What does Syracuse University teach for $100,000 per year?
“Why Syracuse Can’t Attract the Students It Needs to Pay the Bills” (WSJ) covers the financial slide at this Rust Belt school pretty well, but doesn’t dig into the product. Let’s pick a few professors at Syracuse and see what a $100,000/year customer might learn from they/them.
Scholar-activist, Professor Kishi Animashaun Ducre:
“The Black feminist spatial imagination and an intersectional environmental justice”, “Katrina as Postscript to Racialized Spaces in Louisiana.”, and “Addressing Environmental and Food Justice toward Dismantling the School-to-Prison Pipeline: Poisoning and Imprisoning Youth”
Professor PJ DiPietro (she/they, her/them, hers/their):
engages decolonial thinking, hemispheric Latinx studies, and critical theories of race, gender, transgender, and sexuality
“The Coloniality of Gender”; “Trans of Color is an Oxymoron. Humans, nonHuman Animals, and the Bodies Beneath Animals”; “Co-Creating Transdisciplinary Decolonial Curricula”; “Hallucinating Knowing: (Extra)Ordinary Consciousness, more-than-human Perception, and other Decolonizing Remedios within Latina and Xicana Feminist and Queer Theories”
Here’s a department that acknowledges that the university is on stolen land, which it refuses to give back and won’t pay rent on:
What they promise students will be able to do after forking over $400,0000 and four years away from the AI Klondike:
Integrate feminist and queer theory and practice to challenge social relations, representations, knowledges, institutions, and policies.
Model feminist and queer competencies of collaborative learning that embrace cooperation and mutual aid.
From Professor Eunjung Kim, a member of this department:
Kim, E. (2010). How Much Sex Is Healthy? The Pleasures of Asexuality.
Kim, E. (2024). Asexual Kinship: Capitalism, Reproduction, and an Imperiality of Asexuality.
(At least 14 years of studying people not having sex.)
Update: I posted this on X and so far (a day later) it is up to 434,000+ views. One X comment, “This is scary! If true.”, inspired me to visit the Syracuse.edu web site again. This time, I picked the Syracuse School of Education and then picked the first faculty member from an alphabetical list: Professor Barbara Applebaum. She has a “research focus” of “critical whiteness studies; epistemic injustice; feminist philosophy” (Wikipedia: “Epistemic injustice occurs when an individual or group is wronged in their “capacity as a knower”, meaning that their ability to produce knowledge is called into question.”) Prof. Applebaum teaches a full semester course on “Critical Whiteness”:
Her book Being White, Being Good: White Complicity, White Moral Responsibility, and Social Justice Pedagogy promises to “help white students understand and acknowledge their white complicity”. Some Amazon reader review excerpts:
Included are Applebaum’s ideas on how to indoctrinate others to accept this insane ideology that seeks to, at its core, tear down society and “liberate the oppressed” into the Communist utopia that awaits if they could only be “woke” enough to see it! Utter garbage. Stay away.
I am using this work as a foundation of my dissertation. I really don’t know where I would be without this important piece of work.
Whatever ones personal views may be it is a disgrace that Syracuse University would employ this author as a academic professor. This book deposits ideas that are simple anecdotal opinions based of off no scientific data and tries through the use of word salad to push them off as facts deliberately attempting to manipulate data to deceive its intended audience knowing full well that the audience it is targeting does not have a sophisticated understanding of statistical analysis or historical awareness. … [the book] no business in a place of higher education and the author should seek psychological intervention for her racist presuppositions and destructive methods of solutions to her paranoid delusions.
This book helped me understand that most white people aren’t ignorant, but just have a different kind of knowledge that’s based on ignoring racism. And that this is a very active thing that they do (even if it’s unconscious).
It might be a challenge figuring out how to adapt this work to improve the pedagogy in an aeronautical engineering class…
Full post, including comments


























