A posting every day; an interesting idea every three months…
I’m looking at going out to California after teaching FAA private pilot ground school (free and open to the public) at MIT. Here’s a guide to what an elite is willing to pay in order to avoid sitting with the peasants for 7 hours: $700/hr. Prices as of December 19, 2024:
Some “extra room” seats are still available on this flight:
So the alternative isn’t cramped torture.
Full post, including commentsToday is the one-year anniversary of Claudine Gay purportedly “resigning” from Harvard. NYT:
Babylon Bee had a different angle:
Less than a month earlier:
Being a supporter of the Islamic Resistance Movement (“Hamas”), UNRWA, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad in their struggle against the Zionist entity wasn’t a presidency-ending problem, but all of the examples of plagiarism were. The Crimson:
See also CNN.
What’s Claudine Gay, plagiarist, doing after “resigning” from Harvard due to plagiarism? Working at Harvard:
The New York Times right now:
According to the Newspaper of Record (TM), the Cybertruck spontaneously combusted like a Spinal Tap drummer.
(Wikipedia says “the vehicle was discovered to be filled with firework materials and gas canisters” and, therefore, the incident could have been equally described as “a car bomb explosion”.)
In other news regarding attacks by car, the President of the U.S. says, regarding an attack by Shamsud-Din Jabbar in a rented truck on which he had mounted an ISIS flag, “The FBI is taking the lead in the investigation and is investigating this incident as an act of terrorism“:
The ISIS flag wasn’t a sufficient clue?
Full post, including commentsHappy New Year to those who celebrate!
Let’s check in with party animal SARS-CoV-2. The vaccinated masked Followers of Science in Massachusetts are currently hosting a raging COVID-19 epidemic (“Very High”) while Deplorable Florida seems to be COVID-free (“Low”). CDC data:
The Dana-Farber hospital in Maskachusetts went back to forced masking on December 23, 2024 and visitation is limited:
(If a mother of 3 kids is being treated for cancer, only 2 of the 3 kids can visit at a time and it would be best from a COVID-prevention point of view if the father (or “second mother”, since this is MA) is out of the picture.)
Separately, I wonder if these data can be trusted. I don’t want to sound like a Science-denier, but how can levels of plague in the nation’s Capital of Filth (New York) be “Minimal” while simultaneously being “Very High” in Maskachusetts, which actually borders New York and is part of a travel corridor with New York City?
So… Happy New Year and let’s note that Anders Tegnell‘s February 2020 prediction of SARS-CoV-2 continuing to thrive seems to have been confirmed. (Dr. Tegnell, MD, PhD said that SARS-CoV-2 would be with us forever and, therefore, our coronapanic measures should be ones that we were willing and able to maintain for years if not forever.)
A recent tweet from another Swedish heretic:
Related:
Happy New Year to everyone! Let’s consider a New Year’s resolution to look at our investments…
“Wave Goodbye To the Stock Market’s Historic Run, Goldman Sachs Says” (Investopedia):
Analysts at Goldman Sachs on Monday forecast the S&P 500’s average annual return over the last decade of 13% will shrink to just 3% in the next 10 years.
Goldman analysts forecast the S&P 500 will return an average of just 3% a year in the next decade, a far cry from the 13% average annual return of the last 10 years. That would rank in the bottom decile of comparable periods in the last century. It also puts the odds that stocks fail to outpace inflation at about 33%.
So why the pessimism? One of the primary causes for Goldman’s concern is the market’s extreme concentration, which by their measure is near its highest level in 100 years. Concentration of this magnitude, the analysts say, makes the performance of the S&P 500 overly reliant on the earnings growth of the index’s largest constituents.
The 10 largest stocks in the S&P 500 currently account for about 36% of the index, far higher than at any other time in the last 40 years. These stocks have swelled in size in large part because of their exceptional earnings growth over the last two years. The Magnificent Seven—Apple (AAPL), Nvidia (NVDA), Microsoft (MSFT), Alphabet (GOOG; GOOGL), Amazon (AMZN), Meta Platforms (META), and Tesla (TSLA)—more than doubled their earnings on a year-over-year basis in the first quarter of 2024.
2History shows, however, that it’s extremely difficult to sustain earnings growth at that clip. Just 11% of S&P 500 companies since 1980 have maintained double-digit sales growth for 10+ years, according to a Goldman analysis. A microscopic share (0.1%) has sustained 50%+ margins for a decade.
What’s the alternative if you don’t have a direct phone connection to God to tell you what individual stocks to buy?
However, growth is expected to pick up for the “Other 493,” which are forecast to post double-digit earnings growth over the next five quarters, significantly narrowing the gap between those companies and the Mag Seven.
The market’s extreme concentration and the difficulty of sustaining earnings growth are two key reasons Goldman expects the equal-weight S&P 500 index to outperform the more widely tracked capitalization-weight, or aggregate, version over the next decade.
Historically, the equal-weight index tends to outperform the aggregate index, but the last 10 years have been a different story. The aggregate index has outperformed the equal-weight by 3 percentage points a year since 2014.
Goldman expects the pendulum to swing back in favor of the equal-weight index, which their model suggests will outperform by 8 percentage points annually through 2034, its most dramatic outperformance since at least 1980. The size of the outperformance may seem extreme, the analysts note. “However, the equity market has also rarely been as concentrated as it is now.”
The current record outperformance for the equal-weight index is 7%, which it achieved in the decades ending in 1983 and 2010. These two 10-year stretches, Goldman points out, each began when the market was at peak concentration, as it may be today.
How would it work to put together an equal-weight portfolio? Just find a zero-commission broker and buy $1000 of each of 500 stocks (total value: enough to buy a meal at Five Guys a few years from now). It would require a lot more trading for rebalance, though, than the market-weight S&P 500 because the market-weight index adjusts automatically when one component stock rises or falls. The trading could lead to tax inefficiency that would wipe out the theoretical superiority of equal weight.
One could also let someone else do the trading, and somehow this Invesco ETF (RSP) seems to have figured out how to eliminate what you’d expect to be capital gains from all of the trading.
Past medium-term performance doesn’t seem to be great for equal weight:
Perhaps from letting the Mag 7 stocks run wild, the straight S&P (light/bright blue bar) seems to have outperformed, but if we go back 21 years to the fund’s inception (2003), the equal weight index has done a little better than the S&P 500 index (on the third hand, the ETF’s relatively high expense ratio of 0.2% will wipe out quite a bit of that small superiority).
Do we feel confident enough in the market power and dominance of the biggest companies in the S&P 500 that we think they can keep growing?
What about other indices? The NASDAQ-100 is now partly Bitcoin because they brought in MicroStrategy, a Bitcoin account selling at a bit premium to the value of the underlying Bitcoins (WSJ). And there is a lot of overlap by market cap with the S&P 500 (e.g., Apple, NVIDIA, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet). Maybe a simpler way to avoid the concentration risk in the S&P 500 would be to buy a midcap or smallcap fund.
And how about a little humility/honesty as an early New Year’s resolution? “He Lost 35% Ignoring 2024’s Biggest Trades: ‘I Am Not Good at What I Am Doing’” (WSJ):
In early December, Richard Toh, the chief executive and investment officer for the Singapore-based hedge-fund firm Kenrich Partners, sent a four-page letter to investors.
“I have come to the realization that I am not good at what I am doing but I guess some of you may have sensed that already,” he wrote. “I am sorry I have let you down.”
“I pretty much missed all the major themes in the last two years,” Toh wrote. “I was hopelessly out of sync with the market, buying when I should be selling and selling when I should be buying. We got whipsawed several times this year even as we got some facts correct.”
“I learned from that episode that sometimes the best investments are precisely the ones you cannot explain and probably made no sense. It also told me I am getting too old,” he wrote.
(There are so many people to whom I could legitimately write “I am not good at what I am doing” that I don’t know where to start…)
Separately, soon we will need to say goodbye here in Jupiter to our mayor’s personal Christmas light display (no keffiyeh as part of the crèche, as the Pope had):
Happy New Year’s Eve, everyone!
Full post, including commentsClosing out 2024 with the most transformational trend of the year: immigration.
“Chinese Muslims, After Finding a Refuge in Queens, Now Fear Trump” (New York Times, today):
Then they managed to get out of China and reached the soil of the United States, many by trekking through the brutal jungle in Panama known as the Darién Gap on their way to the U.S. southern border.
They are Hui Muslims, a state-recognized ethnic minority group in China, where the government is determined to crack down on Islam.
Deportation could mean years in jail or labor camps.
Of the roughly 25 million Muslims in China, 11 million are Hui…
Most Chinese migrants entering the United States from the southern border are released on parole by immigration authorities. Then they can apply for asylum.
Simply being Muslim in China qualifies a migrant for asylum here in the U.S. (if that were not true, the people described in the article wouldn’t be “released on parole”, assuming that our laws and regulations are being enforced). But we won’t negotiate with the Chinese to arrange an airlift via Airbus A380 of all of the Chinese Muslims who wish to take up their birthrate of American citizenship.
The NYT describes the hardship of being a Muslim migrant to the U.S., even without Trump having resumed his dictatorship:
But Mr. Ma, the founder of the shelter, said Muslim migrants faced obstacles in making lives in America. Pork dishes, which many Muslims don’t eat, feature heavily in most Chinese restaurants.
Here’s someone who has two reasons for needing asylum:
“My mother told me to stay here,” said Yan, a single mother who came to the United States in July with her 10-year-old son, Masoud, through the Darién Gap. “‘If you come back,’” she quoted her own mother as saying, “‘there’ll be no good outcome for you. Who knows — they might even sentence you to life imprisonment.’”
“It would be lying if anyone says they are not scared,” said Yan, the single mother. “Everyone is on edge.” She said she would accept being deported but would make the painful decision to have someone adopt her son, who has problems learning, if it meant he could stay in the United States.
“My son has to stay here,” she said. “Going back would mean no chance of survival for him.”
We’re informed by the New York Times that is de facto illegal to be Muslim in China. As far as I know, it is de jure illegal to be a “single mother” in China (a pregnant person who chooses to have a child outside of marriage is not entitled to avail him/her/zir/theirself of state services, such as free schools and free health care; certainly there is no way to make a profit by having a baby without being married (the American Way)).
Every time I look at an article like this I’m more confused. Why do people have to walk to the U.S. in order to be eligible for U.S. residence/citizenship? If the abuse/danger level is the same, why is a person with the financial means and health required to do the walk more entitled to live here than someone who does not have these advantages?
Related:
There’s currently a debate about whether mediocre nerds should be imported into the U.S. via H-1B or only supernerds, perhaps via the O-1 visa (both of these are “nonimmigrant” visas and yet everyone who gets one seems to end up as a permanent immigrant to the United States). The main argument supporting a massive annual influx of nerds is that Americans cannot and will not do nerd work, just as Americans cannot and will not do any hard work, which is why we need a border open to low-skill undocumented migrants.
Could the U.S. grow its own nerd supply based on native-born Americans? As it turns out, I have some experience in this area! About 25 years ago, I started “ArsDigita University”, a post-baccalaureate program in which people who had non-nerd degrees could take all of the core undergrad computer science classes in a TA-supervised cooperative open office-style environment. People just had to show up for 9-5 every day for a year and they’d come out knowing pretty much everything that a standard CS bachelor’s degree holder would know. Not a “coding camp”, in other words, but traditional CS knowledge. The big differences compared to a traditional university were (1) take one course at a time, and (2) do all of the work together in one room so that it would be easy to get help from another student or a TA.
Did it work? We ran it for just one year, but as far as I know everyone who completed the program got the kind of job that someone graduating with a CS bachelor’s would get.
As loyal readers may be aware, I’ve long been a critic of the traditional four-year college/university. Simply getting rid of summer and winter breaks would reduce the time required to get a degree and begin a career to 2.5 years. 18-20-year-olds are blessed with tremendous health and energy and shouldn’t need to take nearly half the year off. Here are some examples of my previous criticisms:
If we’re going to cut back on H-1Bs, though, we might need to get a little more radical. Following the lead of the Germans/Swiss, we should try to set things up so that a high-school graduate is ready to begin work in the tech mines as an apprentice nerdlet. We can have some demanding career-oriented classes for smart kids where the goal is not to get into college, but instead to get a job at age 18 and continue to develop skills that are obtained via certificate programs with independently administered exams. These would be like the current Microsoft and Cisco certification programs, but with a much broader array of options, e.g., for having learned physics, math, data science, machine learning, etc. to various levels (Coursera maybe already does this). These certifications could also help older workers who’ve maintained their skills. Instead of showing an employer a 35-year-old transcript as evidence that physics and engineering classes were taken, an applicant could show the employer 6-month-old certifications that physics and engineering are currently understood.
I’m not sure what the argument, from an employer’s point of view, for the traditional 4-year-old college experience is. For the lucky kids who get to attend a top-100 school, it’s obviously great fun to hang out with friends, attend football games, have sex with a lot of different partners, and occasionally study. But how do these experiences make a person a more effective worker? I think the answer is “generally, they don’t”. One of my former neighbors in Maskachusetts spent about $1 million on private school and college for a child who is now working as a receptionist for an HVAC company in a city that is notable for its rich concentration of marijuana and meth stores. Plainly this is something that the girl could have done just as easily on graduation from high school, consistent with the book Academically Adrift:
At the heart of the book is an analysis of data from the Collegiate Learning Assessment (CLA), which requires students to synthesize data from various sources and write up a report with a recommendation. It turns out that attending college is a very inefficient way to improve one’s performance at this kind of task. After three semesters, the average college student’s score improved by 0.18 standard deviation or seven percentile points (e.g., the sophomore if sent back into the freshman pool would have risen from the 50th to the 57th percentile). After four years, the seniors had a 0.5 standard deviation improvement over the freshman, compared to 1 standard deviation in the 1980s.
(See also Higher Education?)
Readers: Do you think employers could be talked down from H-1B and convinced to hire American 18-year-olds as apprentices who’d spend their evenings taking in-person or online classes in advanced nerdism?
Separately, I’d love to know how COBOL-coding nerds and beautiful fashion models got lumped together:
“The H-1B program applies to employers seeking to hire nonimmigrant aliens as workers in specialty occupations or as fashion models of distinguished merit and ability“
Email received earlier this month about a price increase that begins today:
We are informed that we live in an era of “disinflation” (see for example, Nobel Prize winner Paul Krugman in the NYT, 2023: “How (Many) Economists Missed the Big Disinflation”). I guess disinflation doesn’t preclude disflation (inflation in the cost of whatever Disney is selling).
Now that the election is behind us, the New York Times is writing that inflation and crime are both raging in New York City. “My Restaurant Was Named One of New York City’s Best. Here’s Why It Closed.” (NYT, Dec 28, 2024): “The combination of inflation, rising crime that required us to pay for security guards and declining profits simply proved insurmountable.”
Related:
Jimmy Carter died today, aged 100. He is most associated in Americans’ mind with raging inflation (unfairly, I think, since it was Lyndon Johnson who indulged in a massive expansion of both the welfare state (Medicaid, Medicare, food stamps, taxpayer-funding housing) and the U.S. role in the Vietnam War) and impotence against powerful Islamic foes, e.g., the Iranian Muslims who took Americans hostage in Tehran.
Let’s look at an area where Jimmy Carter was temporarily out in front of fellow Democrats: support for the Islamic Resistance Movement (“Hamas”).
In 2006, Carter was on the ground monitoring the election in which Palestinians voted Hamas into power (Hamas should legitimately be the ruler of the West Bank as well as Gaza, but that’s a longer story). Trip report:
On election day, Rosalynn and I visited 25 polling sites, in East Jerusalem and its outskirts, Hebron, Ramallah, and Jericho. It seemed obvious to us and other observers that the election was orderly and peaceful and that there was a clear preference for Hamas candidates even in historically strong Fatah communities. Even so, we were all surprised at the enormity of the Hamas victory.
(Note the incorrect-for-traditionalists use of the word “enormity” to describe something large.)
In 2006, he wrote an op-ed for the Washington Post titled “Don’t Punish the Palestinians”:
The election of Hamas candidates cannot adversely affect genuine peace talks … even if Hamas does not soon take the ultimately inevitable steps of renouncing violence and recognizing Israel’s right to exist.
It’s comforting to know that Hamas will inevitably renounce violence (when they run out of ammo?).
2009: “first of all Hamas has to be accepted by the international community as a legitimate player in the future, and that is what I am trying to do today.” (New York Times)
2014: “Ending this war in Gaza begins with recognizing Hamas as a legitimate political actor.” (Foreign Policy); see also USA Today: “Jimmy Carter calls for recognizing terror group Hamas”
2015: “Carter says Hamas leader committed to peace, Netanyahu not” (Times of Israel): “I don’t believe that he’s a terrorist. He’s strongly in favor of the peace process,” Carter said of Hamas politburo chief Khaled Mashaal. (Wikipedia regarding the same noble peace-lover: “On 3 September 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice announced criminal charges against Mashal for allegedly orchestrating the 7 October attack on Israel”)
From 2007 by Alan Dershowitz, who joined Harvard prior to the institution’s conversion to Queers for Palestine:
By 2021, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and whoever was actually running the U.S. had come to see things Jimmy Carter’s way. “Reversing Trump, Biden Restores Aid to Palestinians” (NYT):
The move will once again make the United States a leading donor to the United Nations agency that assists about 5.7 million Palestinians in the Middle East.
The Biden administration announced on Wednesday that it would restore hundreds of millions of dollars in American aid to Palestinians, its strongest move yet to reverse President Donald J. Trump’s policy on the protracted Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The restoration of aid amounted to the most direct repudiation so far of Mr. Trump’s tilt toward Israel in its decades-old conflict with the Palestinian population in Israeli-controlled territories.
In other words, via the implementation of Carter’s 15-year-old ideas U.S. taxpayers fully funded the October 7, 2023 attacks against Israel (we gave the Gazans hundreds of millions of dollars in recent years, enabling men to refrain from working to put food on their families’ tables, thus freeing them to spend full time on military training).
How did Carter’s pro-Hamas sentiments turn into Queers for Palestine? “Jimmy Carter: ‘I believe that Jesus would approve of gay marriage’” (The Hill, 2018).
(Jesus is quoted by Matthew as saying that “sexual immorality” happens because of “evil thoughts”. A man having sex with another man was proscribed as “an abomination” by Leviticus and Jesus never promulgated a substitute set of regulations for sex acts. I wonder what would happen if we could get into a time machine and go back to Jerusalem in AD 30, show Jesus videos of modern 2SLGBTQQIA+ lifestyles (including, of course, the bathhouse!), and then ask him to bless/approve of these activities.)
Loosely related, a bit more about Carter’s theology (Forward):
Carter continued to teach Bible classes, later released in audiobook form. During one, he stated that Jesus “directly challenged in a fatal way the existing church, and there was no possible way for the Jewish leaders to avoid the challenge. So they decided to kill Jesus.”
Carter reiterated this calumny of Jews as Christ-killers, the basis for centuries of antisemitic persecution, in yet another Sunday school lesson about how Jesus was aware that he was risking death “as quickly as [it] could be arranged by the Jewish leaders, who were very powerful.”
Thus contradicts what the PhDs in religion say, e.g., from Frank K. Flinn, professor at Washington University in St. Louis (source):
Full post, including commentsRomans killed Jesus as a political threat, as they had killed many other prophets, brigands, rebels during the first century. Josephus the Jewish historian recounts many examples in his Jewish War and Jewish Antiquities. Had the Jewish authorities been directly involved, Jesus would have been stoned, as Stephen was in Acts 7. Only Roman authorities could authorize crucifixions and they often did so on a gruesome, massive scale.
“How I Leased a New EV for $0 Down and $0 per Month” (Car and Driver, December 2024):
During my morning scroll, I came upon news of a Denver dealer offering a Fiat 500e lease for $0 down and $0 a month. The minimal fine print said lessees had to be Colorado residents, which I am, and just had to cover the tax on this wee EV. I had to check it out.
The magic of this deal comes down to incentives. Because it’s a leased EV with an MSRP below $55,000, the car qualifies for the full $7500 federal tax credit regardless of battery mineral content or origin. Or rather, the leasing company qualifies for that credit, so the lessee’s personal income is irrelevant. This is the so-called leasing loophole. Colorado adds its own spiffs in the form of $5000 for a new EV, plug-in, or hydrogen-fuel-cell vehicle, plus $600 if the vehicle is being financed or leased and an additional $2500 for cars with a sub-$35,000 MSRP. (The model eligible for this deal limbos under that bar at $34,095.) The $5000 state tax break ratchets down to $3500 on January 1, which is why the deal has a deadline of December 31, 2024. Uncertainty about the next administration’s stance on (non-Tesla) EVs provides a push, too.
All together, that’s $16,100 in credits, knocking the capitalized cost of the lease down to $17,995. I’d be on the hook for 4.5 percent tax on the original $34,095, but additional dealer-side coupons from Stellantis brought that down to $1205.50. If I choose to buy the car at the end of the term, it will cost me $17,388.45. I don’t expect that to happen.
Our family is in the laptop class. Could we get the working class to buy us a free car for use in Florida? No.
Because of Colorado’s unique tax-credit situation, the store rounded up as many unsold 2024s as it could find from across the country and slapped the deal on them. The car I ended up with was, coincidentally, originally delivered to the Fiat dealer down the road from C/D HQ in Ann Arbor, Michigan, where I used to live.
Maybe a working class person behind on his/her/zir/their rent could get this deal too? No. It’s restricted to the “reasonably elite”:
A funny formality: They still had to run a credit check to confirm my ability to (not) pay.
Was that the end of the river of cash for the happy journalist?
I get my choice between a free Level 2 home charging station or $600 in charging credits, either of which will offset about half of my initial outlay. I opted for the hardware since I don’t plan to stray too far from home with this little Italian job. There’s also the incremental cost of adding a car to insurance as well as registration and plates, but you can’t get around those. So all in all, I’m paying less than $50 per month in taxes. Not bad.
(The “taxes” described might be more properly considered a user fee for the roads on which the car will be driven.)
What about your range anxiety? Load up on Xanax! From the Fiat USA web site:
I.e., the taxpayer-funded deal makes sense only for those rich enough to already own a long-range electric or gasoline-powered car. It transfers money from people who can barely afford one car to those who can afford to keep at least two. Merry Christmas to the elites, indeed!
Donald Trump, 2014: “I hope we never find life on another planet because if we do there’s no doubt that the United States will start sending them money!”
Related:
