Books >> Movies?
We had a full house last night for an Oscar’s party of sorts (TV is upstairs in a little loft area so people weren’t forced to watch). I was sad because Titanic couldn’t win again; it was such a great film that they really ought to give it Best Picture every year in perpetuity. I was confused when a neighbor sung the praises of the movie Rushmore and its genius director, Wes Anderson. The movie was fun but if there were profound ideas in it, I’m not sure what they were. Books, on the other hand, have been much more thought-provoking for me. Is there any reason to expect that books are a better source of serious thinking than movies? One possible theory is that people who have profound thoughts shy away from the committee and group work characteristic of filmmaking. Even if Joe Director finances a film himself and has 100 percent authority he will still spend a tremendous amount of time and effort communicating his ideas to subordinates, many of whom will misunderstand what he says. Thoughtful writers, by contrast, tend to be solitary figures who stay at home in the Connecticut woods (Philip Roth, Edward Tufte). One of our friends is a truly brilliant and original scientist (i.e., more or less average for Cambridge). This tenured professor says “I don’t like to read, write, or teach.” What does he enjoy doing? “I like to think.”
Would anyone like to take up my neighbor’s position that Rushmore is as profound as any book?
Full post, including comments