Why airplane engines are expensive (one North Carolina lawsuit)

According to this Avweb piece, Continental has agreed to pay $20 million to the children of some people killed on a 1977 twin-engine Cessna 421.  The settlement came out of a North Carolina lawsuit (where former Democratic VP candidate John Edwards made his fortune suing ob-gyns).  To judge from the Avweb article, the evidence against Continental was slim.  The NTSB report, as usual, blames the pilot.  In this case it seems that the pilot shut down the working engine and failed to feather the prop on the dead engine.  So instead of one strong engine and one low-drag feathered engine, he had one medium-drag idling engine producing almost no power and one high-drag dead engine (though actually the NTSB says that they couldn’t find anything that would have prevented the right engine from operating).  The maintenance on the engines does not sound as though it was done very carefully; the NTSB reported 124 hours since the last oil change (recommended interval is 50 hours).  So… even if the engine really did quit, it might have been due to inadequate maintenance and not Continental’s negligence.  And regardless of the reason for an engine failure, a multi-engine rated pilot is supposed to be able to manage the failure (though of course many are not successful and “the second engine carries you to the scene of the accident”).


What I find interesting about this case is the comparison of the $20 million number to the approximately 1000 new airplane engines that a company like Continental is able to sell every year for certified airplanes (i.e., not kits).  There are about 2500 piston-engine planes sold every year.  About half of these are sold with Continental engines, the other half with Lycoming.  An airplane engine costs around $20,000 new.  So basically this $20 million settlement is equal to nearly all of the revenue that Continental could hope to earn in one year from selling airplane engines and perhaps 5-10 years of profits.

Full post, including comments

Back to school? Who wants to be a mentor?

We’re looking for mentors to work with student teams in 6.171, Software Engineering for Internet Applications, from February 7, 2006 until May 18.  If you’re a working software engineer, ideally in the Boston area, please visit http://philip.greenspun.com/teaching/6171/mentorship-program and apply!


There is still time to propose a client project for the course as well.  This is especially useful for smaller businesses and non-profit organizations.


MIT students:  Just a few days left in which to apply for the course.

Full post, including comments

Note to self: Don’t fly through clouds when the temps are below freezing

My friend Julian and I decided to do a little instrument training flight yesterday in our Cirrus SR20.  The ceilings were perfect for practicing instrument approaches:  a layer of clouds from about 1000′ above the ground to 3000′ above sea level.  Wintertime instrument flying, however, requires being careful about icing.  It was below freezing on the ground.  The weather briefer told Julian that it was a beautiful day for practicing instrument approaches.  There were no airmets out for icing.  There were no pilot reports of icing.  There was supposedly an inversion with warmer air aloft.


After an hour on its electric block heater, we pulled the airplane out of the hangar and noticed some red brake fluid seeping out from an inspection panel on the inboard right wing.  Fortunately, I had some good karma built up with the mechanics at East Coast Aero Club and Rob Brigham zipped over to lie down on the ground, remove the panel, and tighten a hydraulic fitting.  Given the spate of Cirrus pilots who’ve managed to set their planes on fire with the brakes, and the fact that we’d never seen a leaking airplane braking system, we were a bit concerned about this.  But we pushed on the brakes and Rob didn’t see any more fluid coming out.


We took off and did an uneventful ILS 11 approach into Worcester, going missed at 200′ above the ground and climbing back up into the clouds for Lawrence.  We were directed to climb up to 5000′.  With the extra delay of getting the brakes tightened, it was beginning to get darker and colder.  We stepped down from 5000′ to 2000′ for the approach into Lawrence.  Julian was doing a bad job of holding altitude.  The plane should hold 105 knots and altitude with about 50 percent power.  He kept cranking up the power to almost 75 percent.  The plane began to vibrate a bit.  I had spent the first part of the flight checking the wings for ice every few minutes, but had become complacent.  We looked at the wings:  about 3/8″ of ice.  Then the windshield began to ice up.  “Your airplane,” said Julian, who had been flying up until now.  I was in the right (copilot’s) seat, looking sideways at the instruments on the left side.  I asked Julian to engage the alternate air intake so that the engine wasn’t trying to suck air through a potentially iced-over filtered inlet.  Our pitot heat was already on, which prevents the airspeed indicator and altimeter from becoming useless and freaking out pilots.


We reported the ice to the Lawrence Tower, but there was really nothing to do differently because we’d already been cleared for the approach and were planning to descend as soon as we intercepted the glide slope.  One thing that I remembered about icing is not to use the flaps, which increase the risk of a tailplane stall and a steep pitch down of the nose.  We didn’t know what our stall speed would be with the new wing shape, so we kept our speed up at 100 knots until just short of the runway, then slowed down to 85 knots for a no-flap not-particularly-great landing.  Two things were in our favor during this landing:  (1) the ceilings remained high (1000′), so we didn’t build up a lot of ice in the final minute or two and we didn’t have to fly the approach down to minimums (200′ above the ground), and (2) the runway at Lawrence is 5000′ long, so you can have lots of extra airspeed and still stop well before reaching the end.


It was getting on toward 5:00 pm in Lawrence, but the guys at Eagle East Aviation were there.  They had done some maintenance work on my old Diamond Star, and I would always stop in whenever I was in Lawrence.  Tim Campbell, one of the owners, cleared some planes out of his maintenance hangar and helped us pull the Cirrus in over the icy ramp.  Then he cranked up one of the big overhead heaters and we went into the office to hang out and wait for the ice to melt off the wing leading edges and prop.  My primary instructor, Hal Spector, happened to be there.  When you do something unnecessary and stupid, why is it that your teacher must always be present?


After 30 minutes, we had the ice off, the ceilings were still more than 1000′, the visibility was more than 10 miles, and there was no precipitation.  Despite the darkness, we decided to go VFR under the clouds rather than IFR through the clouds back to Bedford (a 10-minute flight).  Lawrence was calling itself IFR, so we needed a “special VFR” clearance to get out (at night, this is available only to instrument-rated pilots with instrument-equipped planes).  I don’t like to scud-run at night, but we wanted to get home (a dangerous tendency in itself) and we knew that we didn’t like the clouds.  Visibility underneath the cloud layer was good and the trip back to Bedford was uneventful.  We put the plane away, checked for more brake fluid leaking (none found), and stopped at Jet Aviation to have some chocolate with the gals working the desk.


My previous encounters with ice were all in situations where it was warm at lower altitudes and those were altitudes where it was legal and safe to fly instruments, i.e., I could have at any time descended and melted the ice off the plane.  In this case, we were at all times close to airports with instrument approaches, but the surface temperature was below freezing and we would be forced to fly the plane all the way to the ground with whatever ice it had picked up.


So… what did we learn?  Don’t fly a feeble non-deiced airplane through a cloud in the winter, even if the briefers say that no ice or precip is forecast, unless there are a few thousand feet of warm air over the ground.

Full post, including comments

Note to self: Try not to set airplane on fire

The latest issue of AVweb opens with a story about how airplanes like my Cirrus SR20 are catching on fire, with the fires starting inside the wheel pants due to overheated brakes:



there are no design or equipment faults at work, and for Cirrus this leaves only “operator error” as the cause. Unlike many aircraft pilots may be transitioning from, Cirruses have a free castering nosewheel and are steered only with differential braking, plus some positive or negative contribution from the rudder


The Diamond Katanas in which I trained and the Diamond DA40 that I formerly owned both had the free castering nosewheel and as far as I know, no pilot ever managed to set one of those on fire.  Cirrus chose to put the parking brake lever way down underneath the panel where it isn’t in one’s line of sight.  That might be a factor (the Diamond parking brake is right up by the throttle).  Otherwise, it is tough to say.  To folks learning to fly the Cirrus:  remember to push the rudder all the way in before resorting to a light tap on the brakes.  If you feel that you must tap both brakes to slow down when taxiing, it means you’ve got too much throttle in.

Full post, including comments

Current Reading: The Great Bridge

Current reading:  The Great Bridge by David McCullough, one of my favorite historians.  I’m loving the book so far, especially as it takes us back to an age when engineers were heroes and engineering fascinated the public.


Travel plans:  Flying down to Washington, D.C. (GAI) tomorrow in the Cirrus SR20.  Doing full-down autorotations on Friday at Advanced Helicopters in Frederick, MD (FDK).  Hanging out with friends and family.  Returning to Boston, weather permitting, on Saturday, Dec 31.

Full post, including comments

A bus driver is harder to replace than an air traffic controller?

The New York City transit strike has me puzzled.  The right to unionize and strike, and the requirement that an employer negotiate with a union, is an artificial right created by the government, along with copyright and patent.  The government does not allow certain workers, such as police and firemen and, in this case, transit workers, to strike.  The transit workers strike was illegal.  A typical analysis of transit worker pay shows that they get at least 30 percent more than they would in a competitive market.  The pensions are particularly expensive for New York City taxpayers, providing for retirement at age 55 with 50 percent of the final year’s compensation (typically this works out to 100 percent of a normal 40-hour-per-week salary because a worker will get a lot of overtime shifts in his or her last year and the pension is based on whatever was earned in those final 12 months before retirement, including overtime).


Consider an employer with a 54-year-old worker.  The guy is getting paid $70,000 per year to do a job that a young immigrant would be happy to do for $25,000 per year.  In one more year, assuming he is still on the payroll, you’re going to incur an obligation to pay this 54-year-old guy $70,000 per year for the rest of his life (30+ more years times $70,000 is more than $2 million).  He does something illegal, thereby giving you a pretext for firing him.  There are 140 qualified young applicants for his job, folks who won’t want or need a pension for at least 25 years from now.  What do you do?


Ronald Reagan faced a similar question during his first year in office, when the nation’s air traffic controllers went out on strike.  He fired them all (cnn story), and replaced them with younger, cheaper workers (there was no disruption in service, as supervisors picked up the load and worked overtime).  One would naively imagine that it is easier to replace a bus driver or a subway car cleaner than an air traffic controller.  New York City is more strapped for cash than the Federal government.  Regardless of the merits of the transit workers’ demands, it seems unfathomable that Mayor Bloomberg resisted the opportunity to fire all of the workers who stayed out.  What is different about this strike than the ATC strike of 1981?

Full post, including comments

Pablo Neruda liked helicopters

One of the delights of Valparaiso is visiting La Sebastiana, one of the houses owned by Pablo Neruda.  In addition to his fondness for Communism, Stalinism, Stalin, Castro, and accumulating property (the guy owned a lot of prime real estate throughout Chile), Neruda asked that a rooftop heliport be incorporated into the design of his 1961 Valparaiso house.


p.s.  Happy New Year to all!  The fireworks display last night in Valpo/Vina was the largest that I have ever experienced and filled the harbor across a stretch of several miles with rockets from maybe 20 barges.  Chileans know how to throw a good party.

Full post, including comments