Air Canada demonstrates “inclusivity” by excluding any cisgender heterosexuals from working on a particular flight:
Probability question: We are informed that being 2SLGBTQQIA+ is common/normal and also that in a company with more than 35,000 employees there had never previously been an assembly of 3-6 workers (pilots plus flight attendants) who all identified as 2SLGBTQQIA+ (the flight in the video was the “first all-2SLGBTQIA+ flight”.
In London, Ontario, home to a big Diamond factory:
The Irish equivalent of the FAA:
Atlas Air, best known for a crash with a DEI hire at the controls:
The folks who’ve taken over the Climate Change Awareness mantle from all-Hamas-all-the-time Greta Thunberg:
Airbus UK:
How is are observant Muslims supposed to “be their authentic selves” if they must walk by this flag on their way into work?
In case the Trump Tyranny (TM) reaches D.C.’s airports and the tweet below is memory-holed, screen shots:
If homophobia is so prevalent, shouldn’t an airline be able to advertise sexual humility and corner the f*g-basher market?
Mememe, I totally agree! And, I’d go further…why not require all the airlines to hire butt-f*kers to put on a butt-f*cking show on every plane for everyone to enjoy (not just during butt-f*kers month of June, but every day and month of the year!), particularly the young children? Maybe two shows per flight, one just before take-off and again just before landing…what do you think? Seems like a great opportunity with a “captive” audience to teach everyone about the wonders of butt-f*kers….no?
Is there a dark room at Reagan Airport?
No business is queer friendly unless they offer rapid STD tests and a dark room.
Given a demographic of 3% and two pilots, four crew: P=.03 to the 6th. So, one in 1.37 billion. However, some may think the demographic is more represented in the abovementioned career.
Joe: Some Air Canada flights have only three crew members (two pilots and one flight attendant). We are informed that, in an honest and intelligent population of humans, P = 0.38, not 0.3 (see https://www.browndailyherald.com/article/2023/06/lgbtq-student-self-identification-has-doubled-since-2010-according-to-herald-polling-data ). Therefore, the probability of a regional jet flight going out with an all 2SLGBTQQIA+ crew should be 0.38^3 = 0.055 (i.e., about 5 percent of Air Canada regional flights are all-2SLGBTQQIA+).
FYI, this flight wasn’t promoting any such idea:
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c8d1r3m8z92t
What contribution has the 2SLGBTQIA+ community made to society that warrants this level of continuous attention? Why must we keep celebrating the same group over and over and over? At this point, the world is more aware of them than almost any other group, we don’t need constant reminders.
I remember a time when we celebrated accomplished individuals and groups: scientists, innovators, and historic breakthroughs. Communities and organizations took pride in real achievement, and the word “pride” meant something. Sadly, those days seem to be behind us.
GA: I have seen the advancement from feature mobile phones to smart phones in my lifetime. And a lot of how people use these new devices reminds me of “Amusing Ourselves to Death”, 1984, “Brave New World”, etc. These instagram, YouTube reels type content on these new devices is always looking for a quick emotional response, not the kind of mental response that comes after reflecting on a book, or reflecting on an idea for a long time.
How do you expect the minds which have been overtrained with these devices to think about the L* groups? They would just look for a quick emotional response that comes when you help a homeless person by giving them a few bucks. The homeless person may be good person who is low on luck or a drug-addict. But if the emotional response is what overpowers the decision-making by a large extent then one would find it difficult to not donate to the said homeless person.