Military hardware at Oshkosh

Oshkosh is a great place to see the might and cleverness of the U.S. military on display. Our cargo planes were represented from the C-47 (DC-3), celebrating its 75th anniversary, right through the modern C-130, C-17, and C-5. Fights from World War II, such as the P-51 Mustang, were heavily represented. The crowd was shocked, awed, deafened, and shaken by heavy modern jet fighters. Our ground operations were represented by an MRAP, a made-in-Oshkosh $500,000 replacement for the Hummer (at least $5 billion in taxpayer funds will be spent on this program). The one guy who does not seem to be impressed by our fancy technology, i.e., Osama bin Laden, was nowhere to be found among the crowd.

The quasi-military branches of government were showing off as well. The TSA had a booth where they explained all of the great new stuff that they’re doing. Customs was there to show off its new reporting requirements for arriving and departing the U.S. Technically these guys have grown the GDP by making the procedures so difficult and time-consuming. The companies that formerly assisted aviators in dealing with Third World bureaucracies, such as Sudan’s, are now making money helping people travel between the U.S. and Canada in Cessna 172s. The Border Patrol had a booth trying to recruit 3000 new agents to work on the southern border. I asked how hard that could be, with 15 million Americans being unemployed. The agent responded “It just opened up last week; we haven’t hired anyone for about a year.” The Border Patrol brought in an Astar. Apparently the Department of Homeland Security keeps Americans safe from Mexican workers by sending $2 million over to France for a helicopter and some spare parts and then sending additional funds to Hugo Chavez to buy jet fuel to keep the machine flying in circles.

Full post, including comments

Chinese Aerospace at Oshkosh

The Chinese presence at Oshkosh, the world’s premiere general aviation event, consisted primarily of two aircraft: the Cessna 162 Skycatcher and the Yuneeq electric airplanes. The Skycatcher was approved by the FAA in the Light Sport category last year. However, only eight examples have been produced in the Shenyang factory. So far it is not a great example of the power of Chinese manufacturing applied to light aircraft, though some of the delay in production may be due to problems with the aircraft’s spin characteristics.

The Yuneec E430 got a lot more attention. It might be fairer to call it a one-seat motorglider rather than an airplane, but it has substantial range and points toward electric airplanes with a lot of practical value, e.g., for flight training. Since the Chinese are the world leaders in battery manufacturing they presumably should have a good chance in becoming the world leaders in electric aircraft (though with the Solar Impulse, the Europeans are also doing some very interesting stuff).

Full post, including comments

Wandering around Oshkosh

Getting around Oshkosh involves a lot of meandering through parking lots. As many as 100,000 people will drive in to enjoy the show on any given day. Thus tens of thousands of cars with Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Michigan plates surround the airfield. Having lived in Massachusetts for decades, I’m accustomed to cars whose owners have chosen to show the world how much smarter they are than average. The typical Prius in Cambridge, for example, will display bumper stickers showing that the owner voted for a slate of politicians who’ve promised to make the world a better place. These are augmented by direct statements of the owner’s plans for how other people should behave, e.g., a “Coexist” admonition with various religious symbols juxtaposed. How do they do it in the Midwest? The posteriors of the thousands of cars I walked by were shockingly naked. The handful of bumper stickers that I did see were references to obscure products for which the owner presumably had an enthusiasm. I did not see a single political bumper sticker nor any advocating a social cause.

Most of our evenings in Oshkosh were occupied with dinners for Experimental Aircraft Association supporters. At one we sat next to a quiet Air Force veteran named Blair Bozek. He had served as a crewmember on the SR-71 for 70 operational missions. Did he have any problems with the machine? we asked. “Just the usual hydraulic and electrical glitches,” was his response. We later Googled and found out that he’d had to eject out of a failed SR-71 and swim around in the South China Sea for a while. We decided to give him our “Master of Understatement” award.

A fundraising dinner for the EAA Young Eagles program yielded $2.1 million for a variety of items in a live auction. Generally the TV cameras would swing around to show the happy high bidder at the end of the auction for each item, e.g., a $375,000 customized Ford Mustang. Seemingly invariably it would be a pudgy grey-haired white guy sitting next to an attractive young blonde. I can’t quite figure out why Young Eagles needs so much money to operate, since the program is organized by local volunteers at various airports around the country. The actual rides for young people are given by local airplane owners who are not compensated. I have mixed feelings about the program. If someone said “I introduce young people to something fun, unnecessary, dangerous, and expensive”, my first thought would be “drug dealer”. There are a lot of programs to encourage young people to pursue careers in aviation. Is it kind to steer a young person toward a career in which there are 10 qualified people for every job? When the same young person could go into medicine and pick from 10 job openings for every qualified person?

Six of us found ourselves free one evening and of course ended up at Naughty Girls. My previous experience with gentlemen’s clubs had been in Canada. How does the American/Wisconsin strip club experience differ? Let’s just say that as a 6′ tall guy carrying some extra middle-aged weight you would have to abandon any idea that the strippers should be lighter than you. The high point of my evening was watching the youngest member of our gang (about 24 years old) put a dollar bill into a dancer’s panties while seemingly standing in a different zip code.

Full post, including comments

Oshkosh early report

We arrived at Oshkosh on Tuesday after stopping in Buffalo to pick up Thurman Thomas (a VIP guest of EAA). Arriving in a turbojet IFR meant that we didn’t have to follow any of the traditional Oshkosh “look for the water tower” and “rock your wings” procedures. After landing Runway 27 we turned right and parked and were whisked away to a little caravan of RVs. Then we were given a tour of the convention by an unassuming volunteer, Jeffrey Gentz, who lives in the area and has been volunteering at Oshkosh for 30 years. We had to ask if he had any flying experience himself. “Mostly on the MD11 at UPS,” he noted, “where I also do training, but I’ve also flown the 757/767.” Jeff delivered us finally to a Schweizer 333 for a helicopter loop around the grounds.

We arrived back at the core of the vendor exhibits at about 6 pm, just as tens of thousands of people were walking back from the flightline where they’d been viewing the airshow. The legacy piston airplane manufacturers, Piper and Cessna, had shut down their booths and gone home. Tens of thousands of potential customers streamed past, some stopping to look at the parked airplanes but there were no salespeople to answer questions. The Cirrus booth, on the other hand, was fully staffed and engaged with the eager public. It is not hard to understand how Cirrus took 50 percent of the market away from the legacy companies.

The traditional Oshkosh mishap starts with a guy spending three years in his garage building an airplane. During this time he does not practice flying because he is busy turning wrenches. Anxious to show off his newly completed aircraft, he gets in the plane in North Carolina and embarks on his first real cross-country flight. The plane is wrecked at some point during this trip, though not always at Oshkosh itself, which has long wide runways. This year was a little different, with a $6 million Beechcraft Premier jet pancaked into the ground and split in half (story). Fortunately both pilot and passenger seem to be recovering well.

Oshkosh is not short on infectious enthusiasm. Hundreds of thousands of people come to explore their dreams of flight. Hundreds of startup companies set up booths to show off their wares. This is a market strangled by government regulation and, at least in the U.S., clouded by the economic depression (the sectors of the U.S. that the Politburo has favored in the latest Five Year Plan are government, Wall Street, and health care, none of which are natural users of light aircraft (government folks can stay in their state or in Washington, D.C.; doctors can stay in their hospitals; Wall Streeters mostly stay in Manhattan or head out to Shanghai; a regional real estate developer or retailer would be a natural customer for a light airplane)). Yet entrepreneurs show up with a fiberglass mockup saying “we expect to be certified in 2-3 years” and “we just need to close the next round of financing”.

Some energetic young people from Korea showed up their new four-seat airplane, to be certified in two more years. The plane is made of plastic, exactly likely a Cirrus SR22. It has four seats, exactly like a Cirrus SR22. It has a turbocharged Continential IO-550 engine, exactly like one version of a Cirrus SR22. I asked how much it would cost. “Less than $700,000,” was the response. So the plan is to make a virtual copy of the market leader’s airplane and sell it for the same price. In what other industry would people persist with this kind of plan?

An industry veteran in a new company (he’s a friend so he’ll remain nameless) was kind enough to talk to me about his new company. I asked “Not to be rude, but who would be stupid enough to invest in a yet-to-be-certified design? Think of the risks of the plane being delayed by the FAA and then the risks of liability once the plane goes out the door.” He challenged me to name an investment that would be lower risk. I said “Pizza Hut franchises in Brazil and China.” He replied that a Pizza Hut would face competition from local restaurants and therefore an investment in his company was far safer.

The company that might change the industry is ICON Aircraft. The PR, Web site, brochures, and industrial design are all competitive with what an automobile manufacturer might accomplish. If you called up Central Casting and said “I need a square-jawed business executive who used to be a fighter pilot” they would send over someone just like Kirk Hawkins, the founder and CEO. He stood up and gave a talk reminiscent of Tom Cruise’s motivation speeches in the movie Magnolia. He skipped over questions such as “Given that seaplanes cannot typically be operated safely even by 20,000-hour airline pilots, how are your customers going to avoid wrecking all of these?” (30 percent of ICON position holders have no flying experience and are planning to get their Sport Pilot certificate after 30 hours of training and jump in (an idea encouraged by the ICON brochures)) or “What happens when you put the wheels down by mistake and land in the water?” (answer with every other amphibious airplane: the plane flips over and often the occupants drown, which is why amphib insurance costs a lot more than helicopter insurance). The plane/boat costs $139,000 and seats two.

The Achilles Heel of the ICON is that everything is optional, even stuff that you would need such as wheels. This will presumably drive up the cost but more importantly will drive up the empty weight. The “useful load” will be 420 lbs, typically equipped. That includes two passengers, baggage, oars, life jackets, headsets, water emergency gear, etc., etc., and fuel. The tanks hold about 20 gallons and gasoline weighs 6 lbs. per gallon. The legal full fuel payload is therefore 300 lbs. for a two-seater. I predict that this airplane, if it is ever certified as a Light Sport Airplane and delivered, will almost invariably be operated over gross. Therefore the customers won’t be able to rely on any of the book numbers for runway length and stall speed. The engineers seem to have anticipated this and the most prominent instrument in the panel is a military-style angle of attack indicator. This will show how close the wing is to stalling, irrespective of how overloaded the plane is.

Experienced seaplane pilots at the convention did not like the ICON. “For about the same price, I can buy a used Lake Amphibian [four-seat certified seaplane]” they would note. I think that ICON stands a good chance of expanding the market, something that Light Sport has thus far failed to do (mostly Light Sport pilots are ancient guys who are expert certified airplane pilots but who can’t hold an FAA medical anymore).

Full post, including comments

Where your charitable donations end up

The New York Times had a good story yesterday on the head of the Boys and Girls Club of America helping herself to a $1 million/year salary. Roxanne Spillett said that she’d worked there for 32 years (so she might have siphoned off a total of nearly $32 million!) and, most distressingly, had “never been motivated by a dime, not for a single minute”. So we know that the board should not have been paying her 40X the median American salary in order to motivate her. Could the board have decided to pay Ms. Spillett all of that money so that she wouldn’t jump to a competing non-profit organization? Apparently not, because the article notes that Ms. Spillett was “close to retiring”.

Could it be the high cost of living in Atlanta, Georgia, where the organization is based? Perhaps. The board decided to pay at least eight employees more than $200,000 per year (I grabbed the Form 990 from Guidestar.org).

Could it be that Ms. Spillett did an exceptionally good job during the 2008 fiscal year? Revenues fell about 20 percent and what had been a $30 million profit turned into a $15 million loss. Total assets fell by 25 percent. Was 2008 an unusually tough year? Revenue was about 40 percent higher in 2006 than in 2008, so the trend was down each year for which a Form 990 is available. How about Ms. Spillett’s paycheck? It was also close to $1 million in 2006.

The organization does pretty well by getting government contracts and not paying taxes, so arguably Ms. Spillett has earned her $1 million per year. But you could say the same for Lockheed-Martin and they are gracious enough not to hassle us with requests for donations.

The Politburo down on Capitol Hill seems to be in an active mood these days and passing a lot of new laws. How about one that says any non-profit organization whose executives earn more than 10X the median American wage must start all telephone and direct mail solicitations with “We’d like you to help pay our CEO $X million per year.”

Full post, including comments

Three years with Windows Vista

Two years ago, I wrote “A year with Windows Vista” about my experience with the much-maligned operating system. Now it has been three years. The $650 Toshiba laptop has been bumped along dusty African roads, has been dropped, has been vibrated on multiple cross-country helicopter trips, and has survived a fair amount of food and drink spillage. There have been no hardware failures, no system crashes, and no software incompatibilities. I like the fact that the machine is now worth only $100 or $200. I have no qualms about leaving it in a semi-public conference room and stepping out for lunch.

Full post, including comments

Meeting up at Oshkosh

Folks: I’m going to Oshkosh this year, courtesy of a kind friend who has organized everything. I’m wondering if readers would like to get together for a discussion, perhaps on Thursday, July 29 at noon at the seaplane base (they run a little bbq stand there and the general atmosphere is less insane than at the regular show; there is a shuttle bus from the main show over to the seaplane base).

Please email philg@mit.edu if you’re interested in meeting up on Thursday at noon. Feel free to comment if you think there is a better place to meet.

Full post, including comments

How to explain Singapore’s growth despite lack of stimulus?

After a slight contraction in 2009, Singapore’s economy is roaring back with GDP growth of close to 15 percent in 2010 (nytimes). How did people there manage to achieve this success? By U.S. standards, the government of Singapore is almost non-existent, consuming just 12.5 percent of GDP (source). If you scroll down to the bottom of this chart, you’ll see that the U.S. federal deficit is, at 10.5 percent of GDP, nearly equal to all government spending in Singapore. (Local, state, and federal spending combined in the U.S. is now at a non-WWII record of 44 percent (source).)

One would think that any debate about the likely effectiveness of increased government expansion here in the U.S. would include a discussion of how Singapore is succeeding, but I have not seen that in the news. Why would Americans not look to more successful economies worldwide for inspiration?

[As a side note, the CIA factbook for Singapore shows that the per-capita GDP of this once-poor country is higher than that of the U.S.: $50,300 compared to $46,400. The data have been tweaked for “purchasing power parity”, so it isn’t exactly clear who would find a Honda Accord more affordable, but it is nonetheless impressive that a country with no land and no natural resources could have surpassed the U.S., which has been gifted with (or stolen from the Indians) almost an entire continent to exploit.]

Full post, including comments

Government versus private industry helicopter operating costs

It turns out that the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey has been operating two Sikorsky S-76 helicopters mostly for “security” at a cost to taxpayers of $4 million per year (nj.com story). Most of the 258 annual flights were weekday flyovers of airports to look for unusual activity (aero-news.net; the implication is that terrorists could do whatever they liked on weekends). If we assume that each flight was for one hour (more than enough time to visit all NY-area airports) and hug the docks), that’s a cost of $15,500 per flight hour.

The S-76 was designed for flights of 200 nautical miles through clouds, e.g., getting 12 oil rig crewmembers out across the North Sea. No private company would consider using a $10+ million S-76 for flying short trips in clear weather with just one or two passengers. Aside from the crushing capital and operating costs, the S-76 is notorious for poor visibility compared to simpler cheaper helicopters.

The operation is being shut down because it turns out that the flights have no value at all. So it is kind of an academic exercise to wonder how much it would have cost if they’d used a Robinson R44, which would have offered superior visibility and more than adequate performance to carry two observers (one on either side) plus a pilot. Nonetheless, let’s run the numbers. Various local flight schools would have been delighted to rent out an R44, with pilot, for $400 per hour (East Coast Aero Club charges $379/hour). So the mission could have been accomplished for approximately 2.4 percent of the cost that the government agency actually spent, resulting in saving approximately $4 million per year in operating costs and $12 million in capital expense.

This may be part of the problem with government stimulus. The government spends 40X more than it needs to in order to accomplish a task in an inferior manner (in this case using the wrong helicopter for the job).

Full post, including comments