Navy Joan starts her art collection

The New York Times finally acknowledges a story that has been widely reported elsewhere… “Hunter Biden Settles Child-Support Case”:

According to court documents, Mr. Biden, 53, agreed to pay a monthly sum, which was not disclosed, to Ms. Roberts, as well as turn over several of his paintings, the net proceeds of which would go to his daughter. … works have been listed for $500,000 each.

Hunter Biden had been paying $20,000 a month in child support for several years, for a total of $750,000, according to his attorneys. He had argued that he was not financially able to support the original child-support order. The new amount is lower than had been originally ordered, according to a person familiar with the case.

Ms. Roberts and Mr. Biden met in Washington. In mid-2018, Ms. Roberts was working as his personal assistant, according to a person familiar with the case.

The last part implies that the plaintiff was working for the defendant and they had sex as part of an office romance. The Daily Mail tells it differently:

his baby mama Lunden Roberts ‘was a stripper named Dallas he met in a club in Washington

Navy Joan not only is denied the opportunity to visit Grandpa Joe in the White House, but the elites at the New York Times don’t mention her by name. She is merely “the child”.

The latest Daily Mail story shows us Hunter Biden’s art, which the New York Times does not:

Note that the Daily Mail uses the child’s name and also includes a photo of the purported beneficiary of the cash:

6 thoughts on “Navy Joan starts her art collection

  1. I’m surprised the NYT thought that rewriting history from “stripper” to “personal assistant” was an upgrade for the Bidens, whom they go to great lengths to protect. Having sex with your personal assistant is a #MeToo violation, which I thought in the progressive religion was a much more serious sin than having sex with a sex worker. I guess I still have a lot to learn!

  2. The painting looks AI-generated: “Dall-E, please paint a multi-ethnic, sexually ambiguous figure scrolling on his/her/zir/their iPhone hidden in his/her/zir/their palm in front of dunes with a dark blue sky!”

  3. Sounds like a raw deal to me. Are the Hunter paintings really worth anything without access to the “Big Guy”?

    I wonder if she’s explaining to her little one in the picture, how combining words can give them a different meanings. For example, “sugar” and “daddy”….

  4. That $500,000 Hunter Biden painting? This is how you know New York’s SoHo and whoever buys one of Hunter’s paintings is in Biden’s pocket or the president owes them a “favor”!

  5. If this little girl were the disowned daughter of Don, Jr. or of Eric Trump, and the unacknowledged granddaughter of Trump, the media would have covered it non-stop.

Comments are closed.