Laptop ban on airlines will lead to more support for the docked-phone idea?

Folks:

Back in 2005 I suggested a dock for a mobile phone that would enable consumers to imagine that they were using the phone as a desktop computer. Twelve years later it still hasn’t happened on any large scale and there has been a convergence of CPU capability in the handheld and desktop worlds (which means that putting a CPU in the dock might have become a dumb idea, except for video editing).

In response to global jihad, the U.S. government is now talking about banning laptops on Transatlantic flights. Might it be time to defrost my old idea? United Airlines has given up on seatback screens in favor of the world’s most cumbersome download-an-app-and-register-before-boarding system. Why not beef up the seatback screen into a mobile phone dock with keyboard and mouse? Or does it make more sense to tell everyone who is going to fly Transatlantic “buy a monster-sized mobile phone”? Or do we just admit that flying time is TV-watching time for most “business” travelers who claim to be working?

I will be pondering this on my London to Boston flight today!

Full post, including comments

Medical School 2020, Year 1, Week 19

From our anonymous insider…

We’re back from our three-week Christmas and New Year’s break. Our previous block was exclusively on the cardiopulmonary system. This seven-week block will cover the gastrointestinal (GI), endocrine, reproductive and renal systems.

Lectures introduced the components of the GI system, including the enteric nervous system (ENS), a network of 500 million neurons (as many as in the spinal cord!). In the 1900s anatomists dissected portions of the GI tract and tested responses to specific foods and distensions (see pioneering work by Bayliss and Starling, referred to as “The Law of the Gut”). The ENS contains afferent (sensory) neurons that possess mechano- and chemo-receptors that sense the lumen of the gut. These afferent neurons send their information to interneurons that synapse (connect) with efferent (response) neurons. Efferent neurons control smooth muscle tone and secretory gland cells. Drugs that affect neural synapse communication can affect GI function: I saw a patient abusing opioids hospitalized because he had not defecated in over three months.

The autonomic nervous system integrates with the enteric nervous system, relaying information from the central nervous system, which includes the brain, but the ENS can function independently.

We learned the embryological origin of GI organs: the liver, pancreas, spleen and lungs are all outgrowths of the same tissue! Classmates had a lot of questions and after-class discussions about the fetal twisting of the gut tube that produces these organs.

Lectures also covered the basics, e.g., peristalsis: when a bolus of food enters the lumen of what doctors call the gut, a continuous tube from esophagus to stomach to intestine to rectum. Sensory information is integrated in the myenteric plexus, a region of dense nerve activity that travels between the smooth muscle layers. Efferent neurons contract circular smooth muscle about two centimeters proximal to the distension. Simultaneously, efferent neurons relax distal circular smooth muscle. This ring of contraction propagates and moves the food about five centimeters before being succeeded by the next wave.

Anatomy lab kicked off with the dissection of the abdominal wall. We saw the numerous fascial layers that separate the abdominal muscles and the peritoneum. Every cadaver had six-pack abs once we removed the fat covering the rectus abdominus. Rectus abdominus is a superficial muscle that runs from the lower sternal border and ribs to the pubic tubercle (bony prominence in the front of hip). The muscle alternates between a muscle sheath and three or four horizontal tendinous lines creating six-pack or eight-pack abs.

We were told to concentrate on understanding the inguinal ligament, the division of abdomen from the legs, and inguinal canal. There are two routes for vessels to enter a lower extremity: under the inguinal ligament to the anterior leg or through the pelvic cavity into the posterior leg. Groups with male cadavers showed classmates dissecting female cadavers how the vas deferens takes sperm through the inguinal canal into the abdominal wall and down into the pelvic cavity to connect to the urethra. Sperm travel right next to the peritoneum membrane which encloses the intestines. My favorite trauma surgeon commented that interns and residents are selected to determine the hernia type by feeling up the patient’s scrotum into the inguinal canal.

Three classmates and I stuck around through the lunch break to watch a GI surgeon attending dissect a “Fem-Fem”. The cadaver had an obstructed left femoral artery. A tube was inserted into the left femoral artery distal (farther away from the origin) of the blockage and connected to the perfused (supplied with blood) right femoral artery. It felt like a hard rubber tube, not what I imagined for a biologically compatible material. I asked if this tube would cause stenosis (hardening) of the attached arteries. He said, “Eventually, but this man’s comorbidities would likely kill him within two or three years, well before stenosis. This was a way for him to keep his leg for his last years.”

Our patient case: “Jenny,” a beautiful, intelligent 35-year-old female. After college she moved to start work at an advertising firm. She began to lose weight steadily despite a normal diet. She had regular diarrhea and terrible acne. “The acne was by far the most debilitating. It made me severely depressed,” explained Jenny. “And the dermatologist was worthless.” After the dermatologist’s suggestions did not work, she proposed putting Jenny on Accutane. She declined because of the potential for depression due to interactions with her anti-anxiety medications. She lived with the acne and diarrhea for five years.

Seemingly overnight, everything changed. Jenny lost thirty pounds in a month. Her hair fell out. She developed painful bruises on her legs. “My coworkers thought I was crazy. I thought I was dying.”

A new doctor tested her for celiac disease, and, after a positive result, referred Jenny to the Gastroenterologist who came to present her case. The physician, a woman in her 40s, explained, “Five years is quite typical for time until diagnosis following the onset of celiac symptoms. It wasn’t on physicians’ radar ten years ago.” Celiac disease is an autoimmune disease triggered by gluten, an abundant protein in wheat. Gluten survives the acidic environment of the stomach and is phagocytosed by macrophages in the small intestine. In normal individuals, this elicits a small inflammatory response. Individuals with MHC gene variants may experience an aggressive immune response that destroys the gut epithelial lining. Due to the damage to the lining of her intestines, Jenny was unable to absorb essential vitamins and nutrients, which caused malnutrition and anemia.

Jenny worked to adjust her diet in the pre-gluten-free label age: “I called up every manufacturer and asked if the food contained gluten. Brand-loyalty was key.” Adhering to a gluten-free diet, she is now the healthy mother of a healthy boy. “It is what it is. It is much easier now with labeling and I find my whole family eats healthier.” A student asked the doctor, “What is the difference between celiac disease and gluten-sensitivity?” The doctor chuckled. “I have many patients who tell me they feel better when they do not eat gluten. I tell them good for you. It is not because of an immune response from gluten. It is probably because they just eat healthier food.” Jenny chimed in, “I do not understand people who eat gluten-free foods that are 100-percent carbohydrates. How is that healthier?”

In lecture, a neurobiologist introduced the role of glial cells in regulating cerebral blood flow. Glial cells are the non-neuronal support network for neurons. Astrocytes, a type of glial cells, surround 98% of the surface area of the brain’s capillary network forming the blood-brain barrier. They decide what gets in and out. We learned about current trends in astrocyte pathology. Glioblastoma, cancer of glial cells, is one of the most aggressive forms of cancer. The cancer cells migrate along blood vessels to expand to other areas of the brain making It incurable by surgery. While migrating, the cancer cells scrape off the adherent astrocytes giving the voracious cancer cells direct access to the leaky capillary and its nutrients. As it migrates along the vessel, astrocytes are unable to re-adhere to the vessel causing fluid to leak into the brain’s microenvironment. This is theorized to be the cause of seizures in patients with glioblastoma.

Alzheimer’s is another area he believes involves dysregulation of astrocytes. Unlike most tissues, brain blood flow is regulated both at arteriole and capillary levels. Evidence shows astrocytes are able to constrict capillary networks, but amyloid plaques lead to stiffening of the capillary, which interferes with this control mechanism.

I asked him about a recent 60 Minutes episode, “The Alzheimer’s Laboratory”, about families in Colombia with genetic early-onset Alzheimer’s, based on church records going back to the 1800s. Children of an affected parent have a fifty percent chance of losing memory and independence in their thirties or forties. However, from this tragedy comes opportunity for researchers and future Alzheimer’s patients. There is currently no effective treatment for Alzheimer’s, which has thus become America’s most expensive disease, about $240 billion in 2016 and set to grow as Americans age.

“This represents a critical juncture in Alzheimer’s research,” he explained. “Although amyloids are the only target of all drugs in the research pipeline, there is no evidence that amyloid plaques actually cause Alzheimer’s. Some cases have tons of amyloid plaques, some none. Some people have tons of amyloid with no Alzheimer’s.” The 60 Minutes show described a clinical trial investigating whether a monoclonal antibody against amyloid can delay early-onset Alzheimer’s. I was reminded of another neuroscientist’s comment: “If a clinical trial fails they first blame the patient cohort, second the timing of therapy, and only then the science.”

Statistics for the week… Study: 18 hours. Sleep: 7 hours/night; Fun: 1 night. Example fun: Dinner with Jane’s visiting family before a Saturday morning 10K through 4 inches of snow.

30 classmates rented a ski lodge a two-hour drive away. Most did not go skiing but they still managed to have a grand-ole time, perhaps because they’d packed two car trunks full of peppermint schnapps.

More: http://fifthchance.com/MedicalSchool2020

Full post, including comments

Don’t let your kids grow up to be engineers, Part 1

A Facebook during our family sojourn in Ft. Lauderdale:

I have officially had it with Hertz. The minivan that I reserved was “not available” and this yellow car that they gave us as a substitute is definitely not “stroller-friendly” like the agent said.

img_2347

At least a few engineers later asked me about Hertz, driving the “yellow car” (a Lamborghini, I think), etc.

Full post, including comments

Medical School 2020, Year 1, Week 18

From our anonymous insider…

Exam week covered cardiopulmonary physiology, anatomy and clinical skills. Pharmacology remains the most dreaded topic. Despite this universal struggle, two-thirds of the class appear comfortable with the pace. We know what to expect. We realize that the exams are meant as a stop-safe. If one of us fails the exam, typically a score less than 60%, it is a wake-up call that we are not on-track for the final judgement: Step 1.

The other third of my classmates are nervous wrecks. They are so concerned about what they need to know that they forget about learning. Four percent of the class failed and will have to retake the exam next week. Most of these individuals had adhered to Anita’s strategy of focusing on “High Yield” material, defined as material frequently included on the Step 1 exam and therefore in McGraw Hill’s First Aid for the USMLE Step 1. The First Aid summary figures are worth reviewing the day before the exam, but it seems that “High Yield”-minded individuals quickly forget a substantial amount of the information. These individuals go blank during discussion of some aspect of the patient case that was in the previous block, for example, an enzyme involved in a urea cycle disorder.

As soon as the exams were done, classmates were able to reflect on their experience. We agree that the tested block was much more enjoyable than our first block, which was devoted to clinical applications of molecular pathways, many of which students were exposed to in pre-med required courses and MCAT studying. The tested block was our first foray into predominantly “clinical” material: physiology and pathophysiology. We also got to use our stethoscopes!

After my second exams, a few things I wished I knew on day one:

  • find a good textbook
  • learning begins after lecture
  • study early, study consistently, repeat

Most of the class reads the suggested Costanzo’s Physiology (“I have a date with Costanzo tonight,” is a common inside joke), but I preferred the more in-depth Medical Physiology (Boron and Boulpaep).

Twenty percent of the class no longer goes to lectures because they find it less efficient than independent study. I continue to go to hear the clinical vignettes. Some lecturers are down to an attendance rate of less than 30 percent. Maybe medical school costs could be cut considerably; Jane and and I agree that we could learn everything besides anatomy and clinical exam skills using Web-based and library resources.

The job of a medical student is to study. Many of us got through undergraduate exams by cramming the night before. This purge-in, purge-out mentality does not work in medical school. Curiosity becomes the most valuable asset in medical school. The depth and breadth of information requires constant dedication to translate understanding into retention. My search for immediate answers to questions is challenging for classmates because I don’t have a smartphone right now. Jane suffers the most with my endless questions: “My ankle evertor muscles are sore. What muscles are those?” (Fibularis brevis and fibularis longus)

Statistics for the week… Study: 35 hours. The library was still packed when I left at 10:00 pm most nights this week. Sleep: 8 hours/night; Fun: Learning on Saturday that I’d passed!

More: http://fifthchance.com/MedicalSchool2020

Full post, including comments

Stocks for the long run: GE since 2001

Boston Magazine has an article on GE CEO Jeff Immelt. They note that the stock price has gone down from $40 per share to $29 during the 16 years that he has run the company. Adjusted for inflation, that’s nearly a 50-percent decline ($40 in 2001 is equivalent to about $55 today).

A Google Finance chart of GE versus the S&P 500 confirms the dismal performance of this stock.

What do readers think? Was GE just so crazily overvalued, even after the Crash of 2000, that the stock had nowhere to go but sideways? Revenue in 2001 was $126 billion and earnings per share were $1.41 (annual report). The 2016 annual report shows $113 billion in “industrial segment revenues” and $1 in “continuing EPS” (GAAP measures) and $103 billion in revenue and $1.49 using non-GAAP techniques. So the company’s performance has become incomprehensible to laypeople in the intervening years, but revenue and profits do seem to have stagnated. How can this be in a world that is ever-more-friendly to the biggest companies?

[Not everyone is suffering. Boston Magazine notes that shareholders paid Immelt $21 million last year. He spent a full four months of salary on a modest dwelling: a $7.5 million Back Bay townhouse.]

Related:

  • 2003 Slate article on GE executives underperforming
  • Stocks for the Long Run, the investment classic that my money expert friend says can lead to infinite wealth. If you are in fact sure that stocks will outperform bonds over the next 10 years, for example, you can work with options and futures to pick up guaranteed risk-free cash. (This is in case you don’t want to get infinitely rich by starting a company with a 100-percent female workforce, which Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren say will do the same work at much lower cost than what your stupid competitors are paying their workers who identify as male.)
Full post, including comments

Car and Driver is more convincing than Thomas Piketty

Thomas Piketty presented 704 pages about how rich the world’s rich bastards are and therefore it was time for the pitchforks (see Book review: Piketty’s Capital). We have a household member who, despite being 13 years shy of being able to drive, is fond of Car and Driver magazine in hardcopy. From the June 2017 issue, in a review of the $3 million Bugatti Chiron:

Bugatti by the numbers:

42: number of cars owned by the average Bugatti driver

870: number of miles the average Veyron [previous version of the car] accumulates in a year

(This is in an inset box that is missing from the online version.)

Full post, including comments

New York Times discovers that it is expensive to live in Boston

“How Homeownership Became the Engine of American Inequality” (nytimes) advocates for a seemingly sensible economic policy (getting rid of the mortgage interest deduction), but I can’t see how the cited stories support the author’s argument. Here’s my published comment on the piece:

Affecting stories. And of course subsidizing unproductive investments in housing is a sure way to kill per-capita GDP growth (a worker who lives in a larger and nicer house does not get more work done), so it is hard to imagine a more counterproductive policy for an indebted government (which needs economic growth to pay off $20 trillion in debt) than the mortgage interest deduction.

That said, the author picked people who live in one of the world’s most expensive housing markets (Boston area) and they have kids and they want to have each child in a dedicated bedroom. Absent fellow taxpayers (many of them childless working drones) giving them subsidized housing, how was that ever going to work unless one parent had a high income?

There are some Americans who can afford to have kids with a moderate-income co-parent and a comfortable-sized house/apartment. There are some Americans who can turn a moderate income into a comfortable-sized house/apartment in a high-cost area. What this article shows is that the intersection of these two groups is non-existent without an ample helping of tax dollars contributed either by (a) those who have a higher income, or (b) those who don’t have kids.

Readers: Can you see a way in which eliminating the mortgage interest deduction would make housing in prime urban areas more affordable for low-income people who want multi-bedroom units? If killing the deduction slowed construction of new housing, wouldn’t the price of existing housing actually go up? And how does the mortgage interest deduction have a significant effect when we have (1) a growing population (due to immigration), (2) a demonstrated inability to construct new urban environments that are attractive?

[Separately, if you bought a house in Detroit or Cleveland 15 years ago you’ll be pleased to learn from the NY Times that “homeownership … is a proven wealth builder”]

Full post, including comments

Watching TV is not a good way to learn about reality

From the local school…

Dear Parents & Guardians,

Supporting the mental health and well-being of our students is a priority for all of us as a community. It has come to our attention that some of our middle school students have been talking about and/or watching a popular new Netflix series that presents an inaccurate and graphic portrayal of suicidality. The series, based on a book by Jay Asher, entitled 13 Reasons Why, portrays a high school student who commits suicide after leaving audio recordings for her peers to listen to after her death. The purpose of this letter is to make you aware of this series and the concerns of the suicide prevention experts. We encourage you to have conversations with your child if they have watched this series or have heard about it from friends. Having accurate information and talking points will support your conversation with your child. While all students require support with these discussions, students who may already be vulnerable are at greater emotional risk.

In addition, please be advised, mental health professionals are concerned with the graphic depiction of suicide and sexual assault contained within this series.

——- from the attachments…

On the surface, 13 Reasons Why might come across as a show that discusses mental health, however the issues of mental health or illness are never explored in the show. While a varied number of issues were presented in the show (e.g., sexual assault, sexual orientation, sexting, etc.), for Hannah they seemed to generally manifest themselves as shaming and harassment. The overwhelming message seems to be centered on the oft-cited but misleading narrative that bullying ultimately leads to suicide. The storyline espouses that the simple solution to Hannah’s struggle – indeed the cause of most of her strife – was the unkindness, and in some scenarios, the downright cruelty of her friends. While this is an important theme to explore, causal links between bullying and suicide are simplistic and as such, problematic.

Suicide is not a common response to life’s challenges or adversity.

When you die you do not get to make a movie or talk to people any more. Leaving messages from beyond the grave is a dramatization produced in Hollywood and is not possible in real life.

Hannah’s tapes blame others for her suicide. Suicide is never the fault of survivors of suicide loss. There are resources and support groups for suicide loss survivors.

I think is a good illustration of our culture of victimhood that one can now be a “survivor” as a consequence of someone else’s suicide.

Full post, including comments