With birthright citizenship upheld, will Democrats now say that Supreme Court orders should be followed?

by philg

A lot of Democrat officials have said that the U.S. Supreme Court’s rulings are illegitimate and should not be followed, e.g., the recent ruling that allows temporarily protected Haitians to be sent home after 16 years in the U.S. Example from a Democrat thought leader: “it’s not something we will ever accept”.

The representative for the High-IQ (TM) crowd in Maskachusetts said, a few weeks ago, that the Court is “corrupt” (Ayanna Pressley has been characterizing the Court with this epithet for some years, according to an X search):

We know a guy in Boston who married a Honduran lady. His wife’s pregnant relatives would come to visit a few months before any baby was due. They’d show up alone at a high-end Boston hospital, e.g., Beth Israel, give birth, tell the staff “I’m undocumented”, and go home with a U.S. citizen and without ever seeing a bill from the hospital (costs covered by taxpayers). Except for three haters, the Supreme Court today agreed (Trump v. Barbara; what did Barbara do that was so bad?) that this should continue. Does that mean the Democrats who previously complained that the Court was illegitimate will now say that it is legitimate?

(Maybe there are four haters on the Court, actually. Brett Kavanaugh, the convicted rapist/murderer of Prof. Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, Ph.D., said that Congress could limit birthright citizenship by statute, but that El Presidente couldn’t do it via executive order. I guess that means Amy Coney Barrett was the deciding vote in favor of virtue, love, kindness, etc. Finally, given that 100% of the females on the Court voted one way and 80% of the males voted another, maybe this suggests a question for Alan Turing’s original male-female Turing Test (“imitation game”). Ask the person of unknown sex (there were just two back then) “A migrant walks across the U.S. border and pushes out a baby. Do you give the baby four generations of taxpayer-funded welfare or take the position that it is the parents’ responsibility to take care of their children and descedants?”)

Full post, including comments

Pride Games in the New York Times; Dubai and Pride at Shake Shack

by philg

Word games this month in the New York Times:

Shake Shack, Palm Beach Gardens, promotes “Pride” and “Dubai” (Arabic-inspired script) simultaneously:

Dubai follows Sharia law and, in theory, people with too much Pride could be executed, but more likely “under Article 409 of the UAE Federal Crimes and Penalties Law, consensual same-sex relations are criminalized with prison sentences starting at six months.”

Canada also combines Pride and Islamic rule:

Full post, including comments

Heat is to South Florida as air conditioning is to Europe

by philg

Europeans object to being mocked for their lack of air conditioning on the grounds that, pre-Climate Change, there were at most a few weeks per year when they would have wanted to use it. Note that this is partly due to European tolerance for a wider range of indoor temps than we spoiled Americans. They probably wouldn’t turn on A/C until their interiors were 8-10 degrees warmer than what would motivate an American to open up the WiFi thermostat app on his/her/zir/their phone.

Because of American profligacy with fossil fuels, Europe now has brutal heat waves (example from 1911; one that afflicted Paris in 1757) that make their decision to reject A/C appear stupid, but in reality they are the smart/wise ones.

Maybe, however, there is an analogous situation here in the U.S.: should a house in South Florida be equipped with heat? Outdoor temps drop below a comfortable room temperature for only a few weeks per year, analogous to outdoor temps being higher than room temp in Europe for only a few weeks per year. Houses are well insulated in South Florida because they’re almost all new. There is no historical weather that could reduce the indoor temp of a modern South Florida house to a dangerously cold level. Just as Europeans say that they can deal with typical heat by closing shutters, opening windows, jumping in the local canal, etc., a South Floridian without heat during a severe cold weather event could dig through the closet for a sweater and long pants, use an electric blanket or mattress pad at night, etc. Here’s one of the most extreme cold events that ChatGPT managed to find for Miami, which included a low of 28 degrees:

Running heat in South Florida is incredibly wasteful because (1) it is usually a resistive “heat strip” inside the air handler (the latest houses have fully insulated refrigerant lines in both directions and, therefore, heat pump heating capability), and (2) whatever heat is added to the house will eventually have to be pumped back out using electricity for cooling.

What is the observed behavior? Every house, by code, is built with heat capability. People turn on the heat as soon as they feel uncomfortable. As noted above, the latest houses even have heat pumps, maybe due to federal government tax incentives that encourage this super-wasteful-in-south-florida investment ($thousands extra in capital that lasts 15 years to save a couple of $hundred in electricity every few years).

If Climate Change were to cause South Florida to be subjected to a Maskachusetts-style December, Floridians wouldn’t die like the stoic Europeans. Nor would they get into a brawl at Walmart over space heaters. Houses here are already equipped to handle a multi-day freeze. The damage would be limited to higher FP&L bills (still, probably much lower than in MA, though, because rates here in FL are about one-third per kWh of what my friends who’ve remained Righteous are paying!).

As noted above, we could also explain the apparent difference in preparedness as due to a difference in tolerance for discomfort, with Americans being the wimps!

Related:

Full post, including comments

Bloedel Reserve, a model (I hope) for rich douches everywhere

by philg

Back in 2023 I wondered Where are the gardens and museums created by the Silicon Valley rich? That’s still a good question, in my opinion. Elon Musk is a trillionaire. In addition to voluntarily paying whatever taxes Elizabeth Warren deems fair, why hasn’t he built off-the-charts open-to-the-public gardens near his spaceports? It’s Elon Musk’s birthday today so maybe he will decide to think about the little people for once…

Earlier in June 2026, we visited the Bloedel Reserve, a 140-acre garden surrounding a fancy house that was all built by a lumber executive and his wife. It’s on Bainbridge Island, a suburb of Seattle made possible by the ferry system.

After they got too old to really use it, they turned it over to the public. Walk through the swamp:

Then over the bridge:

Then through the ferns:

Then arrive at what passed for a “mansion” in the days before trillionaires:

If you’re not a Floridian insistent on warm water, it’s a beautiful view from their back yard:

Everyone needs a Japanese tea house and garden to accompany it:

Speaking of Japanese, how about a moss garden like Saihō-ji in Kyoto?

Land Acknowledgement

The nonprofit that runs the garden admits that the land is stolen. Instead of giving it back to the rightful owners, however, they will somehow “honor” the rightful owners by charging everyone, including the rightful owners, $29 to enter (or $1 for those on welfare who show up with their SNAP card). Reserve in advance because they limit the number of people per hour who enter, a coronapanic innovation that they decided to maintain (or maybe they’re still trying to promote social distancing?).

Who is today’s Anti-Bloedel? I nominated succcessful divorce plaintiff MacKenzie Scott Bezos. Wokipedia says that she gave $26.3 billion to various non-profit organizations, including universities, since 2020. This money, nearly 100% of which was unrealized capital gains, was never taxed by the U.S. Treasury or Washington State (with its fresh new capital gains tax that gave us Jeff Bezos, the Starbucks billionaire who said he wanted to pay more tax, et al.), has apparently disappeared without even a ripple in the waters of the various lakes of crises facing the U.S. Perhaps some nonprofit executives have enjoyed higher salaries as a consequence, but the issues she claimed to care about at the outset of her giving (“racial equality, LGBTQ+ equality, democracy, and climate change”) have all gotten worse. Elon Musk ran away with all of the money and he isn’t Black. Scott Weiner, who represents the full Rainbow Flag spectrum, was recently attacked in San Francisco. Donald Trump was elected to a second term as President (proof that “democracy” doesn’t exist in the U.S.). Climate change, as evidenced by the fully baked Europeans, has gotten far worse. If Sam Bankman-Fried was an “effective altruist” maybe MacKenzie Scott Bezos can be characterized as an “ineffective altruist”? Or maybe altruism simply isn’t effective in the aggregate?

Here’s hoping that MacKenzie Scott Bezos will build herself a magnificent mansion with gardens and, following her death in 2070 (she identifies as female and, therefore, due to all of the disadvantages that women suffer, is likely to live only to age 100), will donate it to the public.

Full post, including comments

Posters to show solidarity with our baked brothers, sisters, and binary-resisters in Europe

by philg

No more performative empty words for me while Europe suffers through temps over 100 degrees (in the units that God prefers). There IS a sacrifice that we Americans can make and be part of a global solution. With the help of graphic artist N. Vidia, I prepared posters and distributed them around our neighborhood:

Gemini (“you can help” makes this consistent with #climatechange and exhortations to recycle plastic), ChatGPT, Grok, Claude (“small but meaningful act” is a nice touch).

Because I am a terrible human being, I posted the above in various places on X. Most of those who responded did not process these are satire. Empty words and useless gestures have become so common among the righteous that it seems entirely believable that a group of American progressives would organize a campaign like the above.

Full post, including comments

The Beaches of Olympic National Park

by philg

My last visit to Ruby Beach and the western side of Olympic National Park was 1993 and is described in Chapter XIII of Travels with Samantha.

Ruby Beach is the traditional headline attraction for this part of the park:

Due to the government’s refusal to charge market prices (see What if our National Parks charged Navajo prices?), the beach is crowded and the facilities, in this case outhouses without running water, are grossly undersized for the number of visitors. We were there well before peak season and look at the line:

The beach is dog-friendly, though!

Kids love the tide pools here:

Imaginatively named “Beach 4”, however, had a larger and sadder animal-related sight: two dead whales, one a baby humpback and one a young gray whale. A worker at Kalaloch Lodge blamed Donald Trump for the whales’ deaths. How did Trump kill the whales? By authorizing increased ground fishing, e.g., for halibut, which she said interfered somehow with the density of the food that these whales like to eat. ChatGPT:

What she has right: gray whales are bottom feeders. They eat seafloor invertebrates, including amphipods, by scooping/sucking sediment, and bottom-contact fishing gear can damage some seafloor habitats. NOAA describes gray whales as primarily bottom feeders eating benthic and epibenthic invertebrates such as amphipods.

Where the claim likely breaks down: the major NOAA explanation for the recent gray-whale starvation/mortality problem is not “more groundfishing,” but localized ecosystem changes affecting access to and quality of prey in the northern Bering and Chukchi seas. NOAA says those prey changes caused poor nutritional condition, more deaths during migration, and fewer calves.

The “Trump allowed more fishing” story that is in the news mostly concerns opening Pacific remote island marine monument waters to commercial fishing, far southwest of Hawaii, and a broader deregulatory push. That area/policy is not the northern Bering/Chukchi gray-whale feeding ground, nor the Olympic coast. A federal judge later blocked the Pacific monument rollback, according to 2025 reporting.

Also, the key Alaska/Bering Sea bottom-trawl habitat regime was not newly created by Trump. The North Pacific Fishery Management Council says Bering Sea measures adopted in 2007 and implemented in 2008 “froze the footprint” of bottom trawling and created major trawl-closure areas, including around St. Matthew Island, St. Lawrence Island, and Nunivak/Etolin/Kuskokwim Bay. On the West Coast, NOAA says the groundfish plan has long included habitat protections, including more than 100,000 square miles closed to bottom trawling or all bottom-contacting gears since the 2006 Amendment 19 action.

Regardless of who killed them, the poor animals ended up as backdrops for tourist phone images:

(If Greta Thunberg were still interested in climate change, rather than Gaza, she might be interested to learn that ChatGPT says “Arctic warming → less/changed sea ice → less high-quality bottom-dwelling prey for gray whales → malnutrition during migration” is a plausible explanation.)

This beach also has some great tide pools:

Our base was a cabin in the Kalaloch Lodge, somewhat rustic but the having a kitchen was awesome. Be sure to stock way up on groceries before heading here, though, because the on-site store has a limited selection. The restaurant is reasonably good, but all of these remote places struggle with the fact that the American workforce no longer contains a significant number of people willing to travel to a seasonal job, even if that job is in the middle of a world-class national park.

The weather, mid-50s in early June, was perfect for this Pitbull of the Oberland (Bernese Mountain Dog):

The woods on the other side of the road have some hiking trails.

Full post, including comments

Do public health considerations prevent Minneapolitans from bringing toy poodles with them to the bathhouse?

by philg

I hope that everyone enjoyed the Iran v. Egypt Pride Day soccer match yesterday in Seattle.

“Minneapolis City Council votes to repeal ban on adult bathhouses, sex venues” (state-sponsored public NPR):

Adult bathhouses are community spaces that were historically frequented by gay men in the 1970s and ‘80s where people could engage in sexual activity or relax after going out to bars. They were banned in Minneapolis in 1988 during the AIDS epidemic.

The ban was for public health reasons due to a mistaken association between men having sex with 50 new male friends and contracting HIV/coming down with AIDS. Thanks to Science, the ban has been repealed.

In order to protect public health, a member of the 2SLGBTQQIA+ community cannot legally bring a poodle-in-a-bag into a restaurant.

What does Science say about whether a toy-poodle-in-a-bag can be brought into a bathhouse? Is that a risk to public health?

Let’s ask AI to tell us what the financial stakes have been. Asked “What has been the total cost of the HIV/AIDS epidemic, over all of the years since it started, to the U.S. taxpayer in 2026 dollars?” ChatGPT answers:

A reasonable order-of-magnitude answer is about $1.25–$1.3 trillion in 2026 dollars in federal taxpayer spending from FY1981 through FY2026. … A rough allowance for state Medicaid shares and other nonfederal public spending would likely push the total to around $1.35–$1.45 trillion in 2026 dollars

Grok:

Roughly $1 trillion or more in nominal (unadjusted) dollars through ~2025/2026, likely $1.2–1.5+ trillion when adjusted to 2026 dollars. … This is direct government spending; it excludes private insurance, out-of-pocket, lost productivity, or indirect economic impacts (some older studies estimated broader burdens in the tens to hundreds of billions for specific periods). … Exact figures require summing detailed yearly tables from KFF/CRS/HHS (available in their reports), but the scale is clearly in the trillions when fully adjusted and projected.

I don’t see how the inflation adjustment can be correct. If $1 trillion nominal has been spent starting in the 1980s then the 2026 dollar figure should be higher. Spending $1 in 1981 is equivalent to spending $3.85 today (offiial CPI).

Loosely related…

Full post, including comments

What can we buy from Venezuela to help the Venezuelans recover from the recent earthquake?

by philg

The Trump administration has sent the U.S. military to Venezuela (“hundreds of personnel, two warships, fixed and rotary-winged aircraft, and search and rescue teams”), which will, I hope, help with immediate problems. But what about supporting long-term rebuilding of this frenemy? My preferred method for helping afflicted foreign countries is to boost their economies by buying their exports (see Japan Relief: Idea #1 (buy a knife), for example).

What can we buy from Venezuela in the coming months that we wouldn’t have otherwise purchased? ChatGPT says that Venezuelan coffee is “potentially very good, but uneven and hard to find” (old/popular brand available on Amazon), that chocolate made in Venezuela can be good. Franceschi Chocolate, Chocolates El Rey, and Savoy are the recommended brands. Of these, I found only Savoy at Amazon. ChatGPT apparently wants humans to be too drunk to resist its takeover of the planet and consequently recommends rum: Diplomático, Santa Teresa, Pampero, Cacique. Venezuelan seafood is apparently a big export, but tough to find as a consumer.

Since we live in a Latinx-rich environment, I am going to visit some of the local “Hispanic” supermarkets and see what I can find before hoping and praying for chocolate to make it through the mail in summer heat.

The good old days…

My first order… (U.S.-roasted because ChatGPT says that nationalization and state control hasn’t worked out well for the quality of the two big Venezuelan coffee companies, though of course Mamdani-run state enterprises will do better!)

Purchase #2, at Jupiter’s Latinx supermarket (Tapatia):

Note that the above shows 100 percent of the Venezuela-made items available in the store, according to the staff. They had a lot of stuff from Mexico, some from Central America, and not even coffee from Venezuela.

Full post, including comments

Intersection of Islam and 2SLGBTQQIA+ Pride in Port Angeles, Washington

by philg

Today is the Pride Match in Seattle, which “features a globally controversial matchup between Iran and Egypt, two countries where homosexuality is heavily criminalized. Despite objections from both nations’ football associations, FIFA is permitting rainbow flags and human rights displays inside the stadium.” (Google AI, citing The Atlantic)

Where else do Islam and Pride intersect in Washington State? Port Angeles, Washington. This was where would-be jihadist Ahmed Ressam was arrested on December 14, 1999 after Customs agent Diana Dean became suspicious of “Benni Noris”. The Algerian who had been enriching Canada had more than 100 lbs. of explosives in his rented Chrysler, intending to blow up LAX (for anyone who has been forced to travel through LAX it is tough to know where one’s sympathies should be in this situation).

The town is situated up against the Olympic Mountains:

What would the noble Islamic migrant have seen if he got off the ferry from Victoria, B.C. today? No huge sign or even small plaque at immigration or at the ferry honoring agent Diana Dean, despite the fact that she likely saved hundreds of American lives:

If Mr. Ressam had walked into the local office of the Democratic Party he would have been welcomed in Arabic:

At the front door, the Democrats specifically say that immigration/customs agents such as Diana Dean, Port Angeles’s greatest hero, aren’t welcome:

Context for the above:

Ahmed Ressam would have learned from the Democrats that the whole idea of borders is illegitimate:

Ressam was actually ordered deported from Canada due to his career as a criminal there, but because he refused to assist in his deportation by providing a passport he was allowed to stay in Canada indefinitely. (He is now living at taxpayer expense here in the U.S.) He could have learned this effective strategy from the Port Angeles Democrats (“Do Not Carry Any Documents From The Country Where You Were Born”):

Ressam could have drawn inspiration from RBG: “Fight for the thing you care about” (in Ressam’s case, Islam and Al-Qaeda).

Ressam would have been invited by the Democrats, and by at least half of the other downtown storefronts, to attend the June 14 “Pride on the Pier” festival:

What else would the noble Ressam have seen inside this office?

In the pantheon of resistance heroes, Jew-hater Martin Niemöller, who later become disillusioned with the Nazi Party for which he voted three times, is featured.

Strolling down the street…

What’s in the bookstore window?

(the front door had some more invitations to Pride events and Queerville)

Generally speaking, the town’s storefronts were examples of Rainbow-first Retail, in which the sacred Rainbow Flag must be passed by every customer.

Would would Ahmed Ressam have been enjoying as a snack after his ferry ride, but for Diana Dean’s interference? The “New Zealand-style” ice cream shop next to the ferry offers a Rainbow Sundae and a Pride Float:

How about some reading? The second downtown bookstore had a reasonably rich selection:

That’s it for Port Angeles!

Practical Tourism advice: it’s tough to plan a trip to the northern part of Olympic National Park more than a day in advance if you’re hoping to get up to Hurricane Ridge and actually see anything. There are some decent rainforest walks, though, even when the ride is covered in clouds.

We stayed at Olympic Lodge by Ayres, which might be the best hotel in town. Unfortunately, the WiFi is throttled to 10 Mbits under the best of circumstances and, therefore, it might not be practical to get a lot of work done while waiting days for the weather to clear.

Readers: Who enjoyed the Pride soccer game between Iran and Egypt?

Full post, including comments