The newspapers are full of stories about the fourth anniversary of our adventure in Iraq and the start of our fifth unprofitable year in this corner of the world. How do we get out and explain away the fact that we were beaten by the Iraqis, 60 percent of whom are illiterate?
Maybe it is time for Congress to redefine the mission of the U.S. military so that withdrawal from Iraq will be required by the new mission statement. We can sell our Iraq operation the way that a big company might sell a division after its focus changes.
Suppose that the mission of the U.S. military were defined to be “Shooting and bombing people who don’t like the United States until they are too weak and poor to act on their animosity”. The first few weeks of the Iraq operation fit this mission statement pretty well. We destroyed a lot of infrastructure and military hardware to the point that Saddam Hussein was no longer in command of anything very impressive. The recent U.S. operation in Somalia fits this mission too. We sent some AC-130 gunships to circle at 5000′ and blow up the cars and trucks of the escaping former government.
Who will take over the nation-building and relief operations that our military has been saddled with? We have other U.S. government agencies that specialize in development work and we can always pay other countries to do the grubby on-the-ground stuff (as we are in most African conflicts these days).
Once the U.S. military’s mission has been explicitly redefined to a purely military one, our troops can withdraw from Iraq the very next week, saying “this operation is no longer the kind of thing that we do.”
[Note that this proposal is neutral as to the level of belligerence that we wish to apply to the rest of the world. I am not advocating that we shoot or bomb more or fewer people, only that we say “the military’s mission is exclusively belligerent.”]
Full post, including comments