Best place to find a freelance illustrator/graphic designer?

Folks: I’d like to hire a freelance illustrator/graphic designer for a variety of personal projects, e.g., a party invitation composited out of some photos. What’s a good marketplace to find someone? From 10 years ago, I remember elance.com being useful. A Google search brings up guru.com as well.

Full post, including comments

What to do in San Juan, Puerto Rico next week?

Folks:

I need to be in San Juan, Puerto Rico on Wednesday, August 11 (next week) for business. I’m staying in the Caribe Hilton. I could fly in mid-day on August 10th and depart late on August 12th and/or fly in a day early on August 9th. What would be some fun things to do in San Juan? Given that I will be sitting on a plane for at least four hours in each direction, I don’t want to do any activities that involve significant travel time.

If any readers would like to meet up at the Hilton, I would be delighted to talk over coffee on the afternoon of the 10th or the morning of the 12th (email philg@mit.edu).

Thanks in advance for any suggestions.

[Note that I’ve been to San Juan back in 2002 and spent a couple of days wandering around Old San Juan. I’ve also been to the Arecibo telescope and the rain forest.]

Full post, including comments

Popularity of television and NASCAR shows that Americans aren’t worried about the economy?

I was talking with a guy at Oshkosh who owns a NASCAR team. I asked if the popularity of television in general and NASCAR in particular is evidence that Americans aren’t too worried about the economy. Consider a guy who chooses to spend a Sunday afternoon watching cars drive around in circles. He could have signed up for a class or been reading a book that would help him earn a new credential. Instead, he was sitting on a sofa with his brain on “hold”. This doesn’t look like a picture of a person who is concerned that he won’t have a job next year. Thoughts?

What happens in China? Do working-age adults spend a lot of time watching television? Following sports on television?

[The team owner’s response was to look at me as though I were slightly retarded to question why tens of millions of Americans spend time being NASCAR fans.]

Full post, including comments

Who likes typing on the Droid X?

I played around recently with the Droid X phone. It seemed like a great device, but I can’t get used to the on-screen keyboard. I find it unnerving to watch characters pop up as I type. I greatly prefer the physical keyboard of a Blackberry or my now-ancient Android G1 phone. Anyone having good luck with the Droid X care to explain the secret of typing on the device? Are there rumors of a similar phone with a slide-out keyboard?

Full post, including comments

Oshkosh Wrap-Up

Oshkosh has the following segments:

  • the general carnival atmosphere the results from bringing together hundreds of thousands of people
  • gearheads and engineers showing off new technology that they claim will revolutionize some aspect of aviation
  • certified airplane companies who have hired engineers and have worked through or are working through the FAA bureaucracy in an attempt to put all of the pieces together legally before running out of money
  • light sport airplane companies (nearly 100?) that have collectively sold about 1750 two-seat airplanes and that hope to sell a lot more by promising consumers simplicity and economy
  • displays of amazing pilot technique by aerobatic competitors and military pilots plus families who come in primarily to see the daily airshow
  • individuals who fly ordinary airplanes to Wisconsin every year to socialize with others who share their love of aviation
  • individuals who have restored antique airplanes
  • individuals who have built, and sometimes designed, their own aircraft

In many ways, my favorite groups were the last two: antique airplanes and homebuilt. These are folks whose interest in aviation is closest in spirit to ancient human dreams: escaping the Earth and getting a bird’s eye view. The home-builders are also the most inclusive. My favorite was a 249 lb. all-metal low-wing airplane called the “Hummel” (site). It qualifies as an ultralight and requires no license to fly. With 37 HP it can lift a 200 lb. pilot, full fuel (5 gallons), and still be 70 lbs. under gross weight. With a 45 mph approach speed and hardly any instruments, there is no need for a 7000′ runway, control tower, and instrument landing system. Given the objectives of the pilots of the Hummel (short, local, daytime flights in excellent weather), they can probably be safe after just 10 or 20 hours of training.

Although the range of homebuilders includes some who are superb craftsmen, some who have done significant engineering work, and some who are expert and highly experienced pilots, the message is “anyone can do this”. And indeed there are quick-build kits, factories who provide builder assistance, and airplane designs that are extremely slow and forgiving.

As far as the most significant innovation on display, my vote goes to envelope protection for light airplanes. Introduced on the Airbus A320 in 1988, envelope protection discourages or prevents pilots from stalling or overspeeding an airplane. Stalls often lead to spins and are a common source of low altitude maneuvering accidents, e.g., by pilots preparing to land. Envelope protection is now available in the Avidyne autopilot, an easy retrofit to the popular Cirrus four-seater, and in new airplanes with the Garmin G1000 panel (“Garmin ESP”). This technology would have saved the passengers of Colgan 3407 (previous post).

Full post, including comments

Cooperation Amidst Decline

One inspiring thing at Oshkosh was the spirit of cooperation among light aircraft manufacturers amid a declining market. Despite rapid population growth and growth in the number of airline jobs, the number of pilots in the U.S. has declined roughly 25 percent since 1980 (source; FAA statistics show 692,000 active pilots in 1990 and 594,000 today). The U.S. population has grown from 226 million to 310 million while the number of Americans capable of operating an aircraft has fallen.

As demonstrated by the numerous 75-year-old and 50-year-old airplanes flying at Oshkosh, there is no need for any company to produce new light airplanes. The U.S. has so many two- and four-seat airplanes parked in obscure corners of sleepy airports that we could supply the growing Indian and Chinese markets with airworthy planes given up by U.S. pilots grown too old to hold a medical certificate. The most significant innovations in new airplanes, e.g., glass panel avionics, are easily retrofitted to older planes.

In a bleak environment where sales is usually a zero-sum game (i.e., one company’s sale comes at the expense of another company’s), one might expect to find a lot of bad-mouthing of competitors and fervent prayers that weak manufacturers would simply disappear. Instead one finds the opposite: sincere hopes that everyone in the industry can succeed and cooperative attempts to get Americans to pursue flying as a passion or a business tool.

Full post, including comments

Military hardware at Oshkosh

Oshkosh is a great place to see the might and cleverness of the U.S. military on display. Our cargo planes were represented from the C-47 (DC-3), celebrating its 75th anniversary, right through the modern C-130, C-17, and C-5. Fights from World War II, such as the P-51 Mustang, were heavily represented. The crowd was shocked, awed, deafened, and shaken by heavy modern jet fighters. Our ground operations were represented by an MRAP, a made-in-Oshkosh $500,000 replacement for the Hummer (at least $5 billion in taxpayer funds will be spent on this program). The one guy who does not seem to be impressed by our fancy technology, i.e., Osama bin Laden, was nowhere to be found among the crowd.

The quasi-military branches of government were showing off as well. The TSA had a booth where they explained all of the great new stuff that they’re doing. Customs was there to show off its new reporting requirements for arriving and departing the U.S. Technically these guys have grown the GDP by making the procedures so difficult and time-consuming. The companies that formerly assisted aviators in dealing with Third World bureaucracies, such as Sudan’s, are now making money helping people travel between the U.S. and Canada in Cessna 172s. The Border Patrol had a booth trying to recruit 3000 new agents to work on the southern border. I asked how hard that could be, with 15 million Americans being unemployed. The agent responded “It just opened up last week; we haven’t hired anyone for about a year.” The Border Patrol brought in an Astar. Apparently the Department of Homeland Security keeps Americans safe from Mexican workers by sending $2 million over to France for a helicopter and some spare parts and then sending additional funds to Hugo Chavez to buy jet fuel to keep the machine flying in circles.

Full post, including comments

Chinese Aerospace at Oshkosh

The Chinese presence at Oshkosh, the world’s premiere general aviation event, consisted primarily of two aircraft: the Cessna 162 Skycatcher and the Yuneeq electric airplanes. The Skycatcher was approved by the FAA in the Light Sport category last year. However, only eight examples have been produced in the Shenyang factory. So far it is not a great example of the power of Chinese manufacturing applied to light aircraft, though some of the delay in production may be due to problems with the aircraft’s spin characteristics.

The Yuneec E430 got a lot more attention. It might be fairer to call it a one-seat motorglider rather than an airplane, but it has substantial range and points toward electric airplanes with a lot of practical value, e.g., for flight training. Since the Chinese are the world leaders in battery manufacturing they presumably should have a good chance in becoming the world leaders in electric aircraft (though with the Solar Impulse, the Europeans are also doing some very interesting stuff).

Full post, including comments

Wandering around Oshkosh

Getting around Oshkosh involves a lot of meandering through parking lots. As many as 100,000 people will drive in to enjoy the show on any given day. Thus tens of thousands of cars with Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Michigan plates surround the airfield. Having lived in Massachusetts for decades, I’m accustomed to cars whose owners have chosen to show the world how much smarter they are than average. The typical Prius in Cambridge, for example, will display bumper stickers showing that the owner voted for a slate of politicians who’ve promised to make the world a better place. These are augmented by direct statements of the owner’s plans for how other people should behave, e.g., a “Coexist” admonition with various religious symbols juxtaposed. How do they do it in the Midwest? The posteriors of the thousands of cars I walked by were shockingly naked. The handful of bumper stickers that I did see were references to obscure products for which the owner presumably had an enthusiasm. I did not see a single political bumper sticker nor any advocating a social cause.

Most of our evenings in Oshkosh were occupied with dinners for Experimental Aircraft Association supporters. At one we sat next to a quiet Air Force veteran named Blair Bozek. He had served as a crewmember on the SR-71 for 70 operational missions. Did he have any problems with the machine? we asked. “Just the usual hydraulic and electrical glitches,” was his response. We later Googled and found out that he’d had to eject out of a failed SR-71 and swim around in the South China Sea for a while. We decided to give him our “Master of Understatement” award.

A fundraising dinner for the EAA Young Eagles program yielded $2.1 million for a variety of items in a live auction. Generally the TV cameras would swing around to show the happy high bidder at the end of the auction for each item, e.g., a $375,000 customized Ford Mustang. Seemingly invariably it would be a pudgy grey-haired white guy sitting next to an attractive young blonde. I can’t quite figure out why Young Eagles needs so much money to operate, since the program is organized by local volunteers at various airports around the country. The actual rides for young people are given by local airplane owners who are not compensated. I have mixed feelings about the program. If someone said “I introduce young people to something fun, unnecessary, dangerous, and expensive”, my first thought would be “drug dealer”. There are a lot of programs to encourage young people to pursue careers in aviation. Is it kind to steer a young person toward a career in which there are 10 qualified people for every job? When the same young person could go into medicine and pick from 10 job openings for every qualified person?

Six of us found ourselves free one evening and of course ended up at Naughty Girls. My previous experience with gentlemen’s clubs had been in Canada. How does the American/Wisconsin strip club experience differ? Let’s just say that as a 6′ tall guy carrying some extra middle-aged weight you would have to abandon any idea that the strippers should be lighter than you. The high point of my evening was watching the youngest member of our gang (about 24 years old) put a dollar bill into a dancer’s panties while seemingly standing in a different zip code.

Full post, including comments