Washington, D.C. versus Boston

I spent a recent Sunday in Washington, D.C. visiting art museums, my favorite white bitch, and family. The big show in town is everything Spanish that could be stuffed into the National Gallery. More in tune with the times, however, are the oil paintings commissioned by the Federal Government during the Depression exhibited at the National Museum of American Art (link). There is some truly great stuff on the walls there (example), a subset of the more than 7,000 paintings, 750 sculptures, and 700 murals created by 3,700 artists at a total cost to the taxpayer of $1.3 million (about $21 million in 2009 dollars). Let’s hope that comparable work will come out of the Collapse of 2008 and subsequent bailouts (are there interesting art projects buried amidst the trillions of dollars being spent on bailouts and stimulus?).

Walking around Northwest D.C. you wouldn’t know that anyone anywhere in the U.S. was hurting economically. The parks are groomed, the monuments and museums are polished and fully staffed, there are very few retail spaces vacant, and everyone looks optimistic (walking) or frustrated (stuck in the heavy traffic that attends growth in a city incapable of implementing congestion pricing). Stopping to pick up some fruit at a Giant supermarket in Bethesda, I parked next to a brand new Bentley convertible. Stepping onto the metro at Friendship Heights, I walked passed a soon-to-be-completed gleaming new luxury shopping mall, complete with $100 per person chain steakhouse. The retailers’ confidence in opening was consistent with a July 2009 report that “Washington D.C.’s most expensive retail submarkets seem to be among the few in the nation that have seen rent growth over the last year” (source). Government workers are more numerous and better paid than prior to the Collapse, but probably the Bentley belongs to a lobbyist (see this article for how returns on an investment in lobbying can exceed 22,000 percent). As the government embarks on its largest expansion since World War II and grows beyond 28 percent of the GDP, lobbyists have become second only to politicians in their influence on our nation’s economy.

I expected long lines and full flights around a 9 a.m. Monday morning departure from DCA, but the TSA staff outnumbered passengers in the security area and there were only 19 passengers on our 76-seat regional jet. One possible explanation is that the federal government has now become so powerful that there is no need for anyone in Washington to leave the city on business. The government regulator who used to go to Indiana to check out a factory can now sit at his desk because the factory has shut down.

After the cabin door was closed, the captain warned passengers not to get up and use the restroom prior to reaching our cruising altitude of 31,000′ , by which time we’d be in Delaware or New Jersey and freed from the special security regulations that govern flights in and out of National Airport. If someone had gotten food poisoning from the bagel shop in the terminal and ran to the bathroom, the airplane would have to be diverted from landing in Boston. We’d be landing at some other airport for a security check and would then proceed to Boston. Note that this would cost the airline approximately $10,000 in fuel, engine reserves, and disrupted schedule.

Once home in Boston I was able to renew my struggle with the exciting challenges of suburban living. The Waltham Home Depot was virtually empty at 6 pm. Helpful employees converged to assist in my quest for appropriate technology to water grass that is hundreds of feet from the nearest tap. I asked one of the workers, a fully licensed but young plumber, how the store was doing since the Collapse of 2008. He said “I can’t compare to what it was like before the downturn because the crash is one of the reasons that I am here. I work three jobs now and earn less than I did at just one job.”

6 thoughts on “Washington, D.C. versus Boston

  1. DC is so dependent on the federal government that it is largely isolated from the recession. There was a report the other day that Metro ridership had declined so much that the system was facing around a $20 million shortfall. But this could be due to layoffs, lower gas prices, etc.

    From what I hear law firms in the area are laying off many attorneys.

  2. Going around the museums in DC with kids is quite eye opening. Frankly most of them suck – the zoo, natural history, air & space are all way worse than comparable museums at other large metropolitan areas. Despite having much higher budgets. The lack of competition and accountability leads to mediocre experience. In a normal city you would have at least 3-4 institutions competing for your money.

    But maybe there is a small glimmer of hope: Obama is kicking the lobbyist from government panels:
    http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?parm1=5&docID=news-000003216413

  3. @tekumse – Suck? That’s a little strong. I’m not sure I know of another air museum in the world that can hold a candle to the A&S museum. Where else can you view aircraft with the significance of the Wright Flyer, Spirit of St. Louis, Bell X-1, and the Apollo 11 capsule all by walking, oh 50 steps? I’ve been to other air museums and I always come back to A&S with a sense of “Wow. And I get to see this for FREE!”

    The federal govt. does many things badly. Washington museums are not one of them, IMO. My only beef with them is that whenever I go, at least one is undergoing yet another renovation and infusion of cash so that I’m denied a visit.

  4. Tekumse, Chuck: The Air and Space museum does have an unparalleled collection, of course. But I was very disappointed with their new hangar at Dulles Airport. Although they have ample space for an unlimited quantity of signs, no attempt is made at educating visitors. A person could not go there and learn anything about how engines work or how airfoils fly. You can look around and see some cool stuff, but you don’t learn anything about how the stuff was engineered or how it works.

    The zoo in Singapore does walk all over the National Zoo, despite having a lot less space and presumably less money. The guys in Singapore are brilliant gardeners.

  5. Having a collection is one thing – properly displaying it and exciting the visitors is another. This is very important to younger audience who doesn’t arrive with all the knowledge that a professional would. And I think this should be their focus – getting kids excited about science and discovery. It is not like I’d drop my IT career and apply to NASA. My kids have more than 100 flights before age 10, they take aviation for granted. Most science museums have a lot of hands on things like making your own rover or just trying to keep an airplane steady. Those both challenge the kids and make them actually appreciate how hard it is to do things. Nobody appreciates an expert until they have to walk in their shoes.

  6. The National Museum of the United States Air Force (on Wright-Patterson AFB in Dayton, OH) feels bigger than Air and Space, and has pretty decent signs. Of course, you have to go to Dayton to see it.

Comments are closed.