New meme: “Party like a Kavanaugh”

I was down in Bethesda, Maryland over the weekend, technically home to Georgetown Prep (actually located, since 1919, in what we Native Bethesdans would have called “Rockville”) and its weekly official gang rape parties (organized by Brett Kavanaugh, according to Julie Swetnick). None of these parties were on the calendar for Saturday night at my parents’ retirement fortress, so we were able to enjoy a quiet family dinner (cooked and served by immigrants to the pro-immigration elderly Democrats (nearly all had retired from careers, e.g., civil service, medicine, or law, that depended on Big Government becoming Yet Bigger)).

A grandson who is a local high school junior joined. I asked “Are you partying like a Kavanaugh?”

I’m hoping that this can become a new meme to replace “Party like a Rock Star”.

[I posted this on Facebook. It was #NotFunny and #TooSoon. A woman who manages an anti-development non-profit org:

Really? You mean like, get drunk, assault women, black out, and don’t remember a thing the next day. You seriously think that’s funny?

to which I responded

All the more reason to ask!

A self-employed carpenter and contractor whom I know commented

I only hope he turns out that smart. Remember also “he, who is without sin, cast the first stone”

He’s 70 years old and, for 55 years, has been getting up at 5 am every morning, 6 days per week, to work. It is possible that he interpreted my post literally as he is not a close friend nor a close reader. A woman who went to an elite high school then two elite universities before settling into a cushy university desk job, resonded to him and men in general:

It sounds like you may have things on your conscience. That’s ok, we are not judging you (at least not until you run for a public office). Let me give you this advice. Just come clean and apologize. You will be forgiven.

If Jesus were alive today, he would be a liberal!

I can see the aggrieved male privilege getting up at arms about “politically correct” taking away the last bits of “boys will be boys” fun you were able to have (at our expense too!). Please pardon me if my heart is not breaking for you. I cannot feel guilty or bad that it is no longer ok to drink until you are liberated enough to force yourself on another human being. Please figure out how to bond with other guys and have fun some other way.

Is it reasonable for a woman with an elaborate list of educational credentials and a highly paid desk job that starts at 10:00 am (or later!) to say that a man who gets up at 0500 to work with his hands has “privilege” compared to her? (They both appear to be white, but their respective photos have not been evaluated by official government race-identifiers.) Could billionaire Sheryl Sandberg, for example, say that her immigrant landscapers are “privileged” if they happen to identify as male? If not, where is the line over which a female can cross into the land of “more privileged than a blue-collar guy”?]

For the record, though I was a high school student in Bethesda in the late 1970s, right in the middle of the Jimmy Carter Malaise and a core non-woke period of “rape culture”, I did not hear about any rapes at parties or otherwise (maybe Walt Whitman (public) High School kids were not cool enough for these?). Teenagers back then were terrible gossips and keeping secrets was more or less impossible. The most common sex-related scandal was a pregnancy (this, despite the extensive contraception education provided by Montgomery County officialdom). A few Catholic girls got married as a result of unintended pregnancies. The happy new couple would move into a walk-out basement belonging to one set of parents (our neighborhood was called “Mohican Hills” (maybe Elizabeth Warren lives there now?) and nearly all of the houses were on a slope). The new moms would take a couple of months off school and then hand the resulting baby to their 40-something parents. At the time, a 17-year-old giving birth was considered unfortunate. This was before the advent of child support guidelines (history) that made single motherhood a financially sensible lifestyle choice and every pregnant girl either married the father or had an abortion (legal since 1968 in Maryland).

(Teenage motherhood still seems to be something for people to condemn. I spoke with an anesthesiologist the other day. She remarked negatively on having recently assisted with a birth at which four generations were present: baby, mother, grandmother, and great-grandmother. “The oldest family member in the room was 39. Nobody had a male partner or a job.” (i.e., each child had been born to a 13-year-old mom) In her view, this fecundity was due to our welfare system. “What this country needs is more hunger. You don’t see people in China having babies so that they can then live in public housing.” She’s a frequent business traveler to China so this is based on first-hand knowledge. I was shocked by her statements because typical Boston-area academic physicians are just as liberal as you’d expect given that more than 50 percent of their income comes from the government (Medicare, Medicaid, etc.). It is odd that Americans want to condemn something that they also vote to fund and enable!)

Update: “Kavanaugh Was Questioned by Police After Bar Fight in 1985” (nytimes), which says “As an undergraduate student at Yale, Brett M. Kavanaugh was involved in an altercation at a local bar during which he was accused of throwing ice on another patron, according to a police report.” Compare to students in the 18th century (Daily Mail): “duelling with swords; getting loudly and raucously drunk and getting kicked out of taverns … Trapping a servant girl in their rooms and scaring her; … Getting drunk and arguing with a lecturer…”

Related:

  • “How Anti-Poverty Programs Marginalize Fathers” (Atlantic) explains why today’s 17-year-old mom might not want to marry the dad: “Cohabitating with a boyfriend who is not biologically related to any of the household’s children is the most advantageous setup in most states.”
Full post, including comments

Medical School 2020, Year 2, Week 28

From our anonymous insider…

Exam week: two one-hour clinical standardized patient (SP) encounters, a 4-hour NBME-style 200-question exam, a 2-hour case-based exam, and a 2-hour clinical multiple choice exam over four days.

My first SP is 50-year-old nonobese non-smoking female with a two-month history of radiating back pain. She describes pain beginning in her lower left back, traveling down her buttocks to her feet like a bolt of lightning. She denies urinary incontinence or retention, denies headaches or visual changes. She reports difficulty walking. Physical exam reveals weakness in plantar flexion of the right foot decrease in station over the lateral aspect of the foot. She is unable to walk on heels. She has 2+ pulses in distal extremity. Positive straight leg raise while supine. I diagnosed her with a disc herniation spinal stenosis causing a L5 or S1 radiculopathy. One mistake: I forgot to do sensation testing of the distal lower extremities (feet).

My second SP is a 40-year-old nonobese nonsmoking female presenting for right-side hearing loss and one-hour episodes of dizziness over the past several days. I conduct the Rinne test (tuning fork is placed next to the ear and then on the mastoid bone. If conduction loss, the patient can hear better when fork is placed on the bone) I then do the Weber test (tuning fork is placed on the midline skull, and localizes to the affected ear if conduction loss)

Good news: I have ruled out a problem with mechanical conduction and therefore her hearing issue is due to a sensorineural cause. Bad News: I did not read up on sensorineural hearing loss. Although we are not supposed to discuss the cases (others will see the same patients later in the week), Jane and I overhear the correct answer in the line at Starbucks: Ménière’s disease. Neither Jane nor I had ever heard of this, let alone how to diagnose or treat this disease.

The clinical multiple-choice exam tests ophthalmology, suture technique, lumbar puncture technique, and psychiatric cases. Several questions showed images where we had to identify the correct diagnosis: for example, a cherry red spot in the macula (pigmented area near the center of the retina) suggests a retinal artery occlusion or Tay-Sachs disease. How is it possible to test suture technique with multiple choices? Example: “What suture size and needle type should be used to close a face laceration? What technique is depicted with this diagram?”

Students led by Type-A Anita swarm the clinical director because one of the questions had the wrong units attached to an optic ultrasound measuring the optic sheath diameter. It had calipers measuring the optic nerve diameter at 3 mm distal to the retina. The multiple choice questions all were in cm instead of mm.

The case-based exam covers five patients, each starting with a two-paragraph description of a patient’s presentation. We are then asked open-ended questions about what tests we would order and other symptoms to ask about. The exam for this block covers neurological diagnoses, endocrine diagnostic workups, musculoskeletal fractures, dislocations and malignancies. Neurology questions asked what other symptoms is most likely in a description of a Huntington’s disease patient and localize the lesion for stroke symptoms (e.g,. right anterior cerebral artery for left-sided leg weakness). Endocrine questions dealt with determining if an endocrine pathology is primary (disorder of the endocrine gland itself) or secondary (exogenous or pathologic dysfunction of the pituitary). For example, a patient with low thyroxine hormone and high TSH suggests a primary thyroid disorder; a patient with low thyroxine hormone and low TSH suggests a secondary cause of hypothyroidism. Pinterest Penelope complained about a lifelong smoker with Cushing syndrome (excess cortisol) and high ACTH (adrenal corticotropin hormone, hormone released by the pituitary gland to stimulate the cortisol release from the adrenal cortex). We had to determine if this was a ACTH-secreting pituitary adenoma or paraneoplastic syndrome from an underlying small cell lung carcinoma. “How were we supposed to know what is more likely?”

Jane and I look at the sample question bank on UWorld the night before to prepare for our final NBME block exam. These will be retired Step 1 questions from the National Board of Medical Examiners. I ask Jane about drugs for the treatment of bipolar disorder. She responds, “First Aid says mood stabilizers. lithium and valproic acid.” I look at my own copy of this book: “On page 545, First Aid says you can also use antiepileptics like carbamazepine and lamotrigine.” Jane exclaims, “What!?! Those are sodium channel blockers for seizures.” I add, “I understand why doctors order psych consults and call it a day. We cannot go into psychiatry.”

The Thursday NBME block exam was our toughest so far. Type-A Anita claims to have “blacked out” for the last 15 minutes: “I do not remember anything.” Pinterest Penelope: “Where was the biochem, where was the actual neuro on the test? There was nothing of yield.” Mischievous Mary adds: “I am glad I do not go to lecture because I’ve heard not much was represented on the exam.”

The renal questions required differentiating different types of chronic renal disease. Some questions you could answer using the patient demographics, e.g., African Americans are more likely to get focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), whereas whites and hepatitis B/C patients get membranous nephropathy. Others started with black-and-white scanning electron microscopy images and asked about the immune complex deposition pattern. Anita was not happy: “There is nothing to memorize. It’s like learning a new organ system every single question.” Her mood was not lifted by a genetics counseling question concerning the probability that a couple’s potential children will develop an autosomal recessive disorder. The husband has a sibling afflicted with the disease, which has a 1 in 40,000 prevalence in the general population. “I did not go to medical school to do math!” Anita exclaims. Answer: assuming Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, 1 in 100 individuals are carriers of the disease. The husband’s parents must both be carriers for a sibling to have inherited two affected genes and therefore the spouse has a 2/3rds chance of being a carrier (he doesn’t have the disease so 1/4 of the sample space is removed). Thus the probability of an affected child is wife’s risk of being a carrier times husband’s risk times child’s risk of receiving two carrier genes: 1/100 * 2/3 * 1/4 (1 in 600).

[Editor: In most states, any child born during a marriage will entitle the parent who can obtain custody to child support, regardless of actual paternity. So the wife could have sex with a genetically-clean neighbor and in the event that the husband ever does find out, she can still count on child support profits for 18-23 years (depending on the state).]

After exams, Jane, our class VP, and I help Lanky Luke and Sarcastic Samantha move into their new house. Luke and I rent a U-Haul trailer for his F-150 pickup. While driving, Luke informed us that his uncle has autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease. “I thought the question Anita was complaining about was a great question. My father is an engineer, but has no idea about medicine. He told us he debated having children out of fear his children would inherit the disease.” He continued, “Just like in that question, the doctor informed my parents it would be very unlikely.” We googled ARPKD — a prevalence of 1 in 20,000 puts the carrier frequency at about 1 in 70. Based on the uncle’s phenotype, there is a 0.24 percent chance of his children getting the disease. Luke continued: “People overestimate certain risks. That’s about the same likelihood as a typical couple having someone with Down syndrome. When you put it in that perspective, you wouldn’t change your whole plans based upon that risk.”

We drink some craft beer on their new porch overlooking a small creek as their dog and cat explore their new home. With exams over, campaigning for the six student admissions committee representatives (from M3 and M4) has begun. Geezer George sets off a firestorm by texting the class GroupMe:

Hey all, I know it’s a little early, but I’d like to throw my hat into the ring for the Medical school admissions committee. If you think I would be good for the job, and if one of your better friends isn’t running, I’d love your support!”

Buff Brad responds:

I would also like to throw my hat into the ring for a spot on the Medical School Admissions Committee. I have been working hard to promote the vision of our school to both incoming applicants and current undergrads. I believe that being elected as a committee member would allow me to really make an impact.

Type-A Anita grills the two men: “What are your strategies for getting more girls at our school?” Our class and M1 are both over 50 percent female, but nobody asks Anita to clarify her question with a target percentage. Instead, Fashionable Fiona announces her candidacy:

… Being a women (@Anita) I will ensure we will have equal representation of genders and as a minority I will ensure we have a diverse class. Let me know if you have any questions! I’d love your support!

Optho Annie, an aspiring opthamologist with a family heritage from the Indian subcontinent::

To piggyback off of Anita’s question, I’m also interested in being on the Admissions Committee and have thought about increasing both female enrollment and enrollment of people of color and minorities, something we severely lack. I think the answer comes down to increasing visibility and outreach through different endeavors to show we host an environment where every student can flourish and feel safe. Happy to talk to anyone in person about my ideas, and would appreciate your support if you think I’d be a fair and just committee member!

Our school was awarded a diversity award by the LCME. What was lacking from Annie’s point of view?

… In general, diversity to me means a community or group of people that are of different races, religions, cultures, which can all help expand their peers’ world views. However, that’s the more obvious form and not all of what diversity means to me. I also think people of different socioeconomic backgrounds, hailing from different geographic areas , and also people on different sides of the political spectrum can contribute to and enhance diversity. …

… our class is pretty diverse when it comes to a lot of things like socioeconomic background, geographic background, and even culture and religion. However, I do think we are lacking in minority enrollment as well as female enrollment. We historically have had very few black, Hispanic, and Native American students. Also, over 50% of medical school students are now women but our class percentages do not always reflect this.

It turns out that one of Annie’s prime motivations was hearing about a class several years ago that was 50/50 female/male rather than adhering to the national trend of majority female. Neither of the two closeted conservatives whom I know in our class offer to sit down with her and share their perspective from their Trump-tainted side of the political spectrum!

Adrenaline Andrew, an aspiring ED physician whose family is from Kurdistan:

I would also like to be considered! I think it’s important we present ourselves as inclusive and well-rounded. I really enjoy talking to future students and believe I can represent our school as such. I am huge advocate of diversity and ensuring minority students feel welcomed in our city (and increasing awareness within our school). This a very exciting position! I would love your support and welcome any advice you have for me.

After an extensive exchange of messages, it turns out that nobody wants to promote diversity of undergraduate majors, age, or any other characteristic other than gender and race ID. No white males come forward (Geezer George and Buff Brad can qualify as persons of color).

Sarcastic Samantha, who currently identifies as “white,” cracks up as

Full post, including comments

Puerto Rico shows that Big Government is not the answer to extreme weather events?

The New York Times has an interesting JavaScript interface to a photo-rich article on the current state of hurricane-damaged houses in Puerto Rico (title: “On Hurricane Maria Anniversary, Puerto Rico Is Still in Ruins”).

Punta Santiago’s story underscores how, even after years of responding to devastating storms, the federal government struggles to help get people back in functioning homes after a natural disaster. Residents told stories of FEMA claims denied and their appeals frustrated. Federal grants helped a bit but were not nearly enough to pay for repairs.

FEMA’s work in Puerto Rico was the longest sustained domestic airborne food and water mission in the nation’s history. The agency has never distributed more food or installed more generators.

And its effort to get people back in their homes was massive, too: The $1.6 billion the agency allocated for direct emergency home repairs will be one of the largest housing programs the federal government has ever attempted. FEMA spent another $1.4 billion on grants to homeowners to repair or rebuild their homes and help them pay for temporary lodging.

FEMA’s housing help was slow in arriving, plagued by bureaucratic delays and regulations that failed to take into account the hundreds of thousands in Puerto Rico who had no clear title to their properties.

Time and again, people asked for help in getting the most basic kinds of repairs — for missing roofs, collapsed walls, dangerous mold, soaked belongings — then waited for months and often did not get enough to even start the process.

But in neighborhoods where residents live on meager pensions and disability checks, there were gutted kitchens and electrical wires running randomly along unfinished walls.

Perhaps we could infer from this only that a Big Government run by Donald Trump is not the answer to extreme weather events, but how much could the Trump Administration have touched or changed the 38-year-old FEMA (created by Jimmy carter in an April 1, 1979 executive order, about six months before his presidency was derailed by Iranians taking U.S. Embassy staff hostage).

As the mainland U.S. labor participation rate falls (see “Book Review: The Redistribution Recession“) and more American residents (citizens, documented and undocumented immigrants, refugees, etc.) rely on welfare, the mainland will increasingly resemble Puerto Rico. Most of the U.S. can’t be reached by hurricanes, but supposedly the climate is becoming more extreme and therefore we can have extreme weather events in more parts of the U.S.

The U.S. is terrible at building and maintaining infrastructure and projects run by our government can cost 5-6X more than when a European government builds something (see New Yorker). Should we try to come up with a strategy for weather event recovery that deploys a FEMA-sized budget, but doesn’t depend on government-supervised rebuilding?

Also, if FEMA is giving money to property owners then necessarily it is increasinig income inequality. Property owners are already wealthier than the median.

Some ideas:

  • Instead of giving people with jobs $X to rebuild a damaged house, why not give them $X that they have the option to use to move to a part of the country with a high demand for labor and get set up there? So that people don’t get caught up in the bureaucratic delays that have apparently plagued Puerto Rico, streamline the process so that people can get the cash regardless of home ownership status (i.e., they have to prove only that they lived in the weather-tricken region).
  • For those who are on welfare, streamline the process of transferring to the welfare system (housing, health care, food stamps, TANF cash, etc.) in a different region of the U.S. where housing is available.

Readers: Can we infer from the failure that FEMA as currently conceived can’t deliver what Americans expect? If so, how should their mission be reconceived?

Related:

Full post, including comments

A lot of money to be made in free housing…

“MassHousing employees raking in $200G+ salaries, driving leased cars, parking for free;
Payroll trails only MBTA, Massport” (Boston Herald):

The state agency charged with funding affordable housing is home to some of the most lucrative jobs in the state, with its executive director and other top aides each making more than $200,000 a year, while spending more than $100,000 on a fleet of leased cars with downtown parking, a Herald review has found.

MassHousing, a quasi-public agency that has received little scrutiny or accountability over the years, forks over millions of dollars annually to pay for its high-salaried top officials, who make significantly more than Gov. Charlie Baker and other top state officials.

Nine MassHousing employees rake in more than $200,000 a year. More than 150 of the agency’s 375 employees make more than $100,000, payroll records show.

MassHousing’s executive director, Chrystal Kornegay, who was hired earlier this year, earns $270,000 annually, making her one of the highest-paid non-law enforcement or non-higher education officials in the state.

Former Deputy Director Karen Kelleher made $248,709 a year…

I still can’t figure out how our public housing system of haves and have-nots makes sense. If housing is a human right, everyone who doesn’t work should get a free house rather than, potentially, a place on a 10-year waiting list. If housing is not a human right, why are there millions of Americans getting free housing?

I guess the system works well and makes perfect sense to the folks at MassHousing!

Full post, including comments

Medical School 2020, Year 2, Week 27

From our anonymous insider…

Our last week of classes. Next week we take the block exam and after that we study independently for Step 1.

An endocrinologist specializing in thyroid disease leads 5 hours of lectures on the thyroid, the adrenal glands, and the gonads. She dedicated an additional 1.5 hours for the master pituitary gland, a pea-sized gland on the underside of the brain that regulates all the endocrine glands. “20 percent of normal individuals have a pituitary adenoma (benign tumor). Most are non-functional, and never will give the patient any issue. When I started teaching, there was a much lower threshold for removing these adenomas with transsphenoidal surgery [through the nose]. Now we typically wait and monitor.”

She described how several types of pituitary adenomas can now be managed with drugs instead of surgery. For example, the most common functional pituitary adenoma, a prolactinoma, which secretes the breast milk-producing prolactin hormone, causes amenorrhea and breast formation in both males and females. It can be managed with bromocriptine, a dopamine agonist. “These are much more common in females, but I do not know if this is because they are diagnosed easier in females than in males. Males predominately get breast formation, but with all the obesity in this country, most people will attribute this to the obesity horse, not the tumor zebra.”

What else is new in her practice? “Patients now have complete access to the same imaging reports we read. The patient reads her report and thinks, “Oh my God, cancer.” We call these incidentalomas.” She continued: “What do you do with this information? If we want to rule out a functional pituitary adenoma, we need to run another more expensive MRI study. It’s hard to tell these patients to not worry about this small tumor in their skull. I mean, I would want to know. It will be up to your generation to decide the the right course. With great power comes great responsibility!”

A fertility endocrinologist leads 2-hours on hormonal pregnancy changes. She described Sheehan’s syndrome, a emergent condition in which the pituitary gland infarcts (dies due to blood flow loss) because of loss of blood during delivery. “Throughout pregnancy, the blood volume expands considerably to supply the baby and all the demands on the mother’s body. The pituitary gland enlarges to meet the hormonal demand. If you lose too much blood during delivery, you are at risk of causing ischemic necrosis of the pituitary from hypoperfusion.” She concluded: “This is a terrific example of how medicine can improve lives. In the US, Sheehan’s syndrome occurs 3 times in 1 million births, whereas in India it occurs 3 times in 100 births!”

A recently-retired, Russian-trained physician discussed acromegaly (enlarged skull and soft tissue structures) and gigantism (enlarged bones). He brought in his former patient and current friend Conan, a 45-year-old accountant with acromegaly due to a growth-hormone pituitary adenoma. “Look at his chin, look at his forehead,” exclaimed the Russian. Mischievous Mary was a little taken aback by the physician’s bluntness in front of his friend. “If the adenoma occurs in childhood before the growth plates fuse, the child gets gigantism. This creates the tallest people in the world. If the pituitary adenoma occurs in adulthood, it causes soft tissue swelling (e.g., heart, tongue, hands, feet) and facial bone protuberance (brows, chin).” Patients die of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and associated-arrhythmias if left untreated.

Thursday morning features an applied workshop with five stations, each run by a physician covering a rare endocrine disease. “In all your future careers you might see one of these diseases,” joked my first station internist. “The boards believe if you understand the pathology of the disease, though, you can understand more common issues.”

We had a station on John F. Kennedy. Most people know that John F. Kennedy had Addison’s disease (primary adrenal insufficiency) requiring cortisol shots. This is believed to have given him his characteristic bronze skin and round face. In addition to Addison’s, a review of JFK’s health records revealed a multi-endocrine autoimmune disease including hypothyroidism. We learned about other multi-endocrine organ disorders such as Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia 1 (parathyroid, pancreas, and pituitary adenomas; prevalence 1:100,000) and Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia 2 (pheochromocytoma, an adrenal tumor that secretes life-threatening levels epinephrine, and thyroid cancer; 1:50,000). The physician concluded: “both are highly testable on board examinations.”

Endocrine disorders may impair kidney function because hormones can determine how much salt and fluid to absorb. A station on renal disorders is led by a 75-year-old physician. Straight-Shooter Sally: “He must have had had a mid-life crisis and turned Zen.” My group struggled through the case on Conn’s syndrome (primary hyperaldosteronism), an adrenal tumor that secretes too much aldosterone, which increases fluid reabsorption in the kidney. Patients with Conn’s syndrome have hypertension (high blood pressure) due to increased blood volume. Most doctors work them up for idiopathic hypertension (unknown cause, as with 95 percent of U.S. cases). He continues: “Patients keep getting put on more and more anti-hypertensive drugs. This patient was taking 5 drugs at once. One simple lab test is all it takes.” Patients with Conn’s syndrome can be successfully managed with spironolactone ( aldosterone antagonist) or a curative surgical resection of the affected adrenal gland. “Listen up. If you want patients to love you, this is your chance. The patient that I diagnosed with Conn’s syndrome gave me the ‘World’s Greatest Doctor’ plaque that hangs in my office. I mean this is what it is all about.”

Our patient case: Janet, a 26-year-old ED nurse presents with fatigue, cold-intolerance, and dry hands after delivering her second child Charlie nine months ago. She is frustrated that, despite eating a restricted diet, she has not been able to lose 25 pounds of her pregnancy weight.

“I was a healthy person up until this. When this happened, I realized I really never had a general practitioner. It took several weeks to get an appointment with a doctor accepting new patients.”

[Editor: I wonder if Janet stuck around long enough to learn that her entire audience was seeking desperately to avoid becoming stuck in primary care.]

She continued, “My primary care physician’s first thought was depression.” (Postpartum depression afflicts 1 in 9, typically resolving within a year of giving birth.) Janet continues, “I was depressed because i was tired, not the other way around. Simple tasks were exhausting.” On the second visit, the physician tested thyroid function, which showed low thyroxine levels despite normal thyroid-stimulating hormone response. Janet was diagnosed with primary hypothyroidism due to Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (immune destruction of thyroid gland) and started on Synthroid, which she has been taking now for 30 years. Her aunt and sister are also on Synthroid for hypothyroidism.

Janet and her husband George are retired now and he joined her at the session. George said, “it is so clear in retrospect. Immediately after delivering Charlie, she lost all of her usual spunk and energy. I had just started a new job as a history professor when Charlie was born. I was working non-stop, but we hosted a family reunion. We were both so excited about the party when we planned it, but for most of the party she was sitting on the coach. When the party ended, she went straight to bed. Did not help clean up at all.”

Janet describes her cold-intolerance: “I returned to work a few months after Charlie was born. It was a beautiful spring day, but I just felt freezing everywhere I went. I took out my packed winter clothes and put them on to get to work. I just could not put on enough layers.” She added, “It did not stop there. I would get to work and go straight for the coffee machine. Not for the coffee, but to grab the pot to warm my hands. It was a physician co-worker in the ED who noticed that a crazy lady bundled up in winter jackets hogging the coffee pot should be seen.”

Janet concludes: “You guys are all young and healthy but you still need to get a doctor. You’ll need it when you least expect it. I truly believe this whole episode would have been resolved much sooner if I had a regular internist. You are not invincible!”

Fashionable Fiona, who has hypothyroidism as well asks, “Have you had any issues once you began Synthroid treatment? Have you switched doses?” Janet: “I have never had to adjust my dose. I once tried to switch to the generic version, but started to feel tired again, so my physician switched me back to the brand-name.” Our professor added: “I hear that a lot. The generic is identical for most drugs, but I see variability in biologics. The patent describes the chemical formula of the drug, not the manufacturing process. So different companies may prepare the compound differently.”

Despite Janet’s positive response, our lecturer cautioned us to be careful in prescribing Synthroid. “Everyone hears about the energy-boosting, weight-busting miracle of thyroid hormone. There are serious health complications if you take too much, and long-term use can damage the health of the thyroid. Be conservative in diagnosing hypothyroidism.”

I attend a conference for working orthopedic surgeons on Friday. An example hour-long lecture was on anterior lateral cruciate (ACL) ligament tears in female athletes, 4-6 times more common than among men playing the same high-risk sports. This is believed to be from several factors, including wider hips, decreased femoral notch width, and the impact of estrogen on connective tissue tensile strength. “Title IX is the gift that keeps on giving for orthopedic surgeons,” said the lecturer, but researchers are looking at screening and training processes to reduce injuries. “Sports physicians may be able to screen for ACL tear risk by measuring the mechanical forces with various exercises. Individuals with high risk need to begin training before they jump straight into competition. Several companies are developing tests to monitor neuromuscular synchronization to strengthen muscle tone via biofeedback to minimize the ligament load.”

Several classmates appear right before the free catered lunch. I overhear a few orthopedic surgeons discuss the impact of reimbursements being tied to outcomes and customer-reported feedback. “Medicine is now a product, health systems need good reputations, not just good care. In the past I might have told a patient that he didn’t qualify for disability, but today I would not confront him. I will just refer him out.”

An email titled “Self-Defense Class Sign-Up” from our Dean of Diversity and Inclusion: “This course is taught by [police officer] and [yoga instructor]. It is designed to help individuals who identify as female protect and defend against unwanted physical advances. Participants will learn general safety tips as well as defense techniques including kicks and strikes during the session. Every individual (faculty, student, physician, staff) who identifies as female is welcome to contact [yoga instructor] to participate.”

We are done with classes for our second year of medical school.

Statistics for the week… Study: 20 hours until burn out. Sleep: 8 hours/night; Fun: 1 night. Example fun: After our last day of class, 25 students go downtown to our favorite burgers and beers joint. We discuss our most memorable moments so far. Our class VP: “This was Year 1, Month 2. I was working at the free clinic with Dr. House. He asked, ‘The patient in Room 3 is having stomach pain, can you go in and report back your abdominal exam findings.’ I come out after a few minutes, and say, ‘Looks all good to me.’ He had gone in beforehand and diagnosed her with metastatic ovarian carcinoma that had spread to her peritoneum (abdominal cavity). Dr. House said, ‘Now you won’t make that mistake again’.” Lanky Luke: “I was waiting in the lab for a Path report for my research project. After 30 minutes, a freaking leg came through the door and the severed leg was just plopped on the pathologist’s table.”

More: http://fifthchance.com/MedicalSchool2020

Full post, including comments

You’re never too young to be old

I’m 55 today. “My Husband And I Couldn’t Get Jobs, So We Moved Into My Parents’ Retirement Community” (HuffPost) is kind of inspiring in that it shows that people aren’t locked into age-normal lifestyles:

When I drive into my parent’s retirement community after 9 p.m., nobody’s lights are on. They call it “Dataw midnight.” Shortly after ”Wheel of Fortune,” it’s lights out at the Spanish moss-draped South Carolina island retirement community for seniors aged 60 and up.

My husband Matt had one year left of school after we got married. That August, he was graduating with a PhD in chemical biology from one of the best programs in the nation. Even though our lease ended only days after his graduation date, we didn’t renew. We were sure he’d be employed by then.

As August crept closer, the job offers didn’t come.

Pretending to be retired at 29 was fun at first. Matt took up crabbing. We went for walks every morning around the island, waving at the other couples, 40 years our senior. We had drinks on the porch overlooking the golf course in the afternoon and tuned into ”Wheel” at dinner with my parents.

A few days after we got there, my parents threw a cocktail party. Twenty golf carts parked haphazardly on our lawn.

(The guy who followed the STEM-passionate advice eventually was able to get a job with his STEM Ph.D.)

Readers: What can I do that would be fun and age-appropriate for a 29-year-old? (and does not involve camping in the Black Rock Desert for a week!)

Related:

 

Full post, including comments

Christine Blasey Ford’s profits so far: nearly half a million dollars

In a quick scan of the Christine Blasey Ford testimony transcript (Washington Post), I found the following:

BROMWICH: I — I can help you with that. Both her co-counsel (ph) are doing this pro bono. We are not being paid and we have no expectation of being paid.

In other words, her legal fees and costs such as the polygraph session have been $0.

What about revenue? Just one of the cash conduits is up to $473,622 (see this gofundme page).

The transcript also answered some questions, such as “How did Christine Blasey Ford make it back and forth to Hawaii?“. She is afraid of flying, which is why there was a lot of delay about getting her to the Senate:

FORD: Yes. So that was certainly what I was hoping, was to avoid having to get on an airplane, but I eventually was able to get up the gumption with the help of some friends, and get on the plane.

But she flies coast-to-coast regularly:

MITCHELL: OK (ph). When you were here in the mid — mid-Atlantic area back in August, end of July, August, how did you get here?

FORD: Also by airplane. I come here once a year during the summer to visit my family.

MITCHELL: OK.

FORD: I’m sorry, not here. I go to Delaware.

MITCHELL: OK. In fact, you fly fairly frequently for your hobbies and your — you’ve had to fly for your work. Is that true?

FORD: Correct, unfortunately.

And sometimes on long-haul transpacific legs:

MITCHELL: … I also saw on your C.V. that you list the following interests of surf travel, and you, in parentheses” Hawaii, Costa Rica, South Pacific islands and French Polynesia.” Have you been all to those places?

FORD: Correct.

MITCHELL: By airplane?

FORD: Yes.

MITCHELL: And your interests also include oceanography, Hawaiian and Tahitian culture. Did you travel by air as a part of those interests?

FORD: Correct.

Full post, including comments

What happened at the Kavanaugh hearing?

What happened at the Kavanaugh hearing today? Does everyone who is a Democrat believe Dr. Christine Blasey Ford while everyone who is a Republican believe Judge Kavanaugh? (and libertarians like me think that the idea of listening to either one on the subject of a 36-year-old event doesn’t make sense?)

My Facebook feed suggests that this is true. A passionate Democrat wrote “Dr. Ford’s testimony was searing and devastating.” (Twenty years ago, he was a defendant in a restraining order action brought by a former sex partner. He told the judge (and us) that the plaintiff was lying, but now it seems he is in a #BelieveAllWomen frame of mind.)

[More disturbingly, I saw something about Kavanaugh crying. Is that true? If so, we’ve got a person who

  1. scolded Bill Clinton for romping with interns (letter)
  2. bragged about how the majority of his clerks were female (i.e., he is hiring people for government jobs in violation of the Equal Protection Clause)
  3. cried while testifying

If the Senate votes to confirm, under what conception of masculinity would it be fair to say that Brett Kavanaugh is a “male” justice?]

Separately, I posted the below photos, tagged from the Boston Museum of Fine Arts (Casanova show; closing soon so don’t miss it!), with “I discovered some contemporaneous evidence of Bethesda, Maryland high school parties back in the old days. (Note the trigger warning regarding the Fragonard.)”

Only one Facebook friend dared go on record with a “like”! A museum placard does give a suggestion as to how many of the current disputes in our society could be de-escalated:

Convents were Catholic institutions for women seeking a religious life, but in the 18th century, they also provided lodging for elite young women whose parents wished to keep them out of trouble until their weddings.

(Of course, today we’d want it to be gender-neutral so the young Kavanaughs would have to go the monastery.)

Related:

Full post, including comments

Elizabeth Holmes can redeem herself this week?

One of my (deplorable) friends sent a private message to a group. He’s a police officer and has doubts about Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s polygraph test:

Guys. The lie detector test is basically fake. The kind you can buy to prove you are telling the truth. Read the questions thinking about how the test works based on Baseline questions. There were only two questions and they were designed to give the same physiological response.

Since both questions were equally stressful there was no difference. Supposed to ask them unrelated questions that they answer truthfully.

He does not find the latest accuser, who witnessed or suffered multiple gang rapes at weekly parties that she continued attending:

“Avenatti Client Was in College When She Claims to Have Attended Gang-Rape Parties With High-School Students”

Since when does an adult college student drive 35 miles every week to attend house parties of high school teenagers?

But mostly it is Kavanaugh’s apparently sober and faithful life as a married man that makes him skeptical:

So Kav is a criminal mastermind sexual predator married to the same woman for more than a decade and he almost got away with it except for these three brave women and the porn lawyer.

P*ssy hound to mild mannered married man.

This is where Elizabeth Holmes can come in!

She’s a passionate Democrat. From “Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes Is Holding a Hillary Fundraiser With Chelsea Clinton”:

Elizabeth Holmes, CEO of the embattled blood-testing startup Theranos, has struggled with commercial partners, shed board members and a lot of credibility over the last few months. Prize-winning reporting from the Wall Street Journal indicates that her multibillion dollar startup’s highly publicized blood-testing technology isn’t as successful as Theranos has made it seem.

One person Holmes hasn’t lost? Hillary Clinton, apparently.

She’s connected to Washington insiders. Here’s a TIME profile of her by Henry Kissinger:

Elizabeth Holmes’ is a story that could happen only in America [because other countries don’t have a sufficient supply of gullible investors?]. After her sophomore year she left Stanford to devote herself to a vision of health care available as a basic human right. When I was introduced to Elizabeth by George Shultz, her plan sounded like an undergraduate’s dream. I told her she had only two prospects: total failure or vast success. There would be no middle ground.

Elizabeth accepted only one option: making a difference. Striking, somewhat ethereal, iron-willed, she is on the verge of achieving her vision … Striving for prevention and early detection, she is dedicated to transforming health care around the world. She manages an expanding global business by the refusal to be daunted by any obstacle.

Holmes was born in 1984 and founded Theranos in 2004, the same year that the hated Kavanaugh was married. Why not say that in 2006 she met Brett Kavanaugh at Henry Kissinger’s or George Shultz’s house (she can’t remember which one because she was drunk at the time)? He pushed her into a guest bedroom and locked the door behind them. A struggle ensued, but the married 41-year-old prevailed in violating her honor. Other guests couldn’t hear her scream because the ancient Washington insider host had Mantovani cranked up on the “stereo.” She remembers that it was “On My Own” from Les Miserables, arranged for strings, followed by “Moon River.” Ashamed and worried that a scandal would interfere with fundraising for her young company, she told nobody until now.

Readers: Could this turn things around for Ms. Holmes? Perhaps if Hillary is defrosted for 2020 and wins she would then be grateful enough to pardon Holmes for any Federal securities law convictions?

[I remain opposed to Kavanaugh’s confirmation. There was his outrage regarding Bill Clinton and his adventures with interns. Then there was his statement: “I am proud that a majority of my law clerks have been women.” (law.com) This makes me doubt his ability to rule in a gender-neutral manner, as required (in theory) by the 14th Amendment. Of course, I vote in Massachusetts so it doesn’t matter what I think or how I vote, but I would rather see a judge who has declined to comment on the issue of how jobs should be allocated to people based on gender ID.]

Full post, including comments

Judge Kavanaugh has gone from generic prep school douche to criminal mastermind in two weeks?

September 16: “Woman Accusing Kavanaugh of Sexual Misconduct Comes Forward” (nytimes), alleging a clothed multi-person drunken wrestling event 36 years ago.

September 26: “New Kavanaugh accuser Julie Swetnick details parties where girls allegedly were drugged and raped” (CNBC)

In less than two weeks, Judge Kavanaugh has gone from generic-prep-school-douche-turned-moral-scold to criminal mastermind.

(see “How did Christine Blasey Ford make it back and forth to Hawaii?” for why the moral scold part made me unenthusiastic about this guy even before September 16)

The new allegations:

  • “spiked the drinks of girls at house parties with grain alcohol” (because it is easier to find grain alcohol than vodka?)
  • “Kavanaugh lined up with other boys, including his close friend Mark Judge, waiting to rape those girls at many parties” (did the girls who were raped keep coming back to these purported parties? or if there were “many” parties at which gang rapes were featured activities, were new girls found for each one?)

Some longer excerpts:

Swetnick said she “witnessed efforts by Mark Judge, Brett Kavanaugh and others to cause girls to become inebriated and disoriented so they could then be ‘gang raped’ in a side room or bedroom by a ‘train’ of numerous boys.”

“I have a firm recollection of seeing boys lined up outside rooms at many of these parties waiting for their ‘turn’ with a girl inside the room,” Swetnick said. “These boys included Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh.”

She also said in her affidavit sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee that in approximately 1982 “I became the victim of one of these ‘gang’ or ‘train’ rapes where Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh were present.”

“Shortly after the incident, I shared what had transpired with at least two other people,” Swetnick said.

“During the incident, I was incapacitated without my consent and unable to fight off the boys raping me. I believe I was drugged using Quaaludes or something similar placed in what I was drinking.”

She says that she shared the story of her own rape with “at least two other people” shortly afterward.

So there were gang rapes at “many” parties over a period of months and the teenagers involved kept it all secret for 36 years.

I wonder if we can draw some parallels between this and the day care abuse trials of the 1980s. The allegations began with some inappropriate touching and escalated quickly to ritual sacrifice of animals and humans. Some quotes from a Boston Globe Best Book of 2015 within “Window into American criminal justice system from the daycare sexual abuse trials of the 1980s“:

Things briefly calmed down for Judy Johnson. She and her husband made their separation permanent, and she also found a job in retail. In the summer of 1983, however, Johnson became concerned about the condition of her son’s anus. …

Matthew had revealed more details of his abuse and that McMartin teachers other than Ray had been involved. Babette Spitler, Johnson said, made Matthew vomit by stepping on his stomach, and there was a stranger, an old woman, who came to the school and held Matthew’s feet down while he was sodomized. Matthew had also been forced to perform oral sex on Peggy McMartin Buckey, the school’s administrator. According to Detective Hoag’s report on the call, Matthew also told his mother about “being taken to some type of a ranch far away where there were horses and he rode naked.” Ray took pills. Ray gave himself a shot. Ray killed a dog and put a cat “in hot water.”

Matthew feels that he left L.A. International in an airplane and flew to Palm Springs. . . . Matthew went to the armory. . . . The goatman was there . . . it was a ritual type atmosphere. . . . At the church, Peggy drilled a child under the arms, armpits. Atmosphere was that of magic arts. Ray flew in the air. . . . Peggy, Babs and Betty were all dressed up as witches. The person who buried Matthew is Miss Betty. There were no holes in the coffin. Babs went with him on a train with an older girl where he was hurt by men in suits. Ray waved goodbye. . . . Peggy gave Matthew an enema. . . . Staples were put in Matthew’s ears, his nipples, and his tongue. Babs put scissors in his eyes. . . . She chopped up animals. . . . Matthew was hurt by a lion.

(See also “Why did Americans want to target daycare workers back in the 1980s and 1990s?“)

This dispute is kind of ironic because, like the Silicon Valley VCs who were taken down by women, Kavanaugh imagined himself to be a champion of those with a female gender ID: “I am proud that a majority of my law clerks have been women.” (law.com) In theory, the U.S. runs gender-neutral laws due to the Equal Protection Clause (it is just by happenstance that Census data show that 97 percent of the custody and child support winners in Massachusetts and 98 percent in New Hampshire are of one gender!). The guy was supposed to be enforcing these gender-neutral laws. If he couldn’t say he was “proud that a majority of my law clerks have been men,” why is it okay for the gender-neutral judge to say “proud that a majority of my law clerks have been women”?

[Finally, do the last-minute accusers have any exposure to libel lawsuits? Kavanaugh is a public figure, but accusing someone of organizing gang rapes, if there is no evidence other than a headline-seeker’s heartfelt testimony to support the accusation, seems like it might step over the line even in the U.S.]

Related:

Full post, including comments