Stupid Geophysics Question of the Week: Why are underground parking garages hot?

Here’s a simple-minded geophysics question, appropriate for the 95-degree heat that we’re experiencing in Boston right now: Why are underground parking garages hot?

At a friend’s house and they don’t have air conditioning? Go to the basement where it will be cool.

Have a collection of fine wine from Costco that you want to keep cool? Dig a cave and park the bottles there so that they will stay at a constant temperature somewhere near the average temperature at the surface of the Earth (pilots are taught about the standard atmosphere that is 15C at the surface, about 59 Fahrenheit).

Go into a parking garage underneath an office tower or apartment block and it will be hot and stuffy, oftentimes even hotter than the surface shade temperature. How is this possible?

Here are some possible explanations, but I can’t figure out which, if any, is correct.

  • The parking garage is mostly air, which has low thermal mass, with relatively small patches of contact with the cool adjacent (high thermal mass) ground. The air-to-ground-contact ratio is much higher in a parking garage than in a natural cave or a purpose-built wine cave.
  • Much of the thermal mass in the garage consists of cars, which have recently driven in from the hot surface and are therefore hot.
  • The parking garage has high capacity exhaust fans so that people don’t die from CO poisoning. Therefore hot air is being sucked into the cave to replace the dirty air that is blown out.
  • The parking garage has some doors that are typically open to the surface (this one does not seem significant to me since hot air rises).
  • The cars generate a lot of waste heat as they drive around within the garage.

What do folks think? Why isn’t going down into an urban parking garage a pleasantly cool experience, like going into a natural cave?

Full post, including comments

July 4th Reading: Bunker Hill by Nathaniel Philbrick

If you’re looking for some beach reading on July 4, I recommend Bunker Hill: A City, a Siege, a Revolution, by one of our most readable historians, Nathaniel Philbrick. I’m still working on the background section, but it is interesting to see how Massachusetts political sentiments have changed in the past couple of centuries and also how the professional historian’s view differs from what we learned in K-12 American history.

Here are some quotes from the book:

For most of the early eighteenth century the American colonies had enjoyed the benefits of a policy later known as “salutary neglect.” Left to do pretty much as they pleased, the colonies had been free to pursue economic growth unhindered by the onerous taxes paid by most British subjects. But by the end of the French and Indian War in 1763—a war fought, in large part, on the colonies’ behalf that had saddled Great Britain with a debt of about $22.4 billion in today’s U.S. currency—the ministry determined that it was time the colonies began to help pay for their imperial support.

Rather than propose a means of raising revenue that they deemed fair, the colonials were more than happy to direct their considerable energies toward opposing whatever plan the British ministry put forward.

The British ministry had a problem. The crown-chartered East India Company was burdened with too much tea. To eliminate that surplus, it was decided to offer the tea to the American colonies at the drastically reduced price of two shillings per pound—a third less than the original price. Unfortunately and unwisely, Parliament included in the reduced price a tiny tax of three pence per pound. This gave the patriots ideological grounds on which to object to an act that might otherwise have been viewed as a windfall for the colonial consumer.

Other, less noble reasons motivated the patriots. Many Boston merchants sold illegal Dutch tea procured from the Caribbean island of St. Eustatius (known today simply as Statia). Since the low-priced East India tea would undersell the smuggled Dutch tea, the merchants stood to lose significant income.

Boston’s most widely known poet was a twenty-one-year-old African enslaved woman named Phillis Wheatley, … She’d also used that fame to leverage a promise from her master, Daniel Wheatley, to grant her freedom. For the citizens of Boston, whose love of liberty did not prevent one in five families from owning slaves, … [she wrote] “How well the cry for liberty, and the reverse disposition for the exercise of oppressive power over others agree I humbly think it does not require the penetration of a philosopher to determine.”

Gage [a British official] left the king with the impression that he was ready “at a day’s notice” to return to America and implement whatever “coercive measures” were required. In actuality, he had deep reservations about returning to the colonies, particularly when it came to Massachusetts. “America is a mere bully,” he’d written back in 1770, “from one end to the other, and the Bostonians by far the greatest bullies.”

Boston was known for its love of liberty, its piety, and its prostitutes. In the town’s hilly northwestern corner was a lightly settled neighborhood that the soldiers dubbed Mount Whoredom. One afternoon at the end of July at an establishment known as “Miss Erskine’s,” fifteen British officers “committed,” John Andrews wrote, “all manner of enormous indecencies by exposing their anteriors, as well as their posteriors, at the open windows and doors, to the full view of the people . .

Instead of the selfless patriots we were taught about, Philbrick finds tax-dodging slave-owning patrons of prostitutes.

Separately, taxing the middle class to fund public works stimulus projects is apparently not a new idea:

The Bostonians had objected to paying a tax on British tea, but they were more than willing to fund an expensive public works project if it helped the town get through the crisis [the British Navy sealing off Boston Harbor]. Under the direction of the town’s selectmen, municipal funds were used to hire jobless mechanics, artisans, and dockworkers to build ships, clean up the wharves, and repair roads. John Andrews complained that while the poor had the town to relieve them and the rich had their savings and rents, small merchants such as himself had nothing. “[The] burden falls heaviest, if not entirely, upon the middle people among us,” he wrote.

If you liked In the Heart of the Sea: The Tragedy of the Whaleship Essex (highly recommended!) you’ll probably like this book.

Happy 4th of July to all readers!

Full post, including comments

Ray Bradbury and Gay Marriage

I recently listened to some Ray Bradbury stories in my car. Nearly all were written in the 1950s and set in the 21st Century. Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued a couple of rulings in support of gay marriage. It occurred to me how differently the future turned out from what Bradbury had imagined.

Bradbury’s stories feature working husbands, stay-at-home wives, and two respectful children who call their father “Sir”. The stories that I listened to did not include any single parents, gay people, gay couples, or heterosexual couples in which the woman was the primary earner.

What else did Bradbury get wrong? Telecommunications in 2050 looked just like telecommunications in 1950. Each house, home to a family of husband, wife, and two children, had a single wired telephone. It would ring and, as there was no caller ID, the call would begin with the person who answered asking who was calling and to whom the caller wished to speak.

Bradbury imagined a static future Earth population with roughly 2 billion people. If anything, the population would be on its way down due to nuclear wars. Those people would invest heavily in talk psychotherapy, which would reliably make them feel better about everything. Nobody in Bradbury’s stories takes mood-improving pills; if they are suffering from anxiety, a chat with a psychologist will put them right.

Bradbury’s workers of the future seemed to enjoy their jobs (unlike the 70 percent of Americans who are “not engaged” or “actively disengaged” according to this Gallup poll). Nobody in Bradbury’s stories is collecting welfare, unemployment, disability, or any other kind of taxpayer-funded payments unrelated to work. Other than soldiers and policemen (all men in both cases!), nobody seems to work for the government.

Full post, including comments

Best way to learn aerobatic flying?

Folks:

East Coast Aero Club has acquired a new 2012 Super Decathlon aerobatic training airplane. Whenever the school gets a new plane I try to learn how to fly it. Currently I don’t have even a tailwheel endorsement and I tend to get motion sickness from extreme maneuvers if someone else is on the controls. So this will be a personal challenge and I’m wondering if readers who have Decathlon/aerobatic experience have any suggestions.

My current plan is to spend roughly 5 hours learning the airplane, maybe with the occasional aileron roll when bored with pattern work. This would include slow flight, commercial maneuvers such as chandelles and lazy-8s, short field landings, etc. Then try to spend another 5 hours doing some basic aerobatics. What are the best maneuvers for someone who hasn’t yet built up a good tolerance for motion/Gs? Any special tips regarding the Super Decathlon?

Thanks in advance.

[Separately, the club has a very experienced instructor who is a former U.S. Air Force jet fighter pilot, but he is not available every day so the school has posted a help wanted ad for an aerobatics instructor. If you know of someone good who is interested in living in the Boston area, please tell them about this job.]

Full post, including comments

Manhattan cultural ideas

I’ve taken a few breaks from working here in Manhattan and here are the results:

  • Metropolitan Museum: Very interesting Civil War shows, especially oil paintings by Winslow Homer and Eastman Johnson and by a Confederate artist (name escapes me).
  • International Center for Photography: Triennial show. My favorites were the collages by Sohei Nishino, a young Japanese photographer working in an old style. He captures photos with a 35mm film camera, makes contact prints, then cuts them up to make a collage (see this one of New York).
  • Guggenheim Museum: James Turrell turned the core of the museum into a totally different experience looking up from the ground floor. (Unfortunately the show gets less interesting on higher floors.)
  • ET Modern gallery: the Feynman Diagrams realized as wall sculpture will fascinate anyone with an interest in science and art.
  • Erben Gallery, on the fourth floor of 526 W. 26th St.: photographs by Tom Wood (you won’t be emigrating to the U.K. after seeing these)
  • Vanya and Sonia and Masha and Spike, with film star Sigourney Weaver (good), TV star David Hyde Pierce (amazing; he is best known for being Niles Crane on Frasier), and stage star Kristine Nielsen (great). The play doesn’t seem likely to have enduring appeal, but the actors and overall competence of Broadway make it come to life.

 

 

Full post, including comments

Midtown Manhattan Perspective on Cutting Deficit via Immigration

I’m in midtown Manhattan right now for work. Lines form outside theater box offices starting at 0800 every morning. The line at the Shake Shack is at least an hour long at all times. The sidewalks are so crowded that pedestrian collisions are common. A cozy one-bedroom apartment rents for $4300 per month, affordable for sharing by three entry-level workers.

Now the Congressional Budget Office issues a report saying that if we just increase the population by 10.4 million via immigration we can cut our budget deficit (due to more people from whom the government will be collecting taxes). The U.S. has plenty of empty space, e.g., in western Kansas and central Detroit, but immigrants tend to settle where the jobs are, e.g., already-crowded places such as New York City and Los Angeles.

Is this plan therefore analogous to the following situation:

  • three young people are sharing a one-bedroom apartment in midtown
  • they find that they are having trouble meeting expenses (a budget deficit)
  • they invite a fourth friend from college to join them, contributing to the rent and co-sleeping on the sofabed in the living room

?

Full post, including comments

Google Glass and the war on old people

I tried Google Glass for the first time today. I was in the midst of a group of young people enthusiastically trying out this technological wonder. When it was my turn I could never get the screen to look quite right. The apparent distance of the Google Glass projection is about eight feet. That is a pretty good match for the top of my progressive lenses but a terrible match for the lower portion, used for reading. As the screen position is readily disturbable/adjustable I’m not sure how easily this problem can be solved.

What’s Google’s message to the over-40s? Get a Large Print Edition of the Galaxy Note.

Full post, including comments

The secret to Danish happiness

After a short trip to Denmark (photos) I’m beginning to formulate some theories on why Danes score high on world happiness surveys.

First, they don’t seem to have better answers than we do in the U.S. to the tough challenges. There are lots of jobs for competent, educated people. Danes who did not do well in school and who did not advance beyond high school are at home living with their parents. Danes are simultaneously admitting immigrants from Muslim countries and surrounding government buildings with concrete blocks to deter an attack from these guests whom they don’t fully understand.

Second, part of Danish happiness is predicated upon being willing to live at what for an American would be a fairly low material standard of living. Residential homes are not big or fancy. Furniture tends to come from Ikea. A 10-year-old compact car with broken air conditioning is a perfectly fine (single/only) car for a family of three. A typical urban dweller won’t own a car at all, but will rely on a bicycle or public transport (maybe not too much fun in the cold wet winter!). If we compared Danes in Denmark to Danish-Americans in the U.S. it would certainly be clear who were the rich cousins. One upside of the whole country being somewhat poor is that very few people have the means to indulge in conspicuous consumption. Conspicuous consumption makes everyone in a society poorer and less happy. Consider the owner of the 10-year-old sedan that gets a family reliably to every necessary destination. Now a neighbor buys a $50,000 SUV. The sedan owner wants to keep up with the Jones family and their pavement-melting SUV so he takes on a second job and cancels plans to take a nice summer vacation. Now he and everyone else in the neighborhood have $50,000 SUVs but for most of them it isn’t something they would have bought otherwise, which in turn means that they will derive less than $50,000 in value from having the new vehicle compared to the old. If the former sedan owner previously would have only paid about $10,000 to swap our his old car for the new SUV then he suffers a $40,000 loss as a consequence of conspicuous consumption. This may be one reason why people suffer a measured loss of happiness when neighbors get wealthier.

One way to be happy with less income is to not need a car, a $9,100/year sinkhole for American family wealth (source). Unless a transport service runs fairly frequently it cannot serve as a replacement for a car. The Danes run the Metro every six minutes even at off-peak times and keep it going 24 hours per day (the only U.S. city that comes close to this is New York). Trains that handle hour-long trips to outlying towns will run at least three times per hour all day. Roads almost everywhere have dedicated lanes for bicycles (see separate posting). These lanes are separated from the car lanes by a curb. So a Dane can always use a bicycle safely. He or she can always rely on the Metro. He or she can conveniently rely on train service. Possible lesson for the U.S.: either shut down public transit or beef it up to the point that people can get rid of cars (of course, we would probably want to reconsider running these services with government employees, who earn as much as $100 per hour (plus benefits) to drive a bus (see Boston Globe). Eliminating a $9,000/year after-tax expense is equivalent to giving an American family a $12,000 to $18,000 pay raise (depending on income level and combined city/state/federal income tax rate). Most families would be happy if the adults got a raise like that!

Another way to be happy with less income is to spend less time occupied with money. The smallest coin in general circulation is half a crown. This is worth about 9 U.S. cents. In other words, the smallest value coin that a Dane might conceivably handle is a dime. So people aren’t counting pennies. Sales tax is included in the published price so you don’t end up spending 10 percent more than expected, as you would in California, for example. Credit/debit cards are accepted everywhere for everything so you could spend months without handling cash.

Danish life seems to involve less uncertainty. You can be pretty sure that you aren’t going to strike it rich. There are only a handful of wildly successful enterprises in Denmark, e.g., Maersk and Novo Nordisk. At the same time you aren’t going to become destitute. So you can concentrate on stuff other than trying to earn more money, e.g., connections to family and friends, participation in community groups, hobbies, etc. These non-work items are the ones that happiness nerds say are the most important.

Divorce, a big potential source of unhappiness, is simpler, cheaper, and faster, as covered in a separate posting.

One element of certainty that not everyone will appreciate is the adherence to and enforcement of rules without exceptions. We spent a day with a guy who uses a wheelchair. We’d be stopped at the side of a country road trying to cross. In the U.S. it would be almost unimaginable for a car not to have stopped to let a wheelchair-bound person cross (imagine trying to explain to a passenger why you hadn’t stopped!). But in Denmark the cars would whiz by. They had the right of way under the rules and they were taking it, regardless of the fact that the pedestrian happened to be in a wheelchair. We parked at Hamlet’s castle, in an out-of-the-way town northeast of Copenhagen. The parking lot was only about one third full. Everyone parked there was buying $13/person tickets to see the castle. Yet we had to buy a timed ticket to park there until 3:03 pm. We were a little late getting back and discovered that at 3:08 pm the authorities had noticed our overtime parking and given us a $116 ticket (an effective rate of $1392/hour for those last five minutes). [Separate issue: why oh why can we not have a Singapore-style system where a transponder in the car and sensors in parking lots and on congested roads take the money out of our checking accounts without us having to pay constant attention?]

As has been pointed out by a commenter on a previous post, Danes may have more affection for their more-or-less unified government than Americans have for our dog’s breakfast of local, state, and federal governments. Taxes are high in Denmark but services are visible: fantastic parks and playgrounds, beautifully maintained public facilities of all kinds, paid-for education through college and graduate school, paid-for health care, etc. In the U.S. the government doesn’t provide that much to employed middle class families. We get a public school that was supposed to be for our kids but is often run for the benefit of school system employees instead. We get to drive on roads that are very poorly maintained compared to Danish roads and lacking in bicycle infrastructure. We have fire and police departments, of course, but ideally we don’t rely on them for hands-on assistance every day.

Having a smaller socially cohesive society yields substantial savings in time and money. Partly due to trust and partly due to having civil law (based on the Roman/Napoleonic Code) rather than common law, transactions can be very simple. I rented a $1000 bicycle in Denmark for a week without putting down any kind of security deposit, signing any liability waiver forms, or receiving a helmet (Danes do a huge amount of cycling but helmet use is uncommon compared to the U.S.). Museums had spent a lot less time writing out elaborate rules for what you could and could not do and employ very few guards by American standards. The Copenhagen airport doesn’t have the fancy X-ray scanners and you don’t take off your shoes to go through the metal detector (it is extremely uncommon to wait more than 10 minutes to get through security, according to locals). Office buildings spend much less on security. The U.S. per-capita GDP is much higher than Denmark, but much of the GDP is spent on writing and signing liability waivers, hiring security guards, paying TSA screeners and investing in fancy machines, running prisons to incarcerate people at the world’s highest rate (Wikipedia shows that Denmark has 1/10th as many prisoners per capita as the U.S.), etc. This is not to say that life in Denmark is perfect. The Louisiana Art Museum warns visitors about thieves breaking into cars in the parking lot. I helped a Canadian woman adjust a used bicycle that she had just bought because her previous bike had been stolen. Even in a country where all of the necessities can be obtained from the state, some people will decide to augment their material lifestyle through crime.

What about people stuck in low-wage service jobs? How happy are they? I asked a smiling young woman who was serving us ice cream ($6/cone) if she loved her job. “How would you like to do this for 8 hours per day?” she replied. “That girl was probably making about $22 per hour,” an American emigrant to Denmark pointed out. “And she’ll take home half of it after taxes. You will never get the kind of service in a restaurant that you expect in the U.S. because the waitstaff aren’t working for tips.” Mostly what I noticed was that there were fewer workers in many situations compared to the U.S. and more effort put into saving labor. For example, we went to a supermarket at about 2:30 pm on a weekday and a 15-person line had developed to wait for the single cashier. At the airport Icelandair had chosen to employ a staff of zero at the check-in desks. Passengers were expected to get a boarding pass from a machine and drop their bags at an SAS counter. Before going through security the Danes had a step to verify the validity of one’s boarding pass. Where in the U.S. this was done by a private security screener and then again by a TSA agent, in Denmark this is done with a self-service machine.

Finally… how about those prices? Is it possible to be happy in a country where McDonald’s charges for ketchup? Will a person be thrilled if the only available solution to thirst is a $4 bottle of water or trying to drink from the tap (museums don’t have drinking fountains)? For a visitor staying with a Danish host one answer is to live like a Muslim during Ramadan. Eat a big breakfast and drink a lot of tap water prior to heading out for a day of sightseeing. Try not to consume any food or drink until returning in the evening. Buy all souvenirs at the airport before departing so that you can get a 25% discount (the shops and prices are the same, but you won’t pay value-added tax if you can show a ticket back to the U.S.).

Some links:

[Travel tips: Consider flying Icelandair. The flight attendants are friendly and enthusiastic. The planes are on time and not too packed. The stop in Iceland means that no leg is longer than five hours. There is no Heathrow-style 45-minute security line to change planes. You’ll clear immigration in Iceland in about 5 minutes and won’t be asked to show your passport again when you arrive in Denmark. They sell Angry Birds lollipops in the duty-free shop.]

More: See a few of my photos

Full post, including comments

Recovered Memories: how they work (book review)

Most old folks (like me!) remember the day care center sexual abuse trials (e.g., McMartin) of the 1980s and 1990s and the “Remembering Satan” New Yorker magazine article by Lawrence Wright about recovered memories, e.g., of animal and human sacrifices. To the best of my knowledge, My Lie: A True Story of False Memory, is the only book by a person (Meredith Maran) who, with the aid of therapists, recovered memories of abuse and subsequently decided that those memories were false.

It is an interesting book for anyone whose memories are beginning to get a little fuzzy. My main memory defect is that I have difficulty remembering whether or not I’ve seen movies from the 1980s. Did I just read a detailed review of the movie or did I actually see it? When I hear about the title and a quick plot summary it seems familiar but I’m not sure if the familiarity comes from seeing the movie.

The author was married to a man and the mother of two children when she decided that she wanted a divorce, was in love with a woman, and that her father had sexually abused her. Her accusations against her family caused a lot of family strife and her children lost out on eight years of a relationship with their grandfather.

Why is that anyone would want to claim that he or she was sexually abused? Elizabeth Loftus, a cognitive psychologist at University of Washington, explained it to the author:

“Seriously,” she continued, “people always look for an explanation for their dysfunctional thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. Retractors like you came up with a good one. A colleague of mine called it ‘A-B-C’:“C: you’re crazy. No one likes that explanation for their behavior, so they go on to B. “B: you’re a bad person. No one wants that, either. “A: you were abused, so nothing is your fault. Needless to say, that’s the most popular explanation.”

Loftus described a plaintiff in a sexual abuse case:

“I can’t tell you what happened in Jennifer’s situation,” Loftus said, “but I don’t think she repressed and recovered it. Jennifer has gotten a lot of rewards for being a sex-abuse survivor. It’s her whole career now.”

Out hiking with a female friend, Maran describes the typical path to becoming an abuse rememberer:

“You started having strange dreams, crying jags, trouble with sex,” I went on. “You were seeing a therapist two or three times a week. Finally you remembered that your father had molested you.” “How did you know that?” Joanne asked. “I haven’t talked about it for fifteen years.”

Modern therapists who attributed problems to childhood sexual abuse were working within a tradition started in the 19th Century:

On April 21, 1896, forty-year-old Sigmund Freud delivered his first major address, “The Aetiology of Hysteria,” to the Vienna Society for Psychiatry and Neurology. In it he reported that more than a dozen of his patients were suffering from a strange array of symptoms: nervousness, insomnia, irritability, loss of appetite for food or sex, and “a tendency to cause trouble.”

Even the retraction of sexual abuse claim is an old tradition:

In 1933, Freud went public with the retraction that would alter the course of psychotherapeutic history—and would silence incest victims for generations to come. “Almost all my women patients told me that they had been seduced by their father,” he wrote. “I was driven to recognize in the end that these reports were untrue and so came to understand that hysterical symptoms were derived from phantasy and not real occurrences.”

Abuse claims were back in fashion by 1980:

Michelle Remembers was coauthored by Canadian psychiatrist Lawrence Pazder and Michelle Smith, the patient who later became his wife. The book introduced a new phrase into the lexicon: satanic ritual abuse. During the course of six hundred hypnosis sessions, Pazder wrote, he’d helped Smith remember the satanic rituals she was forced to attend as a child.

Statistical studies were less dramatic:

A new national study . . . examined substantiated cases of sexual abuse involving 1,639 children at 270 day care facilities across the country. The researchers estimated that for every 10,000 children enrolled at the centers, 5.5 were sexually abused each year. By contrast they calculated that for every 10,000 preschool children, 8.9 were sexually abused in their homes each year, based on confirmed cases reported to the Government. (New York Times 1988)

Maran’s personal path started with a job:

One of them knew someone who knew someone who knew that a hero of mine, whom I’ll call Dr. Roselyn Taylor, was looking for a freelance editor. Taylor had founded several feminist organizations and had authored an armful of feminist books. Her antimisogynist antics had earned her a special place in my own Hall of Feminist Fame.

Roselyn’s house was easy to find. The car in her driveway was a bumper-stickered homage to contemporary feminism. Women Unite to Take Back the Night. Well-Behaved Women Seldom Make History. Porn Tells Lies About Women. I’d Rather Be Destroying Pornography. Pornography Violates My Civil Rights.

“More than one-third of American women were sexually abused as children,” Roselyn told me. I gulped, thinking of my beautiful five-year-old niece. “Thirty-eight percent, to be precise,” Roselyn said. “But the most commonly cited study still claims that incest only happens in one percent of the population.”

Maran sees a therapist regularly:

I brought my journal to my individual therapy with Angela and read her my latest incest dreams. When I finished she was perched on the edge of her seat, regarding me with the business end of her eyes. “What do you make of those dreams?” she asked. “I think I’m reading too many headlines. Watching too much TV”

“There could be an entirely different explanation,” Angela said.

Maran’s former husband facilitates Maran’s new life in Oakland, California: “My ex-husband bought me out of our San Jose house to cover the other half.” and then the guy moves there so as to be close to their children.

Maran finds her soulmate:

And so, although our relationship felt like a miracle to me—what were the odds I’d meet a lesbian who gave me the passion and intimacy I’d ached for in my marriage, a woman who loved my children as intensely as she loved me—Jane and I saw a lesbian-affirmative couple’s counselor once a week. “The issue between you two isn’t power,” the therapist said, looking from one of us to the other. “It’s trust.” “I’m an incest survivor,” Jane said. The therapist nodded, as if that explained everything, which I supposed it did. My turn. What to say? “I had an unhappy childhood,” I said.

And being in the Bay Area makes it easy to find other like-minded individuals:

In our last co-counseling class, Kathy instructed each of us to choose one of our classmates as our long-term counseling partner. Thank goddess, there was one person in the group whom I’d come to like and respect. Catherine and I had so much in common; there couldn’t have been a better-matched co-counseling couple than we two. Catherine and I were both in our late thirties, both moms, both in tumultuous relationships with women. Incredibly, both of us were journalists specializing in sexual abuse. …

“I’ll say.” Catherine laughed mirthlessly. “I can’t believe I joined a therapy cult to deal with the fallout from reporting on satanic cults.” She sighed. “When I was working on a feminist film project in L.A. last year,” she said, “the crew was kind of cultish, too. They were all incest survivors, and they’re the ones who got me thinking I’m one too.” “Sometimes I think that’s all life is,” Catherine said. “Trading in one belief system, one cult, for the next.”

Maran describes how co-counseling worked

“My father hurt me,” [Catherine] sobbed.

“Yes,” I said, validating her feelings. “He did.”

When it was my turn, I read her the list I’d been keeping. WHAT MAKES ME THINK I WAS MOLESTED 1. Croup – age 18 months – holding my breath til I turned blue; deciding whether to live or die 2. Nosebleeds – ages 4 on? – waking up in the night with blood everywhere 3. Constant nightmares and insomnia – always. The dream: a monster is in my bedroom, I run for the door, my feet are stuck to the floor, a scream is stuck in my throat… 23. He married a woman my age. 24. He had a terrible sexual relationship with and hated my mother. 25. The dreams

Maran’s partner spends a lot of time with paid therapists:

Jane added Rosen bodywork to her therapy schedule. She was seeing her individual therapist on Mondays, our couple’s counselor with me on Tuesdays, and her Rosen bodyworker on Thursdays. I’d asked Jane whether it was worth the two hundred bucks a week. She’d answered categorically. She couldn’t function without therapy, she said, so how would she earn a living if she stopped? “I can barely function even with it,” she’d said. I didn’t dare say so, but all that therapy didn’t seem to be helping. Jane was more fearful, more easily “triggered” than ever. Everything “brought up her memories” of being molested: a tiny earthquake, a fender-bender, Matthew and Charlie growing taller.

Maran’s mother expresses skepticism: ““Your father had his failings. But there’s no way he could have done something like that to you.” Maran’s answer?

I drove back across San Francisco Bay, back to Planet Incest, where the question was always incest and the answer was always incest and the explanation for everything was always incest, and no one ever asked, “Are you sure?”

Maran tries to kick the habit:

When Catherine moved to D.C., I put incest into a box and locked it and threw away the key. I stopped writing incest articles and reading incest books and writing in my incest journal and hanging out with incest survivors exclusively. I quit therapy cold turkey, got a regular job at a local firm, writing fundraising letters for nonprofits. I started doing regular things with regular people: shopping with old and new friends, cheerful friends; going out for drinks after work and to movies that made me laugh instead of cry. I sang along to Michael Jackson instead of the achy, angry wimmin’s music of Ferron and Holly Near. It worked—for me. No more incest dreams, no more sleepless nights, no more crippling depression—for me. There was just one thing about Planet Incest that I couldn’t avoid: my lover was still living there. As my nightmares and memories receded, Jane’s were becoming more graphic and disturbing. She upped her appointments with her incest therapist to two, three, sometimes four sessions a week.

The result of this extra therapy?

Shaking in my arms, Jane remembered being raped before she was five years old. She remembered men and women standing around a campfire in a forest, chanting in a strange language, wearing dark robes. She remembered them digging a deep hole. They might have killed a baby, she told me in a child’s tremulous voice, and buried it in the hole.

The way back for Maran turned out to involve therapy:

“I want to make up with my father,” I said. I was lying on Miranda’s table, face up, eyes closed, her hands cradling my head from behind. “Your body agrees with that,” Miranda murmured in that Rosen bodywork voice of hers.

The partner moves out:

Dust bunnies blew across the floor, tumbleweeds in a deserted Western-movie town. Her bed was gone, her dressers, her clothes. Her collections of incest books and lesbian anthologies and the gay-parenting book we’d written together.

The family regroups.

When you accused Stan of abusing you,” Gloria [the stepmother] interjected, “I started looking at him with totally different eyes. I couldn’t sleep at night. I thought, ‘Am I lying here next to a child molester?’ ” She gazed at me intently. “I almost left my husband,” she said. “I know,” I said, remembering our

Full post, including comments

Danish happiness: bicycle infrastructure

Some of my personal happiest times have been when riding a bicycle. Even more fun is riding a bike with a child. Using a bicycle for transportation in the U.S., however, entails a certain amount of risk. Even if there is a dedicated bicycle lane there is nothing to stop a mobile phone-using driver from driving over and hitting you from the left. On right side of the bicycle lane will be a row of parked cars, each one a potential source of a driver opening a door without looking (a common enough accident that the term “being doored” has made its way into our language). For many of the bike trips that I’ve enjoyed I wouldn’t be comfortable taking a child with me on a trailer bike or in a bike seat.

Despite its old cities and old road network, Danes invested heavily in dedicated bicycle lanes. Typically there is a curb separating the bike lane from the cars and one more curb separating the bike lane from the sidewalk. Nobody can hit anybody else without going over a curb, in other words. Rather seldom is it the case that parked cars are next to the bicycle lane. Sometimes the bicycle lane is separated from the road by a curb and grass median. If there are cars parked along the road then an opened door will sway into the grass, not into the paved bike lane.

One sees a lot of children riding in various forms of modified bicycles and tricycles, including one heavy-looking design where two or three kids can ride in a huge basket in front of the bike, with the parent pushing on the pedals from behind. The kids get an awesome view; the adult gets a lot of exercise. Fortunately Denmark is pretty darn flat.

Because a bicycle can be used safely on every segment of almost any trip it becomes much more practical to dispense with car ownership and its $9100 annual bleed (according to AAA). The 24-hour metro, excellent intracity buses, and frequent trains other parts of Denmark complement the utility of bicycles in situations involving miserable weather and/or long distances.

The wild popularity of bikes does have some drawbacks. It can be tough to find a secure parking spot for a bike. There are so many cyclists in the bike lanes in Copenhagen in the summer that bike-bike collisions seem like a realistic fear (though I didn’t see any).

The way that we have things set up in the U.S. contributes to our higher per-capita GDP, but it does not make us better off. For example, if you think that a trip by bicycle will be unsafe due to a lack of bike lanes and take a car, you will burn gasoline, maintenance, and depreciation on that car, thereby boosting the measured GDP compared to if you had used your muscle power (not figured into GDP). If you then sign up for a gym membership and personal training to get rid of the fat that you’ve accumulated during all of these car-instead-of-bike trips, that boosts GDP though at the end of the process you will be no thinner or fitter than if you had biked. If you get hit by a car the GDP can easily be boosted by $25,000. You will buy a new bicycle. The car will need bodywork. You may be concerned about your health and get an MRI done at one of the world’s most expensive MRI clinics. Your MRI will be read by one of the world’s highest paid radiologists. What the radiologist says will be read to you, for a GDP-boosting fee, by one of the world’s highest paid neurologists.

Full post, including comments