Literary gold standard for hair dryer reviews

A friend has applied her substantial literary talents to an area that did not seem amenable: the hair dryer review. Check out “Say Hello to the Dyson Supersonic Hairdryer.”

Separately, will significant numbers of people actually pay $400 for a hair dryer? If so, what does that say about the economy?

6 thoughts on “Literary gold standard for hair dryer reviews

  1. Considering that scalpers on Amazon are already selling it at 100% markup ($800), there seems to be at least significant early adopter demand. My previous hairdryer lasted 10 years. If this one lasts even half that long, that’s only $80 a year – about the cost of single blow-out at a salon. Thanks for posting my review! 🙂

  2. Women spend $2000 a year on up , I think, for beauty/cosmetics/salon etc.

    So $400 for something you will keep for 5 years or more, doesn’t seem like a huge outlay.

  3. There is always a (small) market for Veblen goods or perhaps what should be called Barnum goods. I always assumed that companies like Monster Cable would go out of business when digital came in – after all, either a cable is capable of transferring all of a digital signal or fails completely – there’s really no in between. A $5 HDMI works exactly the same as a $100 Monster HDMI. But these companies keep selling imaginary benefits. The power cable is really a whole new level of BS though.

  4. It must be a pretty amazing $400 hair dryer, because on Amazon it is selling for $800.

  5. I think that until the price comes downs a bit then other models like the Parlux 385 will still out sell the Dyson as that is not a affordable price for most.

Comments are closed.