Today is the 10th anniversary of the jihad waged by successful asylum-seekers Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and Tamerlan Tsarnaev at the Boston Marathon. They lived at taxpayer expense in Cambridge, Maskachusetts after being granted permanent welfare entitlement in the U.S. on the grounds that Russia would not let them wage jihad in Russia. Dzhokhar studied diversity and tolerance at the Cambridge Public High School.
Tamerlan celebrated the 10th anniversary of 9/11 by killing two Jews and a roommate in Waltham, Maskachusetts.
Aside from eliminating access to the U.S. for asylum-seekers, what could have been done to prevent the Waltham murders and the Boston Marathon jihad? We could have heeded the warning of Vladimir Putin’s government. From “Russia Told America To Detain Tamerlan Tsarnaev Years Ago” (Insider, March 2014):
NBC News said the Russian intelligence agency FSB cabled the FBI about its concerns in March 2011, warning that Tsarnaev was known to have associated with militant Islamists.
The network said the FBI opened an investigation of Tsarnaev that month conducted by a joint task force of federal, state and local authorities. Tsarnaev was interviewed in person, and a memo was sent to the Customs and Border Protection database called TECS that would trigger an alert whenever he left or re-entered the United States.
But the investigation was closed in June 2011 after finding Tsarnaev had no links to terrorism, NBC quoted the report as saying.
In September 2011, the FSB sent a cable to the CIA, restating the warnings of the first memo. NBC News quoted sources close to the congressional investigation as saying a second note about Tsarnaev was entered into the TECS system the next month, but spelled his name “Tsarnayev.”
So we can perhaps reflect today on a time when we had a better relationship with Russia.
Related:
In 2013, Putin was working too closely with Obama for the neocons’ taste:
https://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/12/opinion/putin-plea-for-caution-from-russia-on-syria.html
The Maidan revolution happened shortly after that, with the involvement of Victoria “eff the EU” Nuland and others. The desired enemy was back!
(Historically, it is also interesting that Obama worked much more closely with Putin than Trump, yet only Trump is called a “Russian asset”.)
Considering that Chechen insurgents were supported by CIA and portrayed as “freedom-loving fighters” in U.S. media, i.e. “the good guys” – exactly like 50 years before that ukrainian left-over nazis in post WW2 western areas of ukraine were suported by CIA, i.e. those nazis whom Gen. Milley glorified recently praising them for fighting against Stalin and Zhukov – having all of this in mind it is no wonder that U.S. would favor “freedom-loving” Chechens vs. “dictatorship-loving” Russians, who, because of innate Russians’ hatred of “freedom” must be treated with suspicion.