How’s Intel doing now that the BLM and DEI cheerleader white guy is out?

It’s been about six months since a Chinese guy took over at Intel from the white male who said that his primary passions were mostly peaceful BLM protests, giving big jobs to women and people with dark skin, etc. (And nine months since the white savior BLM warrior was ousted.) Has Lip-Bu Tan managed to turn the company around? At least with a dead cat bounce?

I still would like to know why Intel’s Gaudi chips are such a failure compared to NVIDIA. They sure sound great in HTML (replacement phrase for “on paper”):

Did Pat Gelsinger follow his BLM and DEI passion into a full-time job at a social justice enterprise? Apparently not. Investors who suffered a 75 percent loss on Intel stock (adjusted for Bidenflation) during the white savior’s leadership of Intel now have the opportunity to lose some more money by giving it to Playground Global, a venture capital fund where Gelsinger is a partner.

Is it too soon to do an INTC v AMD stock price chart? Maybe not! Remarkably, now that the Social Justice Warrior is out, INTC has actually outperformed AMD over the past year:

7 thoughts on “How’s Intel doing now that the BLM and DEI cheerleader white guy is out?

  1. Porting AI models from NVidia to the millions of other platforms is hard. Nvidia was 1st to the party in 2004 when everyone else was investing in web 2.0.

  2. If Intel’s AI chip was one or more of following: faster, cheaper, more energy efficient then NVIDIA’s GPU then LLMs would have been ported to it fast. Intel needs to come up with its own code porting model for copilot and similar tools. I am not following the chip race and can not compare Gaudi to NVIDIA GPU.

  3. Did they release anything after Gaudi 3? It seems so long ago since Nvidia releases something new every year. AMD chips sound impressive in HTML as well but I don’t know if anyone uses them. Maybe losing to Nvidia is not unique to Intel.

    It seems that all big companies are trying to make their own chips, like Google TPU. For smaller players, probably Nvidia alone is enough, porting to something else requires too much effort. Maybe the Chinese companies will all move to Huawei or something but it’s unlikely they will prioritize Intel.

    • For readers that didn’t struggle writing compilers with 8 general purpose registers on the 32 bit Pentium, vs. the 32 on the 32 bit PowerPC–the punch line is that Intel managed to capture the market somewhat despite the hardware, not because of it.

    • And like how MCAS could be considered inferior to changes in geometry of airframe/wings to accommodate large high-bypass engines on certain already designed planes. *Effective* marketing is the key–DEI seems to be weighted less in that during its current downturn.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *