Tax revenue shortfall for New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut from rich people escaping coronaplague?

The richest NYC-area folks whom I know have moved away to escape coronaplague and the associated lockdown. Why be in an apartment, even a $10 million one, if restaurants, museums, theaters, and offices are shut down? The refugees from Covid-19 have washed up in large oceanfront mansions, all of which are outside of NYC and most of which are outside of New York State.

If they decide to stay away for the entire summer and into the fall, coinciding with the minimum expected period of quasi-shutdown they will hit the magic 183 days for 2020. At that point, why will they pay NYC and New York State taxes on income derived from interest and dividends, for example? Haven’t they inadvertently accomplished what 183-day Florida or Puerto Rico residents have previously done intentionally?

This has happened to a lesser extent for my Massachusetts friends during coronapanic (many of whom actually turned into Florida or Texas residents starting in 2018 when the new tax law went into effect).

States can’t print money so they need to borrow, cut spending (hah!), or default (as they did in the 19th century). What happens to New York if their richest taxpayers aren’t around for enough days in 2020 to be hit?

Related:

Full post, including comments

Annals of English idioms

Conversation with a friend who immigrated to the U.S. to attend Harvard College:

  • Me: Do you and [Betsy] want to go for a walk in the woods tomorrow morning with Mindy the Crippler?
  • Him: I don’t know if she’s free.
  • Me: Can you ask?
  • Him: She’s working from home. I’m not allowed to go into her woman-hole.
  • Me: Take it from a native English speaker… that is probably not the idiom you’re looking for.

(It later transpired that his native-speaker daughter, whose room is upstairs, referred to mom’s ground floor home office as a “woman cave” and this had been slightly altered in the dad’s mind.)

Separately, we came up with a strategy in case any of the righteous townsfolk scolded us for failure to social distance. The response: “I’m sorry if you don’t approve of our lifestyle. My husband and I are accustomed to homophobia, but I think his sister here would learn from a dialog. Shall we head down to the rainbow chairs at the First Parish Church and discuss your feelings about same-sex relationships?”

Related:

Full post, including comments

Festschrift for Mike Hawley

A more-interesting-than-usual collection of folks celebrate the life and work of Mike Hawley, currently suffering from cancer. Mike was an early application developer at NeXT, then an early faculty member at the MIT Media Lab, before branching out into a wider world.

Annotations on the video, with my favorites in bold:

  • 2 minutes in: Nicholas Negroponte talks about the early days of the Media Lab, followed by some other MIT insiders (probably not interesting for non-MITers)
  • about 20 minutes in: fountain of Trump-related discourse from law school professor Larry Tribe (maybe not the best choice to teach Harvard’s “A Few Good Points About the Donald Trump Presidency” course)
  • 25 minutes in: the great architect Moshe Safdie shows how to celebrate someone’s life
  • 30 minutes: Alan Kay is introduced as the inventor of the PC (no credit to William Shockley for the transistor, Jack Kilby for the IC, Federico Faggin, Marcian Hoff, Stanley Mazor, and Masatoshi Shima for the first commercial microprocessor, George H. Heilmeier for the LCD, Waldemar Jungner for the NiCd battery (good argument for not shutting down Sweden if we want the next invention from these creative folks)); mostly this is about Mike playing the piano
  • 38 minutes: Bran Ferren talks about the intersection between technology and art
  • 41 minutes: Leonard Kleinrock respects the tradition by talking about Mike instead of himself! (Kleinrock helped build the foundations of the software that enables the Internet, which enabled this virtual festschrift)
  • 46:45: Bob Metcalfe, rounding out the tech foundations (he is the co-developer of the Ethernet local-area standard; also spectacularly wrong about Internet capacity! Coronapanic has proved that 100 percent of Americans can stream high-def simultaneously!), and tells a good dog story
  • 52: Peter Cochrane. Dull and confusing; skip.
  • 57:35: Stewart Brand, looking good and sounding sharp at 81! (He’s a righteous advocate for impeaching Trump; if only the Senate had listened!)
  • 59:45: Tod Machover, no longer an enfant terrible of the music world, but still interesting and he has a good clip of Mike playing.
  • 1:07:07: Gloria Minsky, widow of Marvin Minsky, gives a clear-eyed tribute informed by her background as a physician.
  • 1:11:20: Jill Sobule, singer-songwriter plays and sings, marred by terrible sound quality
  • 1:16:00: Rob Poor, Mike’s first Ph.D. student, talks a bit about the famous/infamous Media Lab Mt. Everest Base Camp assault
  • 1:19:20: Reed Jobs, son of Steve Jobs. Touching; seems like a sweet kid.
  • 1:23:00: George Hawley, Mike’s father. (at 1:27:00 an interesting discussion about how to decide whether to pursue professional music as a career) Sad to think about being told about a child’s stage 4 cancer diagnosis.
  • Mike himself comes on at the end. He was always at his best graciously thanking people with a public speech and does not disappoint.

If I had been asked to speak, I would have highlighted that, despite being late to appreciate the impact that World Wide Web protocols and standards would have, Mike was early to appreciate how digital cameras and Internet would democratize photography. Then he acted on this idea by working with Bhutanese children, putting advanced digital cameras into their hands to see what would happen (a lot of great pictures and a big heavy paper book!). Mike’s most impactful work while at MIT was in the area of photography: he supervised the Master’s thesis of Robert Silvers, whose photomosaics have been hugely popular.

(I also would have had to bite my tongue to avoid noting that Mike spent a tremendous amount of energy over the last four years being upset regarding the candidacy for and then the American Deplorables’ election of Donald J. Trump. Searching through his Facebook posts now… Before the election, Mike was paying attention to women who said that they got paid to have sex with Trump and to investigations by Eric Schneiderman (later in the news because the young women he was paying to have sex with him complained about the specifics of the sex). Even before Trump took office, Mike was #resisting by investigating ways in which the Electoral College could undo the illegitimate vote. In July 2017, Mike was trying to get Twitter to de-platform @realdonaldtrump (“posts constitute frequent abuse and harassment and promulgate outrageous lies”). In the fall of 2018, Mike was poring through the details of the people who claimed to have knowledge of an interaction between Dr. Christine Blasey Ford and Brett Kavanaugh in 1982. Despite his cancer diagnosis, Mike was following the Impeachment of Trump closely.

Certainly Trump’s election has been regrettable from a coastal elite point of view (“they forgot to take away their right to vote,” is my Dutch friend’s summary), but cancer proved to be Mike’s enemy, not Trump. Other than the corporate tax law change that made Mike’s stock market investments more valuable, there was never a single Trump policy that had any effect on Mike’s life. A good reminder to all of us not to get upset about what happens in Washington, D.C. We can’t do anything about it, so why rage at the political weather?)

Mike turned the concept of being a professor on its head. Ask a tuition-paying parent what a “college professor” is. Answer: a professor is someone who puts a huge effort into preparing lectures, handouts, and problem sets. Make sure that the students learn Signals and Systems in a logical progression, for example. Mike realized that modern research universities did not reward this Herculean effort in any way, shape, or form. The whole idea of teaching specific knowledge areas or skills was for chumps. Let the Media Lab students go learn whatever traditional material they needed from the dull-witted professors in other MIT departments who hadn’t figured out that they were wasting their time. To discharge his “teaching” responsibility, Mike set up a class that was one day per week, three hours per week, thus giving himself four free days per week. MIT is in session for 13 weeks so he had to prepare 13 three-hour lectures? Hah! Each week Mike would give a thoughtful introduction and provide some context for one of his famous friends, who would then proceed to hold the students spellbound with a guest lecture. He used a slush fund to order pizza in the middle of the class. Students wrote papers and then graded each other’s papers.

Mike contributed a lot to the early exploratory phase of the MIT Media Lab, that’s for sure. As the lab converged toward a more conventional academic engineering grand-seeking enterprise, which would have required him to pick a project and stick with it for 10-20 years, he wandered off to keep learning about new subject areas with some of the world’s most accomplished people in each area. When your interests are that wide you can never become a true expert in any one area. Thus, Mike’s biggest post-Media Lab achievements will not be reflected in conventional academic journals, but in the connections that he facilitated among some of the world’s most creative and original people.

Assuming that coronaplague does not get me first, I will miss him when he is gone. He has been a fun person to know and he added a lot of color to a university that has a reputation for being colorless.

Sad update: “Michael Hawley, Programmer, Professor and Pianist, Dies at 58” (NYT, June 24, 2020)

Related:

Mike’s student Rob Silvers and Alex in front of the Media Lab circa 1995:

Full post, including comments

Coronascreening of passengers arriving in California from India

From a neighbor:

I reached home last night (April 23) about 12:30. Nine hours of road
transport was followed by a three hour flight to Delhi, then a fifteen hour flight to San Francisco. and finally six hour flight to Boston in two legs (Delta via Atlanta) … i reached San Francisco about 5:30 AM yesterday. They said that the Customs would not open till 6 AM and we lingered on the runway. Coming to the terminal, the luggage did not show up for
two hours. Nobody explained. Then we were led to go to other terminal for our domestic flight. No testing or health checking was done. None of the airport employees (Police, TSA and Customs) had masks and nobody was enforcing anything. It was very different from Delhi where Corona warning was everywhere.

Californians pride themselves on having a lower rate of plague than New York, Massachusetts, and other parts of the U.S. They attribute this to their superior political leadership (yet the University of Washington prophets show that they shut down schools a little later than Massachusetts and non-essential businesses a little earlier; maybe they have a different strain of the virus?). But if they don’t at least pick up some masks and forehead thermometers for people arriving from the plague lands, won’t they just catch coronavirus as soon as they emerge from their bunkers?

Full post, including comments

Coronapoetry

As a measure of how desperate things have become, I’ve taken to reading poetry to the kids (denied their precious and wholesome screen time due to a cruel policy of the local dictatorship).

Here’s “Happy Thought” by Robert Louis Stevenson:

The world is so full of a number of things,
I’m sure we should all be as happy as kings.

Helpful adjustment for those whose lockdown is urban:

The world apartment is so full of a number of things,
I’m sure we should all be as happy as kings.

You’re welcome!

Separately, I have composed some original haiku:

Looked up from my phone
Who’re these people in the house?
Coronavirus

Students stare closely
Zoom lecture is spellbinding
Retriever in frame

You’re double-welcome!

Full post, including comments

What home security cameras for impending collapse of Massachusetts?

Governor Baker has now announced that schools in Massachusetts will be closed through June (i.e., until September). There was a hint at the briefing that businesses would also be ordered closed through June in that the order to close daycare for non-essential workers would be closed through June was explained with”to align reopening of child care with the reopening of businesses.”

We have friends who say that Massachusetts has a reasonable chance of descending into looting, home invasions, ATM kidnappings, etc. They’re not very tech-savvy, but they want some outdoor home security cameras that will at least discourage the roaming criminal gangs. What’s a good solution to secure the four corners of a suburban house? It has to be something easy for non-technical people to set up themselves. (And do cameras actually discourage criminals enough to motivate them to move to the next house that doesn’t have them?)

(Are their fears justified? There are a lot of programs for government hand-outs, but the free cash is limited to people who are great at filling out paperwork. That could leave a substantial portion of the population in desperate straits. Venezuela went from pleasant to lawless after a severe economic downturn. Why not the U.S.? I guess that is why everyone was buying guns and ammo until the gun shops ran out.)

Related:

  • Wirecutter recommends the Google Nest Outdoor Security Camera, but it doesn’t seem like it is intended for people who want to cover the entire perimeter of a suburban house (more like monitor the front door and driveway)
Full post, including comments

Paper titled “Stockpiling Ventilators for Influenza Pandemics” (2017)

Here are some folks who, had they been listened to, could have saved Americans, or at least Texans, a lot of anxiety… “Stockpiling Ventilators for Influenza Pandemics” (Emerg Infect Dis. 2017 Jun; 23(6)) by Hsin-Chan Huang, Ozgur M. Araz, David P. Morton, Gregory P. Johnson, Paul Damien, Bruce Clements, and Lauren Ancel Meyers.

Some excerpts:

In preparing for influenza pandemics, public health agencies stockpile critical medical resources. [except for masks?]

When severe influenza outbreaks cause high rates of hospitalization, a surge of medical resources is required, including critical care supplies, antiviral medications, and personal protection equipment. Given uncertainty in the timing and severity of the next pandemic, as well as the time required to manufacture medical countermeasures, stockpiling is central to influenza preparedness. However, difficulty in forecasting and limited public health budgets often constrain decisions about sizes, locations, and deployment of such stockpiles.

Mechanical ventilators are essential for treating influenza patients in severe acute respiratory failure. Substantial concern exists that intensive care units (ICUs) might have insufficient resources to treat all persons requiring ventilator support. Prior studies argue that current capacities are insufficient to handle even moderately severe pandemics

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) manages this Strategic National Stockpile (SNS) and has plans for rapid deployment to states during critical events … However, SNS ventilators might not suffice to meet demand during a severe public health emergency. In 2002, the SNS included ≈4,400 ventilators, and 4,500 SNS ventilators were added during 2009 and 2010. The American Association for Respiratory Care suggested the SNS inventory should increase to at least 11,000–16,000 ventilators in preparation for a severe influenza pandemic.

Our retrospective analysis of the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic in Texas suggests that hospitals had enough ventilators on hand to treat all patients requiring mechanical ventilation throughout the pandemic. Although these quantities are expected to suffice for a moderate (1957- and 1968-like) pandemic, in which hospitalization rates roughly triple, they would fall far short in a severe (1918-like) pandemic. If we optimistically assume perfect deployment, that is, 0 wastage, by assuming timely delivery, adequately trained and available staff (respiratory therapists, nurses, and physicians), sufficient space to care for a potentially large number of patients, and requisite ancillary equipment and supplies, then even a central stockpile of 8,900 ventilators in Texas—the total number of SNS ventilators in 2010—would fall short, with an expected unmet demand of 576 patients.

Who will vote with me to put these folks in charge of the next plan to fight the last war? And who will bet that if we’d ordered ventilators in 2017 for delivery in 2018-2019 it would have been a lot cheaper?

Note: I found this paper while trying to search for what it might cost to treat a COVID-19 patient in a U.S. hospital ICU with ventilator support. Of course, that was a question that was impossible to answer.

Was this knowledge new in 2017? Has anyone done a study of what it would look like to prepare on a national level, not just in Texas? The Texas paper provides references back to 2006, all coming to the same conclusion: we need to stockpile a bunch of stuff if we want to be ready for a flu or flu-like pandemic.

One of the references from 2015 is “Estimates of the Demand for Mechanical Ventilation in the United States During an Influenza Pandemic”. It is authored by five government workers, four of whom were at the CDC (during the sorely missed administration of Barack Obama!). The authors suggest that more than 60,000 additional ventilators to provide a reasonable assurance of nobody dying for want of a ventilator. What was their conclusion for the administration and Congress of 2015?

The challenge for public health authorities is to plan and prepare how to best respond to the next pandemic that will cause such a rapid and large demand for mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients. Ventilator preparedness planning has to be prioritized against competing influenza pandemic preparedness planning efforts. The time to start planning is now, and the results presented here may help guide such efforts.

What did Barack Obama do in response to the authors’, all of whom worked for him, projection that 308,000 Americans would die if a flu pandemic hit and the ventilators weren’t stockpiled? A month after the paper:

President Obama on Friday hailed a Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide, saying justice has arrived “like a thunderbolt” for gay and lesbian couples.

Obama opposed same-sex marriage when he was first elected president in 2008. He backed it before the 2012 election, saying his views had been “evolving” during his time in the White House.

“Today, we can say in no uncertain terms that we have made our union a little more perfect,” Obama said from the Rose Garden.

From July 2015:

“What I found during the course of the presidency, and I suppose this is true in life, is that investments and work that you make back here sometimes take a little longer than the 24-hour news cycle to bear fruit.”

Well, he was right about this particular investment decision! (to not purchase PPE)

He had developed clairvoyance by November 2015:

“There’s no doubt that the longer I’m in this job, the more confident I am about the decisions I’m making and more knowledgeable about the responses I can expect. And as a consequence, you end up being looser. There’s not much I have not seen at this point, and I know what to expect, and I can anticipate more than I did before.”

Was there any politician that saw this coming? George W. Bush!

Full post, including comments

How much of the country-to-country difference in COVID-19 is simply random variation?

Some countries are suffering more from the coronaplague than others. Italy, for example, is a hotspot while Greece is scarcely touched. Parishioners in the worldwide Church of Shutdown would say that this shows the excellence of the Greek government’s early and eager shutdown (they are not afraid to relax at home and borrow some more money that the Germans can work extra hours to pay off?).

What if we are celebrating the lucky rather than those with special insight?

A map of influenza in Europe for 2015-2016 shows apparently similar countries with radically different levels of flu. Greece was slammed while Italy was barely scratched. Portugal was flu-free compared to adjacent Spain. Ireland suffered much more than adjacent Wales/England/Scotland. Finland had more flu than adjacent Sweden.

The 2016-2017 map, on the other hand, shows no difference between Portugal and Spain. France was hit hard. Greece was hit hard again.

If we step back one year, to 2014-2015, we find that Sweden and Finland have swapped places. Germany and Italy are hit hard while Greece is comparatively better off.

How about within the U.S. states? The CDC offers a map of “Influenza/Pneumonia Mortality by State”, adjustable by year. North Dakota and South Dakota may have dramatically different rates, despite being similarly situated. Vermont is always lower than New Hampshire, despite the geographic and demographic similarities (maybe southern NH gets infected by commuting into Boston?). Nevada is bad in most years, but not all. Florida seems never to be touched by flu and Colorado hardly ever. (It can’t be Florida’s tropical climate that saves it, however, because Hawaii usually has a high prevalence.) It seems that there is a significant amount of random variation and also a consistent pattern for some states. We could certainly look at this map and say that Florida, Vermont, and Colorado are examples of superb governance. Washington and Oregon are always much better off than California. What are they doing right?

If COVID-19 behaves like the flu, are a lot of the policy attributions that we’re making the result of accidents of fate?

Related:

Full post, including comments

The disappointing results of hydroxychloroquine for covid-19 patients

“Study finds no benefit, higher death rate in patients taking hydroxychloroquine for Covid-19” (CNN) is discouraging. We’re apparently not on track to have a better drug treatment for coronavirus infections any time soon, thus potentially casting doubt on the value of “flatten the curve”. If we should be unfortunate enough to get seriously ill from COVID-19, we’ll get the same drugs next month that we would have gotten last month.

(Maybe flattening the curve is still worthwhile because then everyone can get onto a ventilator if necessary? “Nearly all Covid-19 patients put on ventilators in New York’s largest health system died, study finds” (CNN) says that 88 percent of patients on ventilators died. The true number is probably higher, since a lot of patients suffer so much organ damage that they die after being discharged from the hospital where they were on the ventilator. This number is consistent with what my physician friends had told me and what the Chinese found; see April 2 post.)

Should we abandon hope for hydroxychloroquine? A doctor friend responded to my questions with, essentially, “not on the basis of this VA study”:

  • It didn’t fail for indication / mechanism of its action
  • It’s a study done at the wrong stage of disease for the drug to work
  • So much garbage published
  • It works at very early stage of disease to block viral replication
  • If you give it to people who are dying in icu from cytokines storm it’s useless
  • They didn’t separate the patients

(she had only skimmed the paper, so might be wrong about some details)

Not everyone is upset at the failed outcome of this study. My Facebook feed has been alive with glee that the drug does not help people who are suffering and dying from covid-19. They write posts highlighting Donald Trump’s expressed enthusiasm about the drug back in March and then linking to articles about the VA study. Oddly, these expressions of delight come from the same people who are most vocal in their demands for additional shutdown because suffering and dying from covid-19 must be avoided at all costs. This is consistent with my April 7 post:

As much as I want this whole Covid-19 thing to be over, my biggest fear is that it will abate and the stock market/economy will rebound in time for the November election and Trump will claim credit and be re-elected.

Yet I was still unable to think of any situation in which so many people have been happy about a failed drug trial.

Readers who know more about medicine and pharma: Based on the trials that have been done, do we know whether hydroxychloroquine helps covid-19 patients? Anything else that seems promising for the near-term?

Related:

Full post, including comments