[Daniela Jampel, who served as an assistant corporation counsel for the City] had publicly challenged the mayor at an unrelated event on LGBTQ issues — as [Mayor Eric] Adams stood in front of a podium banner that read, “Come to the city where you can say whatever you want.’’
“Three weeks ago, you told parents to trust you that you would unmask our toddlers,” Jampel told the mayor.
“You stood right here, and you said that the masks would come off April 4. That has not happened.”
In other words, she said whatever she wanted opposite a banner that said she could say whatever she wanted. Example signs from NBC:
What happened next?
Sources close to the matter said Jampel – a leading local critic of the toddler mask mandate and pandemic school closures – was informed by e-mail shortly after the presser that she was fired.
(Note that Jampel need only move to Florida to live in a society that conforms to her preferences. It is against state law for a public school system to shut down schools, order children to wear masks, etc. She could leave New York City to the folks who like it the way that it is is and come to a place where most people would agree with her regarding the best ways to protect 4-year-olds from a disease that kills 84-year-olds. (see Relocation to Florida for a family with school-age children for how Americans could be a lot happier if people were more mobile))
- Should Disney World offer a ride educating kindergartners on sexual orientation and gender identity? (presumably the banner promising free speech was in response to a Florida bill banning organized public school “instruction” on certain topics in K-3)
- New York Science: masks for 2-year-olds, but not in the strip clubs
- Adult unvaccinated New Yorkers can go unmasked to the strip club; 3-year-olds must be masked in pre-K
- “There is no excuse left for keeping NYC schools closed” (March 25, 2021), an article by the now-fired Jampel
- “NYC mayor uses ‘Don’t Say Gay’ law to recruit LGBTQ Floridians with billboard campaign” (Politico): Mayor Eric Adams announced the placement of billboards denouncing the “Don’t Say Gay” law in five major Florida cities to bring state residents opposed to the legislation to New York City. (See also “‘Loud. Proud. Still allowed’: New York’s mayor urges LGBTQ+ Floridians to move to city” (Guardian))
- “The Wage Gap Among LGBTQ+ Workers in the United States” (Human Rights Campaign): In an HRC Foundation analysis of nearly 7,000 full-time LGBTQ+ workers, median earnings were about $900 weekly, about 90% of the $1,001 median weekly wage a typical worker earns in the United States, as reported recently by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Put another way, LGBTQ+ workers earn about 90 cents for every dollar that the typical worker earns. LGBTQ+ people of color, transgender women and men and non-binary individuals earn even less when compared to the typical worker.
- “The Staggering Costs of Being Transgender in the US” (mountsinai.org): The cost of medical treatments can add up to more than $100,000
Note that if we combine the last two points we find that New York City is spending its taxpayers’ money to recruit additional lower-than-average income residents who will thus be eligible for a full range of means-tested welfare programs after arrival in NYC. And, if a transition is just beginning, for every valuable 2SLBGTQQIA+ community member who is persuaded to move, NY taxpayers will be forking out $100,000 to gender reassignment surgeons and therapists, via Medicaid, that would otherwise have been shouldered by working taxpayers in Florida. Nonetheless, NYC may find itself outbid by Palm Springs, California, which is offering guaranteed cash to members of the 2SLGBTQQIA+ community. See Guaranteed Income Pilot – DAP Health and California city to give universal income to transgender, nonbinary residents regardless of earnings | Fox News:
Transgender residents in Palm Springs, California are eligible to receive a UBI of up to $900 per month solely for identifying as transgender or nonbinary — no strings attached.
The new pilot program will have $200,000 set aside for allocation after a unanimous vote by the Palm Springs City Council last week.
Twenty transgender and nonbinary Palm Springs residents will receive the free money funded by the taxpayers for 18 months, with advocacy-based health center DAP Health and LGBT advocacy group Queer Works managing the program.
Not everyone in the 2SLGBTQQIA+ community is aligned on this one:
Palm Springs Mayor Lisa Middleton, who is transgender, pointed to the transcript from the city council’s March 24 meeting where she “expressed strong reservations in general to guaranteed income programs.”
Former San Diego City Councilman Carl DeMaio, a Republican who served as the first openly gay member of the city council, called the program “outrageous and discriminatory.”
“We’re completely opposed to guaranteed or universal basic income programs, because they ultimately cause inflation and raise the cost of living on everyone — they don’t work,” DeMaio said in a statement.
“But at least some of them have minimum income requirements to qualify, whereas this one is no-strings-attached ‘woke’ virtue signaling to the LGBT community in a way that is not only offensive but discriminatory,” he continued.
I personally disagree with Mx. DeMaio. If there is an income threshold necessary to qualify for free taxpayer cash then you’re pretty much guaranteeing that the recipient will limit his/her/zir/their working efforts so as to stay under this threshold. (See Fast-food economics in Massachusetts: Higher minimum wage leads to a shorter work week, not fewer people on welfare for how low-wage workers are smart enough to avoid working themselves out of means-tested entitlements.) If people are going to be paid for identifying as transgender or non-binary the money shouldn’t be conditional on them also refraining from serious work efforts.
6 thoughts on “Freedom of speech opposite the banner promising freedom of speech”
This sounds legitimate, since only free speech under the rainbow constitution is allowed. Consider the East German precedent:
Every citizen has the right to freely and publicly advance his or her opinion in accordance to the principles of the constitution.
The freedom of press, broadcasting and television is warranted.
The good ole’ USSR had total freedom of speech, too. ROFL. From Stalin’s Constitution of 1936:
ARTICLE 125. In conformity with the interests of the working people, and in order to strengthen
the socialist system, the citizens of the U.S.S.R. are guaranteed by law:
a. freedom of speech;
b. freedom of the press;
c. freedom of assembly, including the holding of mass meetings;
d. freedom of street processions and demonstrations.
These civil rights are ensured by placing at the disposal of the working people and their
organizations printing presses, stocks of paper, public buildings, the streets, communications
facilities and other material requisites for the exercise of these right.
From the DAP Health site:
A recent study by McKinsey & Company confirmed that Transgender adults are twice as likely as cisgender adults to be unemployed, and Transgender individuals who are employed make 32% less money than their cisgender counterparts – even with similar education levels.
Here we find the real reason for the program: Shoveling money in the direction of McKinsey. See also (McKinsey was one of the consultants):
Ursula von der Leyen is at the centre of an administrative scandal over the channelling of more than €100 million of public money to external advisers, some of whom are alleged to have effectively functioned as high-ranking civil servants.
“2SLGBTQQIA+ community” is too much typing, how about we just call them “Disneys”?
Whoa I have fallen behind on the long list of genders. Questioning is the new one for me so I looked it up.
Questioning is a term that can refer to a person who is questioning their sexual orientation or gender identity. Sexual orientation and gender identity are intensely personal aspects of ourselves that sometimes take a little while to figure out.
I remember in college a classmate was coming out and told others he was confused. A friend of mine said confused is not the word, more like… curious 🙂
Can we assume that “detransitioning” (the reversal of “transitioning”) costs another $100,000?
What does Science say about “detransitioning”? Are people still oppressed, or perhaps doubly oppressed after two procedures? Or are they back in the set of oppressors after the roundtrip?
Comments are closed.