Sheryl Sandberg on Mother’s Day

Now that we’re sufficiently distant from the obligatory sentimentality around Mother’s Day, let’s look at Sheryl Sandberg’s Facebook posting on the subject:

Being a mother is the most rewarding – and hardest – job many of us will ever have. The day you become a mom, you also become a caregiver, teacher, nurse, and coach. It’s an all-in-one kind of role that comes with no training.

Apparently she and Bill Burr are destined to disagree regarding the difficulty of a job that can be done in pajamas.

For most moms, it’s only one of many jobs we have. Over 40% of mothers are the primary breadwinners for their families – and in many, the only breadwinner. We all have a responsibility to help mothers as well as fathers balance their responsibilities at work and home.

Celebrating the heroism of single mothers is a stock item for politicians so perhaps Sandberg will soon run for office? But can she be right about a significant number of single moms being the only breadwinner? If this is a low-income mating situation, the taxpayer will be providing the single mom and her children with a subsidized (or free) house, free health care, and free food. If this is a high-income mating situation, the child support defendant will be sending a stream of cash into the mother’s checking account.

Companies can do a lot to lead the charge, and I’m proud of the steps Facebook has taken. But not everyone has the opportunity to work for a company that supports working parents. It’s time for our public policies to catch up with what our families deserve and our values demand.

To start, it’s long past time to raise the federal minimum wage. Two-thirds of minimum wage workers are women. Raising the wage would reduce pay inequality and help millions of families living in or near poverty.

Sandberg is concerned about “pay inequality.” Her reported net worth is $1.6 billion. Thus we can estimate that she has been paid $2-3 billion pre-tax by Facebook, money (or the stock equivalent) that otherwise could have been paid to employees lower down in the bureaucracy. Why not reduce pay inequality at Facebook before asking for government intervention in the labor market for other employers (let’s assume that Facebook, being in Silicon Valley, is forced by the market to pay well above the minimum wage, so a change to this law will have no effect on Sandberg’s personal wealth).

We need paid leave. The United States is one of the only developed countries in the world that doesn’t guarantee paid family leave – and we’re the only developed country in the world without paid maternity leave. That means many moms are forced to return to work right after giving birth to keep their jobs. They deserve more support. So do dads, LGBTQ parents, adoptive parents — families of all kinds.

So those Americans who haven’t been fortunate enough to find a mate or have a child are going to be further disadvantaged by a forcible transfer of income to those who have been blessed with a mate (at least for a few hours) and children?

All of us will have times when we need to take care of ourselves and our relatives. We shouldn’t have to risk losing a job or being able to meet the basic needs of our families to do that.

And we need affordable child care. Child care for two children exceeds the median annual rent in all 50 states. How are parents supposed to work if they don’t have a safe and affordable place to leave their kids?

More wealth transfer from the childless will be required!

On this Mother’s Day, even more than ever, I feel deep gratitude for my amazing mom Adele Sandberg, who has given me her love and strength my whole life and these past two years especially. I am also grateful for the love and support of my mother-in-law Paula Goldberg who dedicates herself not only to her own family, but to families with children with disabilities through the PACER Center. For those for whom this day can be more painful than celebratory, I hope – as Connie Schultz would say – that it lands gently.
This is an emotional day for so many reasons – because we thank the mothers we have and remember the mothers and the children we’ve lost. I hope we can also use this day to commit to do more for all the mothers who have given so much and deserve even more.

Sandberg proposes to hit women who couldn’t find a mate and/or couldn’t have a child with higher tax rates to subsidize their sisters who were fortunate enough to become mothers. But Sandberg offers them some kind words in exchange for their higher tax payments!

Related:

 

Full post, including comments

Medical School 2020, Year 1, Week 29

From our anonymous insider…

We had a week off. Several classmates visited girlfriends, boyfriends, and family. One went on a Caribbean cruise. A few stayed in town to recuperate and study this next block in advance (“gunners” is the class label for this behavior).

We’ll study neurology for the next two months, but class began with two deans reprimanding us. “It has come to our attention that several doctors and professors think you need to work on professionalism. Several of you are on Facebook, browsing Amazon, and checking Instagram during lecture while you sit next to a physician. SnapChatting in class is inexcusable. These physicians frequently volunteer their time to come in and speak to you. Treat them with respect. Every class gets a reputation. Don’t let this be yours.”

For eight weeks we will be taught almost exclusively by a 74-year-old neuroanatomist, “Doctor J”. He worked for several years as a physical therapist, then earned a Ph.D. in neuroscience. His first slide was a quote from Emerson Pugh: “‘If the human brain were so simple that we could understand it, we would be so simple that we couldn’t.” “We will do our best,” explained Doctor J. His second slide was a black and white photo of an old guy. “Neuroscientists bow before Cajal.” In the late 1800s there was no consensus on the anatomy of the nervous system. Two luminary anatomists, Camillo Golgi and Santiago Ramón y Cajal, supported opposing viewpoints. Golgi supported the reticular theory: nerves are a syncytium of several cells connected together. Cajal supported the neuron theory: each nerve is a single cell. Cajal used Golgi’s own staining method to disprove the reticular theory. This history lesson gave a human spin to the evolution of knowledge. These men worked in shoddy laboratories with microscopes that we could build today out of paper and tape.

We had to purchase several tools for the neurological exam, including a reflex hammer, pen light, and eye chart. Our white coat is filling up with gadgets! We will practice the exam in several workshops. Students complained to the dean about Doctor J not posting answers to the workshop questions. The neuroanatomist responded during lecture, “This is your fault. The first few years we did give out answers for the lab book. I put a copy in the library. Within a week, someone had photocopied it and send it as PDF to the whole class. The value of the workshops went down, no one attended, so I no longer give the answers out.” Apparently not all classmates were mollified by this explanation because enough students went back to the dean that he submitted a “formal grievance” against Doctor J.

Lecture began with an overview of the nervous system, divided into a central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS). The CNS is a tube with a hollow canal in the middle where cerebrospinal fluid flows. This tube is simple in the spinal cord but becomes suddenly more complicated at the top of the tube, which will become the brain. During fetal development (in utero), the cells of this part grow much faster than the surrounding skull causing bending and folding of the tube. The brain retains its lumen (inner membrane adjacent to canal) as the four ventricles of the brain that are continuous with the central canal of the spinal cord.

Unbeknownst to me, the spinal cord does not extend the whole length of the spine. Before birth, the spinal cord extends to each vertebrae. However, during childhood the vertebrae elongate faster than the the spinal cord, resulting in the spinal cord’s termination at the first or second lumbar vertebrae (above the hip bones). A lumbar puncture (“spinal tap”), a common procedure to sample cerebrospinal fluid, leverages this anatomy by sampling the cerebrospinal fluid at L4 without the risk of puncturing the spinal cord.

There are about 860 billion cells in the brain, only 10 percent of which are neurons. Ninety percent are supporting cells called glia and microglia. These cells perform various functions: astrocytes (a type of glia) maintain the blood-brain barrier by wrapping foot processes around ninety-five percent of the capillary surface area (it reminds me of the scintillating podocytes in the glomerulus of the kidney); oligodendrocytes (a type of glia) insulate the axon cable (wire to the next neuron(s)) by wrapping sheaths of their cytoplasm around the cable; microglia are specialized resident macrophages that get in the central nervous system in utero before the blood brain barrier is formed.

Myelination is essential for neuron function. The conduction velocity of the action potential (the nerve signal) decreases as the resistance of the axon cable increases. Organisms such as the giant squid without myelinating cells achieve high transmission speeds by having huge axon diameters. Myelination decreases the effective membrane capacitance, which reduces the amount of potential needed to charge up the axon, and decreases potential leakage. Myelination enables the preservation of high speed as more neuron connections are packed into a small volume. This is important because intelligence is related to the connectivity (or synapse density) of each neuron. A human brain is estimated to contain more than 100 trillion synapses for roughly 86 billion neurons.

We learned how the number of cells change during human development. Between the third week and twenty-eighth week after fertilization, 250,000 brain cells are produced every minute! Many of these neurons undergo apoptosis (cell suicide) during training of the neural network. Despite this amazing proliferation, the brain is only twenty-five percent of its adult size at birth; the brain reaches seventy-five percent of its adult size at one-year of age.

In my small group we discussed foundational neuroanatomy structures. The corpus callosum is a bridge for nerve fibers to cross between cerebral hemispheres. Someone mentioned the corpus callosum is thicker in females. A question “Is this why women are more emotional?” yielded chuckles from several male students and glares from Type-A Anita and straight-shooter Sally. Anita replied, “Yes, that is exactly why. It’s going to be a long two months with you guys.”

Anatomy held a dry lab in which we felt bone vertebrae. Dry vertebrae (just the bones) have spinous processes which look like something out of a Game of Thrones episode. The spikes you can feel on your back are these spinous processes. The vertebral body, the main weight-bearing part, lies deep to this on the anterior (front) side. The spinal cord sits between the vertebral body and the spinous process inside the vertebral foramen (hole). The spinal cord gives off spinal nerves through the small bilateral intervertebral foramen. We saw how the intervertebral facet joints differ among the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar (neck, chest, and lower back) regions. The cervical vertebrae have the joints in the axial (horizontal) plane facilitating rotation; the cervical have the joints in an oblique plane preventing significant movement here; and, the lumbar vertebrae have their joints in the sagittal (vertical side section) facilitating forward bending and extension.

Our patient case: Jonathan, 25-year-old male presents to the ED nine months ago for a three-minute seizure and worsening headaches in the morning for the past month. A neurological exam shows absence of venous pulsations, suggesting elevated intracranial pressure. Jonathan did not pay much attention to the headaches. He was busy at work, and his wife was due with a second child.

A CT (“CAT scan”) revealed a 3x3x3 cm (a little more than a cubic inch) tumor in the right temporal lobe of the brain. Surgery was scheduled immediately. The neurosurgery team debated removing the entire temporal lobe or just a “lesionectomy” where they remove the tumor with as good margins as possible. A lesionectomy was performed and a pathology analysis of some of the tumor removed revealed a grade III glioma. Jonathan’s neurosurgeon told us that “All grade III gliomas eventually become grade IV.” A death sentence. Jonathan is still alive, nine months after his first ED visit, but was unable to attend due to worsening health.

According to the neurosurgeon, a patient presenting to the ED with a headache will always get a head CT. However, it is unlikely the same patient’s primary care doctor will order a head CT for just a headache.

How many patients with advanced brain cancer elect not to get surgery? “Much more rare than you would expect,” responded the neurosurgeon. “Everyone hopes they will be the exception, the extreme outcome. We hope for a cure, so our treatment plan is very aggressive.” He has operated on a 86-year-old with grade IV glioma (the patient died; Medicare paid the bill). He recounted a troubling story of a 60-year-old late stage Huntington’s patient with glioblastoma. “His wife had a very difficult time letting go. We said we could get him back to baseline, but that baseline was late stage Huntington’s. They decided to not operate.”

What’s more important for neurosurgery, dexterity or knowledge? “We can teach a monkey to do surgery in seven years. Passion is the most important quality. I see senior residents get angry at newer residents because they work shorter hours than they did. They are bitter, and remorseful. Unless you have the passion, you will burn out.” He joked that sometimes beginners can be too passionate. “One of my residents got so excited about a successful shunt [apparently, a common neurosurgery procedure] he performed. It’s not that big a deal, we do shunts every damn day. I did not want to burst his bubble so I told him ‘Great job!’… Don’t tell him I said that!”

How did he cope with such depressing cases? “It is tough. I see cases like Jonathan’s every month,” he answered. “Everyone manages it differently. For me, as long as I feel like I treated my patient and their family like my family, I sleep fine. It is when I remember at night that I forgot to talk to that family member that it hits me.”

A seventy-year-old dermatologist with a strong southern accent held a lunch session to explain why his field is the best: “I cannot think of a single reason why you would not want to do Derm. It pays well. It has unbeatable hours. The patient population is generally quite motivated to get better.” He was in private solo practice for much of his career. “Many of my patients, such as lawyers, paid cash.” A classmate asked, “Did it get lonely working solo?” He responded, “No, we have nurses.” He described how there are just not many dermatologists, claiming this was the reason why there were so few dermatology residency slots. Dermatology is one of the most competitive residency programs.

Friday was Match Day, a slight misnomer because it is one day after fourth-year medical students hear where they will (or will not) be completing residency. Students and residency programs rank their top choices. Almost 36,000 domestic medical students and international doctors vied for about 29,000 residency slots. Fifty percent of applicants nationwide got their first choice.

The whole school attends the ceremony. Each student goes up to the podium and says something like “I will be will doing Internal Medicine at the University of Southern California.” Fifteen percent of the class couples matched. Two individuals need not be married or in the same specialty to couples match. An orthopedic surgeon sent an email out congratulating the class on their impressive Match Day results, but reminded the first through third year students not to slack off. He ended with a quote from Will Rogers: ” Even if you are on the right track, you will get run over if you just stand there.”

Statistics for the week… Study: 10 hours. Sleep: 7 hours/night; Fun: 2 nights. Example fun: A good friend and former coworker visited for the weekend. We joined Match Day celebration at a pregame followed by a late bar night filled with plenty of Guinness for Saint Patrick’s Day. Jane and I saw Beauty and the Beast on

Full post, including comments

Do the British need a dose of American political correctness?

In some meetings in London regarding the helicopter market I noticed a big difference in how pleasant well-educated natives spoke about the people who might want to go from Point A to Point B within this cloud-plagued rain-soaked traffic-clogged land. Where an American might have said “executives” or “businesspeople,” the British consistently referred to potential helicopter users as “businessmen.” Nobody seemed surprise by this phrase, not even the female consultants at the global management consultancy conducting the meetings.

Readers: Is this just another example of the persistent inability of people in England to use the English language correctly? Or does the apparent sexism of the language reflect a society that is in fact more sexist than the U.S.?

Full post, including comments

Mark Zuckerberg at Harvard Commencement

Mark Zuckerberg showed up this year to give the commencement speech at Harvard. Let’s look at parts of the transcript:

graduates of the greatest university in the world

What better proof of the high quality of a university than that the most successful affiliates are those who dropped out? (See also Bill Gates, apparently too busy saving Africans (or “sharing the load” of housekeeping with his wife?) to give this year’s address.) Times Higher Education gives Harvard a solid #6 ranking, behind such schools as Oxford, Stanford, and Cambridge.

my best memory from Harvard was meeting Priscilla. But without Facemash I wouldn’t have met Priscilla, and she’s the most important person in my life

She faces some obstacles to becoming the most important plaintiff in Zuckerberg’s life, though, because the wedding was deferred until a day after the IPO (see “Zuckerberg’s post-IPO wedding is smart legal move” (Reuters) and our chapter on California family law).

Many of our parents had stable jobs throughout their careers. Now we’re all entrepreneurial, whether we’re starting projects or finding or role. And that’s great. Our culture of entrepreneurship is how we create so much progress.

Young people are better and more interesting than their boring parents. The Harvard graduate who goes to work for the government is an “entrepreneur.”

Millennials are already one of the most charitable generations in history. In one year, three of four US millennials made a donation and seven out of ten raised money for charity.

[Entrepreneur notes that “Despite being the largest U.S. demographic by age, the generation of 18-to-34 year-olds donates less and volunteers less for charitable causes than any other age group.” “Why Are Americans Less Charitable Than They Used to Be?” (Atlantic) says “The average American has grown more tight-fisted in recent years, donating a smaller portion of his or her income to charity than he or she did 10 years ago.” (Of course, the authors note that high-income Americans have become less charitable recently, but don’t consider the possibility that this could be due to higher tax rates, such as the Obamacare tax on investment income.)]

giving everyone the freedom to pursue purpose isn’t free. People like me should pay for it. Many of you will do well and you should too.

[… on average not as well as folks who chose to become California prison guards.]

We should have a society that measures progress not just by economic metrics like GDP, but by how many of us have a role we find meaningful.

Maybe Facebook can re-hire Chia Hong to measure the meaningfulness of jobs within the company? (See also “Underpaid and overburdened: the life of a Facebook moderator” (Guardian))

We should explore ideas like universal basic income to give everyone a cushion to try new things. … In a survey asking millennials around the world what defines our identity, the most popular answer wasn’t nationality, religion or ethnicity, it was “citizen of the world”. That’s a big deal. Every generation expands the circle of people we consider “one of us.” For us, it now encompasses the entire world.

UBI will enable everyone to start a company. Certainly no American would use his or her UBI to become an opiate addict, as has been common with SSDI and Medicaid.

[If you’re a citizen of the world and also support universal basic income (UBI), shouldn’t everyone on the planet get a handout? Why does someone who happens to be physically in the U.S. have a greater entitlement than a fellow citizen of the world in Bolivia, India, or China? We take the total wealth we’re going to hand out and divide by 7.5 billion? Or do we exclude citizens of the world who live in the richer-than-the-US countries from joining the check-of-the-month club?]

We’re going to change jobs many times, so we need affordable child care to get to work

Guy with a kid says that people with no kids should work harder and pay higher taxes to subsidize his child care costs.

We get that our greatest opportunities are now global—we can be the generation that ends poverty, that ends disease. … How about curing all diseases and asking volunteers to track their health data and share their genomes? Today we spend 50x more treating people who are sick than we spend finding cures so people don’t get sick in the first place.

There is no way that viruses will turn out to be smarter than humans. Certainly throwing money at a problem will solve it. Maybe a War on Cancer instead of these ongoing battles we’ve been funding?

How about stopping climate change before we destroy the planet

There is no better way to conserve the planet’s resources than tearing down four houses and rebuilding them in the same location.

Readers: What struck you about the dropout’s speech to the graduates?

Related:

Full post, including comments

Trump’s proposed tax rates would devalue Berkshire Hathaway?

Suppose that part of Berkshire Hathaway’s value is avoiding corporate income tax by combining insurance with conventional businesses. And part of the firm’s value is avoiding individual income tax by doing stock buybacks instead of dividends.

Warren Buffett says that Trump’s proposed federal corporate tax rate cut to 15 percent (don’t forget to add state taxes as well!) would help his investors (link). But if corporate and/or individual income tax rates are cut, would that devalue Berkshire Hathaway relative to other enterprises?

Full post, including comments

U.S. versus U.K. taxes

I met an expat for coffee in Moscow. He is British, but also has a U.S. passport because his mother is originally American. He runs a company that does business in Russia and the U.K. He has to file taxes both in the U.K. (because he works there) and in the U.S. (because he holds the passport). Much of the U.S. work is disclosure, e.g., of real estate owned or money withdrawn from a foreign bank account, e.g., to pay for an apartment. “It takes me one hour to do the U.K. taxes,” he said. “I use the government’s web site and it leads me through it step by step.” What about the U.S.? “That takes a week and it is the worst week of my year.”

Full post, including comments

Unwelcome news on enchilada night

Shortly before we sat down to a family dinner of chicken enchiladas, a moderately Deplorable friend emailed me “This Week in Appropriation: Kooks Burritos” (Portland Mercury):

This week in white nonsense, two white women—Kali Wilgus and Liz “LC” Connely—decided it would be cute to open a food truck after a fateful excursion to Mexico. There’s really nothing special about opening a Mexican restaurant—it’s probably something that happens everyday. [in Mexico?]

Week after week people of color in Portland bear witness to the hijacking of their cultures, and an identifiable pattern of appropriation has been created. Several of the most successful businesses in this town have been birthed as a result of curious white people going to a foreign country, or an international venture, and poaching as many trade secrets, customs, recipes as possible, and then coming back to Portland to claim it as their own and score a tidy profit.

Because of Portland’s underlying racism, the people who rightly own these traditions and cultures that exist are already treated poorly. These appropriating businesses are erasing and exploiting their already marginalized identities for the purpose of profit and praise.

People of color are nothing more than an afterthought when the white perpetrators of this tradition continue to do this on a regular basis.

I didn’t feel the need to read the masthead to infer that this is from Portland, Oregon rather than Portland, Maine…

Full post, including comments

Russian support for Vladimir Putin and freedom of expression

Growing up in the 1970s I was told by American media that Russia was to blame for everything that wasn’t going well here in the U.S. This is apparently still true today. A one-day (May 16) sample from Facebook:

  • “Trump Revealed Highly Classified Intelligence to Russia” (nytimes; referenced by a concerned Facebook friend)
  • The guy under investigation for illegal ties to Russia leaks classified material to the…Russians! Yes, but she used email
  • Another Russian Connected To Trump Has Turned Up Dead – That’s 8 So Far
  • DEMAND A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR ON RUSSIA (ACLU)
  • Trump’s business network reached alleged Russian mobsters
  • “Top Senate Democrat Calls on White House to Release Trump-Russia Meeting Transcripts” (nytimes)

Our media portrays Russians as living under a cruel dictatorship. Vladimir Putin and his friends are stealing all of their money. Our go-to “look how they abuse their women” slam against enemies doesn’t work with Russians (since women obtained an equal role in their society 100 years ago) so we decry the cruel oppression of gay and transgender people by a heteronormative government.

What was it like on the ground? I visited Moscow, which I was told was the part of Russia least likely to support Putin. Nonetheless, I met Putin supporters and Russians of all political persuasions agreed that Putin would win 65-70 percent of the vote in a completely free election. Putin is credited with eliminating corruption and chaos at local and intermediate levels of government. Although Russians might be happy to live in an English- or German-style parliamentary democracy, they don’t see this as the alternative to Putin. Instead they envision pervasive corruption, violence, and looting. What about the fact that Putin and people close to the government seem to have become richer than typical civil servants? [Though let’s keep in mind that these folks haven’t made anywhere near as much money, in the aggregate, as cronies of the U.S. government! Consider the $182 billion A.I.G. bailout, for example, and all of the Wall Streeters protected from their own incompetence thereby.] “I look at Putin as a hedge fund manager,” said one Russian. “We have about $500 billion in foreign currency reserves and Putin should get a fee for managing that. At least he hasn’t buried us in debt the way that Bush and Obama buried the Americans.” (A Boston-based emerging markets bond fund manager confirmed Putin’s basic fiscal prudence: “When oil prices went up, Russia paid off a lot of its debt early. Compare that to Venezuela where they spent it on social programs and making Hugo Chavez’s daughter a billionaire.”)

Russia has a flat 13-percent individual income tax, a flat 20-percent corporate income tax, and a European-style value-added tax of 10-18 percent (PWC). They are suffering from more or less permanent “austerity” because the government spends only about what it takes in via revenue. I.e., they don’t have deficit spending.

Tyler Cowen said that the stagnation of the U.S. economy shouldn’t make us weep because we now have the option of same-sex marriage (and, fortunately for litigators, divorce). Russians certainly don’t have this option. Is the oppression of gays as bad as portrayed in the American media? “You can be as gay as you like here,” said one expat. From the Lonely Planet Moscow:

Moscow is the most cosmopolitan of Russian cities, and the active gay and lesbian scene reflects this attitude. Newspapers such as The Moscow Times feature articles about gay and lesbian issues, as well as listings of gay and lesbian clubs. Visit Gay.ru (http:// english.gay.ru) for up-to-date information, good links and a resource for putting you in touch with personal guides.

Students at the university that I visited had a much more diverse set of opinions regarding social and political issues than their American counterparts. On the issue of gay rights, for example, students at the same cafeteria table might range from someone actively interested in promoting LBGTQ issues (maybe not the Transgender part, though; I didn’t hear anyone mention gender ID) to someone who would openly say “It doesn’t bother me if people want to have sex in their apartments, but I don’t want to hear about it.” They could all go back to eating after discovering these differences, instead of one group trying to enforce political orthodoxy on the other! What do university students who don’t put energy into enforcing conformity do with all of their leftover time and energy? I met economics masters students who not only knew the names of a bunch of (Russian-language) poets, but actually had poems memorized!

As in Soviet times, though there is probably more freedom of expression in social and work situations than we have here in the Boston area (e.g., you can express your opposition to race-based hiring preferences at your employer, but you won’t have a job a day later!), running a mass-market TV network with 24/7 anti-government stories wouldn’t work. People thought that Putin would still win in totally free elections in a country with totally free media, so restrictions on media may not have any practical effect on the government.

What about something that corresponds to our obsession with Russians controlling important events here in the U.S.? Are there Russian stories about how various officials are being manipulated by Americans or the American government? There don’t seem to be. Government-influenced Russian media do seem to enjoy pointing out American hypocrisy and of course we give them plenty to choose from. The Land of Liberty (TM) has the world’s highest incarceration rate. The Land of Opportunity (TM) has a massive underclass. From those two contradictions alone the Russians can fill all of the pages that they want with stories that make us look ridiculous.

Full post, including comments

Medical School 2020, Year 1, Week 28

From our anonymous insider…

Exam Week: physiology (including pharmacology), anatomy, and clinical (x2).

Classmates are nervous about physiology due to range of systems covered in this block: endocrinology, reproductive, kidney, and gastrointestinal. From our class GroupMe chat: “I cannot believe they could not put one of these systems into the next block.” (We can believe anything about the next block because we haven’t experienced it!); “FML,” [F… My Life] liked by 26 classmates.

Anatomy questions were easier than on the previous two exams. Every question was first order (e.g., What is this structure?), instead of a more challenging clinical scenario or applied reasoning (e.g., Which of the following structures would be used to access the posterior aspect of the stomach?). The most difficult question asked us to identify two arteries in the abdomen on a CT image slice. Classmates speculated that standards were lowered in response to complaints during the last block regarding the anatomy curriculum. I wasn’t among the dissatisfied; if I get a well thought-out question wrong I tend to remember the material.

I spoke with an M4 (fourth-year medical student) after the anatomy exam. The school apparently used to conduct the anatomy exam in the lab on your individual cadaver. They stopped this because some students felt under too much pressure from being “pimped” by instructors and “it did not look good for the LCME [Liaison Committee on Medical Education].” I asked, “What does pimping mean?” The term refers to an attending bombarding a resident or medical student with questions. The M4 chuckled, “Hospitals have not succumbed to these restrictions so be prepared on your rotations. A good attending won’t let his or her resident leave the day without feeling humbled or inadequate, depending on how you take the experience.”

After exams we completed a Web-browser-based anonymous evaluation for every instructor. The “Learning Environment” section requires a response to “Were you required to perform any personal services?” and “Did you feel you were denied opportunities for training or subjected to offensive remarks because of gender, ethnicity, or sexual orientation?” We were informed via mass email to be careful with this section because every “yes” response causes an email marked “urgent” to be sent to each dean. Accidental “yes” responses at the end of the last block caused a bit of an inbox meltdown among the academic administrators.

The good news about “offensive remarks” is that LCME requires they be recorded, along with the rest of each lecture, on video. This way students who can’t be bothered to attend still have access and anyone who enjoys being offended can repeat the experience. Over half the class uses this feature and our large IT staff are frequently called to help with issues. Before the weekend, a student asked a beloved instructor, “What is your favorite beer?” He responded, “The video is recording, I’ll tell you afterwards.”

Statistics for the week… Study: 25 hours. Sleep: 8 hours/night (I once again get more sleep during exam week?); Fun: 1 night. Example fun: Final exams ended at 12:00pm. Ten of us went to classmate’s apartment for beer and mimosas, followed by an early happy hour excursion downtown and late night dancing. Jane and I slept until noon the next day.

More: http://fifthchance.com/MedicalSchool2020

Full post, including comments