Category: Uncategorized

On a recent Acela ride from New York to Boston, when I wasn’t remarking on my good fortune at not having derailed, I read two articles from what seems to be American journalism’s deep well of “Women can’t succeed in the workforce” pieces.

The first was from the sub-well of “Women yearn to sit at a desk for 30 years and stare at a computer (until they’ve outlived their utility to employers) but men are preventing them from taking these programming jobs.” “A big documentary on Silicon Valley’s sexism problem” (Claire Suddath, Bloomberg Business, May 14, 2015) says that

Gender equality in Silicon Valley isn’t just an altruistic ideal but a way for women to start earning fair wages. According to a 2014 White House report, more than 1 million jobs will be created in computing and related fields by 2020; less than 1 percent of those will go to American women. The average salary for a Bay Area software engineer is about $130,000, says San Francisco placement firm Riviera Partners. “I really think this is a Rosie the Riveter moment,” says Jocelyn Goldfein, a director of engineering at Facebook. “The jobs are here, and we don’t have the people to fill them.”

The ADP Paycheck Calculator says that $130,000 in California works out to $82,000 per year after taxes. That is enough to cover the median rent ($43,740 per year) on a Palo Alto apartment but there won’t be a huge amount left over after paying for a car, food, etc. Why would anyone, male or female, be desperate to go through years of training to take an all-consuming job where the income was just 2X the cost of an apartment near the job?

[Related: “Women in Science” — asking if it is possible that bright hardworking women are able to find better jobs than academic science.]

The second was “While at War, Female Soldiers Fight to Belong” (Benedict Carey, New York Times, May 24, 2015), concentrating on Lt. Courtney Wilson. Here’s what the Times implies is the typical experience of being a female U.S. Army officer:

In the months to come, that sense of exclusion would deepen into depression. Halfway through her deployment, she sent an email to a friend at home saying she was determined not to kill herself.

The psychic distress is measurable. More than 38 percent of women report depressive symptoms after deployment,

Women are 10 times more likely than men to have reported serious sexual harassment.

“She experienced depression and panic attacks after being deployed to Afghanistan.”

http://www.goarmy.com/benefits/money/basic-pay-active-duty-soldiers.html shows that a lieutenant earns roughly $55,000 per year (taxable). On a strictly economic basis that hardly seems worth the aggravation and mental anguish described, not to mention the potential for combat risk (though if one reaches the rank of four-star general, Bloomberg says that cash may follow).

“Women in Science” focuses on the professions as an alternative to seeking an academic science faculty job. The theory being that anyone capable of getting a PhD in science and doing work interesting enough to make it at a top academic institution would be likely to have an above-average career as a medical specialist. Compared to the above jobs, however, it might be enough simply to have sex with an above-average medical specialist. Consider the person who goes into Manhattan and has sex with a doctor or dentist earning $360,000 per year. Under New York law, if custody of the resulting child can be obtained, this results in a 21-year tax-free cash flow of $61,200 per year (17 percent of pre-tax income; about $1.3 million total). That’s plainly more than the Army lieutenant’s $55,000/year pre-tax income. If the recipient of the $61,200/year decides to live in the artists’ community of Beacon, New York, for example, where the average rent is less than half of what it costs in Silicon Valley, the child support profiteer will enjoy a better lifestyle than the Silicon Valley software engineer. [Note that the child support revenue can be doubled or tripled with additional children.]

Given the ever-present alternative of child support, if the journalists’ portrayals of life in the workforce are accurate, can waged employment be an economically rational choice for American women of childbearing age?

Full post, including comments

The most famous toy store in the U.S. will be closing on July 15 (USA Today). They can’t justify the rent on Fifth Avenue now that everything in New York is gold-plated. I’m wondering if this also shows the dominance of electronic games. A $1500 stuffed giraffe is great but do kids value it as much as $100 of apps?

What do readers think? Is there is a long-term downward trend for non-electronic physical toys?

[Separately I wonder what New York is going to look like going forward. Any part of the city exposed to the market economy seems to trend toward high-end stuff that is not useful for day-to-day living. Yet the government is passionate about “affordable housing” and the lucky few (55 out of 88,000 in this example) end up with an apartment worth perhaps $5 million that they can occupy for life, but not sell. So they can’t take the $5 million and move to the Midwest (or Mexico?) and enjoy being rich. Instead they will stay in Manhattan, have a job at Starbucks, and have to order everything from Amazon because the local retailers sell only furs and diamonds.]

Full post, including comments

If you like graphic novels, here’s one from 1941: Jacob Lawrence’s Migration Series, on view at New York’s Museum of Modern Art through September 7 (all images and captions can be viewed online as well). One of my personal favorites is Panel 58, showing three children at a blackboard.

Full post, including comments

On May 5 I wrote in support of same-sex marriage on the grounds that what the government offers as a civil marriage no longer bears any relationship to what traditionalists and religious people think of as “marriage.” The Irish recently voted to approve same-sex marriage and this represents a clean experiment due to the fact that “religious marriage” or “traditional marriage” in Ireland must mean Roman Catholic marriage.

Civil marriage and Roman Catholic marriage in Ireland were more or less synonymous until 1997 at which point no-fault divorce was introduced in Ireland. As noted in my previous posting, once a country establishes no-fault divorce and the possibility for citizens to make a profit by marrying and divorcing a higher-income or wealthier partner, denying the right to marry is primarily the denial of an economic opportunity. Irish voters, even ones with a strong Catholic faith, apparently realized that it didn’t make sense to keep mixing church and state.

[As a measure of how much social change has occurred in Ireland over the past few decades, note that it seems that Ireland also enables parents to profit from obtaining custody of children following a one-night encounter. This courts.ie page explains that marriage is not a bar to obtaining a potentially unlimited amount of child support (though if you want to get more than $8500/year you have to go to a Circuit Court or High Court rather than a District Court). Not too many years ago having a child out of wedlock would be a source of shame in Irish society; today the child is a source of cash, albeit probably not as much as one could get from a U.S. court (see Real World Divorce).]

Full post, including comments

It seems that an organization with billions of dollars in revenue and no supervision is roughly 1.5 percent corrupt ($150 million in bribes, kickbacks, etc. against $10 billion in revenue from the news reports that I’ve seen). That would be comparable to $60 billion siphoned off to cronies out of the $4 trillion annual U.S. federal budget. Here’s a fun quote (WSJ):

After Mr. Bin Hammam said he was seeking their support [to become president of FIFA], Mr. Warner allegedly told attendees that they could pick up a “gift” at a hotel conference room. Officials were allowed to enter one at a time, the indictment said, and each person was handed an envelope with $40,000 inside.

The next day, Mr. Warner allegedly told recipients that the money came from Mr. Bin Hammam. “If you’re pious, open a church, friends,” Mr. Warner allegedly said. “Our business is our business.”

It seems reasonable to assume that any organization that is structured like FIFA would be susceptible to the same kinds of corruption. What could replace it? Forgive an American’s ignorance of all things soccer-related, but what does FIFA do that is important? Is it mostly picking countries to host events, collecting broadcast and sponsorship revenues, and dividing up the cash? If so, why not replace it with a system in which any country can apply to host the World Cup or some other event and then the winner is chosen at random via a process everyone can agree is transparent (something like Bitcoin)? And have the money division be done by mid-level officials at a bank (maybe not one of those recently fined for market rigging)?

And more importantly, how will the FIFA prosecution affect the Eurovision Song Contest, which Americans cannot live without?

Full post, including comments

The May 16, 2015 cover story for Economist is “Tax-free debt: The great distortion.” The article advocates one of my personal pet ideas: eliminate tax deductions for home mortgage interest (see “Most perverse things about the U.S. tax code?” for example), though not for all of the reasons that I am against subsidizing home ownership, e.g., that it makes the labor market more rigid and exposes consumers to risks such as Detroit or Chicago becoming insolvent. The Economist goes farther, however, and suggests eliminating deductions for business interest. Could that work? Consider an equipment leasing company. After depreciation, interest would presumably be its largest expense. At current U.S. corporate income tax rates the enterprise would owe more in taxes than its actual cash earnings. Thus leasing companies couldn’t exist in their present form or with anything like their existing rates.

I can’t quite figure out if this makes sense as an economic policy. If interest is not deductible, doesn’t that favor the largest enterprises that can borrow at the lowest costs? So if you’re a mid-sized business trying to compete with General Electric, you’re now at a further disadvantage because GE can borrow at much lower cost than you and then offer favorable lease rates for its products, an effect magnified by the lack of deductibility for your higher payments. If interest is not deductible then incumbent companies with large capital bases will be further advantaged compared to startups? Supposedly there are economists at the Economist but I can’t figure out why interest, a necessary expenses for many types of businesses, should be treated differently than other types of business expense. (The home mortgage situation is different, I think, because that’s a personal expense and generally personal expenses are not deductible.)

[Separately, the research behind the article is a little suspect for saying “America’s debt subsidies cost the federal government over 2% of GDP—as much as it spends on all its policies to help the poor.” To the extent that you believe elaborate medical interventions “help the poor,” this is wrong. Federal Medicaid spending alone is close to 2% of GDP (gao.gov; this is not the total spent on Medicaid, I don’t think, because it excludes what states spend). How could the editors have missed the fact that the U.S. is a country with tens of millions of working-age residents who don’t work and yet who don’t lack for the essentials (housing, food, health care) and that this could not be consistent with only a few percent of GDP captured by the poverty industry?]

Full post, including comments

Back in 2003 I wrote a much-derided posting about how high school students should learn math, science, and engineering by building a bicycle. The latest issue of New Yorker contains “D.I.Y. School”, an article about a school in Malibu Canyon, Califronia where James Cameron‘s 11-year-old son built a motorcycle.

 

 

Full post, including comments

I can’t figure out why Uber is so valuable. Someone who wants to find out what are the nearest available pizza vendors can open up Apple or Google Maps and see. If Uber/Lyft/et al. develop profits that are significant by Apple/Google standards what stops Apple and Google from adding “nearest available transportation providers” to their respective maps applications? Then they establish a commission for that service that effectively takes all of the profit out of Uber/Lyft/et al. Why should I have two Maps applications on my smartphone, one that shows 50,000 different types of businesses (Apple Maps, e.g.) and one that shows just one type of business? (Uber, e.g.)

Full post, including comments

The world of photography is a poorer place as of yesterday due to the death of Mary Ellen Mark (age 75), one of America’s most effective artists in the book medium. A Google Image search will show some of her range but I would encourage readers unfamiliar with Mark’s work to get hold of some of her books. Most of her pictures were designed to be part of a series.

Sad.

Full post, including comments

Eight of us went to Carnegie Hall on May 24 to hear the Verdi Requiem performed by more than 400 young singers (including my favorite Stuyvesant student!). The concert was organized by DCINY and featured an excellent orchestra. One of us is a fairly serious musician prone to critical comments, e.g., “What a pathetic joke” (Jean-Pierre Rampal concert in Boston Symphony Hall), and “Any guy who would sit down and write 106 symphonies, most of them bad, has just got to be an asshole” (after seeing Haydn on a program). Even he was won over by Claudia Chapa, mezzo-soprano. It is not easy for a young singer to work in that size venue but she handled it like someone accustomed to the Met’s gargantuan space. Baritone Christopher Job and tenor John Pickle also managed to fill the hall.

Full post, including comments