Optimism about U.S. economic prospects

My favorite economist (never understand what she says, but love to hear her talk) sent me “Possible Macroeconomic Consequences of Large Future Federal Government Deficit” by a Yale economist under a subject line “fodder for your bleak outlook”. She summarized my recent Weblog postings on the economy as “bleak”, which to me means “pessimistic”. Yet I’m actually very optimistic about U.S. economic prospects in an unfettered market. Here are some reasons for optimism…

  • The average American worker is better educated and more capable than the average worker worldwide. There are, of course, many excellent workers in countries such as China and Mexico, but on average a U.S. worker is more useful to a business.
  • We have a better-than-average infrastructure of transportation, communications, electric power, and legal system.
  • We have a lot of natural resources, including the basics of land and fresh water.

How come we are having trouble growing our economy? Part of the problem is that the products and services that people want to buy aren’t available. Let’s look at a top-of-the-head list. We’ll exclude products that require a huge amount of scientific and engineering innovation, e.g., a house-cleaning robot.

  • A basic city car, gas or electric, priced similarly to the Tata Nano (i.e., $2500)–I would buy one tomorrow
  • A dock for using a smartphone as one’s home computer (see this 2005 article)
  • A compact motorhome, sort of like the old VW camper van (see this article on making recreational vehicles in China)
  • A home aquarium hood combining lights, filter, heater, UV sterilizer, and automatic fish feeder (see this posting; I would buy one tomorrow)
  • A floor lamp consisting of an upright fluorescent tube covered by a paper shade (see this posting; I would buy one tomorrow)
  • A prefabricated one-room house, for someone who wanted to have the industrial loft experience in the suburbs (see this design)
  • Mobile phone software that would, based on its knowledge of your location, show you a list of nearby hotels and how much they were charging for rooms at the moment, with the opportunity to reserve a room through the phone (useful for travelers; I used this as an example of the lack of innovation at phone companies back around 1997 when it became technically straightforward (Expedia was up and running by then)–it never occurred to me that we still wouldn’t have this 12 years later)

It is true that the same old products aren’t selling quite as well at their same old prices, but that’s partly because people already have the same old products. It is a lot easier to sell new products for which no competition exists.

So that’s my optimistic posting about the economy. All that we need to do is design and produce a few things that aren’t available already.

3 thoughts on “Optimism about U.S. economic prospects

  1. Awe. It sounds like Phil has a bit of a crush. This is a refreshing article, though the study is realistically “bleak.” I’m glad that someone else commented on increasingly frequent sad and frustrated posts so that I didn’t have to 😉

    I’m an undergrad currently enrolled in a macroeconomics course at an “urban research university” in the midwest. I recently discovered the industry of stranger originated life insurance, and was a bit appalled. Surprisingly, the overwhelming majority of the students replied with “Why not do it?” One woman said something to the effect of “I am a finance major and while this sounds morally wrong, its legal so I want to profit from it one day.”

    I brought up the point that there is no productivity in someone’s death and thus short term gains from abuse of the insurance system will not create sustainable growth in the GDP. Not to mention that it gives someone else a vested interest in your death, but that’s just social pish posh, right!

    I believe this is the most basic reason that the US is having trouble growing its economy. Smart people prefer to think up things like STOLI and COLI, instead of figuring out how to make a car that costs less than a set of quality American tires (ok, maybe two sets).

    The innovation isn’t focused on creating something that people want- its all about new ways to control and manipulate knowledge and public policy in such a way that special interest groups can gain short term profits. I seem to remember a couple instances of Phil citing former MIT students as selling sub prime mortgages with their compsci education.

    http://philip.greenspun.com/blog/2005/11/19/the-value-of-an-mit-education/
    http://philip.greenspun.com/blog/2008/12/02/life-is-unfair-applied-to-globalization/

  2. Here is one to add to the list:
    High speed rail, North America is falling behind China on this:

    http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2009/fortune/0908/gallery.china_high_speed_train.fortune/index.html

    This would provide an alternative to the crowded airports and airspace especially on the east coast.

    Instead of bailout for the banks and GM the US could have invested in high speed rail and at least have something valuable to pass on to the next generation along with the big debt.

  3. Ott Lite is an American company that makes great lights for crafters, etc. Not too sure if they have the technology you are looking for …

    As for the car thing, Better Place is working on that! Ontario’s Bullfrog Power has a connection so I will sell my Matrix and get one as soon as they arrive in Canada.

    Love your blog Phil … I share it sometimes with my 15 year old son and it makes for great discussions at the dinner table.

    Dianne
    Toronto, Canada

Comments are closed.