100 percent of Maine’s progressive females have apparently had sex with 100 percent-disabled (according to our government experts) Graham Platner. At least one of these females now says that Platner raped her, but the rape wasn’t as bad as continued representation in the U.S. Senate by Susan Collins, nominally Republican (Politico):
“One of the reasons I didn’t come forward sooner was, the huge moral conflict that I had between supporting his politics, but not supporting him as a person,” she said. “I just want the truth out there. I just want people to have a whole scope of who he is as a person.”
After some discouraging poll results regarding the November general election, it seems that the only way to protect democracy is for the person who won 72% of the primary vote (NBC) to be replaced by someone selected by a handful of elite Democrats (how will they find any who haven’t had sex with Mr. Platner?).
Platner could make $millions simply by betting on himself to stay in the race and then… staying in the race. Here’s Polymarket, for example:
Rules for one of the above options:
This market will resolve to “Yes” if Graham Platner withdraws from or officially announces his withdrawal from the 2026 Maine Senate election, or announces the suspension of his 2026 Senate campaign, by July 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
What if Platner wants to be a billionaire rather than a multimillionaire? He could agree to withdraw from the race in exchange for $1 billion from progressive Democrat multi-billionaires, such as divorce plaintiff MacKenzie Scott Bezos.
(Maybe a deal with be done in secret and we won’t find out about until after the election when Platner hangs swastika flags from his new beach houses in Bar Harbor, Palm Beach, and other strongholds for Democrat elites?)
Update: Herr Platner actually did quit, but we have no idea if he is now sitting on $0, $10 million, $20 million, $250 million, or $1 billion from MacKenzie Scott Bezos. He leaves us with an exhortation to “Free Palestine”.
Just after “Free Palestine” is “Up the Hearts,” which ChatGPT says is a reference to a Portland-based soccer team that plays in a “third tier U.S. league”:
Besides the noble Palestinians, who is sorry to see Graham Platner, and all of his tattoos, go? The same people who couldn’t resist having sex with him: progressive females in Maine. “Why Some Women in Maine Are Mourning the End of Graham Platner’s Campaign” (NYT) depicts a 40-year-old who appears to be on track for the standard Maine “more tattoos than teeth” look:
Although she believes the woman, Jenny Racicot, who said Mr. Platner had raped her, she also believes, with just as much conviction, that politicians in Washington are corrupt. …. How else could it be that, after years of promises, she still could not afford medical checkups? With a deductible north of $10,000, she said she had to weigh whether a mammogram was worth the $450 price tag.
… As recently as late June, a slight majority of women — 52 percent — said they supported Mr. Platner, according to a New York Times/Portland Press Herald/Siena poll.
(Other than “corruption”, how could health care in the U.S. have become unaffordable? Econ 101 says that a great way to do it would be by legally importing at least 70 million patients, plus an unknown number of undocumented patients, into a country with a health care system designed for 200 million people.)
Regarding the $450 screening mammogram for a 40-year-old, that’s an American idea. The technocrats in the progressives’ dream society of the UK Caliphate say to start at 50-53. https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/breast-screening-mammogram/who-breast-screening-is-for/ (50 seems to be the standard recommended age in most of Europe, including in France, Germany, Switzerland, the Islamic Republic of Ireland, the Islamic Once Again Republic of Spain, Norway, Sweden, etc.)
Phil, you are a little late to the game here on the Polymarket concept. I already went down that road, but they disallowed me from betting on myself…how Un-American is that!! That said, you could bet on me and I would be happy to not only share the proceeds (maybe a few %?), but I would also be honored if you would join my team of rapists, Nazis, child molesters and other aficionados. Your Cambridge and MIT bona fides are all I need to know about you. Pocahontas and Bernie are leading the effort. Can we count you in?
Thank you, Graham. I’m proud to be part of your inner circle of friends and family proxy bettors! See you on the Blockchain!
> I already went down that road, but they disallowed me from betting on myself
Pete Rose would be proud, G. He reportedly made $1M year signing anything with “I’m sorry I bet on baseball.” (Also, he swears he thought the girl in Ohio was 16.)
I would wager that a significant number of veterans are rated 100% “disabled”. Its a scam, one that isnt widely reported either. Nobody questions any of this because they are veterans. I know 2 individuals that got to the 100% rating. There isnt a damn thing wrong with either of them. Sleep apnea apparently gets you to 60% and then its easy to get to 100 from there. You can also get social security disability too if you play your cards right. You might have to sue to get it but apparently its not hard to win those cases and that would be another $1000 a month.
There’s an old saying in the American Midwest, “Don’t curse the farmer with food in your mouth.” Also straight out of Compton, “Don’t hate the playa, hate the game, yo.”
I do “hate the game”. The game allows for this type of fraud, its pervasive and we are all on the hook paying for it. One of the many reasons we are $40 trillion in debt and will never climb out of it.
Sure is a hottie! Marriage unravelling now? I’m good with my hands and can help with the oyster business and everything else. Just reach out, or better still c’mon over and bust in on me anytime.