From our anonymous insider…
A suave 35-year-old male urologist introduces diseases of the external genitalia, testicles, and prostate. A urologist completes a four-year residency with a one-year internship year, typically in general surgery. “In medical school you are not going to get much exposure to urology because we are a surgical subspecialty. If you are at all interested, come shadow us for a day. You can shadow an academic urologist or a community urologist.” Gigolo Giorgio: “That’s quite exciting. You become a specialized surgeon in five years.” (In a surgical field other than urology, six or seven years is more typical, plus, of course, four years of medical school.)
Cryptorchidism is failure of the testicle to descend from its embryological origin in the abdomen. If the testicle is not descended, it will involute (curls up) because the warmer temperature is too high for spermatogenesis (production of sperm). “We wait until age two before we surgically descend the testicle. Most undescended testicles will descend on their own in the first year. If it doesn’t, the child still won’t remember anything if he gets surgery at two. The mother bears the brunt.” Even if the testicle undergoes orchiopexy (peg it to the scrotum), there is still an increased risk of testicular cancer. “If you see cryptorchidism, immediately think testicular cancer on board questions.”
After skin malignancies, testicular cancer is the most common malignancy in 15-35 year old males. “Testicular cancer is four times more prevalent in white than in African Americans. I have never seen a black male with testicular cancer.” The mortality of testicular cancer has decreased substantially over the past two decades. “Testicular cancer is completely curable with less than a five-percent mortality rate. We hit it strong and fast, some of the highest levels of chemo, but we get it.” (Younger patients can handle higher doses of chemo.) He emphasized how every testicular mass should be considered malignant as opposed to ovarian masses that are commonly benign. We learned a common board stumper: a 20-year-old male presents for a left testicular mass. After an ultrasound confirms a mass, what is the next step? Answer: orchiectomy (removal of the testicle). “Never biopsy a testicular mass,” said our urologist. The testicles drain into a different lymph system than the scrotum. “If you shoot a needle through the scrotum, you can potentially seed a whole new lymph basin [with cancer].”
We spent the next two days focusing on the “controversial” prostate, a gland that wraps around the urethra and secretes the majority of the ejaculate fluid. Prostatitis is painful inflammation of the prostate, typically from an infection, but also from pressure. “Always ask the guy if he is a biker or motorcyclist.”
The urologist continued: “Every guy over 50 will have BPH [benign prostate hypertrophy] with varying degrees of urinary symptoms. BPH is one of the most under recognized, easily treatable health issues.”
Persevering Pete: “What could internists and family medicine Docs do better?” Our lecturer: “I think BPH screening should be part of the standard wellness check. So many 50-60 year olds have hesitancy, difficulty starting and inability to unload. Most men with BPH get accustomed to it as it is a slow decline in function, not abrupt. We have several lines of drug treatment. We used to have to perform surgery, which is now reserved for the severe refractory cases.”
Our patient case: Robert, a comedic 5’4″ 68-year-old recently retired Ob/Gyn, presents to the urology clinic after a routine wellness check discovers an elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA), a commonly used screening blood test for a protein secreted by the prostate. Robert denies dysuria, urgency, hesitancy, dribbling or erectile dysfunction. The internist was unable to palpate any prostate mass on DRE, but Robert is referred to a urologist who palpates a small nodule on the left lobule. Needle biopsy reveals an intermediate-grade prostate carcinoma. Contrast MRI of the abdomen and pelvis does not show any nodal involvement, and a PET-CT does not show any metastatic bone lesions. (First Aid: “Prostate Cancer loves the bone.”) Robert underwent radical prostatectomy with clear margins.
Robert: “The diagnosis caught us completely off guard. My wife and I were preparing for our long-awaited retirement entertaining all sorts of crazy ideas. The Caribbean, Florida, Wyoming, who knows where we would have ended up.” For 15 minutes, we discussed how he determined to get surgery. “I had fantastic doctors. I went into surgery knowing it was the right decision, even with the potential side effects. I had 2-3 years, now I am cured. I will die of my heart, not my prostate. I live a great life. I fish, enjoy walks with my wife, and celebrate being a grandfather.”
Straight-Shooter Sally: “Are you able to have sex?” The nerves that control blood flow to the penis for an erection travel travel through the prostate into the penis. Invasive prostate adenocarcinoma can invade the nerve sheaths. The radical prostatectomy can damage these nerves as the cancer tissue is removed. Robert replied, “Oh, yes. Finally, someone asked. Last year it was the very first question from the class. My wife and I had sex last night! After surgery. I had urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. The erectile dysfunction improved over six to seven months. My urinary incontinence has still not returned to normal, but it is improving. I stopped wearing adult diapers about six months ago.”
Gigolo Giorgio: “Does sex feel the same?” Robert replied, “Mostly. As you should know, I do not ejaculate. I still orgasm, but nothing comes out.” Classmates turned to each other. The urologist, sensing the general ignorance and confusion, explained that radical prostatectomy removes of the prostate and seminal vesicles, and ties the vas deferens.
A discussion ensued regarding the new USPTF [US Preventive Services Task Force, government-funded panel of physicians] recommendation against PSA screening? Our urologist: “I still recommend males over 50 get annual screening involving a PSA blood test and DRE [digital rectal exam]. I understand that it is not a specific test, but I see so many patients diagnosed with prostate cancer prior to metastasis. The screening saves their lives. It is the best we have.”
The urologist continued: “The challenge with prostate cancer is stratifying risk. 1 in 7 males will be diagnosed with prostate cancer… probably 75 percent of males by age 75 have prostate cancer. Most people will never be affected by their prostate cancer, but we do not have an effective screening method. Most patients present with metastatic disease when it is too late to treat. I am asking each and everyone of you to discover a better way to detect high-grade prostatic cancer. There is some hope with the new bound/unbound PSA ratio test. More and more doctor offices are offering this as a second test if an individual has an elevated PSA.”
In the small group discussions Type-A Anita expressed her displeasure that we spent much of the week on prostate cancer and male reproductive system. “It is not that serious or complicated compared to other GU issues. Typical male-dominated field.” A female group-member: “That is just because you hate men, Anita.” Anita: “Just the bad ones.”
After hours, Anita shared a “Showing Up For Racial Justice” Facebook group’s post regarding Roy Moore’s Alabama senatorial election loss:
@ white people: we need to get serious about changing minds and voting patterns. White people overwhelmingly made a disgusting choice in Alabama, and Jones’ victory was because of black voters. How long is this party going to demand the absolute fucking most from people of color and not address the real fucking problem: white people.
Also @ white women what the actual fuck.
Our Dean lead a mandatory 45-minute session to review an LCME-required survey that our class completed back in May. Highlights of the survey: 15 percent fewer students in our class report they enjoy being a medical student compared to the class of 2010. Students are surprised that only 10 percent of the class felt there was unnecessary competition amongst students. The biggest issue continues to be “work/life balance” (but nobody has a job?). Our Dean: “We created an entire department [two years ago] to improve these issues. Stay tuned for more wellness events.”
Most of the session regarded mistreatment among students and between faculty and students. The Dean just returned from the annual American Association of Medical Colleges [AAMC] meeting in Boston: “Three of the four lectures were on mistreatment in the learning environment.” He shared a PowerPoint with the LCME’s definition of mistreatment, which starts with “a behavior that shows disrespect for the dignity of others.” Examples include language that “can be perceived as” rude, sarcastic, loud or offensive.
Our school has a committee composed of two student representatives from each grade, three deans and rotating faculty that meet monthly to respond to anonymous reports of mistreatment. The accuser need never be involved unless more information is needed. Following the committee’s investigation, disciplinary action has included removal of a faculty member’s appointment.
After class, Luke, Mischievous Mary, Persevering Pete, Jane, her trauma nurse sister and I go to our weekly Thursday beers-and-burgers spot. Lanky Luke: “A student could anonymously report a perceived insult from a resident or attending, which would immediately kick off a multi-month investigation. You don’t see an issue when people feel entitled to not be offended?” After a 5-second silence, he added, “I am referring to mistreatment outside of sexual conduct. I agree you need a channel to address sexual harassment.”
Jane’s sister: “Almost every unmarried nurse on my floor is romantically engaged with another nurse or resident. Most of my coworkers who have gotten married found their spouse through work. There is nothing wrong with that. It just should not be someone you work directly with like your charge nurse, attending, subordinate, etc..”
Mary: “As a woman, I kind of take being flirted with as a norm. It’s not good or bad. It’s just life. And it serves a purpose. It lets you know who’s interested in whom. Pretty quickly you can tell if someone is interested or not.
Jane’s sister: “I flirt all the time with this Colombian critical care resident who passed through our floor. We went on a few casual dates. If you did not know him, some women would probably think what he is doing is inappropriate. His English is good, but he does not understand colloquial sayings and expressions. We tricked him to say dirty words to the new nurses. It was hilarious. In this day and age he could get fired for that. There needs to be a mechanism to report if something is inappropriate without that accused individual getting terminated. They should be given a warning.”
Mary: “Sorry, but someone who cannot figure out how NOT to sexual harrass someone is an idiot and should be fired.”
Jane’s sister: “All I am saying is there are going to be a lot fewer happy couples because of this culture.”
Pete changed the subject. Pete and girlfriend, an M3 who competes in bodybuilding competitions, co-signed an 18-month lease on an expensive apartment. She was unfaithful to him on an “away rotation” (extended interview at a different hospital system where one is interested in applying for residency). He broke up with her, but she will neither move out nor approve his removal from the lease. “I either have to move out and pay for two apartments, or stay living in misery. What do I do? Also, her brother is a lawyer and is not afraid to sue me.” [Editor: Note that, as marriage rates decline, there is a trend to allow plaintiffs to sue in family court after living with someone for at least two years (e.g., in British Columbia and Scotland). Pete can think of the extra rent as alimony.]
Later that evening, Jane and I attend an optional heart workshop led by a 55-year-old cardiothoracic (CT) surgeon and his fellow. The surgeon was crude and direct, laying frequent F-bombs. Anita
Full post, including comments