Watching TV is not a good way to learn about reality

From the local school…

Dear Parents & Guardians,

Supporting the mental health and well-being of our students is a priority for all of us as a community. It has come to our attention that some of our middle school students have been talking about and/or watching a popular new Netflix series that presents an inaccurate and graphic portrayal of suicidality. The series, based on a book by Jay Asher, entitled 13 Reasons Why, portrays a high school student who commits suicide after leaving audio recordings for her peers to listen to after her death. The purpose of this letter is to make you aware of this series and the concerns of the suicide prevention experts. We encourage you to have conversations with your child if they have watched this series or have heard about it from friends. Having accurate information and talking points will support your conversation with your child. While all students require support with these discussions, students who may already be vulnerable are at greater emotional risk.

In addition, please be advised, mental health professionals are concerned with the graphic depiction of suicide and sexual assault contained within this series.

——- from the attachments…

On the surface, 13 Reasons Why might come across as a show that discusses mental health, however the issues of mental health or illness are never explored in the show. While a varied number of issues were presented in the show (e.g., sexual assault, sexual orientation, sexting, etc.), for Hannah they seemed to generally manifest themselves as shaming and harassment. The overwhelming message seems to be centered on the oft-cited but misleading narrative that bullying ultimately leads to suicide. The storyline espouses that the simple solution to Hannah’s struggle – indeed the cause of most of her strife – was the unkindness, and in some scenarios, the downright cruelty of her friends. While this is an important theme to explore, causal links between bullying and suicide are simplistic and as such, problematic.

Suicide is not a common response to life’s challenges or adversity.

When you die you do not get to make a movie or talk to people any more. Leaving messages from beyond the grave is a dramatization produced in Hollywood and is not possible in real life.

Hannah’s tapes blame others for her suicide. Suicide is never the fault of survivors of suicide loss. There are resources and support groups for suicide loss survivors.

I think is a good illustration of our culture of victimhood that one can now be a “survivor” as a consequence of someone else’s suicide.

Full post, including comments

Invitation to two lectures (tomorrow) at the New Economic School

Russian-oriented folks:

I’m giving two talks tomorrow (Friday, May 12) at the New Economic School here in Moscow. The first is from 11-12 and covers the American start-up world, open-source software, and some lessons on management and working with big customers (speaker notes/handout). If you’d like to attend, here is an official sign-up page. The second talk is from 17-18 (5 pm in American parlance!) and is titled “U.S. Family Law: What happens to an economy when having a baby is more lucrative than going to college and working?” (notes; best guess: the economy shrinks by about 3 percent). It is geared more to graduate students in economics planning their research projects, but if you’d like to attend please add a comment to this posting and perhaps it will be worth setting up an official sign-up page for that as well.

Full post, including comments

Can we measure value of American health care and pharma by exports?

One of my money expert friends refuses to believe that we are being bilked by the health care industry. Sure we spend 18 percent of GDP and Singapore spends 4.5 percent and we spend more than twice as much per person in dollars as do the richer European countries. However, American pharma and healthcare are way better than in those other parts of the world where they spend less.

Life expectancy statistics suggest that American health care is not better, but we can argue about lifestyle, accidental death rates, etc.

How about a new measure: exports of our purportedly superior products and services.

There are plenty of upper-middle-class and richer people all around the world. We can assume that their desire to be healthy and alive is as strong as ours. If our pharma is so great and the new patented drugs so much more effective than older generics, are foreigners happy to import these new drugs and pay U.S.-style prices for them? If our hospitals and procedures are more advanced, do we see planeloads of upper-middle-class French and Germans, for example, coming to hospitals in the U.S. for treatment? There is no debate that we charge 5-10X more and that they’ve already paid for insurance over there, but if we really do a better job wouldn’t at least a sizable number be willing to invest $800 in a plane ticket and whatever we are charging for procedures? What’s more valuable to a wealthy French or German citizen than health?

What do readers think? Is this a good metric?

Related:

  • my health care reform proposal from 2009 (pretty much the opposite of what was done with Obamacare! I advocated for universal coverage at a predictable and budgeted cost. Obamacare leaves out tens of millions of Americans and nobody can say what the cost will be.)
  • Book review: Bad Pharma (do new drugs work better than old drugs?)
Full post, including comments

Flying the Corsair from a World War II aircraft carrier

From Norman Hanson’s Carrier Pilot:

The [Corsair] fighter had originally been ordered by the US Navy for carrier use to replace the Grumman F4F, the Wildcat (Martlet to the Royal Navy); but it had proved to be such a handful in Fleet trials—particularly in deck-landing—that the new Grumman F6F—the Hellcat—had been adopted instead. The F4U—the Corsair—could now go to the shore-based squadrons of the US Marine Air Corps; and to the Royal Navy, if they wanted it. The Royal Navy accepted it willingly. The only alternatives in sight were the Seafire and Sea Hurricane—RAF production models fitted with arrestor hooks—and these just weren’t carrier material.

What was it like to fly a Corsair? It is no easy matter to describe it to someone who has never handled a fast aircraft; who has never known the thrill of three-dimensional high speed. Once tasted, that thrill remains with a pilot for the rest of his life. He climbs up on the high wing of the Corsair and lowers himself into the cockpit. The seat is a concave bowl of steel, designed to fit a packed parachute on which he sits. Between his backside and the parachute itself is a one-man dinghy, carefully stowed into a canvas case and attached to the parachute harness by a webbing lanyard. He straps himself, first, into the parachute harness, then into the safety harness. Now he dons his helmet and goggles and connects the R/ T lead and oxygen pipe. He’s ready to start up. In front and to either side are ranged the controls, levers, switches, dials—in all, about 110 of them. He goes through his check-off list … Magneto switches off. Control locks off; and check, too, that rudder, elevators and ailerons are all turning ‘the right way’ in response to movement of the controls. (They have been known to have been reversed, with dire consequences.) The wing-lock lever is in neutral and the manual lock engaged. Tail wheel unlocked. … The propeller control is in fully fine pitch. The angle of attack of the blades on the air is adjustable hydraulically; fully fine pitch, offering least resistance to the air, gives maximum horsepower and is always used for take-off. Once in flight, the coarser the angle, the lower the speed, the less wear and tear on the engine and the more economical its petrol consumption. (Consumption, as a matter of interest, is about 60 gallons per hour at cruising speed and no less than 100 at operational speeds.) Mixture control to full rich, to give the engine plenty of petrol to get her started. Elevator and aileron trimming tabs in neutral. Six degrees of right rudder trim. At maximum horsepower the engine torque is enormous and will try to tear the aircraft round to port. The pilot’s own strength on the rudder pedal would be insufficient to resist that force and the trimming tabs help him to overcome it. Cooling gills, round the front of the big radial engine, oil coolers and intercoolers open. Petrol cock turned on to main tank. This large container, holding 350 gallons, is surrounded by self-sealing material and is positioned immediately in front of the cockpit, behind the engine. All this sounds quite a handful. In fact, it took only a few seconds. Now the pilot confirms to the fitter, standing to one side below him, that the magneto switches are off. The fitter grasps the propeller blade nearest to him and rotates it once or twice ‘the wrong way’, blowing out; tough going, this, against the compression of 18 cylinders. Now he moves back and looks towards the pilot who turns on the master electrical switch, rendering all systems ‘live’. He gives the priming switch two or three short but decisive squirts, injecting a shot of neat petrol into the cylinders. Again he looks to his fitter, who signals to him that no one is standing within range of the great propeller. The pilot turns the magneto switches to ‘on’ and presses the starter switch, firing the Koffman starter which ignites a slowly expanding gas to hit the pistons under enormous pressure. The starter has a deep-throated tiger’s cough. It jerks the propeller into life, back-fires once, then settles into the comforting roar which signifies a good, clean, fire-free start. He moves the mixture control to auto-rich and advances the throttle to give 500 revs per minute on the rpm indicator. He leaves it there until the oil pressure gauge awakens and climbs to normal. Whilst waiting, he has another look around. Hydraulic pressure is normal. Oil temperature is rising to normal. The blind-flying ‘artificial horizon’ is dancing around slightly, showing that it, too, is awake and healthy. He switches on the radio and the crackling and unintelligible natter from miles away tells him that the set is functioning satisfactorily. At last the oil temperature and pressure gauges show normal. He opens up the throttle steadily to 1,000 revs and, keeping an eye on the rev counter, turns off one of the magneto switches. The revs drop by 50. He switches back to ‘Both’. A pause; then he turns off the other. Now the drop is only 30. Both are acceptable, for anything up to a loss of 100 is safe. Everything is OK for him to move. He throttles back and crosses and re-crosses his hands before his face. The fitter and rigger nip below the wing and behind the lethal propeller to pull away the wheel-chocks. The fitter gives a ‘thumbs-up’ sign. The pilot advances the throttle a little and taxies out to the downwind end of the airfield runway.

Today there would be at least a month of transition training before a pilot moved into a different aircaft. Back then?

After the Sabang operation, Joe Clifton from Saratoga and I exchanged aircraft for a local flight. It was my first experience of the Grumman Hellcat and, despite my fanaticism for the Corsair, I was certainly enamoured of it. Its cockpit was similarly roomy and efficiently laid out. Its performance, too, was much the same but in landing particularly I found it a lot safer and easier to handle largely, I think, because of its superior visibility and better stall characteristics.

Imagine an F-15 pilot just jumping into an F-18 for a $100 hamburger ($10,000 hamburger?) run!

Hanson does not describe anyone having qualms about killing enemies, even when an individual, such as a flak gunner, was targeted by strafing. War, it seems, came naturally to this group of young men.

We were searching out ahead, weaving all the time like bastards, when tracer flew past us, fired from astern. There in my mirror was an Oscar—it looked as though it was sitting on my elevators—with guns flashing along its wings. I had time neither to shout nor to break before it dived beneath us, only to reappear in a split second, pulling up in front of us, the length of two cricket-pitches away. We all heaved back on our sticks and gave it the works; no need for gunsights. The silly bastard was half-stalled, sitting there like a broken-down old whore. Its port aileron took off and sailed over our heads. What looked like a section of flap fell away to our right. Someone must have hit the engine. The aircraft fell, smoking, down on the port side and Matt Barbour must have nearly flown through it. God knows how he missed it. I yelled and did an aerobatic turn to port where another fighter—a Tojo?—was boring in. No—it was another Oscar. We gave it a long burst, tearing chunks out of the back end of the fuselage and tail section, and it sheered off to starboard. Jesus! Business was brisk and we were tearing around like frustrated virgins!

It must have been about 1630 as we crossed the town, flying at about 8,000 feet. Glory be! There was a parade ground! What was more, it was pretty full with all the licentious soldiery drawn up in serried ranks. One of the Corsair’s drawbacks as far as the enemy was concerned was that the exhaust roar from its 18 cylinders was all behind it. There was virtually no noise from the engine apparent until the aircraft was almost overhead. It was said that the Japanese called it the ‘whispering death’ for this reason. So when I decided to attack this juicy target, they broke formation only when it was too late for most of them to find cover. There were three possible angles from which to attack, only one of which was dangerous. After an afternoon of sheer frustration, monumental stupidity born of weariness and a touch of ‘twitch’ chose for me the route which in normal and more carefree times would clearly have indicated—‘ A sticky death this way’. In my eagerness to get in amongst it without losing the invaluable element of surprise, I gave the boys no warning at all. I banged the stick over to the right and down, leaving them to follow as best they could. It was providential that I did so, for had I led them down in an orderly formation, at least two of them would have bought it. As it was, they had scarcely made their move to follow me down when they realised that I had made a hash of things, giving them time to alter their own approach to something much safer and more airmanlike. Certainly I wrought a bit of death and destruction, there was no doubt about that. With that enhanced, falcon-like vision which fiercely pumped adrenalin produces at moments of high excitement, I could see soldiers fairly bouncing away from the sledgehammer impact of the .5 shells. It needed only a touch on the rudder-bar to cover square yards of the parade ground and there was a fair number of bodies lying motionless as I levelled out and pulled away. And then I saw it. Rising sharply from the back of the military area was a sheer cliff-like eminence which I had completely missed in my haste to get to ground level. Now, as I approached it at 300 knots, it looked like the North Wall of the Eiger. Taking my life in my hands I pulled on the stick for all I was worth. I can only remember thick streamers springing from my wingtips before I blacked out good and true. The black-out hit me like pentothal—there was no greying-out, no fuzziness. I went out like a light. When I recovered I was out at sea, climbing gently at about 150 knots, safe and sound. The others had formed up on me again and were gazing at me with uncomprehending eyes. Well they might. They had all been enthralled by the spectacle of their senior and most stupid bastard of an officer busily trying to kill himself.

Hanson crashes into the ocean during a landing mishap and is rescued by a destroyer. This turns out to have been common:

John Winton, in his book The Forgotten Fleet, now regarded as a classic history of the operations of the British Pacific Fleet, counts the casualties suffered by the Fleet Air Arm in the two operations [against an oil refinery in Indonesia]. Forty-one aircraft were lost from the four carriers: 16 in actual combat, 11 in ditchings near the Fleet and 14 from deck-landing crashes. As Winton says, this works out at roughly one aircraft for every ten sorties flown; and he adds his own significant commentary: ‘a casualty rate which would have made even Bomber Command flinch’. Against these losses, it was estimated that we had destroyed 68 enemy aircraft—38 on the ground and 30 in the air, not taking into account several ‘probables’. Palembang, whilst not completely destroyed, was effectively put out of the war for a long time to come.

Why don’t fighter pilots do a lot of damage by pressing the wrong buttons? It turns out that they do…

Coming in to land for the second

Full post, including comments

Life onboard a carrier in World War II

From Norman Hanson’s Carrier Pilot:

Illustrious wasn’t merely an aircraft carrier. She was a legend, a ship which, in her short life, had already made history. Built by Vickers-Armstrong at Barrow-in-Furness, she was launched on April 5 1939, commissioned on April 16 1940 and joined the Fleet at Spithead six weeks later. … a brief description of the ship; one of three of her class. The others were Victorious and Formidable. She had a nominal displacement of 23,000 tons, although it was popularly believed that additions and modifications had brought this to something nearer 30,000 tons. Three propellers, driven by turbines each developing 37,000 hp thrust her through the water at 31 knots. The centre propeller was situated directly forward of the rudder, whose action was thereby greatly enhanced. She could turn on a sixpence. The overall length was 740 feet, with a maximum flight-deck width of 95 feet. She was at once a mighty warship, a floating airfield and a seaborne anti-aircraft artillery regiment. Eighteen hundred officers and men lived within her steel walls.

To operate aircraft, the flight-deck was equipped with eight arrestor wires—strong steel hawsers stretched at intervals laterally across the deck. At each end they disappeared round pulleys through the armour-plated deck into the hangar, where they were wound round great spools on which tension, under hydraulic pressure, of varying strength according to the physical weight of aircraft being operated, could be imposed. As a wire was engaged by the aircraft’s arrestor hook, so the self-centring wire was pulled from the spools, decelerating the aircraft to a standstill. The G force exerted on the pilot was between two and three, depending upon which wire was engaged. Some 60 feet forward of the centre of the deck were two safety barriers (a euphemistic term which fooled nobody—to us they were crash barriers). These consisted of hinged steel stanchions at both sides of the deck, which were raised or lowered to allow for the passage of aircraft across them. They were connected by two steel hawsers of enormous strength, about three feet apart; and they themselves were linked together by three or four vertical hawsers, like a huge net. These hawsers, too, were capable of being stretched—though only slightly—under hydraulic tension. Six-ton aircraft at 70 knots appeared to go through No 1 barrier like a knife through butter; but it must have taken some of the way off them, for No 2 always brought them up solid. Forward on the port side was the hydraulic catapult, capable of launching an aircraft to flying speed within a matter of 100 feet.

Slick work, too, is demanded of the flight-deck parties. As soon as an aircraft hooks a wire, members of those parties must rush from the nets to disengage the wire, to allow the aircraft to taxi forward. The wire operator must quickly rewind the wire in readiness for the next landing; and the barrier operators must lower both barriers as soon as an aircraft is hooked and then re-erect them immediately the landed aircraft has taxied across them to the forward end of the deck. With every man concerned doing his job efficiently and with squadrons at peak performance, aircraft in our ship could take off at intervals of 12 seconds and land at the incredible rate of one aircraft every 22 seconds.

As far as aircraft maintenance was concerned, it was naturally the hangar where there was most activity. In temperate latitudes this armour-plated box, capable of holding 30-odd aircraft, was a pleasant enough workshop for the boys. In the tropics it was hell upon earth. In a daytime temperature of anything up to 120-130 degrees Fahrenheit, the slightest movement produced a stream of perspiration. When an aircraft was flown regularly without mishap, its servicing was a straightforward, uncomplicated procedure. Every 30 hours it underwent an ever-increasingly rigorous overhaul culminating—if it lasted long enough!—in a truly major one which was tantamount to taking the whole thing apart and re-building it. It was also subjected to a daily check—tyre pressures, oil, hydraulic and air pressures, the correct functioning of ignition, instruments, radio and guns. If an aircrew was fortunate and their aircraft was in the right place at the right time, this daily check could conveniently be carried out on the flight-deck. If they were not so lucky, however, the daily check had to be done in the hangar, that ill-lit, unbelievably noisy, unbearably hot dungeon where aircraft were lashed down cheek by jowl, surrounded by straining, swearing mechanics clad only in a pair of shorts—wringing wet from perspiration—and gym-shoes. Here they toiled, fuming at obstinate nuts, red-hot pipes and sparking plugs; and with the roll or pitch of the vessel calling constantly for a change of balance. Their hands never ceased to clear sweat from their eyes and within ten minutes their faces were covered in greasy filth and grime, rendering them almost unrecognisable.

Accidents were common:

In the early evening, off Alexandria, we were caught with our pants down when a German reconnaissance Ju 88 flew very high and fast over the Fleet. I cannot now remember if our radar boys had been asleep or if some blind spot in signal reception had caused us to fail to locate him. The fact remains that he was overhead when Wings scrambled the standby Corsair flight; tragically, too quickly for our young man Monteith. In his rush to become airborne, he failed to lock his wings properly in the ‘spread’ position, with the tragic result that, when he retracted his undercarriage as he passed over the destroyer screen, his wings folded and the aircraft plunged into the sea. He was only 20 and had become engaged, whilst at Stretton, to a charming young girl from his native Glasgow, who in that short time had captured all our hearts. It was a sad way to go.

The two main landing wheels of the Corsair were made of aluminium alloy and carried large tyres inflated to a pressure of 120 lb per square inch. To inflate these, our ratings used compressed air bottles of a pressure of 1,300 psi; not the sort of thing for children to play with. One rating—I think in Victorious—in recent weeks had inflated a tyre and had elected to guess its pressure rather than go to the trouble of fetching a pressure gauge. In fact, he had inflated the tyre to such a pressure that the wheel had broken in two under the strain. Half of it flew straight for his abdomen, cutting him neatly into two portions. Not surprisingly, he was very dead before he knew what had hit him. So the gipsy’s warning went out—don’t blow up tyres without having a pressure gauge in hand.

Weather could be unfriendly by Royal Caribbean standards:

Soon after we left Cape Town en route for Ceylon, the weather worsened and our met officer, Norman ‘Schooly’ Jenkins, began to look thoughtful. It seemed that a typhoon lay ahead of us, astride the Equator. Its position was foxing, for he couldn’t decide whether it would turn out to be a ‘north’ or a ‘south’. They have different patterns, according to which side of the Equator they occur. We spent two days and nights trying to dodge it, but it won in the end and on October 26 it hit us with all the force of Nature gone stark, staring mad. It continued to hammer us for three days and I have no desire to experience another. Everything about it was terrifying. The sky, for one thing, was a dull, yellow blanket that covered us from one horizon to the other. The wind: we had 115 knots blowing down the flight-deck. The seas: from my cabin, down aft near the stern of the ship, the waves could be heard hitting the bows like the blows of a sledgehammer. The ship’s speed was pulled down to the minimum, just sufficient to keep her head into wind. We crawled along and took fearful punishment. The sailors up in the forepart were sick in their hundreds; and, as no one could possibly survive on the weather-decks, a breath of fresh air was out of the question. Our deck-park of 14 aircraft required continual vigilance and sailors were held by lifelines as they moved gingerly from the island on to the deck to fix and check extra lashings. The wind was actually turning the propellers of these aircraft—and that against the compression of 18 cylinders! Everyone had to use the starboard passage to reach the island and to stand on the compass platform was an awesome experience. Outside was a mad, mad world of elements gone crazy, where the noise of the wind was that of the endless high-pitched whistle of a steam locomotive. On the evening of the third day the sky began to clear. Next morning we had sunshine, although the sea still retained its gigantic, terrifying swell. Two off-duty Petty Officers, sitting on the forward round-down in the agreeable sunshine after being so depressingly cooped up in the bowels of the ship, were swept away by a gigantic wave of 50 or 60 feet. One was never seen again. The other one, luckier, fetched up in the forward starboard gun turrets with broken ribs and limbs.

True heroism is not always appreciated:

One act of cold-blooded courage must be recorded. When the Kamikaze appeared, we had two Corsairs ranged on the centre line, all set for take-off. Churchill was leading, Parli astern of him, both with engines turning and ready to go. Suddenly the after 4.5-inch guns commenced to fire, simultaneously with a red warning over the Tannoys. The two pilots ‘baled out’ and, together with the mechanics who had been holding the chocks, ran to the island for cover. The steady, shattering thump of the 4.5s, ear-splitting in the painful explosions from their muzzles, and the whip-like crack of the Bofors and Oerlikons on all sides made incoherent all thought and speech. Parli, on leaving his aircraft, had found time to pull the mixture control back to ‘automatic cut-off’ which stopped the engine instantly. Churchill hadn’t lingered and the engine of his Corsair was still ticking over at about 300 revs. Now the engine’s vibration, the tremor of the deck as the gunfire shook the ship and, finally, the ship’s leap into the air as the suicider exploded—all these proved sufficient to dislodge the aircraft’s chocks; and the Corsair slowly moved forward and slightly to port. In a matter of seconds it would reach the port nets and plunge over them into the sea. £ 75,000, apart from any injuries it might cause on its way. There might be Kamikazes about, although I couldn’t see any as I emerged on to the flight-deck. All I could see were shells exploding at a great height and a strung-out flight of Hellcats tearing upwards towards a bank of cumulus way up above us. A tug on my sleeve brought me back to ground level. From the door to the island, where he had sought shelter, came Demaine, our high-diving electrician, running swiftly towards the moving Corsair, completely disregarding Kamikaze and gunfire. He leapt on to the wing and climbed into the cockpit, where he managed to hit the foot-brakes in the nick of time, just as the wheels reached the three-inch deck-edge. He switched off the engine and sat there, cool as a cucumber, until two lads ran across with sets of chocks. I tried in vain to get a DSM for him, for his was a deed of true bravery in the middle of an action. He was, however, mentioned in despatches which showed at least that his courage had been recognised by the hierarchy.

The financial destruction of war (and wealth transfer to military contractors) was apparent to the young aircrews. A verse from one of their songs:

When the batsman gives ‘Lower’ I always go higher;
I drift off to starboard and prang my Seafire.
The

Full post, including comments

My Trump-hating friends are delighted about the French Trump?

My Facebook friends are excited about the election of a new leader in a country with the same level of manufacturing output as one city in China.

France rejects extremism: a proud day for France and for Europe.

Here’s to you and the election in France. Listen to macron’s speech, got about 90 percent of it despite my really broken French… and started crying… Vive Le France

Congrats to France. I love your country and can’t wait to return.

Merci, la France. Grateful for the French nation’s collective sanity. A potential refuge for expat Americans should things go even more sour here? [what better lifestyle than gringo in Bordeaux? (“Gringeaux”?) Note that this move would likely be unwise for a potential American divorce, alimony, or child support plaintiff (French family law is a whole different animal)]

Obviously in style this Macron guy is different from King Donald I. What about substance? Trump proposes cutting the U.S. corporate tax rate to 15 percent. Add in a state tax, e.g., California’s of 8.84 percent, and a company would be paying close to 25 percent. Trump says that the government has too many employees and could function as well or better with a smaller headcount.

How does that compare to Macron? TIME says the following:

his campaign promises, which include cutting 160,000 positions in France’s mammoth public-service sector, cutting corporate taxes from 33% to 25%, and cutting the huge payroll taxes, which economists (like Macron) believe keep companies from hiring more people.

Readers: if we strip away empty rhetoric, are Macron and Trump actually proposing the same changes? If so, and Facebookers love Macron and hate Trump, does that prove that empty rhetoric is all that matters for political success?

Full post, including comments

Transgender hostility disguised as sensitivity?

I called to make an appointment with a doctor. This being the U.S., since I wasn’t bleeding out at the time of the phone call, the appointment was for three weeks in the future. Listening to my voice and learning that my first name is “Philip,” the receptionist asked “Do you identify as male or female?”

Initially I thought “What a wonderfully sensitive medical office.” Then it occurred to me that I had been given only two gender ID options and therefore the question was offensive to those who identify as neither male nor female. Furthermore, since the appointment was three weeks in the future, to respond those with fluid gender, the receptionist should have asked “What’s your best estimate of your gender ID at the end of May?”

Full post, including comments

Aircraft carrier training in World War II

From Norman Hanson’s Carrier Pilot:

After training on American aircraft, it was now necessary to make a few minor adjustments to the mechanics of flying. Instead of applying hydraulic brakes with the upper part of the rudder pedals, we now operated air brakes with a lever incorporated in the joystick. The engine power gauge was no longer calibrated in ‘inches of mercury’; on British aircraft the measurement was in ‘pounds of boost’. (Both systems, incidentally, gave an indication of the pressure of the combustible air/ petrol mixture being forced through the carburettor venturi.) The ‘turn-and-bank’ indicator was no longer ‘needle-and-ball’. Now it comprised two needles.

A deck-landing must be safe, slow and in a ‘nose-up, tail-down’ attitude, primarily to ensure a slow approach and also to facilitate the picking-up of an arrestor wire by the aircraft’s arrestor hook. Approaching to land in this attitude calls for a considerable amount of engine power, maintained until the last moment when the batting officer gives the mandatory signal—CUT!—by crossing the bats before his face. There were, of course, no arrestor wires on the runways on which we practised; but there was an area marked approximately to the length of a carrier’s flight-deck on which landings are made. Into this area the instructor aimed to bring us to touch-down. His signals were simple enough to follow: Bats held horizontally: ‘You’re doing fine—just keep it like that.’ Bats held upwards in a V pattern: ‘You’re too low—put on more throttle to gain height.’ Bats held downwards in an inverted V: ‘Now you’re too high—reduce throttle a bit.’ Both bats rotated: ‘You’re becoming too slow—put on more urge!’ One bat held out, the other concealed behind his back: ‘You’re too fast—go easy on the throttle!’ Left arm raised 45 degrees above the horizontal, right arm lowered: ‘You’re not lined up on the deck—come to port!’ Right arm raised 45 degrees above the horizontal, left arm lowered: ‘You’re too far to port—come to starboard!’ Bats crossed before the face: ‘Cut the throttle!’

The drill was quite simple. Argus had six arrestor wires strung across the after end of the deck. She had no ‘island’ in the accepted sense, only a rather comical structure somewhat reminiscent of a submarine’s conning tower at the forward port side of the deck, which could be raised or lowered at will. She had no crash barriers. Instead, standing near the island was a very brave young officer who vigorously waved a red flag if an aircraft failed to engage any of the wires with its arrestor hook. The pilot was thus energetically exhorted to open the throttle and take off again, to make another circuit and another approach to the deck. We were each to do six landings, preceded by two dummy runs with the wires in the down position and with arrestor hooks up. The batsman would bring us on as though for a normal landing and, at the last moment, would then wave us off. After the second of these dummy runs, if satisfied with his performance, the pilot would waggle his wings. Thus he signified that his next approach would be ‘for real’ with hook down, to be batted into the wires for a landing. Jimmy Robertson and Bill Laidlaw duly did their six in copybook style without any trouble. Then Johnny Adams climbed out of the ‘nets’ and walked across to the Fulmar, where a fitter was reloading the magazine with starter cartridges. Johnny was resplendent in a new suit of flying overalls—black, with Royal Navy buttons. It was very much the ‘in’ thing at the time and had been duly admired as it was the first one we had seen. He climbed into the cockpit. His two dummy runs were classic. He waggled his wings as he went over the bows for the third time and we saw him drop his hook as he came down wind on his circuit. He had less than two minutes to live. In the last 200 yards to the deck, he drifted to port ever so slightly. The batsman slanted his bats to correct him, more and more energetically as Johnny failed to react. As the aircraft came in over the side of the deck and supported only by fresh air, the batsman dropped for his life—and we, standing in the nets, dropped with him. The port wheel went into the nets, and the Fulmar, at about 65 knots, slewed to port and fell into the sea. As she went, we could see Johnny making the greatest and last mistake of his life; he was casting off his harness and climbing out of the cockpit. Then he and the Fulmar were gone. An attendant corvette came up at the rush and hove-to over the spot. Only Johnny’s helmet rose to the surface—nothing else. He had been married just three days earlier.

More: Carrier Pilot

Full post, including comments

Avni Khatri wins at the 2017 Women in Open Source Award

If you voted for Avni Khatri (see Women in Open Source Award) you’ll be pleased to know that she was one of two winners at the 2017 event.

Avni does so much good that the rest of us can be completely selfish! By day she is at Amazon, making our lives easier through software. By night and on her vacation days she is in Mexico helping kids in Internet-free areas gain access to offline Wikipedia, etc.

Full post, including comments