Mauthausen concentration camp still a live issue in the U.S.

According to this AP news story, a guard from Austria’s Mauthausen concentration camp was arrested today in Michigan.  It is rather ironic that the Europe’s war against its Jewish citizens is still a matter of public interest and debate here in the U.S. considering that for most Europeans it is history as ancient and irrelevant as the Roman Republic.  The story reminded me of a trip to Austria in May 2002.  Austrians would ask where I’d been thus far.  I’d reply “Salzburg, Mauthausen, biking down the Donau”.  Oftentimes their immediate response was “We had no idea that camp was there.”


Mauthausen has been turned into a very informative museum and one of the interpretive signs is a map showing the dozens of factories within a radius of about 60 miles to which thousands of Mauthausen inmates were dispatched to work alongside ordinary Austrians.  If the Austrians were indeed unaware of the existence of the camp they must have thought it was strange that some of their fellow workers were so shabbily dressed and getting thinner every day until finally they didn’t show up.

Full post, including comments

A billion here, a billion there…

Ever since I started to fly it has been confusing to me that the FAA does not spend a few $million publishing charts, airport and airspace information, and terrain avoidance information for the U.S. on a Web site; this would greatly improve the availability of this information to pilots and therefore safety.  A federal report released today provides some insight.  This report looks at 20 computer- and software-heavy projects undertaken by the FAA over the last 7 years.  They found cost overruns of $4.3 billion and schedule slippage of up to 7 years (but never less than 1 year).


It is no wonder that a lot of decision-makers don’t want to invest in anything with an information technology component. 

Full post, including comments

Dia:Beacon

An hour’s train ride north of Manhattan, straight up the Hudson River toward Poughkeepsie, is the new Dia:Beacon art museum.  I stopped there today on my way back to Boston from Washington, DC.  It is a vast warehouse of contemporary art, sort of like Mass MOCA, but much more a celebration of the art and the artists and much less about the building and the institution.  Where Mass MOCA has big signs talking about the history of each room, the Dia:Beacon has only signs giving information about the art.  Where Mass MOCA crams the art into whatever space is convenient for a season or two and then shoves it back out the front door, the art at Dia:Beacon has found a permanent home.  Each artist gets at least one room to him or herself.


Philip and Annie’s tips for would-be visitors:


1) Don’t judge Dan Flavin, the fluorescent tube artist, by what you see in Beacon; go to Marfa, Texas (another Dia-funded project).


2) The cafe is rough around the edges.  Eat before you arrive unless you just want coffee and carbs.


3) Don’t miss the Robert Irwin garden (same guy who did the garden at the New Getty) and the big collection of Serras in the adjoining basement.


4) Be sure to read the essay in the Sandback string sculpture room, which is also available on the Web site (pull down “Riggio Galleries” from the “Beacon” menu).  Favorite excerpts:  “space is both defined and imbued with an incorporeal palpability”; “each sculpture is newly parsed for the site”; “Fact and illusion are equivalents,” [Fred Sandback] asserts; “Trying to weed one out in favor of the other is dealing with an incomplete situation.”  [Getting to the Dia:Beacon had required flying through 30 minutes of cumulus clouds on an instrument flight from Gaithersburg, MD, the rest of which was obscured by the same kind of summer haze that proved fatal to JFK, Jr.-style; imagine if the airline pilots flying through the same conditions decided that fact (what the instruments say) and illusion (one’s natural perceptions of being straight and level or falling sideways) were equivalent.]


For pilots or people whose friends are pilots:  You get to Dia:Beacon by flying into Stewart Air Force Base, KSWF, an active base for C5 cargo jets.  The runway is 11,800′ long so if you have trouble landing a Cessna there don’t tell anyone.  Taxi over to Rifton Aviation and borrow a crew car (1994 Ford Escorts with 110,000+ miles on them, perfectly adequate with air conditioning and a radio, thus proving the previously stated theory about the $2,000 Chinese car) for a 15-minute drive over to the east side of the Hudson River.  Take the first exit on 9D and follow signs for the train station in Beacon.  The museum is just south of the train station.

Full post, including comments

I wish that I had voted for Ross Perot…

I had an antipathy to Ross Perot, the independent presidential candidate, from the moment that I heard him speak on television.  He was talking about education.  Any time that you hear a federal candidate talk about education you know that he is trying to snow the voters.  The Federal Government has almost nothing to do with funding or delivering education in this country; it is overwhelmingly a local and state government show.


But it turns out that H. Ross Perot, Jr.is my new hero.  I was down on the Washington Mall on Sunday afternoon.  The Smithsonian was running a folk festival.  Instead of scheduling it from 5-10 pm, Mexican- or Italian-style, they’d scheduled it during the peak heat of the afternoon.  After one hour it became intolerable and I ducked into the Air and Space Museum to soak up the air conditioning.  Up on the second floor, they have a Bell Jet Ranger helicopter.  H. Ross Perot, Jr., a young punk with 500 hours, and J. Coburn, a 3500-hour Vietnam vet were the first people to fly a helicopter all the way around the world.


Two guys.  Big extra fuel tank in the back seats.  One (very reliable turbine) engine.  Refueling stop on a container ship.


(I’ve not kept up with the achievements of the children of our current President; perhaps the comment section will fill up with reports of their heroic deeds.)

Full post, including comments

How to Get Rich from Online Personals?

One of the pleasures of being an old lazy person is helping young energetic people achieve their dreams.  I’ve been working with a young very capable guy since around 1997.  He sold his last company, traveled a bit, and is now starting up a business centered around online personal ads.  I’m supposed to be helping him but of course being old and lazy it would be much easier to harvest good ideas from the comments section of this blog.  So let’s hear your creative ideas for some new business that is somehow related to online personals….


To frame the discussion a bit, a bit of background (but not so much that ideas will be constrained):


1) in a world where people won’t pay for online subscriptions, they seem to be happy to pay for online personal sites (a plus for a new business)


2) more or less everything that can be monopolized on the Internet has been monopolized, i.e., assume that Amazon owns retail, eBay owns classifieds, match.com owns the underlying personals database, etc.  This means that you can’t start a business whose objective is to unseat or even compete with any of the established monopolies.  One’s goal must be to work within the environment that the monopolies have established.  (And possibly to get acquired by one in the long run.)


Thoughts?

Full post, including comments

Why the Supreme Court affirmative action decision was right

The Washington Post carries an interesting article today on why the recent Supreme Court decision allowing the state of Michigan to continue its race-based affirmative action program is “welcome”.  The absence of these ideas from earlier debates shows how easy it is to forget that the American people have, in theory, some political power to change laws (Paul Krugman op-ed today reminds us of the opposite.)


(The Post article also carries a link to last week’s column in which the same writer argues in favor of a tax on imported oil, as at the end of my Israel Essay.)

Full post, including comments

Privatization of Air Traffic Control

Measured objectively, the government sector of the United States runs some of the developed world’s worst-performing schools and the best-performing aviation system.  Yet oddly enough it is the air traffic control system that politicians propose to privatize.


Privatization is currently underway for flight service stations.  These are FAA employees who don’t separate airplanes from each other but instead provide varied forms of assistance.  You can call Flight Service on the telephone to ask about the weather before departing.  You can call Flight Service on the radio to ask where the thunderstorms are along your route or what the closest airport with good weather is.  You can call Flight Service in an emergency.  These folks are incredibly resourceful and helpful by and large and often go far beyond their job description in an effort to help pilots.


The folks at www.naats.org are trying to save their jobs and they’ve put together a very interesting audio clip that is worth hearing whether or not you care about this issue:  http://www.naats.org/docs/flightassist.mp3 (you may decide not to fly with beginner private pilots after listening to these emergency calls).


Plan for today… fly to Republic Airport on Long Island and swim in Bob’s pool, then back to Bedford and over to the Weston Town Green for a 7 pm concert by Not the Beatles (the infamous Luke, of Harvard Square fame, is lead guitar).  The concert is free but bring your own blanket and picnic.  Alex will be there!

Full post, including comments

Universities: Training America’s youth to be racist

A grim day in the Supreme Court.  Libraries can filter out porn sites, which means that philip.greenspun.com won’t be accessible (there are a few nude pix on it but the filtering companies generally block the whole site).  Judging a man (or woman) by the color of his skin gets Supreme Court blessing as well.


My personal primary argument against affirmative action at universities was never voiced during the debate so I’ll present it here.


Background:  Getting into a selective university is partly a consequence of high IQ and fortunate preparation but a lot of doing well at all levels of school is a question of how willing a student is to accept authority blindly.  For example, I was amazed last semester when tutoring 6.002 (intro circuit theory).  My friend Gerry delivered several lectures on the response of linear systems to complex exponentials.  I said “Gerry you have to motivate this by telling the students that any real-world signal can be represented as a sum of complex exponentials.  Otherwise, why would they care?”  Gerry refused to take even 30 seconds out of his lecture time to explain why what he was teaching was relevant.  I waited for the MIT sophomores to tune out.  They never did!  They paid attention, took notes, did the problem sets, etc., even though they had no idea what any of the stuff was good for.  Then it hit me:  high school teachers don’t always motivate the material either, MIT only accepts students who did well in high school, ergo all students at MIT are people who are willing to do stuff merely because a teacher (authority figure) says to do it.


Top schools select heavily for people who respect authority and those who respect authority the most tend to do the best once in college.  It is thus no mystery that Asian immigrant children do well and ghetto kids raised on rap music (“fuck the police”) don’t do so well, even if both groups start out with the same IQ.


Assertion:  Affirmative action programs at universities do not result in a reduction of prejudice but rather inculcate prejudice in people who would otherwise be fair-minded.


Example of how this happens:  Consider a hypothetical race of Bodleians, people from the Planet Bodleia.  Bodleians on average do not perform well in high school and are under-represented at universities.  If admissions were race-blind Big State U would be 5% Bodleian, 40% white, and 55% Asian.  Administrators at Big State U establish a program that gets rid of 5% of the Asians and replaces them with Bodleians.  Now Big State U is 10% Bodleian.


Consider Joe Whiteboy, a new graduate student who has no preconceived ideas about Bodleians.  He is a teaching assistant for undergrad courses and, after three semesters, notices that all of the students who got Fs were Bodleian.  Not all Bodleians got Fs, mind you.  In fact some of Joe’s best students were Bodleians, presumably drawn from the 5% who would have gotten in under a race-blind system.  That said, Joe’s very worst students were all Bodleian.  They didn’t do any of the homework, seldom showed up to class, and didn’t seem to care about academics.  Grading in these big courses is all based on exam scores so it couldn’t have been prejudice by other staff members that resulted in the Bodleian failure.  Joe Whiteboy starts his fourth semester of TAing and sees four Bodleians in his section.  He gets a sinking feeling in the pit of his stomach.  Though he hopes that one or two will be quite bright, he expects that at least two of these minorities will fail the class.  Joe Whiteboy has learned prejudice at Big State U, as have all of the white and Asian undergrads who watched the failure of such a high percentage of Bodleians in their classes. 


Is it so bad for our state schools to teach prejudice?  Our prejudiced graduate can make $300,000 per year as a radiologist.  He reads the MRI scans and probably nobody will ever ask what he thinks of Bodleians as a group.  He’d think twice about hiring a Bodleian but his prejudice isn’t a career liability for him.


What about for the 5% of Bodleians who would have gotten into Big State U?  Affirmative action is a disaster for them.  Consider the used car market.  Very few used cars are lemons but it is tough as a buyer to figure out whether or not a used car is reliable.  Economists have demonstrated that the result, in the absence of certification programs and warrantees, is people valuing all cars as though they were lemons.  A Bodleian with a degree from Big State U will be treated as a potential lemon.


Suggestion:  Public universities should be race-blind.  There are enough high achievers from every ethnic group that every university student will have some contact with politically favored minorities and those students will learn an important lesson:  politically favored minorities are every bit as smart as whites and Asians.


How do we help under-represented minorities?  Our public schools are so expensive that, at no extra cost to taxpayers, we could fly ghetto kids out of the ghetto and into a top boarding school in an authority-respecting, achievement-oriented society, e.g., India, Hong Kong, or Korea.  When they come back from their sojourn among the diligent, they’ll be able to get into just about any American college.


Homework assignment:  watch the documentary Spellbound, currently in theaters, to see how American kids from different ethnic groups prepare for the National Spelling Bee (my college classmate Barrie Trinkle was the winner in 1973 but sadly she was not interviewed).


Tidbit:  Our local school system here in Cambridge, Massachusetts is the most expensive in Massachusetts and also one that has some of the lowest test scores in the state, i.e., we are producing the kids that need affirmative action to get into college.  I ate Thanksgiving dinner with a couple of Mexican children whose father was spending a year at Harvard and therefore they had enrolled in Cambridge public school.  I asked them how they compared their school experience in Cambridge versus Mexico and was it difficult to attend classes in English when their native language was Spanish.  They replied “School here is much easier.  In Mexico we had to work until 8:00 pm every night doing homework but in Cambridge we never have to study at all.”

Full post, including comments

Favorite island in the South Pacific? Place to stop in Europe?

Let’s see whether the blog works in reverse…


At the end of July I must give a talk in Sydney, Australia.  The plan is to fly west around the world.  It would be possible to stop somewhere in the South Pacific, perhaps most easily in Fiji.  On the way back I am planning to stop in Western Australia and then St. Petersburg, Russia.


The questions:


1) best place to stop in the South Pacific for a few days?  Is there a great place to sit in a hotel and snorkel from the beach in Fiji?


2) interesting place to stop in mid-August between Perth, Australia and Russia?


Constraints:  (a) I have an Israeli stamp in my U.S. passport from my recent trip to Tel Aviv and therefore would be denied entry to almost any Muslim country; (b) I want to take reasonably direct flights (and therefore Africa seems to be out of the question; you can’t get there except by connecting through Europe or Dubai (which might be a problem with that Israeli passport stamp)).


Please put your suggestions in the comments or email if you prefer.


Thanks!

Full post, including comments