There’s “space for everyone” and “different perspectives” are valuable. But on the other hand, there is no space for perspectives from taxpayers who fund the agency.
Also, why is it just “LGBTQI+”? Why not 2SLGBTQQIA+?
Finally, if the future of the galaxy is female, according to Science and the baseball cap below, why does NASA hire anyone who identifies as of the 73 other genders recognized by Science? Why is “diversity” better than betting on the winning gender?
- Inflation chronicles: NYT says Pioneer Venus cost $230 million for both robots flung on separate rockets to the inner solar system… about the same as the cost of two nice houses in Palm Beach, Florida today (a teardown for $110 million)
- “NASA Commits To Planting Pride Flag On The Moon By 2030” (Babylon Bee):