We are informed that the typical Gazan has no relationship with the Islamic Resistance Movement (“Hamas”) and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. It is an accident that Hamas governs Gaza, which is otherwise populated by entirely peaceful humans. At the same time, anyone in Gaza who is killed in the latest fighting has been referred to, both by Palestinians and westerners in the do-gooder industry, as a “martyr”. One wouldn’t refer to a person killed in a car accident as a “martyr”. How can someone who wasn’t in any way aiding Hamas or PIJ and who didn’t go into Israel on October 7 be characterized as a “martyr” if he/she/ze/they is, unfortunately, killed by being in the wrong place at the wrong time?
(Note that recent opinion polls show 75 percent of Palestinians supporting Hamas and 85 percent supporting PIJ.)
Here’s an example from a Norwegian do-gooder:
There is an entire Twitter account devoted to stories of peace-loving civilians who have become “martyrs”:
Note the martyr wearing a huge “PRESS” sign on his chest despite the fact that we’ve been informed since October 8 that the IDF Is specifically targeting journalists and killing them via snipers and airstrikes (example). Since journalists don’t need special outfits to do their jobs, if what we’re told about the IDF is true why are Palestinian journalists choosing to make themselves targets with huge “PRESS” signs front and back and unique blue outfits? Are they seeking martyrdom by making themselves readily identifiable from a helicopter or drone? Below a group of “PRESS”-/blue-clad figures gathered in the open where any passing helicopter or drone can see them (source). If they believe what they’ve written, i.e., that journalists are targets for the IDF, they’re endangering the huge crowd of non-journalists surrounding them.
Here’s another example and it includes what seems to be a standard phrase for Palestinians: “rest in power” (rather than “rest in peace”):
(in other words, they will keep (powerfully) fighting the hated Israelis from beyond the grave?)
Separately, could it be that Palestinians are SWATting each other? Here’s a story about a peace-loving family in Gaza with “no verified Hamas presence nearby”… “Why Did Israel Kill My Family in Gaza and Destroy My Childhood Home?” (Newsweek, December 28, 2023):
There were no armed clashes, no Israeli ground troops, and no verified Hamas presence nearby. My family, on both my dad’s and mom’s sides, come from a long line of technocratic professionals who are independent and not involved with any political party.
The death toll surpassed 31. All five of my aunts and uncles who were in the building were instantly killed. Additionally, nine children as young as three and four months old, along with their parents and almost all of my cousins were killed in the airstrike
My vocal opposition to Hamas has drawn the ire of some of the pro-Palestine community, which finds my critiques of the Islamist group untimely, undue, unhelpful, or quite frankly inconvenient to their resistance narratives.
Faulty intelligence, inconsistent rules of engagement, the use of massive ordnances in crowded and dense civilian areas, and the application of overwhelming firepower to support advancing troops are regularly causing the needless loss of Gazans’ lives.
The author says that his previous writings regarding Hamas have “drawn ire”. Perhaps his family (100+ members if 31 were killed by one bomb? (Palestinians have been the world’s most demographically successful humans since the establishment of UNRWA)) was SWATted by a fellow Palestinian who called up the IDF to say that three senior Hamas commanders were at the house that was destroyed from the air.
The Arab apologists are one thing but one should be a little more forgiving of the Norwegians. Only a third of Norwegian Jewry was slaughtered during the Shoah under its Quisling government while the Continent successfully slaughtered 2/3 of its Jews. So imagine the envy the Norwegians must feel about the 10/7 massacre given that about 1,200 Jews still remain in Norway. And remember too the Oslo Accords, that proud progenitor of peace loving Gaza and that wonderful Norwegian play on the subject that made it to Broadway — according to Wikipedia: “Oslo concerns the true story of the efforts of Mona Juul and her husband, Terje Rød-Larsen, who are diplomats from Norway, and who organized breakthrough negotiations between Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and Palestine Liberation Organization Chairman Yasser Arafat in 1993. The play runs for three [long] hours.”
Martyrs should have the last laugh because they should get far superior eternal benefits in afterlife, compared to living a normal life and then having not the best afterlife for eternity. What is one lifespan compared to eternity?
In other news in FL
https://www.wcjb.com/2024/01/10/florida-university-system-waive-some-enrollment-requirements-jewish-students/
Forget it Phillip. *It’s Gazatown*
Lots of questions in this one but I will do my best as Obama always did.
How can someone who wasn’t in any way aiding Hamas or PIJ and who didn’t go into Israel on October 7 be characterized as a “martyr” if he/she/ze/they is, unfortunately, killed by being in the wrong place at the wrong time? They can’t!
Since journalists don’t need special outfits to do their jobs, if what we’re told about the IDF is true why are Palestinian journalists choosing to make themselves targets with huge “PRESS” signs front and back and unique blue outfits? They must crave the sweet relief only death can provide.
Are they seeking martyrdom by making themselves readily identifiable from a helicopter or drone? Yes!
Separately, could it be that Palestinians are SWATting each other? No!
What’s so difficult to understand? Have you tried with Google? Here’s one definition for your convenience:
“Who endures every punishment and even death for their ideals of life; those who sacrifice themselves for an activity in which they deeply believe: the m. of the liberation struggle; a m. of work”
Jews have various levels of remembering people, including a phrase for a person who died as a result of antisemitism; see the bottom of the chart: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honorifics_for_the_dead_in_Judaism
Christians also have phrases for cases where they were killed even if not active participants in strife, sometimes called “saints” or depending on denomination, different phrases.
@Pirol, @paddy the definition is one thing, and each religion having a similar term is something else.
In the Middle East, “martyr” is over-used by the elite to rally their flocks, to give their flocks a sense that the death of their loved ones is not in vane. In the Middle East, when someone is killed by the “enemy”, the funeral is a celebration, sweets and flowers are offered and heroic songs are sang. What’s more, the family of the “martyr” are congratulated. All this is staged by the elite so that they encourage more “martyrs”. Sadly, a day after the celebration, the family of the “martyr” is forgotten.