Weekend conversation #1: A naturalized American citizen talks about how a visit to Gaza made her hate Israelis for being responsible for the straitened circumstances of Palestinians and now she took every opportunity to criticize the Israeli government, which she saw as exceptionally evil. I pointed out that the U.S. government had been a lot harsher to anyone who had ever borne arms against it. There aren’t many in-person opportunities to feel sorry for those who have borne arms against the U.S. and are living in squalor because most of them are dead (or living in cages in Guantanamo).
Weekend conversation #2: A forty-something mother of three recounts her recent citizenship interview and ceremony. She is asked “Would you be willing to bear arms to defend the United States?” Her secret thoughts ran more to escape with her children rather than standing and fighting, but she tried to come up with a sufficiently belligerent response to satisfy the officials.
If we decry violence in our society, why do we insist on the willingness to carry out violence as a condition of citizenship for new Americans?
[Note: Personally I was a little offended that a new citizen wouldn’t be willing to shoulder any military burden if the barbarians were at the gate. I would go to war if asked, regardless of the futility of the war, because I don’t see my own skin as more worthy of preservation than my fellow Americans, I don’t think that someone else should go in my place, and I don’t have any power to stop our government from conducting the war.]
Full post, including comments