly we had two motors out, both on the same side.

THE MOST FRIGHTENING experience in life is going down in a plane. Those moments when you fall through the air, waiting for the inevitable impact, are like riding a roller coaster— with one important difference. On a roller coaster you close your eyes, hold on despite the sheer horror, and come through. In a plummeting plane there’s only sheer horror, and the idea of your very imminent death is incomprehensible. Of course, only if you’ve lived through a crash can you tell anyone about the abject terror. You think, This is it. It’s over. I’m going to die. You know with 100 percent of your being that the end is unavoidable. Yet a part of you still believes you can fight and survive no matter what your mind knows. It’s not so strange. Where there’s still life, there’s still hope.

His explanation of how he survived is completely different from what a younger author writes in Unbroken:

Everybody in the service gets the same combat training. We go to the front line with the same equipment. When the chips are down, some will panic and run and get court-martialed. Why? Because we’re not all brought up the same. I was raised to face any challenge. If a guy’s raised with short pants and pampering, sure, he goes through the same training, but in combat he can’t face it. He hasn’t been hardened to life. It’s important to be hardened to life. Today kids cut their teeth on video games. I’d rather play real games. This generation may be ready to handle robotic equipment and fly planes with computers, but are they ready to withstand the inevitable counterattack? Are they emotionally stable? Are they callous enough to accept hardship? Can they face defeat without falling apart?

The young writer (Laura Hillenbrand) attributes Zamperini’s success to fortunate genetics, basically. Zamperini himself says it was a lack of childhood coddling.

Full post, including comments

Meet in Moscow next week?

Friends/Romans/Readers:

I’m going to Moscow next week to give a talk at the New Economic School (probably Saturday, May 13). I will arrive at 0400 on Sunday morning, May 7 in order to begin the de-jetlag process. If any of you would like to meet for coffee or to sight-see, I would be grateful.

Please email me, philg@mit.edu, if you’re going to be in Moscow between May 7 and May 14.

Thanks in advance.

(Also, if you have any advice for the first-time visitor to Moscow please post it here in the comments section. I’m staying pretty close to Red Square and don’t want to venture too far afield.)

Full post, including comments

Library of Congress has solved America’s illegal aliens problem

From https://www.loc.gov/aba/cataloging/subject/ :

The Library has extended the comment period on its proposal to replace the subject heading “Illegal aliens” to Saturday, August 20, 2016. The survey will remain open for comment through that date.

(Retrieved April 28, 2017)

 

Full post, including comments