Microsoft is 2000 times less effective than Google; Yahoo Board seems to be insane
With Windows Vista continue to disappoint users and PC hardware designers continuing to produce ugly oversized desktops, Microsoft has apparently decided that Internet applications are the path to more revenue. It has offered $44 billion to Yahoo, which the Yahoo Board apparently rejected on Friday, despite the fact that the $31/share bid was higher than Yahoo has typically traded since mid-2006 (see http://finance.google.com/finance?q=YHOO and click on “1y” to get a chart).
The interesting question is why a company that claims to know how to program would pay anything for Yahoo, much less a P/E ratio of more than 60.
Google unseated Yahoo at a cost of about $20 million in financing, simply by being effective software developers and tasteful interface designers. We can infer from this offer that Microsoft expects its own programmers to be only 1/2000th as effective, dollar for dollar, as Google’s. In comparing Vista to XP and dividing by the amount of coding effort that went into Vista, it would be tough to argue with this conclusion.
[If I were a Yahoo shareholder, I would be looking at purchasing an old battleship right now, sailing it into San Francisco Bay, and lobbing some 16″ shells on the Board members’ houses in Atherton. The chance of a Yahoo shareholder ever getting more than $31/share, adjusted for inflation and risk, seems remote.]
[Additional thought… this could be a good new analogy question for the SATs… Microsoft is to Yahoo as Time Warner is to (correct answer) AOL. I recognize that it was AOL that purchased Time-Warner, but it was AOL that collapsed in value shortly afterwards, demonstrating that Internet giants can fall almost as fast as they rise…]
Full post, including comments