A guy with a future meets a girl with a past
A group of us, aged 33-44, all enjoyed The Girl Next Door, which was last week’s best-selling DVD nationwide. This was one of my cousin Harry’s smaller ideas, nurtured over the years and eventually spun off to a group of younger folks while Harry himself went to Omaha to make About Schmidt. Harry likes quiet, subtle movies like Breaking In, which he did with Burt Reynolds at the end of the 1980s. Hollywood, however, and the public to a large extent likes to pour youth and excess into even the quietest ideas. It is the director who has the final say over what goes into the script and what goes into the film. The young director of the Girl Next Door, Luke Greenfield, seems to have larded a lot of freight onto Harry’s small cart. Some of it is loud, some of it is confusing (esp. when it touches on the bank), much is unrealistic, and none is really necessary. Still we couldn’t understand how this movie was abandoned so quickly in the theaters. I don’t remember even seeing an ad for the movie anywhere. It seems like the sort of movie that could have been very successful with a young audience.
Anyone see this in the theater? If so, what was the crowd reaction? My friends were laughing out loud in the living room.
[Personally some of the stuff in the movie that struck me as odd: (1) the school photographer was using a Hasselblad rather than a long-roll camera to do senior portraits [opening credits], (2) all the high school boys had their own VCRs and TVs in their rooms and were watching porn movies [maybe kids really do this these days], (3) substantial usage of VHS tape, both for watching porn and as a master tape of the final production even though the kids were clearly shooting using mini-DV.]
Full post, including comments