First Helicopter Instrument Student Today
I flew with my first helicopter instrument student today (ink still wet on my Helicopter CFII). He drove all the way to Boston from Dayton, Ohio to fly with us because he hadn’t been happy with the instructors in his region. The guy was a reasonably good instrument pilot but somewhat befuddled with the big challenges of doing approaches. His instructors had taught him to start a timer at the final approach fix, even on an ILS in case the glide slope failed and they wanted to turn it into a localizer approach. He was supposed to use a timer to hold, and a timer for procedure turns, even though his previous trainer aircraft had a Garmin 430 GPS. They hadn’t taught him to use more than the most basic features of the Garmin.
I pointed out that the new FAA Practical Test Standards required an applicant to use a moving map if available. I noted that a professional crew of two airline pilots would not try to salvage an ILS into a localizer approach if the glide slope were to fail. Since they did not brief the LOC approach they would go missed, ask for delay vectors, brief the LOC approach and come back to do it. Why would a general aviation pilot by himself try to do something that an airline crew wouldn’t do?
What about timing? The Garmin shows you where to hold, how to enter the hold, where to start procedure turns, when you’ve reached the missed approach point. Why would you run a timer to second-guess the Garmin? If the Garmin fails, ask for vectors from ATC.
I told him that I had recently passed an ATP checkride where I timed nothing, telling the examiner that I was going to turn off my brain and rely on the Garmin. Why was he making his instrument checkride tougher than my ATP ride?
He is doing great and I think he’ll be ready for a checkride in another week or so. I said “As soon as you can do all of this with about 20 percent of your attention, you’re ready. You need to save the other 80 percent to watch for and handle the unexpected.”
Full post, including comments