Time for graduate school in Trump hatred

If we regard the lead-up to the election as a Bachelor’s degree in Trump-hatred, can the post-election activity be thought of as grad school? From “Voting Trump Out is Not Enough,” by Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor (New Yorker):

Like tens of millions of Americans, I voted to end the miserable reign of Donald J. Trump, but we cannot perpetuate the election-year fiction that the deep and bewildering problems facing millions of people in this country will simply end with the Trump Administration. They are embedded in “the system,” in systemic racism, and the other social inequities that are the focus of continued activism and budding social movements. Viewing the solution to these problems as simply electing Joe Biden and Kamala Harris both underestimates the depth of the problems and trivializes the remedies necessary to undo the damage. That view may also confuse popular support for fundamental change, as evidenced by Trump’s one-term Presidency, with what the Democratic Party is willing or even able to deliver.

The hated dictator’s name appears more than 20 times in this article.

With Trump gone, it is apparently time to listen to the scientists who said that the shutdown would cost more lives than would be saved from Covid-19:

Today, in Philadelphia, where I live, there is not a single aspect of life that the pandemic has not upended, from work and school to housing and health care, pulling poor and working-class African-Americans, in particular, deeper into debt and despair. The uncertainty of the moment, let alone the future, feeds fear, frustration, hopelessness, and dread. In Philadelphia, shootings are on the rise, and the murder rate is growing. … African-Americans make up eighty-five per cent of the city’s shooting victims. Even before the pandemic, drug overdoses in Black Philadelphia were on the rise. In the first three months of shelter-in-place orders, a hundred and forty-seven Black residents died by accidental drug overdose, forty-seven per cent of drug deaths in the city. … Job losses have overwhelmingly affected low-wage, minority workers. Since May, as many as eight million people have been pushed into poverty, with Black families overrepresented among them. … Thousands of people have already been evicted during this crisis, and nearly one out of six renters have fallen behind on their rent. Nearly one in four renters who live with children report that they are not up-to-date with the rent. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s unprecedented moratorium on evictions was too good to be true: the Trump Administration recently signalled to landlords that it would allow them to challenge the eligibility of tenants. This leaves the viability of the C.D.C. moratorium up to the discretion of individual judges, who may or may not honor it. Local organizers and activists have tried to fill the gap created by federal neglect with relentless mutual-aid organizing, but it is hardly sufficient.

Our cities are actually run by good people:

It is not a Trumpian slur to observe that many of the cities where Black suffering takes place are also governed by proud members of the Democratic Party. Instead, it illuminates the depth of the bipartisan failure to address the tangled roots of racism, poverty, and inequality.

But they have been let down by the U.S. economy, which is only about half as large as it needs to be to support the subsidies that low-skill and/or non-working Americans require:

In Philadelphia, which, ignobly, has among the highest proportion of poor residents of any big city in the country, thousands stand on the cusp of eviction. Twenty-two per cent of households in the city are severely cost-burdened, meaning that they are spending half or more of their income on housing costs, which is well above the national average. Before this downturn, sixty-one per cent of households headed by Black women in Philadelphia were spending at least thirty per cent of their income on rent, compared with fifty-three per cent of households headed by white women and forty-four per cent of households headed by white men.

(The author doesn’t mention this, but what will really help these folks is 45 million immigrants to compete with them in the rental market:

(from Migration Policy Institute). Econ 101 tells us that when demand is boosted by 45 million, prices for scarce rentals will inevitably fall.)

Not enough money is being diverted from rural America (i.e., the counties that voted Republican) to the cities (i.e., the counties that voted Democrat):

The likely gridlock in Congress next year will lead to more stagnation in local government, as communities become hamstrung by a lack of federal funding.

(I should do a separate blog post on this. I wonder if the reason that people in low-density parts of the U.S. vote for smaller government is that big government spends nearly all of its money in cities. Hospitals, federal buildings, central post offices, community centers, concert halls, courthouses, etc. all tend to be built in downtown areas. The bigger the government, the larger the transfer from rural counties to urban counties.)

The core problem is the existence of Republicans:

That conclusion may seem to be supported by the shocking fact that upward of seventy million people voted to reëlect the most corrupt, venal, and brazenly racist President in modern American history. … The insistence on unity between the two parties almost always comes at the expense of those whose needs are greatest. How would a Biden Administration incorporate the views of a Republican Party that has supported a white-supremacist President, voted for Trump’s plutocratic tax cuts, advocated for the separation of families at the border, and facilitated the heist of a Supreme Court seat in hopes of fulfilling the right’s fantasy of ending access to abortion and destroying any hint of government-backed health insurance? We were told that this Presidential race was the most consequential of our lifetimes, that it was a contest between democracy and budding fascism. Why would Biden welcome the foot soldiers of Trump’s authoritarian politics into his coalition?

And the struggle will continue even if Trump disappears in his Boeing 757, beyond the reach of even the most vindictive Democrats:

The need in this country dwarfs the best of what Biden has put on the table for changing our current condition. But the demonstrations of the summer, the ongoing campaigns for mutual aid, and the growing movement against evictions are demonstrable proof that power is not only generated in mainstream politics but can be garnered through collective organizing and acts of solidarity. They also foretell a future in which the country does not return to a long-forgotten normal but is animated by protests, strikes, occupations, and the ongoing struggle for food, medicine, care, housing, justice, and democracy.

One reason that I voted for Bernie Sanders (twice!) was his logical consistency. In my opinion, we shouldn’t run a country that says housing is a “right” and then provide subsidized housing to only one quarter of those who qualify. At the same time, building the 7 million additional low-income housing units that are required (NLIHC) will cost roughly $5 trillion. Not only don’t we have an extra $5 trillion lying around, but every year an additional million or so low-skill immigrants arrive whose correspondingly low income would entitle them to subsidized housing (i.e., even if we got 7 million new units built by the end of 2021, we’d still have a substantial shortfall).

The Democrats actually did have control of the Presidency and Congress in the first two years of the Obama Administration, right? And they couldn’t find enough money in the U.S. economy to achieve their policy goals? If the Democrats’ huge advantage in funding is sufficient to take control of the Senate via the Georgia runoff votes, will they be able to fund their dream programs in 2021 and 2022? Or will they discover that the U.S. economy has grown at a much slower per-capita rate than their dreams?


13 thoughts on “Time for graduate school in Trump hatred

  1. I’ve had enough of all of them. The New York Times using its pages as a neo-Marxist Social Justice broadsheet and everything else these idiots have championed for the past 40 years have resulted in every single problem imaginable and more, and they never stop to ask themselves if anything they’ve done has something to do with it. Never even a single moment of self-reflection or self-criticism, except to push their agendas harder and force everyone at the point of a spear. Which they deserve.

    • Actually, I’m wrong about that. Alan Krueger had a moment of self-reflection when he killed himself.

  2. A bunch of trumpers are saying they have proof of chicanery. Lacking any mastery of the subject of computers, I cannot evaluate the validity of the claims.


    It’s a bunch of .python scripts analyzing json data from the new york times on the vote reporting.

    Is this total baloney, philg, or does this present a smoking gun of miscounting? Imagine the accolades you would receive in your community if you proved the trumper claims wrong.

    • I don’t think Philg has a community. He’s kind of an Army of One, and won’t take up the counting. And I don’t expect what you linked to will make any difference whatsoever. That’s already been decided. The election is over in terms of the Presidency. All that’s left is the Senate.

    • If you want to be morbid about it, look at poor Ivana Trump. She looks like a very sad, sad woman indeed. They’re both pizzachit.

    • America is run by people who have absolutely no idea of what they’re doing, except when it comes to taking money from them. It is literally the biggest fraud in the history of the world, from one end to the other. And the larger fraud is the government we maintain, which is just going to get bigger and more elaborate. America abandoned all the principles of limited government many, many years ago and what’s left is just a competition among various tribes of thieves.

    • @Mememe: I’m a descendant of Thomas Jefferson. And I can tell you that if you brought him back to life and showed him what America has become, he’d say: “Send me back!”

  3. Reading the Taylor essay, I wouldn’t describe it as Trump hatred: it’s a description of the huge challenges facing the US from an urban perspective. On top of that there’s similarly huge challenges in rural areas, like the opioid crisis. As an outsider, it seems to me that the overall US economy, pre-Covid, is doing fine, but Americans are divided, demoralized, and insecure.

    The immediate crisis is whether the Republican Party will continue to back Trump’s attempts to set aside the results of the election. Then there’s the wartime-level emergency of Covid (which seems like an opportunity to try to unify the country, assuming Trump no longer has the incentive to downplay the virus). Getting more financial aid passed by the Republican-held Senate, so that people can stay home instead of going to work and spreading the virus, will be difficult; but maybe pairing it with more large tax cuts for the wealthy (suggested by Matthew Yglesias) will work.

    After that, we’ll see how much the Biden Administration can get done with the Republicans holding the Senate and wanting to retake the House in 2022. Anything that requires Senate approval, like spending money or passing legislation, is unlikely. It sounds like Trump will want to run again in 2024.

    Personally I think that US political institutions have become increasingly paralyzed, leading to immense frustration and the desire for a strongman. In a healthy democracy, political parties keep demagogues from gaining power, but the Republican Party has demonstrated that it’s too weak to stand up to Trump or to future demagogues. Richard Rorty, writing in 1997:

    … members of labor unions, and unorganized unskilled workers, will sooner or later realize that their government is not even trying to prevent wages from sinking or to prevent jobs from being exported. Around the same time, they will realize that suburban white-collar workers – themselves desperately afraid of being downsized – are not going to let themselves be taxed to provide social benefits for anyone else.

    At that point, something will crack. The non-suburban electorate will decide that the system has failed and start looking around for a strongman to vote for – someone willing to assure them that, once he is elected, the smug bureaucrats, tricky lawyers, overpaid bond salesmen, and postmodernist professors will no longer be calling the shots….

    One thing that is very likely to happen is that the gains made in the past forty years by black and brown Americans, and by homosexuals, will be wiped out. Jocular contempt for women will come back into fashion…. All the resentment which badly educated Americans feel about having their manners dictated to them by college graduates will find an outlet.

    One minor point that caught my eye:

    (I should do a separate blog post on this. I wonder if the reason that people in low-density parts of the U.S. vote for smaller government is that big government spends nearly all of its money in cities. Hospitals, federal buildings, central post offices, community centers, concert halls, courthouses, etc. all tend to be built in downtown areas. The bigger the government, the larger the transfer from rural counties to urban counties.)

    I’m pretty sure it’s the other way around: a disproportionate share of economic activity happens in the metro areas. According to a Brookings report, the 100 largest metro areas account for 12% of the country’s land area, 65% of the population, and 75% of GDP. Rich people tend to live in the large metro areas, and the income-tax system is progressive, so the metro areas will also account for a disproportionate share of tax revenue.

  4. It was far too obvious that the buildup of forces by the media-academia-pharma-victim coalition over the past decade would never dissipate after cancellation of the oppressor de jour. What can be termed the “intelligentsia-victim complex” has grown to a degree that will always require fresh oppressors.

  5. Jeffrey Toobin gets fired. Ambassador Buttigieg gets promoted. At least Mayor Pete didn’t whip it out. “Whatever his desires or intentions are, he is not broadcasting it very widely.” That must be the reason.


    “He wants to build out his foreign policy credentials and land a spot that keeps him in the news but out of domestic political fights,” said one person familiar with Buttigieg’s thinking. “The UN does that, and gives him the option to build out his political possibilities.”

    • @Stuart:

      I don’t know why they fired Toobin. I think it was an overreaction. He didn’t touch anyone else, it was over a video link, it obviously wasn’t intended for anybody in particular, no children were involved, and I’m sure he won’t be doing it again! If anyone ever gets back to work in person, it might be a little uncomfortable around the office for a few days, but in more enlightened times people would tell some jokes and that would be the end of it. Aside from damaging his own byline’s reputation, what harm was done, except to his own marriage?

    • At a law school I used to work for, a professor visiting at a different law school, out of the country, returned to his office a week early without telling anyone. He opened up his office door one Saturday afternoon and was astonished to find two law students – the female was his research assistant – fornicating on his desk!

      HOW embarrassing!

      They didn’t expel the students. There were a lot of jokes, and the students wanted to die all by themselves, were given some administrative punishment and a note was made in their student records, but they didn’t destroy their careers. It was consensual. They were adults. The door was locked. They just didn’t know the professor was going to show up that day.

Comments are closed.